Skip to content

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Familiar-Risk Population: Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Versus Colonoscopy

Colorectal Cancer Screening in Familiar-Risk Population: a Randomized Control Trial Comparing Immunochemical Fecal Occult Blood Testing Versus Colonoscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01075633
Acronym
COLONFAM
Enrollment
1501
Registered
2010-02-25
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2013-06-30
Last updated
2014-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Cancer

Keywords

FOBT, colonoscopy, familiar risk, colorectal cancer, advanced adenoma

Brief summary

This study is aimed: 1) to compare the accuracy of colonoscopy vs immunochemical faecal occult blood test (iFOBT) and colonoscopy when positive for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in familiar-risk population and; 2) to determine the complications associated with both strategies.

Detailed description

This is an observational, controlled, randomized phase III study to evaluate the effectiveness of the iFOBT for detecting advanced neoplasia (polyps \> 1cm in size, high grade dysplasia or with villous component, or CRC) in first degree relatives of patients with CRC. Index cases will be interviewed to obtain the family tree and their first-degree relatives will be contacted to invite them to participate in the study. Index-cases, will be randomized into one of the following two groups in order that their relatives receive the same screening strategy: A) colonoscopy; or B) annual iFOBT test (OC-Sensor®, cut off ≥50 ng/ml) and colonoscopy if positive. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of the iFOBT strategy, individuals randomized to group B will be invited to undergo a complete colonoscopy following two years follow-up. In addition, epidemiological data, personal history of disease, family history of neoplasm, characteristics of lesions at colonoscopy and histological diagnosis will be recorded. To test the hypothesis of equivalence between the iFOBT test and colonoscopy for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasm, it was considered a probability of participation, detection capability and prevalence of advanced adenomas for iFOBT of 0.750, 0.565 and 0.077, respectively, being the product of them 0.033. In the case of colonoscopy, the likelihood of participation, detection capability and prevalence of advanced adenomas in this population at risk are 0,500, 0.965 and 0.077, respectively, and their product 0.037. Accordingly, for a Type I error (alpha) of 5%, a power of 80% and a maximum deviation between the probabilities of the two tests of 0.03 the number of subjects to be included per arm is 744

Interventions

PROCEDUREImmunochemical fecal occult blood test And colonoscopy if test is positive

Annual (3 rounds), without diet restriction, 1 stool sample. Positive cut-off level: 50 ng/ml.

Colonoscopy with sedation

Sponsors

Enrique Quintero
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women aged 40-75 years, first degree relatives of patients with non-syndromic CRC

Exclusion criteria

* Personal history of CRC, colorectal adenoma, colorectal polyposis, or inflammatory bowel disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Advanced colorectal neoplasm detection rate [Time Frame: 2 years] [Designated as safety issue: No]2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Complications rate2 years

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 19, 2026