Skip to content

Efficacy of Two Antiemetic Regimens in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Concomitant Weekly Cisplatin

A Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Palonosetron and Dexamethasone Plus Fosaprepitant or Placebo in Patients Receiving Radiotherapy and Weekly Cisplatin.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01074697
Acronym
GAND-emesis
Enrollment
246
Registered
2010-02-24
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2015-04-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nausea, Vomiting, Genital Neoplasms, Female

Keywords

Randomized Controlled Trial, Serotonin Agonists, Dexamethasone, Receptors, Neurokinin-1, Radiotherapy, Cisplatin, Prevention & control

Brief summary

GAND-emesis is a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of a neurokinin1 receptor antagonist (fosaprepitant dimeglumine) in combination with an antiemetic (anti-nausea-and-vomiting) control regimen (palonosetron and dexamethasone) in patients with a gynaecological cancer diagnosis, who are scheduled to receive radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy. The study aims at investigating if a three-drug antiemetic regimen is superior to a two-drug regimen (standard treatment) in preventing nausea and vomiting in patients receiving radiotherapy and weekly chemotherapy. A pilot study demonstrated that approximately 50% of patients will experience nausea and vomiting when offered a two-drug antiemetic regimen, and it is expected that addition of a third drug (a neurokinin1 receptor antagonist) can increase the proportion of patients with no vomiting in the course of combined chemo-radiotherapy.

Interventions

Addition of fosaprepitant dimeglumine 150 mg IV single dose weekly (before chemotherapy) to dexamethasone and palonosetron.

DRUGPlacebo

Saline water

Sponsors

Helsinn Healthcare SA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Odense University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(abbreviated) 1. The patient has a diagnosis cervical cancer. 2. The patient understands the nature and purpose of this study and the study procedures and has signed informed consent. 3. The patient is aged \> 18 years. 4. The patient must be both chemo- and radiotherapy (RT) naïve. NB: previously low voltage RT or electron RT for non-melanoma skin cancers is allowed. 5. The patient is scheduled to receive fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2 for at least five weeks. 6. Brachy therapy is scheduled to be initiated after the third cycle of weekly cisplatin, and preferentially after the fifth week of treatment. 7. Chemotherapy with an emetic risk potential of minimal or mild (up to 30%) is allowed on days 1-4 (see ref. 14). 8. The patient has a WHO Performance Status of ≤ 2.

Exclusion criteria

(abbreviated) 1. The patient has a current malignant diagnosis other than cervical cancer, with exception of non-melanoma skin cancers. 2. The patient is aged \< 18 years. 3. The patient is scheduled to receive less than five weeks of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin. 4. Brachy therapy is planned to be initiated before the third cycle of weekly cisplatin. 5. The patient has been previously treated with radiotherapy, and/or chemotherapy, with exception of treatment with low voltage RT or electron RT for non-melanoma skin cancers . 6. The patient has a WHO Performance Status of \> 2.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare fosaprepitant dimeglumine, palonosetron, and dexamethasone with palonosetron, dexamethasone, and placebo with respect to efficacy; the proportion of subjects with no vomiting during five weeks of radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.35 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with no significant nausea during five weeks of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen with respect to complete response in the 35 days following initiation of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with no nausea during five weeks (35 days) of fractionated radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin at a dose of ≥ 40 mg/m2.35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the proportion of subjects with complete response in the 7 days following initiation of radiotherapy and concomitant weekly cisplatin.7 days
To compare quality of life using the FLIE questionnaire.0-35 days
To compare tolerability of both regimens.0-35 days
To compare the fosaprepitant dimeglumine regimen and the control regimen in terms of the number of days to first emetic episode.0-35 days

Countries

Australia, Denmark, Germany, Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026