Skip to content

ClearVoice Sound-processing Strategy for AB HiRes 120 Cochlear Implant Users

Evaluation of the ClearVoice™ Strategy in Adults Using HiResolution® Fidelity 120® Sound Processing

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01066780
Enrollment
48
Registered
2010-02-10
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2010-09-30
Last updated
2020-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implant

Keywords

cochlear implant, adults, HiResolution, Fidelity 120, listening benefits, noise, cochlear implant benefit

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to collect information about how the new sound-processing affects the ability to hear in everyday listening situations.

Interventions

DEVICEClearVoice

ClearVoice is a sound processing strategy designed to improve listening ability in some challenging everyday listening environments for users of the Harmony® HiResolution® Bionic Ear System (Harmony®)

Sponsors

Advanced Bionics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Post-lingually deafened, * experienced (6 months device use), * adult users of the Harmony HiResolution Bionic Ear System and HiRes Fidelity 120 sound processing. * English language proficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Speech Perception of Standardized Sentences Presented From Recorded Format in Speech-spectrum Noise4 WeeksThis was a within subjects design where scores on the AzBio sentence test in speech spectrum noise were compared against quiet scores at the 2-Week and 4-Week Follow-up Visit. The AzBio corpus of sentences consists of 33 lists of 20 sentences each (6 to 10 words per sentence) that have been equated for intelligibility. Two AzBio sentence lists were scored at each follow-up visit (2-Week and 4-Week) with either ClearVoice MEDIUM or ClearVoice HIGH enabled and averaged together. Two AzBio sentence lists were also administered in quiet at each visit. The ClearVoice score minus the quiet score provided the difference in score for the analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
The AzBio Sentences Will be Administered in Recorded Format in Multi-talker Babble.2-4 weeks

Countries

Canada, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

All subjects were fit acutely at the Baseline Visit (Visit 1) with ClearVoice Low and underwent acute speech perception testing. Each subject was then randomized to Group A or Group B.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ClearVoice46
Total46

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawn prior to ClearVoice exposure.11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicClearVoice
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
17 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants
Age, Continuous58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Speech Perception of Standardized Sentences Presented From Recorded Format in Speech-spectrum Noise

This was a within subjects design where scores on the AzBio sentence test in speech spectrum noise were compared against quiet scores at the 2-Week and 4-Week Follow-up Visit. The AzBio corpus of sentences consists of 33 lists of 20 sentences each (6 to 10 words per sentence) that have been equated for intelligibility. Two AzBio sentence lists were scored at each follow-up visit (2-Week and 4-Week) with either ClearVoice MEDIUM or ClearVoice HIGH enabled and averaged together. Two AzBio sentence lists were also administered in quiet at each visit. The ClearVoice score minus the quiet score provided the difference in score for the analysis.

Time frame: 4 Weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group 1Speech Perception of Standardized Sentences Presented From Recorded Format in Speech-spectrum NoiseClearVoice Setting Medium8.7 percentage of words scored correctlyStandard Deviation 10.1
Group 1Speech Perception of Standardized Sentences Presented From Recorded Format in Speech-spectrum NoiseClearVoice Setting High10.6 percentage of words scored correctlyStandard Deviation 10.2
Secondary

The AzBio Sentences Will be Administered in Recorded Format in Multi-talker Babble.

Time frame: 2-4 weeks

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026