Coronary Artery Disease, Myocardial Ischemia
Conditions
Keywords
Adenosine, Fractional flow reserve, Hyperemia, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the peripheral IV continuous infusion without the insertion of central venous vascular access method in the achievement of steady-state maximal coronary hyperemia compared with the central IV continuous infusion method.
Interventions
Patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis were consecutively enrolled. FFR was measured by a standard intravenous (IV) adenosine infusion (140 μg•min-1•kg-1) via Rt central femoral vein.
Patients with intermediate coronary artery stenosis were consecutively enrolled. FFR was measured by a standard intravenous (IV) adenosine infusion (140 μg•min-1•kg-1) via continuous peripheral vein.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* non -infarct related, patients with moderate coronary artery stenosis * normal ejection fraction on echocardiogram
Exclusion criteria
* infarct-related arteries or clinically unstable state * collateral blood flow to the target vessel is shown * atrioventricular block on electrocardiogram * reduced ejection fraction(\<50%) or left ventricular hypertrophy on echocardiography * contraindication of adenosine
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| compare fractional flow reserve at maximal hyperemia | interval of 10 minutes |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| compare the time to maximal hyperemia and changes in heart rate | interval of 10 minutes |
Countries
South Korea