Skip to content

PROPHESYS 3: Observational Study on Predictors of Response in Patients With Treatment-naïve Chronic Hepatitis C Initiated on Treatment With Pegasys (Peginterferon Alfa-2a) or Peginterferon-alfa-2b

Prospective Observational Study on Predictors of Early On-treatment Response and Sustained Virological Response in a Cohort of Treatment naïve HCV-infected Patients Treated With Pegylated Interferons

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01066819
Enrollment
1656
Registered
2010-02-10
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2016-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hepatitis C, Chronic

Brief summary

This observational study will assess predictors of early on-treatment and sustained virological response in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C initiated on treatment with Pegasys (peginterferon alfa-2a) or peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin. Data will be collected during the treatment period (24 or 48 weeks) and 12 and 24 weeks after the end of treatment. Target sample size is \<2000.

Interventions

DRUGPeginterferon alfa-2a [Pegasys]

Peginterferon/ribavirin treatment period as prescribed by treating physician (e.g. 24 or 48 weeks) and treatment-free follow-up period of 24 weeks.

Peginterferon/ribavirin treatment period as prescribed by treating physician (e.g. 24 or 48 weeks) and treatment-free follow-up period of 24 weeks.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>/= 18 years of age * chronic hepatitis C * HIV HCV co-infection allowed * informed consent to data collection

Exclusion criteria

* co-infection with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) * previous treatment with peginterferon and/or ribavirin

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationAt 24 weeks (Wk) after EOTSustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response (VR) at 24 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virological response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) of \<15 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) as assessed by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (CAP/CTM) or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (lower limit of detection \[LLOD\] 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected modified all-treated (mTRT) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationAt 24 weeks after EOTSustained virological response was defined as VR at 24 weeks after EOT. Virological response was defined as HCV RNA of \<15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected per protocol (PP) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationAt 24 weeks after EOTModified sustained virological response (mSVR) was defined as modified virological response (mVR) of HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationAt 24 weeks after EOTModified sustained virological response is defined as mVR of HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationAt 24 weeks after EOTThe probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the positive predictive value (PPV) of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the negative predictive value (NPV) of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationAt 24 weeks after EOTThe probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Participants with 1-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 1- log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 90%. The 1- log drop in HCV RNA was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Participants with 1-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 1- log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 90%. The 1- log drop in HCV RNA was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationAt 24 weeks after EOTThe probability that a participant who developed VR by Wk 2 achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive Values of VR was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationAt 24 weeks after EOTThe probability that a participant who developed VR by Wk 2 and achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 2 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 2 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12At Week 4 and Week 12Rapid virological response (RVR) was defined as VR by Wk 4, Modified rapid virological response (mRVR) was defined as mVR by Wk 4, complete early virological response (cEVR) was defined as VR by Wk 12, but no RVR, modified complete early virological response (mcEVR) was defined as mVR by Wk 12, but no mRVR, partial early virological response (pEVR) was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline (including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL) by Wk 12, but no RVR and no cEVR, modified partial early virological response (mpEVR) was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline by Wk 12, but no mRVR and no mcEVR. The data is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeAt Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOTVirological Response (VR) was defined as HCV RNA \<15 IU/mL as assessed by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (HCV) (CAP/CTM) or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (lower limit of detection 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. PEOT= Post End of Treatment. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of TreatmentAt 12 weeks after EOTParticipants whose last test result in their respective follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. The number of participants with relapse was reported in treatment naive mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24 weeks after EOTParticipants whose last test result in the follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. It was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. No participants were analysed for arm 'Genotype Unknown'.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of TreatmentAt 12 weeks after EOTParticipants whose last test result in the follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. It was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.
Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of TreatmentAt 24 weeks after EOTParticipants whose last test result in the follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. It was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. No participants were analysed for arm 'Genotype Unknown'.
Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12During first 12 weeks of treatmentRVR was defined as as VR by Wk 4, mRVR was defined as mVR by Wk 4, cEVR was defined as VR by Wk 12, but no RVR, mcEVR was defined as mVR by Wk 12, but no mRVR, pEVR was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline (including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL) by Wk 12, but no RVR and no cEVR, mpEVR was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline by Wk 12, but no mRVR and no mcEVR. The data is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeAt Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOTVirological response (VR) was defined as HCV RNA \<15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The VR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment
Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeAt Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOTModified virological response (mVR) was defined as HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The mVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment
Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeAt Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOTModified virological response (mVR) is defined as HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The mVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Participants with 2-logarithm (log) drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 2 log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 99%. The 2 log drop in HCV RNA is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.
Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Participants with 2-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 2 log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 99%. The 2 log drop in HCV RNA is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.

Countries

Puerto Rico, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1656 participants were enrolled in this study conducted from January 2008 to August 2011 at 111 centres in United States.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Genotype 1 (G1)
Eligible participants with serologically proven CHC (Genotype 1) who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a or PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin for up to 48 weeks according to the standard of care and in line with SPCs/local labeling were observed.
1,006
Genotype 2 (G2)
Eligible participants with serologically proven CHC (Genotype 2) who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a or PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin for up to 48 weeks according to the standard of care and in line with SPCs/local labeling were observed.
348
Genotype 3 (G3)
Eligible participants with serologically proven CHC (Genotype 3) who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a or PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin for up to 48 weeks according to the standard of care and in line with SPCs/local labeling were observed.
257
Genotype 4 (G4)
Eligible participants with serologically proven CHC (Genotype 4) who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a or PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin for up to 48 weeks according to the standard of care and in line with SPCs/local labeling were observed.
25
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)
Eligible participants with serologically proven CHC (Genotype 5/6) who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a or PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin for up to 48 weeks according to the standard of care and in line with SPCs/local labeling were observed.
7
Genotype Unknown (UNK)
Eligible participants with serologically proven CHC (Genotype unknown) who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a or PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin for up to 48 weeks according to the standard of care and in line with SPCs/local labeling were observed.
13
Total1,656

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Overall StudyAdministrative642000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1816000
Overall StudyDeath501000
Overall StudyEarly termination200000
Overall StudyFailed to return29810768723
Overall StudyLab test not done902100
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy2212100
Overall StudyMiscellaneous281018100
Overall StudyNon responders12327201
Overall StudyNot categorised926100
Overall StudyNot met inclusion/exclusion criteria100000
Overall StudyOther511000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision623000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1260000
Overall StudyRelapse1643000
Overall StudyResults not available100000
Overall StudyScreen failure100000
Overall StudySpontaneous cure100000
Overall StudyTreatment never started851919322
Overall StudyTreatment stopped1212100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject29116000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGenotype 1 (G1)Genotype 2 (G2)Genotype 3 (G3)Genotype 4 (G4)Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Genotype Unknown (UNK)Total
Age, Continuous48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.74
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.41
46.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.59
53.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.48
45.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.72
48.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.71
Sex: Female, Male
Female
419 Participants148 Participants110 Participants5 Participants3 Participants7 Participants692 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
587 Participants200 Participants147 Participants20 Participants4 Participants6 Participants964 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
841 / 1,441
serious
Total, serious adverse events
130 / 1,441

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population

Modified sustained virological response is defined as mVR of HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)31.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)26.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)57.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)48.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)48.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)35.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)35.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population

Modified sustained virological response (mSVR) was defined as modified virological response (mVR) of HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL at 24 weeks after EOT. The mSVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 international units per millilitre (IU/mL) were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)30.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29, 2,1,1)23.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)56.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29, 2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)43.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29, 2,1,1)37.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)31.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29, 2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29, 2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Sustained Virological Response Over Time by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29, 2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (ASIAN vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Week \[Wk\] 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.004595% CI: [1.704, 18.378]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (BLACK vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.975595% CI: [0.497, 1.967]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (HISPANIC vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.478695% CI: [0.327, 1.688]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (OTHER vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Week 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.01495% CI: [1.405, 20.597]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.062, 1.094]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (ASIAN vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.003595% CI: [1.819, 20.701]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (BLACK vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.782195% CI: [0.439, 1.857]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (HISPANIC vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.484695% CI: [0.317, 1.723]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (OTHER vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.01795% CI: [1.353, 21.749]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for HCV RNA at BL in log10(IU/mL). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.012595% CI: [0.523, 0.925]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for average number of drinks per week (1 vs 0). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.013995% CI: [1.288, 9.357]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for average number of drinks per week (\> 1 vs 0). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.632795% CI: [0.601, 2.311]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.042, 1.08]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Cumulative PEG-IFN alfa-2a dose per 1000 ug. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.003395% CI: [1.058, 1.326]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.151, 1.308]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response, combined (RVR vs NO RVR). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2b.p-value: 0.003595% CI: [1.686, 14.362]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for cumulative ribavirin dose per 10000 mg, 1st 12 weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.028995% CI: [0.676, 0.979]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.177, 1.383]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Cumulative ribavirin dose per 10000 mg. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.009995% CI: [0.821, 0.973]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for age per 10 years. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.005895% CI: [1.213, 3.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.154, 1.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for age per 10 years. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.005895% CI: [1.213, 3.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.154, 1.38]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (ASIAN vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.020595% CI: [1.219, 10.721]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (BLACK vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.955795% CI: [0.506, 1.903]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Ethnic origin (HISPANIC vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.295% CI: [0.273, 1.312]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for (OTHER vs WHITE/CAUCASIAN). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.043795% CI: [1.037, 13.083]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response (RVR vs NO RVR/EVR). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [17.956, 1009]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response (cEVR vs NO RVR/EVR). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [10.521, 576.85]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response (pEVR vs NO RVR/EVR). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.010595% CI: [1.872, 112.73]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for age per 10 years. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.004195% CI: [1.152, 2.12]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response, combined (RVR vs NO RVR). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.405, 12.838]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for age per 10 years. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.003795% CI: [1.216, 2.732]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response, combined (RVR vs NO RVR). The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between on-treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [3.977, 32.347]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2b.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.068, 1.158]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for mSVR was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2b.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [1.068, 1.158]Regression, Logistic
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated Population

The probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the positive predictive value (PPV) of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the negative predictive value (NPV) of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)52.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)76.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)53.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)81.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)48.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)91.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)52.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106, 46,29, 2,1,1)96.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)57.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106, 46,29, 2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)62.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)52.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)78.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)59.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)88.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)87.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106, 46,29, 2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)51.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)95.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)40.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)56.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)20.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106, 46,29, 2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)60.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106, 46,29, 2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106, 46,29, 2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol Population

The probability that a participant who developed VR by Week 4 and 12 and also achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR are reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)75.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)54.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)78.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)49.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476, 190,123,14,2,1)90.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)55.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)95.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)57.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)62.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)48.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476, 190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)51.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)70.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)59.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)77.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)47.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)87.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)51.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476, 190,123,14,2,1)87.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)38.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)55.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476, 190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)20.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476, 190,123,14,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476, 190,123,14,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4, PegIFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response by Week 4 and 12 on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population

Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as virological response (VR) at 24 weeks after end of treatment (EOT). Virological response was defined as hepatitis C virus ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) of \<15 international units per milliliter (IU/mL) as assessed by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (CAP/CTM) or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (lower limit of detection \[LLOD\] 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected modified all-treated (mTRT) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks (Wk) after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline (BL) result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)30.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)23.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)55.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)43.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)37.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)31.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population

Sustained virological response was defined as VR at 24 weeks after EOT. Virological response was defined as HCV RNA of \<15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The SVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected per protocol (PP) population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The per-protocol (PP) population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)31.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)26.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)57.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)48.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)48.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)35.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)35.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Sustained Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol PopulationPeg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12

Rapid virological response (RVR) was defined as VR by Wk 4, Modified rapid virological response (mRVR) was defined as mVR by Wk 4, complete early virological response (cEVR) was defined as VR by Wk 12, but no RVR, modified complete early virological response (mcEVR) was defined as mVR by Wk 12, but no mRVR, partial early virological response (pEVR) was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline (including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL) by Wk 12, but no RVR and no cEVR, modified partial early virological response (mpEVR) was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline by Wk 12, but no mRVR and no mcEVR. The data is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.

Time frame: At Week 4 and Week 12

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b RVR (n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)19 participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b mRVR(n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)24 participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a RVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)130 participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a mRVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)147 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b mRVR(n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)39 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b RVR (n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)38 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a mRVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)189 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a RVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)184 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b RVR (n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)20 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a RVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)114 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b mRVR(n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)22 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a mRVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)120 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b mRVR(n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)2 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a RVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)5 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a mRVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)6 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b RVR (n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)2 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a mRVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)2 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a RVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)1 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b RVR (n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)1 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b mRVR(n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)1 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b mRVR(n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)0 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a RVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)1 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2a mRVR(n= 568,221,159,16,2,1)1 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Modified All-Treated Population at Week 4 and Week 12Peg IFN Alfa 2b RVR (n= 106,46,29,2,1,1)0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12

RVR was defined as as VR by Wk 4, mRVR was defined as mVR by Wk 4, cEVR was defined as VR by Wk 12, but no RVR, mcEVR was defined as mVR by Wk 12, but no mRVR, pEVR was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline (including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL) by Wk 12, but no RVR and no cEVR, mpEVR was defined as at least a 2-log10 drop in HCV RNA as compared to baseline by Wk 12, but no mRVR and no mcEVR. The data is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.

Time frame: During first 12 weeks of treatment

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)21 participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)16 participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)109 participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12cEVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)155 participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR,Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)121 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)33 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)34 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)165 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12cEVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)21 participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR,Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)170 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)19 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)21 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12cEVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)15 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR,Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)103 participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR,Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)6 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)5 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)2 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)2 participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12cEVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)5 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)1 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)1 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12cEVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)1 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)1 participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR,Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)2 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)1 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12RVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12cEVR, Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0 participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Number of Participants With Response by Disjoint Categories in Per-Protocol Population at Week 4 and Week 12mRVR,Peg IFN Alfa 2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Participants with 1-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 1- log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 90%. The 1- log drop in HCV RNA was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)29.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)26.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)73.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)62.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)97.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)45.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)56.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)95.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)89.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)95.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)62.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)50.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)31.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)68.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Participants with 1-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 1- log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 90%. The 1- log drop in HCV RNA was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)31.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)29.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)74.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)65.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)91.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)83.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)48.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)95.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)97.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)59.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)99.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)96.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)99.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)89.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)98.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)53.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)64.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)78.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)85.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)35.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per-Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Participants with 2-logarithm (log) drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 2 log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 99%. The 2 log drop in HCV RNA is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)19.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)17.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)53.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)43.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)78.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)67.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)43.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)95.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)97.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)53.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)95.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)99.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)96.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)94.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)86.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)92.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)48.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)62.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)62.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)25.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Modified All Treated Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Participants with 2-log drop in HCV RNA including HCV RNA values \<50 IU/mL in the serum from baseline to Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12, expressed in terms of a logarithmic scale with base 10 were evaluated and reported. A 2 log drop in HCV RNA was defined as drop of HCV viral load by 99%. The 2 log drop in HCV RNA is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b.

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12

Population: Th PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)21.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)19.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)54.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)47.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)79.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)72.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)46.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)95.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)97.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)57.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)98.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)96.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)98.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)85.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)96.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)52.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)64.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)57.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)71.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)28.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With at Least a 2-log10 Drop in Hepatitis C Virus Ribonucleic Acid in Per Protocol Population at Week 2, Week 4 and Week 12Wk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time

Modified virological response (mVR) was defined as HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The mVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)22.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)25.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=106,46,29,2,1,1)29.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)34.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)40.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)56.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)3.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)7.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)43.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)58.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)19.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)28.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)85.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)84.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)95.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)95.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)86.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)87.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)60.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=106,46,29,2,1,1)54.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)75.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)72.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)25.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)85.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)75.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)31.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)93.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)48.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=106,46,29,2,1,1)44.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)75.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)56.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)37.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)18.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)62.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)37.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time

Modified virological response (mVR) is defined as HCV RNA \<50 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The mVR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOT

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)23.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)25.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)30.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)35.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)44.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)56.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)3.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)7.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)45.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)58.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)19.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)32.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)89.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)82.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)98.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)95.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)90.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)85.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)63.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)51.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)75.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)71.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)28.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)94.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)83.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)32.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)92.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)52.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)42.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)81.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)64.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)42.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)21.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)71.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)42.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT, Peg IFN Alfa 2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2, Peg IFN Alfa 2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Modified Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time12wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated Population

The probability that a participant who developed VR by Wk 2 achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 4 and 12 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 4 and 12 for mSVR. Predictive Values of VR was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population participants who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)45.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2,Peg IFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)69.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)78.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)62.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2,Peg IFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)43.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)63.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)58.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)57.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2,Peg IFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)64.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)54.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2,Peg IFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)66.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2,Peg IFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2,Peg IFNAlfa2a,NPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, PPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa 2b, NPV (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Modified All Treated PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a,PPV (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol Population

The probability that a participant who developed VR by Wk 2 and achieved mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the PPV of the VR by Wk 4 for mSVR. The probability that a participant who failed to develop VR by Wk 2 and also failed to achieve mSVR at 24 weeks after EOT was called the NPV of the VR by Wk 2 for mSVR. Predictive values of VR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a, PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)48.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)67.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)77.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)62.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)33.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a, PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)61.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)53.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)58.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)57.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)56.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a, PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)51.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a, PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)57.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a, PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2a, NPV(n=476,190,123,14,2,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, PPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, PegIFNAlfa2b, NPV(n=88,41,28,2,1,1)NA percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Predictive Values of Virological Response on Modified Sustained Virological Response After Treatment Initiation in Per Protocol PopulationWk2, Peg IFNAlfa2a, PPV (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment

Participants whose last test result in their respective follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. The number of participants with relapse was reported in treatment naive mTRT population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 12 weeks after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=153,94,63,4,1,1)24.8 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=19,18,9,2,0,0)10.5 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=153,94,63,4,1,1)8.5 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=19,18,9,2,0,0)11.1 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=153,94,63,4,1,1)22.2 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=19,18,9,2,0,0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=153,94,63,4,1,1)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=19,18,9,2,0,0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=153,94,63,4,1,1)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=19,18,9,2,0,0)NA Percentage of Participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=153,94,63,4,1,1)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=19,18,9,2,0,0)NA Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment

Participants whose last test result in the follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. It was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected mTRT population receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. No participants were analysed for arm 'Genotype Unknown'.

Time frame: 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=236,136,84, 6, 2, 0)26.3 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=28, 25, 11, 1, 1, 0)10.7 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=236,136,84, 6, 2, 0)8.8 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=28, 25, 11, 1, 1, 0)8.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=236,136,84, 6, 2, 0)19.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=28, 25, 11, 1, 1, 0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=28, 25, 11, 1, 1, 0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=236,136,84, 6, 2, 0)16.7 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFN Alfa2a (n=236,136,84, 6, 2, 0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Modified All-Treated Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFN Alfa2b(n=28, 25, 11, 1, 1, 0)100.0 Percentage of Participants
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Sex (MALE vs FEMALE). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.016295% CI: [0.226, 0.859]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for HCV RNA at BL in log10(IU/mL). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.015695% CI: [1.111, 2.741]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) ratio at BL (\<=1 vs \> 3). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.107595% CI: [0.829, 6.789]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for ALT ratio at BL (\> 1 - 3 vs \> 3). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.851895% CI: [0.321, 2.559]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.001295% CI: [0.951, 0.988]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Sex (MALE vs FEMALE). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.016295% CI: [0.226, 0.859]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for HCV RNA at BL in log10(IU/mL). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.015695% CI: [1.111, 2.741]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for ALT ratio at BL (\<=1 vs \> 3). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.107595% CI: [0.829, 6.789]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for ALT ratio at BL (\> 1 - 3 vs \> 3). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.851895% CI: [0.321, 2.559]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.001295% CI: [0.951, 0.988]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin up to Wk 12), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.001795% CI: [0.765, 0.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for treatment duration after VR in weeks. The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment exposure and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants (including total cumulative dose of peginterferon and ribavirin), in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.001795% CI: [0.765, 0.94]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for Sex (MALE vs FEMALE). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.007195% CI: [0.206, 0.78]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response (RVR vs NO RVR/EVR). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.000695% CI: [0.001, 0.169]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response (cEVR vs NO RVR/EVR). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.025595% CI: [0.008, 0.729]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response (pEVR vs NO RVR/EVR). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: 0.150195% CI: [0.018, 1.845]Regression, Logistic
Comparison: The statistical analysis is presented for On-treatment response (cEVR vs RVR). The logistic regression analysis for relapse was performed for association between treatment response and baseline factors available in at least 90% of participants, in naive HCV mono-infected mTRT participants receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [6.729, 110.35]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment

Participants whose last test result in the follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. It was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At 12 weeks after EOT

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegINFAlfa2a (n=128,86,55,4,1,1)23.4 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=16,15,8,2,0,0)12.5 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegINFAlfa2a (n=128,86,55,4,1,1)8.1 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=16,15,8,2,0,0)13.3 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegINFAlfa2a (n=128,86,55,4,1,1)21.8 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=16,15,8,2,0,0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegINFAlfa2a (n=128,86,55,4,1,1)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=16,15,8,2,0,0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegINFAlfa2a (n=128,86,55,4,1,1)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=16,15,8,2,0,0)NA Percentage of Participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT,PegINFAlfa2a (n=128,86,55,4,1,1)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 12 Weeks After End of Treatment12wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=16,15,8,2,0,0)NA Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment

Participants whose last test result in the follow-up time window showed mVR were considered to have maintained their modified end of treatment response (mEOT-R). Participants whose last test result in the respective follow-up time window did not show mVR, or who did not have a test result in the respective follow-up time window but whose last follow-up test result before the time window did not show mVR, were considered to have relapsed. Only participants with mEOT-R who had a HCV RNA measurement in the follow-up time window (without use of backward imputation), or whose last HCV RNA measurement at a follow-up time point before the time window did not show mVR, were included in the calculations. It was reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population receiving PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. No participants were analysed for arm 'Genotype Unknown'.

Time frame: At 24 weeks after EOT

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=201, 120, 72, 6, 2, 0)24.4 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=26,22,10,1,1, 0)11.5 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=201, 120, 72, 6, 2, 0)8.3 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=26,22,10,1,1, 0)9.1 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=201, 120, 72, 6, 2, 0)18.1 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=26,22,10,1,1, 0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=26,22,10,1,1, 0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=201, 120, 72, 6, 2, 0)16.7 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=201, 120, 72, 6, 2, 0)0.0 Percentage of Participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Relapse After Modified End of Treatment Response by Genotype in Per-Protocol Population at 24 Weeks After End of Treatment24wk PEOT, PegIFNAlfa2b(n=26,22,10,1,1, 0)100.0 Percentage of Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time

Virological Response (VR) was defined as HCV RNA \<15 IU/mL as assessed by COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (HCV) (CAP/CTM) or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (lower limit of detection 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. PEOT= Post End of Treatment. EOT= 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment.

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOT

Population: The mTRT population included all participants who received at least one dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin, and had at least one post-baseline HCV RNA result. Participants with a baseline result \<50 IU/mL were excluded. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)17.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)22.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)29.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)34.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)38.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)55.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)2.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159 ,16,2,1)6.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)39.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)54.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)17.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159 ,16,2,1)25.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)83.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)82.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)95.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)95.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)85.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)84.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)59.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)54.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)69.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)72.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159 ,16,2,1)20.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)83.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)71.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)24.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)93.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)48.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)44.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)74.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)56.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)31.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159 ,16,2,1)12.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)62.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)31.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159 ,16,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=106,46,29,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159 ,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Modified All Treated Population Over Time12Wk PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=568,221,159,16,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over Time

Virological response (VR) was defined as HCV RNA \<15 IU/mL as assessed by CAP/CTM or another HCV RNA test with at least the same degree of sensitivity. The CAP/CTM test is an in vitro nucleic acid amplification test for the quantification of HCV. This test possesses a high sensitivity (LLOD 15 IU/mL) and a broad linear range of quantification (43 IU/mL up to 69 million IU/mL) in all HCV genotypes. The VR is reported in treatment naive HCV mono-infected PP population who received PEG-IFN alfa-2a and PEG-IFN alfa-2b. The EOT was 12, 24, 48 or 72 weeks after initiation of treatment. PEOT= Post End of Treatment

Time frame: At Week 2, Week 4, Week 12, EOT, and at 12 Weeks after EOT

Population: The PP population included all participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. n = the number of participants analyzed at a given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)43.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)22.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)35.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)40.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)18.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)55.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 EOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)30.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)7.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)3.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 1 (G1)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)55.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)80.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)28.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)85.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)97.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)62.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)88.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)95.1 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)86.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 EOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)51.2 percentage of participants
Genotype 2 (G2)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)19.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)92.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)52.8 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)93.5 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)25.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 EOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)42.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)67.9 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)81.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)23.6 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)71.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 3 (G3)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)81.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)71.4 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)64.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)35.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 EOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)14.3 percentage of participants
Genotype 4 (G4)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)35.7 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 EOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)50.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype 5/6 (G5/6)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 EOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk4,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12 PEOT,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeEOT,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk2,PegIFNAlfa2a (n=476,190,123,14,2,1)100.0 percentage of participants
Genotype Unknown (UNK)Percentage of Participants With Virological Response by Type of Peginterferon and Genotype in Per Protocol Population Over TimeWk12,PegIFNAlfa2b (n=88,41,28,2,1,1)0.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026