Skip to content

Moxifloxacin in Pediatric Subjects With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Sequential (Intravenous, Oral) Moxifloxacin Versus Comparator in Pediatric Subjects With Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01069900
Acronym
MOXIPEDIA
Enrollment
458
Registered
2010-02-17
Start date
2010-07-21
Completion date
2015-01-21
Last updated
2018-03-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intraabdominal Infections

Keywords

Intra-abdominal infection, Pediatric infection

Brief summary

The primary focus of the study is the evaluation of the safety of treatment with moxifloxacin in a pediatric population 3 months to \<18 years old. Approximately 450 pediatric subjects with a complicated intra-abdominal infection will be enrolled in the study and treated with either moxifloxacin intravenously and orally if switched to oral therapy or ertapenem (intravenously) and, if switched to oral therapy, amoxicillin/clavulanate.

Interventions

For subjects 12 to less than (\<) 18 years of age and weighing at least 45 kilograms (kg), the dose of moxifloxacin will be 400 milligrams (mg), once daily (OD). Subjects 12 to \< 18 years of age and weighing less than 45 kg, the dose of moxifloxacin will be 4 mg/kg twice daily (BID), every 12 hours (q12h), not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects 6 to \< 12 years of age the dose of moxifloxacin will be 4mg/kg, q12h, not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects 2 to less than 6 years of age the dose of moxifloxacin will be 5mg/kg, q12h, not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects 3 months to less than 2 years of age the dose of moxifloxacin will be 6mg/kg q12h IV, not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects who were switched from IV to PO therapy, 400 mg or 50 mg moxifloxacin tablets were provided.

DRUGErtapenem

For subjects 13 to \<18 years of age, the dosage of ertapenem was 1 gram (g) OD. For subjects 3 months to \< 13 years of age, the dosage was 15 mg/kg q12h not to exceed 1 g/day.

Subjects 2 years to \< 18 years of age who were switched from IV to PO therapy receive amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension. The dosage of clavulanate was 3.2 mg/kg q12h. (maximum dose of clavulanate was 125 mg q12h). The dosage of amoxicillin was 22.5 mg q12h (a maximum dose of 875 mg amoxicillin q12h must not be exceeded).

DRUGMoxifloxacin placebo

Sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution intended for IV use was used as the placebo for IV moxifloxacin. Tablets containing inactive ingredients were used as the placebo for PO moxifloxacin 400 mg and 50 mg tablets.

DRUGErtapenem placebo

Sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution intended for IV use was used as the placebo for IV ertapenem.

DRUGAmoxicillin/Clavulanate placebo

Suspension containing inactive ingredients was used as the placebo for PO amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension.

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Months to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hospitalized males or females 3 months to 17 years of age * Able to obtain parental or legal guardian written informed consent and assent from subjects as applicable by local laws and regulations * Expected duration of treatment with antibiotics is a minimum of 3 days administered IV, for a total of 5 to 14 days administered IV or IV followed by PO * If the subject is a female of child-bearing potential she must have a negative pregnancy test at the screening visit or be capable of practicing an adequate method of contraception, and agree to continue the same method for 1 month following the TOC visit. Lactating subjects are not to be included. * Subjects may be enrolled upon a surgically (laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage) confirmed cIAI revealing at least one of the following: * Gross peritoneal inflammation with purulent exudate within the abdominal cavity * Intra-abdominal abscess * Macroscopic intestinal perforation with diffuse peritonitis OR * Subjects may be enrolled on the basis of a suspected cIAI, which must be supported with radiological evidence (ultrasound, abdominal plain films, computed tomography \[CT\], magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) of gastrointestinal perforation or localized collections of potentially infected material and at least one of the following: * Symptoms referable to the abdominal cavity (eg, anorexia, nausea, vomiting or pain) * Tenderness (with or without rebound), involuntary guarding, absent or diminished bowel sounds, or abdominal wall rigidity * Fever * Leukocytosis * The subject must be scheduled for a surgical procedure (laparotomy or laparoscopy) or percutaneous drainage.

Exclusion criteria

* Presumed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis * All pancreatic processes including pancreatic sepsis, peripancreatic sepsis, or an cIAI secondary to pancreatitis * Early acute or suppurative (nonperforated) appendicitis unless there is evidence of an abscess or peritoneal fluid containing pus and micro-organisms suggestive of regional contamination * Infections originating from the female genital tract * Known severe immunosuppression. Subjects with known mild immunosuppression (eg, Type I or II diabetes mellitus, trauma, or absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] between 1000 and 1500 cells/mm3) may be enrolled. * Congenital or documented acquired QT prolongation * Receiving concomitant treatment with QT prolonging drugs * History of tendon disease/disorder related to quinolone treatment * Pathogenic organisms suspected or identified (eg, Pseudomonas) which are resistant to any of the study drugs * Abnormal musculoskeletal findings at baseline assessment; or chronic musculoskeletal disease (eg, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis); or chronic illness with high risk for chronic or recurrent arthritis or tendinitis (eg, cystic fibrosis, chronic inflammatory bowel disease) * History of myasthenia gravis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects With Adverse EventsAll AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse EventsClinical cardiac event related to QT interval were recorded from treatment start until day 3 of treatment. All other clinical cardiac events were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit, up to day 56.
Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse EventsAll AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3The PR interval is defined as the period that extends from the onset of atrial depolarization (beginning of the P wave) until the onset of ventricular depolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3QTc interval Calc Bazett represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) milliseconds (msec) which was calculated by Bazett's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3QTc interval Calc Fridericia represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) msec which was calculated by Fridericia's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than (\>) upper limit of normal (ULN) range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported.
Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than ULN range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported.
RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3The RR interval refers to the respective time interval in the Electrocardiogram. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit28 to 42 daysBacteriological responses were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'Presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures, and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded and invasive procedures are not warranted; índeterminate' was applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pre-treatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at TOC were reported.
Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)28 to 42 daysClinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported
Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitDay 3 to Day 5Clinical responses during therapy visit were graded as clinical improvement, clinical failure, or indeterminate. Clinical improvement defined as a reduction in the severity and/or the number of signs and symptoms of infection; 'clinical failure' defined as a failure to respond or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy. 'Indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent, receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than the study indication and receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug, etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response during therapy visit were reported.
Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitDay 3 to Day 5Bacteriological response during therapy were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication, or indeterminate'Presumed persistence' is applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation;'presumed eradication' is defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug is not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject is not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response during therapy visit were reported
Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitDay 5 to Day 14Clinical responses at EOT were graded as resolution, failure, or indeterminate. 'Resolution' defined as a disappearance of signs and symptoms related to the infection or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection and the subject does not require any further antibiotic therapy or surgical intervention; 'failure' defined as worsening or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy; 'indeterminate' is defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent; receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug; receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than study indication; etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at EOT were reported.
Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitDay 5 to Day 14Bacteriological response at EOT were grades as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate' is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at EOT were reported.
Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit28 to 42 daysClinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported.
QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3The QRS interval represents the time it takes for ventricular depolarization to occur. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermAll AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.Musculoskeletal adverse events were classified as following SOCs (preferred terms): injury, poisoning and procedural complications (forearm fracture, joint injury, ligament sprain, muscle strain) musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (arthralgia, joint swelling, musculoskeletal pain, myalgia). Incidence rates were reported as percentage of subjects categorized under preferred terms.

Countries

Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Peru, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at multicenter between 21 July 2010 (first subject first visit) to 21 January 2015 (last subject last visit).

Pre-assignment details

Overall 478 subjects were enrolled, 20 subjects had screening failures hence, 458 subjects were randomized to receive treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)
Subjects randomized to the moxifloxacin arm of this study received intravenous moxifloxacin plus ertapenem placebo (0.9 % sodium chloride \[NaCl solution\]) for a minimum of 3 days and, if switched to oral treatment, PO moxifloxacin plus PO amoxicillin/clavulanate placebo. Total treatment duration is 5- 14 days.
305
Comparator Ertapenem
Subjects randomized to the comparator arm of this study received intravenous ertapenem plus moxifloxacin placebo (0.9 % NaCl solution) for a minimum of 3 days and, if switched to oral treatment, amoxicillin/clavulanate as an oral suspension plus PO moxifloxacin placebo. Total treatment duration is 5-14 days.
153
Total458

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyInsufficient Therapeutic effect10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up71
Overall StudyProtocol Violation41
Overall StudyTechnical problems01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject61

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMoxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Comparator ErtapenemTotal
Age, Continuous12.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.66
12.046 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.495
12.049 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.602
Age, Customized
12 - < 18 years
190 Subjects94 Subjects284 Subjects
Age, Customized
2 - < 6 years
14 Subjects7 Subjects21 Subjects
Age, Customized
3 months - < 2 years
1 Subjects0 Subjects1 Subjects
Age, Customized
6 - < 12 years
100 Subjects52 Subjects152 Subjects
Sex: Female, Male
Female
124 Participants53 Participants177 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
181 Participants100 Participants281 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
127 / 30163 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
20 / 3016 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Number of Subjects With Adverse EventsAny AE175 Subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Number of Subjects With Adverse EventsAny SAE20 Subjects
Comparator ErtapenemNumber of Subjects With Adverse EventsAny AE82 Subjects
Comparator ErtapenemNumber of Subjects With Adverse EventsAny SAE6 Subjects
Primary

Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse Events

Time frame: Clinical cardiac event related to QT interval were recorded from treatment start until day 3 of treatment. All other clinical cardiac events were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit, up to day 56.

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse EventsAny AE38 Subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse EventsAny SAE0 Subjects
Comparator ErtapenemNumber of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse EventsAny AE7 Subjects
Comparator ErtapenemNumber of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse EventsAny SAE0 Subjects
Primary

Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse Events

Time frame: All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse EventsAny AE13 Subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse EventsAny SAE1 Subjects
Comparator ErtapenemNumber of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse EventsAny AE5 Subjects
Comparator ErtapenemNumber of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse EventsAny SAE0 Subjects
Secondary

Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit

Bacteriological response during therapy were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication, or indeterminate'Presumed persistence' is applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation;'presumed eradication' is defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug is not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject is not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response during therapy visit were reported

Time frame: Day 3 to Day 5

Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitPresumed Persistence1.2 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitPresumed Eradication95.6 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitIndeterminate3.2 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitIndeterminate1.5 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitPresumed Persistence0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitPresumed Eradication97.8 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit

Bacteriological responses were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'Presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures, and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded and invasive procedures are not warranted; índeterminate' was applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pre-treatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at TOC were reported.

Time frame: 28 to 42 days

Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitPresumed Eradication84.7 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitPresumed Persistence6.8 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitIndeterminate8.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitPresumed Eradication94.9 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitPresumed Persistence2.2 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitIndeterminate2.9 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit

Bacteriological response at EOT were grades as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate' is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at EOT were reported.

Time frame: Day 5 to Day 14

Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitIndeterminate3.4 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitPresumed Persistence5.5 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitPresumed Eradication91.1 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitPresumed Persistence0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitPresumed Eradication97.8 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemBacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) VisitIndeterminate1.5 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit

Clinical responses during therapy visit were graded as clinical improvement, clinical failure, or indeterminate. Clinical improvement defined as a reduction in the severity and/or the number of signs and symptoms of infection; 'clinical failure' defined as a failure to respond or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy. 'Indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent, receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than the study indication and receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug, etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response during therapy visit were reported.

Time frame: Day 3 to Day 5

Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitClinical Improvement94.3 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitClinical Failure1 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitIndeterminate4.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitIndeterminate1.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitClinical Improvement98 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at a 'During Therapy' VisitClinical Failure0.7 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit

Clinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported.

Time frame: 28 to 42 days

Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitClinical Cure86.2 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitClinical Failure5.7 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitIndeterminate8.1 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitClinical Cure95.3 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitClinical Failure2 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) VisitIndeterminate2.7 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)

Clinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported

Time frame: 28 to 42 days

Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)Clinical Cure86.2 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)Clinical Failure5.7 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)Indeterminate8.1 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)Clinical Cure95.3 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)Clinical Failure2 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)Indeterminate2.7 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit

Clinical responses at EOT were graded as resolution, failure, or indeterminate. 'Resolution' defined as a disappearance of signs and symptoms related to the infection or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection and the subject does not require any further antibiotic therapy or surgical intervention; 'failure' defined as worsening or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy; 'indeterminate' is defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent; receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug; receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than study indication; etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at EOT were reported.

Time frame: Day 5 to Day 14

Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitResolution92.2 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitIndeterminate3.2 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitClinical Failure4.6 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitResolution98 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitClinical Failure0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemClinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) VisitIndeterminate1.4 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3

QTc interval Calc Bazett represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) milliseconds (msec) which was calculated by Bazett's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150)419.5872 millisecondsStandard Deviation 19.3278
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148)9.731 millisecondsStandard Deviation 14.2961
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146)419.2055 millisecondsStandard Deviation 16.6815
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146)9.2509 millisecondsStandard Deviation 16.8132
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146)1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 12.5346
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150)417.34 millisecondsStandard Deviation 18.5718
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146)412.7945 millisecondsStandard Deviation 17.0075
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148)2.2905 millisecondsStandard Deviation 14.2544
Secondary

Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3

QTc interval Calc Fridericia represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) msec which was calculated by Fridericia's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146)8.115 millisecondsStandard Deviation 13.5805
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148)7.0724 millisecondsStandard Deviation 11.3219
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150)391.1846 millisecondsStandard Deviation 19.1574
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146)397.3767 millisecondsStandard Deviation 17.2179
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150)390.9467 millisecondsStandard Deviation 18.4339
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146)1.774 millisecondsStandard Deviation 9.3328
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146)392.6918 millisecondsStandard Deviation 18.8144
Comparator ErtapenemCorrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148)1.9122 millisecondsStandard Deviation 11.3058
Secondary

Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3

N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150)93.4 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 19.1
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 ((N= 294, 148)2.8 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.7
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)84.3 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 17.2
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146)1 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 8.9
Comparator ErtapenemHeart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146)-0.9 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 7.1
Comparator ErtapenemHeart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150)90.4 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 16.9
Comparator ErtapenemHeart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)82.6 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 16.2
Comparator ErtapenemHeart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 ((N= 294, 148)0.3 Beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 6.9
Secondary

Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term

Musculoskeletal adverse events were classified as following SOCs (preferred terms): injury, poisoning and procedural complications (forearm fracture, joint injury, ligament sprain, muscle strain) musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (arthralgia, joint swelling, musculoskeletal pain, myalgia). Incidence rates were reported as percentage of subjects categorized under preferred terms.

Time frame: All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermForearm fracture0.3 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermJoint injury0 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermLigament sprain0.3 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermMuscle strain0 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermArthralgia3 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermJoint swelling0 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermMusculoskeletal pain1 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermMyalgia0.3 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermMyalgia0 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermForearm fracture0 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermArthralgia1.3 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermJoint injury0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermMusculoskeletal pain0 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermLigament sprain0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermJoint swelling0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemIncidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred TermMuscle strain0.7 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3

A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than ULN range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)0.7 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 300, 150)7.7 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 297,148)16.2 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)5.4 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)0 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 293, 146)3.8 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 291,148)15.5 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)9.6 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)2 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)0 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 300, 150)2.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 291,148)3.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 297,148)4.1 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 293, 146)1.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)0 Percentage of subjects
Secondary

Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3

A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than (\>) upper limit of normal (ULN) range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)2 Percentage of subjects 17.2179
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)17.9 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 293, 146)1.4 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)1.7 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)0.3 Percentage of subjects 13.5805
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 300, 150)0.7 Percentage of subjects 19.1574
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 291,148)9.6 Percentage of subjects
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 297,148)3 Percentage of subjects 11.3219
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 291,148)1.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)0 Percentage of subjects 18.8144
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148)0 Percentage of subjects 9.3328
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 293, 146)1.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 297,148)2 Percentage of subjects 11.3058
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)3.4 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148)0.7 Percentage of subjects
Comparator ErtapenemPotentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3Day1: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 300, 150)1.3 Percentage of subjects 18.4339
Secondary

PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3

The PR interval is defined as the period that extends from the onset of atrial depolarization (beginning of the P wave) until the onset of ventricular depolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 299, 150)136.8294 millisecondsStandard Deviation 18.3554
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 ( N= 292, 148)0.7123 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.2587
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)139.4915 millisecondsStandard Deviation 17.3258
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146)1.5813 millisecondsStandard Deviation 9.2143
Comparator ErtapenemPR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146)1.5616 millisecondsStandard Deviation 9.9322
Comparator ErtapenemPR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 299, 150)140.5933 millisecondsStandard Deviation 20.5113
Comparator ErtapenemPR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)139.5685 millisecondsStandard Deviation 20.8174
Comparator ErtapenemPR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 ( N= 292, 148)-0.0203 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.5631
Secondary

QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3

The QRS interval represents the time it takes for ventricular depolarization to occur. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150)89.0333 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.8279
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148)0.119 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.3799
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)89.2423 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.0196
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146)0.2768 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.123
Comparator ErtapenemQRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146)0.2877 millisecondsStandard Deviation 3.1687
Comparator ErtapenemQRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150)88.8067 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.9264
Comparator ErtapenemQRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)89.3904 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.8198
Comparator ErtapenemQRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148)1.223 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.2568
Secondary

QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3

The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150)341.1812 millisecondsStandard Deviation 33.9858
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148)2.5828 millisecondsStandard Deviation 15.213
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146)358.3082 millisecondsStandard Deviation 34.0504
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146)6.0906 millisecondsStandard Deviation 16.1875
Comparator ErtapenemQT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146)3.1644 millisecondsStandard Deviation 11.9586
Comparator ErtapenemQT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150)344.2333 millisecondsStandard Deviation 33.5494
Comparator ErtapenemQT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146)356.5822 millisecondsStandard Deviation 35.6653
Comparator ErtapenemQT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148)1.1149 millisecondsStandard Deviation 11.5744
Secondary

RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3

The RR interval refers to the respective time interval in the Electrocardiogram. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.

Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3

Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150)670.7567 millisecondsStandard Deviation 142.6153
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148)-20.6429 millisecondsStandard Deviation 74.3401
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)740.4778 millisecondsStandard Deviation 149.0964
Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039)RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146)-9.2862 millisecondsStandard Deviation 77.7582
Comparator ErtapenemRR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146)10.5137 millisecondsStandard Deviation 67.1124
Comparator ErtapenemRR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150)689.3067 millisecondsStandard Deviation 145.5957
Comparator ErtapenemRR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146)754.6027 millisecondsStandard Deviation 150.1203
Comparator ErtapenemRR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148)-3.4797 millisecondsStandard Deviation 56.9955

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026