Skip to content

A Study in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate (GA) Injection 40 mg Administered Three Times a Week Compared to Placebo

A Multinational, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-group Study Performed in Subjects With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Glatiramer Acetate (GA) Injection 40 mg Administered Three Times a Week Compared to Placebo in a Double-blind Design

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01067521
Acronym
GALA
Enrollment
1404
Registered
2010-02-11
Start date
2010-06-22
Completion date
2017-05-12
Last updated
2021-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, Glatiramer Acetate

Brief summary

The study is designed to assess the efficacy of Glatiramer Acetate (GA) injection 40 mg administered three times a week compared to placebo in subjects with RRMS, as measured by the number of confirmed relapses during the 12 month placebo controlled period. The study has two periods: * Placebo Controlled Period: 12 months of 40 mg administered three times a week by subcutaneous injection or matching placebo. * Open Label Extension Period: All subjects will continue treatment with GA 40 mg administered three times a week, until this dose strength is commercially available for the treatment of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients or until the development of this GA dose regimen is stopped by the Sponsor

Detailed description

Participants who were randomized to the GA 40 mg treatment arm in the Double-Blind Period, continue that treatment in the Open-Label Extension Period and are referred to as Early Start participants. Participants randomized to the Placebo arm in the Double-Blind Period and switched to GA 40 mg subcutaneous injections three times a week in the Open-Label Extension are referred to as Delayed Start participants.

Interventions

GA 40 mg/mL administered 3 times a week by subcutaneous injection for a period of 12 months for participants assigned to GA treatment in the Double-Blind Period, and GA 40 mg/mL administered 3 times a week by subcutaneous injection for all participants in the Open-Label Extension Period.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo comparator administered by subcutaneous injection three times each week for 12 months during the Double-Blind Period.

Sponsors

Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects must have a confirmed and documented MS diagnosis as defined by the Revised McDonald criteria with a relapsing-remitting disease course. 2. Subjects must be ambulatory with an EDSS score of 0-5.5 in both screening and baseline visits. 3. Subjects must be in a relapse-free, stable neurological condition and free of corticosteroid treatment \[intravenous (IV), intramuscular (IM) and/or per os (PO)\] or ACTH 30 days prior to screening (month -1) and between screening and baseline (month 0) visits. 4. Subjects must have experienced one of the following: At least one documented relapse in the 12 months prior to screening, or At least two documented relapses in the 24 months prior to screening, or One documented relapse between 12 and 24 months prior to screening with at least one documented T1-Gd enhancing lesion in an MRI performed within 12 months prior to screening. 5. Subjects must be between 18 and 55 years of age, inclusive. 6. Women of child-bearing potential must practice an acceptable method of birth control. 7. Subjects must be able to sign and date a written informed consent prior to entering the study. 8. Subjects must be willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

1. Subjects with progressive forms of MS. 2. Use of experimental or investigational drugs, and/or participation in drug clinical studies within the 6 months prior to screening. 3. Use of immunosuppressive (including Mitoxantrone and Fingolimod) or cytotoxic agents within 6 months prior to the screening visit. 4. Use of natalizumab (Tysabri®) or any other monoclonal antibodies within 2 years prior to screening. 5. Use of cladribine within 2 years prior to screening. 6. Previous treatment with immunomodulators (including IFNβ 1a and 1b, and IV Immunoglobulin (IVIg) within 2 months prior to screening. 7. Previous use of GA or any other glatiramoid. 8. Chronic (more than 30 consecutive days) systemic (IV, PO or IM) corticosteroid treatment within 6 months prior to screening visit. 9. Previous total body irradiation or total lymphoid irradiation. 10. Previous stem-cell treatment, autologous bone marrow transplantation or allogenic bone marrow transplantation. 11. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. 12. Subjects with a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition that would preclude safe and complete study participation, as determined by medical history, physical exams, ECG, abnormal laboratory tests and chest X-ray. Such conditions may include hepatic, renal or metabolic diseases, systemic disease, acute infection, current malignancy or recent history (5 years) of malignancy, major psychiatric disorder, history of drug and/or alcohol abuse and allergies that could be detrimental according to the investigator's judgment. 13. A known history of sensitivity to Gadolinium. 14. Inability to successfully undergo MRI scanning. 15. A known drug hypersensitivity to Mannitol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total Number of Confirmed Relapses During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionDay 1 to 12 monthsRelapses were monitored throughout the study. During the PC Period, two neurologists/physicians assessed subjects' general medical and neurological evaluations separately. A relapse was defined as the appearance of 1+ new neurological abnormalities or the reappearance of 1+ previously observed neurological abnormalities lasting \>= 48 hours and immediately preceded by an improving neurological state of at \>=30 days from onset of previous relapse. An event was counted as a relapse only when the subject's symptoms were accompanied by observed objective neurological changes, consistent with \>= one of the following: - An increase of \>= 0.5 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as compared to previous evaluation. - An increase of one grade in the actual score of \>=2 of the 7 functional systems (FS), as compared to previous evaluation. - An increase of 2 grades in the actual score of one FS as compared to the previous evaluation. Adjusted mean values are displayed.
Annualized Rate of Confirmed Relapses Comparing Early Starters to Delayed Starters Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionDay 1 up to 6.5 yearsThe annualized relapse rate (ARR) was calculated for the study by dividing the cumulative number of confirmed relapses by the number of person-years of exposure to treatment. The analysis of the annualized relapse rate is based on estimating a contrast (early start vs delayed start) derived from a baseline-adjusted, Negative Binomial Regression model to the number of confirmed relapses observed during study (post randomization) with an offset based on the log of exposure to treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Normalized Brain Volume From Baseline to Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment PeriodBaseline (Day -7), Month 12The analysis of brain atrophy as defined by the percentage change in normalized brain volume from baseline to Month 12 was based on the outcome of a contrast (GA 40 mg TIW vs. placebo) derived from a baseline-adjusted ANCOVA. In addition to the treatment group, the model included the following covariates: - SIENAX normalized brain volume at baseline. - The number of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images at baseline. - country or geographical region. Sienax estimates total brain tissue volume, from a single image, normalised for skull size.
The Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionBaseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12, Month 36All data accumulated from screening, the PC Treatment period up to the end of the Open Label (OL) period are combined and referred to as the Long Term Period. T2 lesions are hyperintense brain lesions that show on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and are associated with multiple sclerosis. The number of T2 lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 that are new or enlarged as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression, adjusted for baseline number of T2 lesions and country or geographical region as covariates. An offset employing the log of the proportion of the number of the available post-placebo-controlled baseline (PCBL) scans was used to adjust for missing MRI scans.
The Cumulative Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions Taken at Month 6 and Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionBaseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12T2 lesions are hyperintense brain lesions that show on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and are associated with multiple sclerosis. The cumulative number of T2 lesions at Months 6 and 12 that are new or enlarged as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Note that the two timeframes (Months 6 and 12) are combined. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression, adjusted for baseline number of T2 lesions and country or geographical region as covariates.
Brain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresBaseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12, Month 36The analysis of brain atrophy as defined by the percentage change in brain volume from baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 was performed using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with SIENAX normalized brain volume at baseline, number of Gd-enhancing lesions at baseline, and country or geographical region as fixed effects. Sienax estimates total brain tissue volume, from a single image, normalised for skull size.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Early Start: Day 1 up to 6.5 years Delayed Start - Placebo: Day 1 up to Month 12 Delayed Start - GA: Month 13 up to 6.5 yearsAdverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.
The Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionBaseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12, Month 36All data accumulated from screening, the PC Treatment period up to the end of the Open Label (OL) period are combined and referred to as the Long Term Period. The cumulative number of gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced lesions on T1-weighted images at Months 6, 12 and 36 as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression The model was fit using an autoregressive covariance structure. Covariates used: number of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images at placebo-controlled baseline and country or geographical region. The cumulative number is derived from all the data points before it. For example, if the participant skipped one time point in between the baseline and 36 months, then it cannot be calculated.
The Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Month 6 and Month 12 of the Placebo-Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionBaseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12The cumulative number of gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced lesions on T1-weighted images at Months 6 and 12 as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Note that the two timeframes (Months 6 and 12) are combined. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression with an offset employing the log of the proportion of the number of the available post-baseline scans to adjust for missing MRI scans (if any), adjusted for baseline number of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images and country or geographical region as covariates.

Countries

Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Estonia, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1524 subjects were screened in this study, and 120 (7.9%) subjects failed screening. Of these, 69 did not meet inclusion or exclusion criteria, 30 withdrew from the study and 21 failed screening for other reasons.

Pre-assignment details

1404 subjects were enrolled and randomized in the placebo-controlled (PC) double-blind period. Participants were randomized 2:1 to the treatment arms.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mg
Participants were administered glatiramer acetate (GA) 40 mg/mL by subcutaneous injection three times a week for 12 months during the double-blind Placebo-Controlled Period, and then continued that treatment in the Open-label Period from Month 13 up to Year 6.5 until the study ended.
943
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mg
Participants were administered placebo subcutaneous injections three times a week for 12 months during the double-blind Placebo-Controlled Period. Participants were then switched to glatiramer acetate (GA) 40 mg/mL by subcutaneous injection three times a week during the Open-Label Period from Month 13 up to Year 6.5 until the study ended.
461
Total1,404

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodAdverse Event296
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodDeath01
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodLost to Follow-up51
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodNoncompliance with study drug20
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodPhysician Decision11
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodPregnancy74
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodProtocol Violation20
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodRefused to sign informed consent41
Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled PeriodWithdrawal by Subject3417
Open-Label PeriodAdverse Event3028
Open-Label PeriodDeath31
Open-Label PeriodLost to Follow-up2120
Open-Label PeriodNon-compliance with study drug50
Open-Label PeriodPhysician Decision1311
Open-Label PeriodPregnancy148
Open-Label PeriodProtocol Violation30
Open-Label PeriodTeva requested subject to be withdrawn52
Open-Label PeriodWithdrawal by Subject16088

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDelayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgEarly Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mg
Age, Continuous37.61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.346
38.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.222
37.36 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.401
Body Mass Index (BMI)24.40 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.739
24.44 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.804
24.38 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.709
Number of T1 Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions per Participant at Baseline1.6 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.39
1.4 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.69
1.7 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
Number of T2 Lesions Per Participant at Baseline37.5 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.45
36.7 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.68
38.0 lesions
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.34
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
15 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants1 Participants9 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
1394 Participants460 Participants934 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other, not specified
15 Participants3 Participants12 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
1371 Participants455 Participants916 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
954 Participants313 Participants641 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
450 Participants148 Participants302 Participants
Sienax Normalized Brain Volume at Baseline1535.206 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 110.6347
1537.899 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 110.7549
1533.888 mL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 110.6107
Time from First Symptom7.66 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.621
7.61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36
7.68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.748
Time from Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Diagnosis3.76 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.904
3.88 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.744
3.70 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.982

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 4191 / 4613 / 943
other
Total, other adverse events
238 / 419167 / 461609 / 943
serious
Total, serious adverse events
36 / 41921 / 461117 / 943

Outcome results

Primary

Annualized Rate of Confirmed Relapses Comparing Early Starters to Delayed Starters Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression

The annualized relapse rate (ARR) was calculated for the study by dividing the cumulative number of confirmed relapses by the number of person-years of exposure to treatment. The analysis of the annualized relapse rate is based on estimating a contrast (early start vs delayed start) derived from a baseline-adjusted, Negative Binomial Regression model to the number of confirmed relapses observed during study (post randomization) with an offset based on the log of exposure to treatment.

Time frame: Day 1 up to 6.5 years

Population: ITT

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgAnnualized Rate of Confirmed Relapses Comparing Early Starters to Delayed Starters Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression0.2621 relapses per yearStandard Error 0.0189
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgAnnualized Rate of Confirmed Relapses Comparing Early Starters to Delayed Starters Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression0.3146 relapses per yearStandard Error 0.0279
Comparison: Entire Study The Negative Binomial Regression model covariates: • treatment group • PCBL (Placebo-Controlled Baseline) Kurtzke's Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as 1 degree of freedom variable • Log of the # of relapses in the 2 years prior to PCBL • Volume of T2 lesions at PCBL • Status of Gd-enhancing T1 lesion activity at PCBL (=0 if no Gd-enhancing T1 lesions at PCBL; =1 if at least one Gd-enhancing T1 lesion at PCBL) • Country or Geographical Region (CGR)p-value: 0.040995% CI: [0.6995, 0.9925]Negative Binomial Regression
Primary

Total Number of Confirmed Relapses During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression

Relapses were monitored throughout the study. During the PC Period, two neurologists/physicians assessed subjects' general medical and neurological evaluations separately. A relapse was defined as the appearance of 1+ new neurological abnormalities or the reappearance of 1+ previously observed neurological abnormalities lasting \>= 48 hours and immediately preceded by an improving neurological state of at \>=30 days from onset of previous relapse. An event was counted as a relapse only when the subject's symptoms were accompanied by observed objective neurological changes, consistent with \>= one of the following: - An increase of \>= 0.5 in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score as compared to previous evaluation. - An increase of one grade in the actual score of \>=2 of the 7 functional systems (FS), as compared to previous evaluation. - An increase of 2 grades in the actual score of one FS as compared to the previous evaluation. Adjusted mean values are displayed.

Time frame: Day 1 to 12 months

Population: Intent To Treat (ITT) Analysis Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgTotal Number of Confirmed Relapses During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression0.331 confirmed relapsesStandard Error 0.028
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgTotal Number of Confirmed Relapses During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression0.505 confirmed relapsesStandard Error 0.049
Comparison: Relapses were estimated by a baseline-adjusted, Negative Binomial Regression with an offset based on the log of subject's exposure to treatment. The model included the following covariates: - Baseline EDSS score. - Log of the prior 2-year number of relapses. - Volume of T2 lesions at baseliner. - Status of Gd-enhancing T1 activity at baseline (=0 no Gd-enhancing T1 at baseline; =1 at least one Gd-enhancing T1 at baseline). - CGR.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.539, 0.799]Negative Binomial Regression
Secondary

Brain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated Measures

The analysis of brain atrophy as defined by the percentage change in brain volume from baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 was performed using mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with SIENAX normalized brain volume at baseline, number of Gd-enhancing lesions at baseline, and country or geographical region as fixed effects. Sienax estimates total brain tissue volume, from a single image, normalised for skull size.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12, Month 36

Population: ITT population of participants with SIENEX brain scans at both baseline and the designated timeframes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresMonth 6-0.429 percentage changeStandard Error 0.032
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresMonth 12-0.739 percentage changeStandard Error 0.035
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresMonth 36-1.935 percentage changeStandard Error 0.063
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresMonth 6-0.345 percentage changeStandard Error 0.04
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresMonth 12-0.653 percentage changeStandard Error 0.046
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Brain Volume From Baseline to Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by a Mixed Model for Repeated MeasuresMonth 36-1.952 percentage changeStandard Error 0.09
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.042595% CI: [-0.166, -0.003]Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)
Comparison: Month 12p-value: 0.084495% CI: [-0.184, 0.012]Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)
Comparison: Month 36p-value: 0.870195% CI: [-0.91, 0.225]Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM)
Secondary

Brain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Normalized Brain Volume From Baseline to Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period

The analysis of brain atrophy as defined by the percentage change in normalized brain volume from baseline to Month 12 was based on the outcome of a contrast (GA 40 mg TIW vs. placebo) derived from a baseline-adjusted ANCOVA. In addition to the treatment group, the model included the following covariates: - SIENAX normalized brain volume at baseline. - The number of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images at baseline. - country or geographical region. Sienax estimates total brain tissue volume, from a single image, normalised for skull size.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7), Month 12

Population: ITT population of participants who had SIENEX brain volume estimates at both baseline and Month 12.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Normalized Brain Volume From Baseline to Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period-0.706 percentage changeStandard Error 0.037
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgBrain Atrophy As Defined by the Percent of Change in Normalized Brain Volume From Baseline to Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period-0.645 percentage changeStandard Error 0.047
p-value: 0.205895% CI: [-0.154, 0.033]ANCOVA
Secondary

Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse events (AEs) summarized in this table are those that began or worsened after treatment with study drug (treatment-emergent AEs). An adverse event was defined in the protocol as any untoward medical occurrence that develops or worsens in severity during the conduct of a clinical study and does not necessarily have a causal relationship to the study drug. Severity was rated by the investigator on a scale of mild, moderate and severe, with severe= an AE which prevents normal daily activities. Relation of AE to treatment was determined by the investigator. Serious AEs include death, a life-threatening adverse event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability or incapacity, a congenital anomaly or birth defect, OR an important medical event that jeopardized the patient and required medical intervention to prevent the previously listed serious outcomes.

Time frame: Early Start: Day 1 up to 6.5 years Delayed Start - Placebo: Day 1 up to Month 12 Delayed Start - GA: Month 13 up to 6.5 years

Population: Glatiramer Acetate (GA) - Treated Analysis Set The GA-Treated analysis set includes all subjects randomized into the study and treated with at least 1 dose of GA at any time during the study. Analyses includes data collected for these subjects from the first time GA was administered.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE777 Participants
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Mild698 Participants
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Moderate441 Participants
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Severe95 Participants
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAEs501 Participants
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs117 Participants
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths3 Participants
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation63 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Moderate168 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths1 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Severe24 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAEs189 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs36 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE322 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Mild283 Participants
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation28 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Moderate101 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Mild247 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any TEAE284 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Severity of TEAEs: Severe16 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Deaths1 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Serious TEAEs21 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Treatment-related TEAEs73 Participants
Delayed Start: PlaceboParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation6 Participants
Secondary

The Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Month 6 and Month 12 of the Placebo-Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression

The cumulative number of gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced lesions on T1-weighted images at Months 6 and 12 as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Note that the two timeframes (Months 6 and 12) are combined. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression with an offset employing the log of the proportion of the number of the available post-baseline scans to adjust for missing MRI scans (if any), adjusted for baseline number of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images and country or geographical region as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12

Population: ITT. When a subject had both Month 6 and Month 12 scans missing, the subject was excluded from the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Month 6 and Month 12 of the Placebo-Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression0.905 lesionsStandard Error 0.087
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Month 6 and Month 12 of the Placebo-Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression1.639 lesionsStandard Error 0.194
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.436, 0.699]Negative Binomial Regression
Secondary

The Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression

All data accumulated from screening, the PC Treatment period up to the end of the Open Label (OL) period are combined and referred to as the Long Term Period. The cumulative number of gadolinium (Gd)-enhanced lesions on T1-weighted images at Months 6, 12 and 36 as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression The model was fit using an autoregressive covariance structure. Covariates used: number of enhancing lesions on T1-weighted images at placebo-controlled baseline and country or geographical region. The cumulative number is derived from all the data points before it. For example, if the participant skipped one time point in between the baseline and 36 months, then it cannot be calculated.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12, Month 36

Population: ITT population of participants with MRIs at both baseline and the designated timeframes, inclusive of the proceeding post-baseline timeframes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 60.629 lesionsStandard Error 0.072
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 121.054 lesionsStandard Error 0.115
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 361.501 lesionsStandard Error 0.168
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 61.131 lesionsStandard Error 9.186
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 122.051 lesionsStandard Error 0.282
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of Gadolinium (Gd)-Enhanced Lesions on T1-Weighted Images At Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 362.265 lesionsStandard Error 0.278
Comparison: Month 6p-value: 0.000595% CI: [0.4, 0.773]Negative Binomial Regression
Comparison: Month 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.388, 0.679]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Month 36p-value: 0.001595% CI: [0.514, 0.854]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

The Cumulative Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions Taken at Month 6 and Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression

T2 lesions are hyperintense brain lesions that show on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and are associated with multiple sclerosis. The cumulative number of T2 lesions at Months 6 and 12 that are new or enlarged as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Note that the two timeframes (Months 6 and 12) are combined. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression, adjusted for baseline number of T2 lesions and country or geographical region as covariates.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12

Population: ITT. When a subject had both Month 6 and Month 12 scans missing, the subject was excluded from the analysis. When the Month 12 scan was missing, data from Month 6 was used and an offset of log (0.5) introduced. When the Month 6 scan was missing, data from Month 12 was used with an offset of 0.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions Taken at Month 6 and Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression3.650 lesionsStandard Error 0.259
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Cumulative Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions Taken at Month 6 and Month 12 During the Placebo Controlled (PC) Treatment Period Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression5.592 lesionsStandard Error 0.49
Comparison: Negative binomial regressionp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.546, 0.78]Negative binomial regression
Secondary

The Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial Regression

All data accumulated from screening, the PC Treatment period up to the end of the Open Label (OL) period are combined and referred to as the Long Term Period. T2 lesions are hyperintense brain lesions that show on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and are associated with multiple sclerosis. The number of T2 lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 that are new or enlarged as compared to the baseline MRI are offered. Adjusted mean is based on negative binomial regression, adjusted for baseline number of T2 lesions and country or geographical region as covariates. An offset employing the log of the proportion of the number of the available post-placebo-controlled baseline (PCBL) scans was used to adjust for missing MRI scans.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -7), Month 6, Month 12, Month 36

Population: ITT population of participants with MRIs at both baseline and the designated timeframes.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 62.872 lesionsStandard Error 0.214
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 124.484 lesionsStandard Error 0.318
Early Start: GA 40 mg / GA 40 mgThe Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 365.836 lesionsStandard Error 0.41
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 63.902 lesionsStandard Error 0.43
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 127.086 lesionsStandard Error 0.699
Delayed Start: Placebo / GA 40 mgThe Number of New/Enlarging T2 Lesions at Months 6, 12 and 36 Estimated by Negative Binomial RegressionMonth 368.759 lesionsStandard Error 0.82
Comparison: Month 6 Negative binomial regressionp-value: 0.005695% CI: [0.592, 0.914]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Month 12 Negative binomial regressionp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.524, 0.765]Negative binomial regression
Comparison: Month 36 Negative binomial regressionp-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.557, 0.797]Negative binomial regression

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026