Intraabdominal Infections
Conditions
Keywords
Intra-abdominal infection, Pediatric infection
Brief summary
The primary focus of the study is the evaluation of the safety of treatment with moxifloxacin in a pediatric population 3 months to \<18 years old. Approximately 450 pediatric subjects with a complicated intra-abdominal infection will be enrolled in the study and treated with either moxifloxacin intravenously and orally if switched to oral therapy or ertapenem (intravenously) and, if switched to oral therapy, amoxicillin/clavulanate.
Interventions
For subjects 12 to less than (\<) 18 years of age and weighing at least 45 kilograms (kg), the dose of moxifloxacin will be 400 milligrams (mg), once daily (OD). Subjects 12 to \< 18 years of age and weighing less than 45 kg, the dose of moxifloxacin will be 4 mg/kg twice daily (BID), every 12 hours (q12h), not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects 6 to \< 12 years of age the dose of moxifloxacin will be 4mg/kg, q12h, not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects 2 to less than 6 years of age the dose of moxifloxacin will be 5mg/kg, q12h, not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects 3 months to less than 2 years of age the dose of moxifloxacin will be 6mg/kg q12h IV, not exceeding 400 mg/day. Subjects who were switched from IV to PO therapy, 400 mg or 50 mg moxifloxacin tablets were provided.
For subjects 13 to \<18 years of age, the dosage of ertapenem was 1 gram (g) OD. For subjects 3 months to \< 13 years of age, the dosage was 15 mg/kg q12h not to exceed 1 g/day.
Subjects 2 years to \< 18 years of age who were switched from IV to PO therapy receive amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension. The dosage of clavulanate was 3.2 mg/kg q12h. (maximum dose of clavulanate was 125 mg q12h). The dosage of amoxicillin was 22.5 mg q12h (a maximum dose of 875 mg amoxicillin q12h must not be exceeded).
Sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution intended for IV use was used as the placebo for IV moxifloxacin. Tablets containing inactive ingredients were used as the placebo for PO moxifloxacin 400 mg and 50 mg tablets.
Sterile 0.9% sodium chloride solution intended for IV use was used as the placebo for IV ertapenem.
Suspension containing inactive ingredients was used as the placebo for PO amoxicillin/clavulanate suspension.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Hospitalized males or females 3 months to 17 years of age * Able to obtain parental or legal guardian written informed consent and assent from subjects as applicable by local laws and regulations * Expected duration of treatment with antibiotics is a minimum of 3 days administered IV, for a total of 5 to 14 days administered IV or IV followed by PO * If the subject is a female of child-bearing potential she must have a negative pregnancy test at the screening visit or be capable of practicing an adequate method of contraception, and agree to continue the same method for 1 month following the TOC visit. Lactating subjects are not to be included. * Subjects may be enrolled upon a surgically (laparotomy, laparoscopy, or percutaneous drainage) confirmed cIAI revealing at least one of the following: * Gross peritoneal inflammation with purulent exudate within the abdominal cavity * Intra-abdominal abscess * Macroscopic intestinal perforation with diffuse peritonitis OR * Subjects may be enrolled on the basis of a suspected cIAI, which must be supported with radiological evidence (ultrasound, abdominal plain films, computed tomography \[CT\], magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\]) of gastrointestinal perforation or localized collections of potentially infected material and at least one of the following: * Symptoms referable to the abdominal cavity (eg, anorexia, nausea, vomiting or pain) * Tenderness (with or without rebound), involuntary guarding, absent or diminished bowel sounds, or abdominal wall rigidity * Fever * Leukocytosis * The subject must be scheduled for a surgical procedure (laparotomy or laparoscopy) or percutaneous drainage.
Exclusion criteria
* Presumed spontaneous bacterial peritonitis * All pancreatic processes including pancreatic sepsis, peripancreatic sepsis, or an cIAI secondary to pancreatitis * Early acute or suppurative (nonperforated) appendicitis unless there is evidence of an abscess or peritoneal fluid containing pus and micro-organisms suggestive of regional contamination * Infections originating from the female genital tract * Known severe immunosuppression. Subjects with known mild immunosuppression (eg, Type I or II diabetes mellitus, trauma, or absolute neutrophil count \[ANC\] between 1000 and 1500 cells/mm3) may be enrolled. * Congenital or documented acquired QT prolongation * Receiving concomitant treatment with QT prolonging drugs * History of tendon disease/disorder related to quinolone treatment * Pathogenic organisms suspected or identified (eg, Pseudomonas) which are resistant to any of the study drugs * Abnormal musculoskeletal findings at baseline assessment; or chronic musculoskeletal disease (eg, juvenile rheumatoid arthritis); or chronic illness with high risk for chronic or recurrent arthritis or tendinitis (eg, cystic fibrosis, chronic inflammatory bowel disease) * History of myasthenia gravis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects With Adverse Events | All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution. | An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. |
| Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse Events | Clinical cardiac event related to QT interval were recorded from treatment start until day 3 of treatment. All other clinical cardiac events were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit, up to day 56. | — |
| Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse Events | All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution. | — |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. |
| PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | The PR interval is defined as the period that extends from the onset of atrial depolarization (beginning of the P wave) until the onset of ventricular depolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. |
| QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. |
| Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | QTc interval Calc Bazett represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) milliseconds (msec) which was calculated by Bazett's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. |
| Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | QTc interval Calc Fridericia represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) msec which was calculated by Fridericia's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. |
| Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than (\>) upper limit of normal (ULN) range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported. |
| Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than ULN range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported. |
| RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | The RR interval refers to the respective time interval in the Electrocardiogram. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. |
| Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | 28 to 42 days | Bacteriological responses were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'Presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures, and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded and invasive procedures are not warranted; índeterminate' was applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pre-treatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at TOC were reported. |
| Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) | 28 to 42 days | Clinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported |
| Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Day 3 to Day 5 | Clinical responses during therapy visit were graded as clinical improvement, clinical failure, or indeterminate. Clinical improvement defined as a reduction in the severity and/or the number of signs and symptoms of infection; 'clinical failure' defined as a failure to respond or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy. 'Indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent, receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than the study indication and receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug, etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response during therapy visit were reported. |
| Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Day 3 to Day 5 | Bacteriological response during therapy were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication, or indeterminate'Presumed persistence' is applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation;'presumed eradication' is defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug is not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject is not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response during therapy visit were reported |
| Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit | Day 5 to Day 14 | Clinical responses at EOT were graded as resolution, failure, or indeterminate. 'Resolution' defined as a disappearance of signs and symptoms related to the infection or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection and the subject does not require any further antibiotic therapy or surgical intervention; 'failure' defined as worsening or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy; 'indeterminate' is defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent; receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug; receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than study indication; etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at EOT were reported. |
| Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | Day 5 to Day 14 | Bacteriological response at EOT were grades as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate' is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at EOT were reported. |
| Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | 28 to 42 days | Clinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported. |
| QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3 | The QRS interval represents the time it takes for ventricular depolarization to occur. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. |
| Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution. | Musculoskeletal adverse events were classified as following SOCs (preferred terms): injury, poisoning and procedural complications (forearm fracture, joint injury, ligament sprain, muscle strain) musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (arthralgia, joint swelling, musculoskeletal pain, myalgia). Incidence rates were reported as percentage of subjects categorized under preferred terms. |
Countries
Argentina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, Czechia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Peru, Romania, Russia, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
The study was conducted at multicenter between 21 July 2010 (first subject first visit) to 21 January 2015 (last subject last visit).
Pre-assignment details
Overall 478 subjects were enrolled, 20 subjects had screening failures hence, 458 subjects were randomized to receive treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) Subjects randomized to the moxifloxacin arm of this study received intravenous moxifloxacin plus ertapenem placebo (0.9 % sodium chloride \[NaCl solution\]) for a minimum of 3 days and, if switched to oral treatment, PO moxifloxacin plus PO amoxicillin/clavulanate placebo. Total treatment duration is 5- 14 days. | 305 |
| Comparator Ertapenem Subjects randomized to the comparator arm of this study received intravenous ertapenem plus moxifloxacin placebo (0.9 % NaCl solution) for a minimum of 3 days and, if switched to oral treatment, amoxicillin/clavulanate as an oral suspension plus PO moxifloxacin placebo. Total treatment duration is 5-14 days. | 153 |
| Total | 458 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Insufficient Therapeutic effect | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 7 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 4 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Technical problems | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 6 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Comparator Ertapenem | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 12.05 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.66 | 12.046 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.495 | 12.049 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.602 |
| Age, Customized 12 - < 18 years | 190 Subjects | 94 Subjects | 284 Subjects |
| Age, Customized 2 - < 6 years | 14 Subjects | 7 Subjects | 21 Subjects |
| Age, Customized 3 months - < 2 years | 1 Subjects | 0 Subjects | 1 Subjects |
| Age, Customized 6 - < 12 years | 100 Subjects | 52 Subjects | 152 Subjects |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 124 Participants | 53 Participants | 177 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 181 Participants | 100 Participants | 281 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 127 / 301 | 63 / 150 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 20 / 301 | 6 / 150 |
Outcome results
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Time frame: All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Number of Subjects With Adverse Events | Any AE | 175 Subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Number of Subjects With Adverse Events | Any SAE | 20 Subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Number of Subjects With Adverse Events | Any AE | 82 Subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Number of Subjects With Adverse Events | Any SAE | 6 Subjects |
Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse Events
Time frame: Clinical cardiac event related to QT interval were recorded from treatment start until day 3 of treatment. All other clinical cardiac events were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit, up to day 56.
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse Events | Any AE | 38 Subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse Events | Any SAE | 0 Subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse Events | Any AE | 7 Subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Number of Subjects With Clinical Cardiac Adverse Events | Any SAE | 0 Subjects |
Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse Events
Time frame: All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse Events | Any AE | 13 Subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse Events | Any SAE | 1 Subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse Events | Any AE | 5 Subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Number of Subjects With Musculoskeletal Adverse Events | Any SAE | 0 Subjects |
Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit
Bacteriological response during therapy were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication, or indeterminate'Presumed persistence' is applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation;'presumed eradication' is defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug is not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject is not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response during therapy visit were reported
Time frame: Day 3 to Day 5
Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Presumed Persistence | 1.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Presumed Eradication | 95.6 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Indeterminate | 3.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Indeterminate | 1.5 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Presumed Persistence | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Presumed Eradication | 97.8 Percentage of subjects |
Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Bacteriological responses were graded as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'Presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures, and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded and invasive procedures are not warranted; índeterminate' was applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pre-treatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at TOC were reported.
Time frame: 28 to 42 days
Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Presumed Eradication | 84.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Presumed Persistence | 6.8 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Indeterminate | 8.4 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Presumed Eradication | 94.9 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Presumed Persistence | 2.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Indeterminate | 2.9 Percentage of subjects |
Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit
Bacteriological response at EOT were grades as presumed persistence, presumed eradication or indeterminate. 'presumed persistence' was applicable for subjects judged to be clinical failures and appropriate culture material is not available for evaluation; 'presumed eradication' defined as the absence of appropriate culture material for evaluation because the subject has clinically responded (with a response as a resolution or cure) and invasive procedures are not warranted; 'indeterminate' is applicable when the bacteriological response to the study drug was not valid for any reason (eg, pretreatment culture was negative or culture was not obtained when material was available and the subject was not judged a clinical failure). Percentage of subjects with bacteriological response at EOT were reported.
Time frame: Day 5 to Day 14
Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | Indeterminate | 3.4 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | Presumed Persistence | 5.5 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | Presumed Eradication | 91.1 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | Presumed Persistence | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | Presumed Eradication | 97.8 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Bacteriological Response at the End of Treatment (EOT) Visit | Indeterminate | 1.5 Percentage of subjects |
Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit
Clinical responses during therapy visit were graded as clinical improvement, clinical failure, or indeterminate. Clinical improvement defined as a reduction in the severity and/or the number of signs and symptoms of infection; 'clinical failure' defined as a failure to respond or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy. 'Indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent, receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than the study indication and receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug, etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response during therapy visit were reported.
Time frame: Day 3 to Day 5
Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Clinical Improvement | 94.3 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Clinical Failure | 1 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Indeterminate | 4.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Indeterminate | 1.4 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Clinical Improvement | 98 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at a 'During Therapy' Visit | Clinical Failure | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit
Clinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported.
Time frame: 28 to 42 days
Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Clinical Cure | 86.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Clinical Failure | 5.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Indeterminate | 8.1 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Clinical Cure | 95.3 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Clinical Failure | 2 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit | Indeterminate | 2.7 Percentage of subjects |
Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI)
Clinical responses were graded as clinical cure, failure or indeterminate. 'Clinical cure' defined as a resolution or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection; 'failure' defined as a reappearance of the signs and symptoms of the original infection, or wound infection requiring further systemic antimicrobial therapy; 'indeterminate' defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment was not possible to determine (due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at TOC were reported
Time frame: 28 to 42 days
Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) | Clinical Cure | 86.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) | Clinical Failure | 5.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) | Indeterminate | 8.1 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) | Clinical Cure | 95.3 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) | Clinical Failure | 2 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at Test-of-Cure (TOC) Visit in Subjects With Bacteriologically Confirmed Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection (cIAI) | Indeterminate | 2.7 Percentage of subjects |
Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit
Clinical responses at EOT were graded as resolution, failure, or indeterminate. 'Resolution' defined as a disappearance of signs and symptoms related to the infection or sufficient improvement of clinical signs and symptoms related to the infection and the subject does not require any further antibiotic therapy or surgical intervention; 'failure' defined as worsening or insufficient lessening of the signs and symptoms of infection requiring a modification or addition of antibacterial therapy; 'indeterminate' is defined as those subjects in whom a clinical assessment is not possible to determine (eg, due to early withdrawal from the study because of adverse events, protocol violation, withdrawn consent; receipt of less than 3 full days of study drug; receipt of an effective concomitant antibacterial for an indication other than study indication; etc). Percentage of subjects with clinical response at EOT were reported.
Time frame: Day 5 to Day 14
Population: Safety analysis set with subjects evaluable for this outcome
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit | Resolution | 92.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit | Indeterminate | 3.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit | Clinical Failure | 4.6 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit | Resolution | 98 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit | Clinical Failure | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Clinical Response at the End-of-Treatment (EOT) Visit | Indeterminate | 1.4 Percentage of subjects |
Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3
QTc interval Calc Bazett represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) milliseconds (msec) which was calculated by Bazett's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150) | 419.5872 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 19.3278 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148) | 9.731 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 14.2961 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146) | 419.2055 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 16.6815 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146) | 9.2509 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 16.8132 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146) | 1 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 12.5346 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150) | 417.34 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 18.5718 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146) | 412.7945 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 17.0075 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Bazett Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148) | 2.2905 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 14.2544 |
Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3
QTc interval Calc Fridericia represent the interval corrected for heart rate (QTc) msec which was calculated by Fridericia's method. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146) | 8.115 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 13.5805 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148) | 7.0724 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 11.3219 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150) | 391.1846 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 19.1574 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146) | 397.3767 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 17.2179 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150) | 390.9467 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 18.4339 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146) | 1.774 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 9.3328 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146) | 392.6918 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 18.8144 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Corrected QT (QTc) Interval Calculated (Calc) Fridericia Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148) | 1.9122 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 11.3058 |
Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3
N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150) | 93.4 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 19.1 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 ((N= 294, 148) | 2.8 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 84.3 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 17.2 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146) | 1 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146) | -0.9 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 7.1 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150) | 90.4 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 82.6 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 16.2 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Heart Rate Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 ((N= 294, 148) | 0.3 Beats per minute (bpm) | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term
Musculoskeletal adverse events were classified as following SOCs (preferred terms): injury, poisoning and procedural complications (forearm fracture, joint injury, ligament sprain, muscle strain) musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (arthralgia, joint swelling, musculoskeletal pain, myalgia). Incidence rates were reported as percentage of subjects categorized under preferred terms.
Time frame: All AEs and SAE were recorded from treatment start to test of cure visit; musculoskeletal AEs were recorded up to 1 year post-end of treatment (EOT) visit; subjects with musculoskeletal AEs 1 year after EOT were followed up to 5 years or until resolution.
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Forearm fracture | 0.3 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Joint injury | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Ligament sprain | 0.3 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Muscle strain | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Arthralgia | 3 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Joint swelling | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Musculoskeletal pain | 1 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Myalgia | 0.3 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Myalgia | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Forearm fracture | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Arthralgia | 1.3 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Joint injury | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Musculoskeletal pain | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Ligament sprain | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Joint swelling | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Incidence Rates of Musculoskeletal Adverse Events by Primary System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term | Muscle strain | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3
A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than ULN range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 300, 150) | 7.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 297,148) | 16.2 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 5.4 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 293, 146) | 3.8 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 291,148) | 15.5 Percentage of subjects |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 9.6 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 2 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 0.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 0 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 300, 150) | 2.7 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 291,148) | 3.4 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 297,148) | 4.1 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Pre-dose QTc Calc Bazett > ULN (N= 293, 146) | 1.4 Percentage of subjects |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Calc Bazett Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 0 Percentage of subjects |
Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3
A significant QTc prolongation was considered when the QTc value was more than (\>) upper limit of normal (ULN) range or was prolonged for 30 msec or 60msec in comparison with the pre-treatment value measured on Day 1. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively. Percentage of subjects with potentially clinically significant ECG data was reported.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 2 Percentage of subjects | 17.2179 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 17.9 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 293, 146) | 1.4 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 1.7 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 0.3 Percentage of subjects | 13.5805 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 300, 150) | 0.7 Percentage of subjects | 19.1574 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 291,148) | 9.6 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 297,148) | 3 Percentage of subjects | 11.3219 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 291,148) | 1.4 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 0 Percentage of subjects | 18.8144 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 297,148) | 0 Percentage of subjects | 9.3328 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 293, 146) | 1.4 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Post-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 297,148) | 2 Percentage of subjects | 11.3058 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >30 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 3.4 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day3: Post-dose >60 ms from pre-dose (N= 291,148) | 0.7 Percentage of subjects | — |
| Comparator Ertapenem | Potentially Clinically Significant Electrocardiogram (ECG) QTc Interval Prolongation - by QTc Interval Calc Fridericia Correction on Treatment Day 1 and During Therapy Day 3 | Day1: Pre-dose QTcCalcFridericia>ULN (N= 300, 150) | 1.3 Percentage of subjects | 18.4339 |
PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3
The PR interval is defined as the period that extends from the onset of atrial depolarization (beginning of the P wave) until the onset of ventricular depolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 299, 150) | 136.8294 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 18.3554 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 ( N= 292, 148) | 0.7123 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 8.2587 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 139.4915 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 17.3258 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146) | 1.5813 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 9.2143 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146) | 1.5616 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 9.9322 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 299, 150) | 140.5933 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 20.5113 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 139.5685 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 20.8174 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | PR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 ( N= 292, 148) | -0.0203 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 8.5631 |
QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3
The QRS interval represents the time it takes for ventricular depolarization to occur. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150) | 89.0333 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 7.8279 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148) | 0.119 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 4.3799 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 89.2423 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 8.0196 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146) | 0.2768 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 4.123 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 289, 146) | 0.2877 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 3.1687 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150) | 88.8067 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 7.9264 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 89.3904 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 7.8198 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QRS Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Predose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148) | 1.223 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 4.2568 |
QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3
The QT interval is the period that extends from the beginning of ventricular depolarization until the end of ventricular repolarization. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150) | 341.1812 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 33.9858 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148) | 2.5828 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 15.213 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146) | 358.3082 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 34.0504 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146) | 6.0906 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 16.1875 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 287, 146) | 3.1644 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 11.9586 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 298, 150) | 344.2333 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 33.5494 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 292, 146) | 356.5822 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 35.6653 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | QT Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 290, 148) | 1.1149 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 11.5744 |
RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3
The RR interval refers to the respective time interval in the Electrocardiogram. N signifies subjects who were evaluable for the specified parameter for each arm, respectively.
Time frame: Baseline (Pre-dose), Day 1, Day 3
Population: Safety analysis set; All subjects (N= 451) treated with at least one dose of study medication.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150) | 670.7567 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 142.6153 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148) | -20.6429 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 74.3401 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 740.4778 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 149.0964 |
| Moxifloxacin (Avelox, BAY12-8039) | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146) | -9.2862 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 77.7582 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 3 (N= 290, 146) | 10.5137 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 67.1124 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 1: Pre-dose (N= 300, 150) | 689.3067 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 145.5957 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Day 3: Pre-dose (N= 293, 146) | 754.6027 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 150.1203 |
| Comparator Ertapenem | RR Interval Changes in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Profiles From Pre-dose to Post-dose on Treatment Day 1 and Treatment Day 3 | Change at Day 1 (N= 294, 148) | -3.4797 milliseconds | Standard Deviation 56.9955 |