Skip to content

Evaluation of Pain With Radiesse® With Lidocaine for Nasolabial Folds

Evaluation of Pain With the Use of Radiesse® With Lidocaine for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01069354
Enrollment
102
Registered
2010-02-17
Start date
2012-11-30
Completion date
2014-02-28
Last updated
2018-05-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nasolabial Folds

Keywords

Moderate to severe wrinkles and folds such as nasolabial folds

Brief summary

To assess pain during nasolabial fold treatment using Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler with lidocaine

Detailed description

To assess pain immediately after nasolabial fold treatment with Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler with lidocaine in one nasolabial fold compared to Radiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler without lidocaine in the contralateral nasolabial fold

Interventions

DEVICERadiesse® Injectable Dermal Filler with Lidocaine

Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier with 3% lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl)

Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier without 3% lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl)

Sponsors

Merz North America, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Is at least 18 years of age * Is a candidate for nasolabial fold treatment using Radiesse * Has approximately symmetrical nasolabial folds * Understands and accepts the obligation not to receive any other facial procedures in the lower half of the face for 1 month

Exclusion criteria

* Has received any type of treatment or procedures including surgery in the nasolabial folds * Has received neurotoxin, hyaluronic acid, calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) or collagen injections in the lower half of the face within past 6 months * Has received polylactic acid, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), silicone or any other permanent filler in the lower half of the face * Has nasolabial folds that are too severe to be corrected in one treatment session * Has any history of hypersensitivity to lidocaine or anesthetics of the amide type

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain (0 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)Immediately after injection (Time 0)Assessment of whether a statistically significant reduction in pain score in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine nasolabial fold was observed when compared to the Radiesse® without Lidocaine nasolabial fold using a 10-cm visual analog pain scale (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). In the study protocol, the assessment of achieving a statistically significant reduction in pain at time zero was selected a priori to be analyzed using a paired t-test to test the null hypothesis that the mean of the differences in VAS scores between the Treatment and Control folds is equal to zero.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 15 Minutes Post Injection15 minutes post injectionA 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 30 Minutes Post Injection30 minutes post injectionA 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 45 Minutes Post Injection45 minutes post injectionA 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 60 Minutes Post Injection60 minutes post injectionA 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.
Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain As Defined by a ≥ 2.0-cm Reduction in VASImmediately after injection (Time 0)In this split-face study, a clinically meaningful difference in pain was defined as a 2-cm reduction (i.e., subject reports at least 2-cm less pain on a 10-cm VAS) in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine NLF when compared to the Radiesse® without Lidocaine NLF.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 2 Weeks Post Injection2 weeks post injectionA 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 4 Weeks Post Injection4 weeks post injectionA 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.
Assess Subject Preference to PainImmediately after injection (Time 0)2 questions were asked of 101 subjects: 1) Was one treatment less painful than the other? and 2) Was the difference in pain levels significant enough to affect your preference for one treatment over the other? Only those participants responding yes to these 2 questions about pain and preference for treatment are reported in the table below.
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 1 Week Post Injection1 week post injectionA 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Radiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine and Radiesse® Without Lidocaine
Injectable Dermal Filler. The same 102 participants received the experimental device and the active comparator device at the same time (left and right sides of face). Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier containing 3% lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl) and Calcium hydroxylapatite particles suspended in an aqueous-based gel carrier without 3% lidocaine hydrochloride (HCl)
102
Total102

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRadiesse® Mixed With Lidocaine and Radiesse® Without Lidocaine
Age, Customized48.85 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.43
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
I: burns easily, never tans
6 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
II: burns easily, tans minimally with difficulty
19 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
III: burns moderately, tans moderately & uniformly
59 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
IV: burns minimally, tans moderately & easily
8 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
VI: never burns, tans profusely
5 participants
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
V: rarely burns, tans profusely
5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
8 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
88 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
87 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
90 / 10192 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1010 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

Pain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain (0 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)

Assessment of whether a statistically significant reduction in pain score in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine nasolabial fold was observed when compared to the Radiesse® without Lidocaine nasolabial fold using a 10-cm visual analog pain scale (0 = no pain, 10 = very severe pain). In the study protocol, the assessment of achieving a statistically significant reduction in pain at time zero was selected a priori to be analyzed using a paired t-test to test the null hypothesis that the mean of the differences in VAS scores between the Treatment and Control folds is equal to zero.

Time frame: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocainePain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain (0 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.57
Radiesse® Without LidocainePain Score Using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain (0 = no Pain, 10 = Very Severe Pain)6.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Assess Subject Preference to Pain

2 questions were asked of 101 subjects: 1) Was one treatment less painful than the other? and 2) Was the difference in pain levels significant enough to affect your preference for one treatment over the other? Only those participants responding yes to these 2 questions about pain and preference for treatment are reported in the table below.

Time frame: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineAssess Subject Preference to PainWas One Treatment Less Painful Than the Other?98 participants responding yes
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineAssess Subject Preference to PainPain Significant Enough to Affect Preference?87 participants responding yes
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain As Defined by a ≥ 2.0-cm Reduction in VAS

In this split-face study, a clinically meaningful difference in pain was defined as a 2-cm reduction (i.e., subject reports at least 2-cm less pain on a 10-cm VAS) in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine NLF when compared to the Radiesse® without Lidocaine NLF.

Time frame: Immediately after injection (Time 0)

Population: In this split-face study, participants received both treatments (i.e., 1 NLF with Radiesse Mixed with Lidocaine and 1 NLF with Radiesse without Lidocaine). Results are presented as the number of participants reporting at least a 2-cm lower pain VAS score in the Radiesse Mixed with Lidocaine NLF when compared to the Radiesse without Lidocaine NLF.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineNumber of Participants With a Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain As Defined by a ≥ 2.0-cm Reduction in VAS91 participants
Comparison: 91 (90.1%) of 101 subjects had a ≥ 2.0 cm lower VAS Score in treatment versus control NLF at Time 0p-value: <0.0001Fisher Exact
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 15 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Time frame: 15 minutes post injection

Population: One subject did not receive treatment in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine (treatment) fold due to adverse event during injection of the Radiesse® without Lidocaine (control) nasolabial fold, which was randomized to be treated first. This subject was followed through the end of the trial for safety, but was excluded from comparative analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 15 Minutes Post Injection1.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.23
Radiesse® Without LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 15 Minutes Post Injection3.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 1 Week Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Time frame: 1 week post injection

Population: Two subjects missed their Week 1 visit.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 1 Week Post Injection0.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.32
Radiesse® Without LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 1 Week Post Injection0.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.31
p-value: 0.5663t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 2 Weeks Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Time frame: 2 weeks post injection

Population: One subject did not receive treatment in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine (treatment) fold due to adverse event during injection of the Radiesse® without Lidocaine (control) nasolabial fold, which was randomized to be treated first. This subject was followed through the end of the trial for safety, but was excluded from comparative analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 2 Weeks Post Injection0.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Radiesse® Without LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 2 Weeks Post Injection0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
p-value: 0.3197t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 30 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Time frame: 30 minutes post injection

Population: One subject did not receive treatment in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine (treatment) fold due to adverse event during injection of the Radiesse® without Lidocaine (control) nasolabial fold, which was randomized to be treated first. This subject was followed through the end of the trial for safety, but was excluded from comparative analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 30 Minutes Post Injection0.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.99
Radiesse® Without LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 30 Minutes Post Injection2.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 45 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Time frame: 45 minutes post injection

Population: One subject did not receive treatment in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine (treatment) fold due to adverse event during injection of the Radiesse® without Lidocaine (control) nasolabial fold, which was randomized to be treated first. This subject was followed through the end of the trial for safety, but was excluded from comparative analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 45 Minutes Post Injection0.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Radiesse® Without LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 45 Minutes Post Injection1.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 4 Weeks Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Time frame: 4 weeks post injection

Population: One subject did not receive treatment in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine (treatment) fold due to adverse event during injection of the Radiesse® without Lidocaine (control) nasolabial fold, which was randomized to be treated first. This subject was followed through the end of the trial for safety, but was excluded from comparative analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 4 Weeks Post Injection0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Radiesse® Without LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 4 Weeks Post Injection0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Secondary

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 60 Minutes Post Injection

A 10-cm VAS (with 21 total circles, marked at 0.5 cm intervals) was used in which 0 = no pain and 10 = very severe pain.

Time frame: 60 minutes post injection

Population: One subject did not receive treatment in the Radiesse® Mixed with Lidocaine (treatment) fold due to adverse event during injection of the Radiesse® without Lidocaine (control) nasolabial fold, which was randomized to be treated first. This subject was followed through the end of the trial for safety, but was excluded from comparative analyses.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Radiesse® Mixed With LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 60 Minutes Post Injection0.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Radiesse® Without LidocaineVisual Analogue Scale (VAS) Pain Score 60 Minutes Post Injection1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.56
p-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026