Skip to content

Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

The Effect of Pre-operative Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Block in the Quality of Recovery of Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Prospective, Randomized, Blinded Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01074229
Acronym
TAP HYS
Enrollment
75
Registered
2010-02-24
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2014-05-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Pain, Post Operative, Opioids, Laparoscopic, Surgery, Hysterectomy

Brief summary

The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block involves the sensory nerve supply of the anterior -lateral abdominal wall where the T7-12 intercostal nerves, ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric and the lateral cutaneous branches of the dorsal rami of L1-3 are blocked with an injection of local anesthetic between the internal oblique abdominal muscle (IOAM) and the transverse abdominal muscle(TAM)This technique allows sensory blockade of the anterolateral abdominal wall via local anesthetic deposition superficial to the transversus abdominis muscle. It was first described by McDonnell et al. as a landmark technique to provide analgesia for lower abdominal surgery. Hebbart et al. subsequently described an ultrasound guided technique for the TAP block which they named posterior TAP block. The ultrasound allows identification of the external oblique abdominal muscles (EOAM),IOAM and TAM. Previous studies about ultrasound -guided regional anesthetic techniques suggest improved block quality and safety, which is primarily due to direct visualization of the relevant anatomy, the tip of the needle, and the spread of the local anesthetics. Clinical trials of the single shot posterior TAP block have shown a significant reduction in morphine consumption during the first 24-36 hours after surgery. More recently, El-dawlatly et al. demonstrated that ultrasound guided TAP block in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduced perioperative opioid consumption by more than 50%. This is the first study to evaluate the effect of TAP block in the quality of recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy and may help the pathway to make this an outpatient procedure.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

placebo injection

DRUGDrug .5% Ropivacaine

.5% ropivacaine 20 mls on each side of abdomen

DRUG20 cc of 0.25% ropivacaine

Will receive a bilateral TAP block using 20 cc of 0.25% ropivacaine

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age: 18-64 years * Surgery: Laparoscopic Hysterectomy surgery * ASA status: I and II * Fluent in English

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy to local anesthetics * History of chronic opioid use * Pregnant patients * BMI greater than 30 Drop-out criteria: * Patient or surgeon request * Complications related to the procedure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
QoR40 on the Day After Surgery1 dayQoR40 on the day after surgery. Quality of recovery is based on a score of 40-200. 40 being a poor recovery and 200 being a good recovery score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
24 Total Morphine Consumption1 dayTotal 24 total morphine consumption post operative.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Group B (control group) will receive sterile normal saline.
25
Study Drug
Group A (study group) 20 cc of 0.5% ropivacaine
25
20 cc of 0.25% Ropivacaine
Active Comparator 2. 20 cc of 0.25% ropivacaine
25
Total75

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyChange to open surgical procedure134
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStudy Drug20 cc of 0.25% RopivacainePlaceboTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants25 Participants25 Participants75 Participants
Age, Continuous45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5
46.76 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
47.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
46.55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants25 participants75 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants25 Participants25 Participants75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

QoR40 on the Day After Surgery

QoR40 on the day after surgery. Quality of recovery is based on a score of 40-200. 40 being a poor recovery and 200 being a good recovery score.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
PLACEBOQoR40 on the Day After Surgery152 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 22.8
20 cc of 0.5% RopivacaineQoR40 on the Day After Surgery180 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 12.16
20 cc of 0.25% RopivacaineQoR40 on the Day After Surgery180 units on a scaleInter-Quartile Range 15.3
p-value: 0.05Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: 0.0595% CI: [9, 37]Dunns test
p-value: 0.0595% CI: [14, 42]Dunns Test
Secondary

24 Total Morphine Consumption

Total 24 total morphine consumption post operative.

Time frame: 1 day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PLACEBO24 Total Morphine Consumption22.75 miligrams of morphineStandard Deviation 10.75
20 cc of 0.5% Ropivacaine24 Total Morphine Consumption12.5 miligrams of morphineStandard Deviation 9.84
20 cc of 0.25% Ropivacaine24 Total Morphine Consumption17.5 miligrams of morphineStandard Deviation 13.07
p-value: 0.05Kruskal-Wallis
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [3, 15]Dunns test
p-value: 0.1495% CI: [-1, 12]Dunns test

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 27, 2026