Skip to content

An Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability Study of Canagliflozin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Moderate Renal Impairment

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Parallel-Group, 26-Week, Multicenter Study With a 26-Week Extension, to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Moderate Renal Impairment

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01064414
Enrollment
272
Registered
2010-02-08
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2013-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Renal Insufficiency

Keywords

Canagliflozin, JNJ 28431754, Placebo, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2, hemoglobin A1c protein, Blood Glucose, reduced kidney function, Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 different doses of canagliflozin compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have reduced kidney function.

Detailed description

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), double blind (neither the patient or the study doctor will know the name of the assigned treatment), parallel-group, 3-arm (patients will be assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups) multicenter study to determine the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 2 different doses of canagliflozin (100 mg and 300 mg) compared to placebo (a pill that looks like all the other treatments but has no real medicine) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have renal impairment (reduced kidney function) and who are not achieving an adequate response from current therapy to control their diabetes. Canagliflozin (also referred to as JNJ-28431754) is a drug that is being tested to see if it may be useful in treating patients diagnosed with T2DM. Approximately 240 patients will participate in the study for approximately 63 to 72 weeks, depending on the length of the pretreatment phase. The study will consist of a pretreatment phase, a 52 week double blind treatment phase, and a posttreatment phase. During the pretreatment phase, screening evaluations will be performed to see if patients meet the entry criteria for the study. In addition, routine clinical procedures will be performed (physical examination, vital signs measurements, and an electrocardiogram \[ECG\]), a blood and urine sample will be collected for routine clinical laboratory tests, and all antihyperglycemic therapy taken by patients will be reviewed. Patients who meet entrance criteria for the study and who currently take a stable antihyperglycemic agent (AHA) regimen according to the local prescribing information will be eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients who meet entrance criteria for the study but who are not taking a stable AHA regimen according to the local prescribing information will enter an AHA adjustment period that may last for up to 12 weeks. Patients will receive once daily treatment with study drug in addition to their current stable diabetes regimen (eg, diet, exercise, and medication therapy). Patients will continue to take their assigned treatment for 52 weeks (includes a 26-week core double-blind treatment period and a 26-week extension double-blind treatment period). During the study, if a patient's blood sugar remains high despite treatment with study drug in combination with their other antidiabetic agents, the study physician will modify the patient's treatment. If patients take insulin and experience low blood sugar (hypoglycemia), the dose of insulin may be modified. During the study, patients will be monitored for safety by review of adverse events, results from safety laboratory tests (including chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis), ECGs, vital signs measurements, body weight, physical examinations, self-monitored blood glucose, and collection of potential hypoglycemic episodes reported by patients on diary cards. The safety of patients in this study will also be monitored by a company internal Medical Safety Review Committee (MSRC). An Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) will evaluate cardiovascular (CV) events that are reported across the entire clinical development program for canagliflozin. Patients who complete the Week 52 visit or who discontinue treatment early and are withdrawn from the study will have end-of-study evaluations performed and a follow-up telephone interview conducted by study personnel approximately 30 days (but no more than 42 days) after the last dose of study drug to collect any serious adverse events that occurred since their last study visit. The primary outcome measures in the study are to assess the effect of canagliflozin relative to placebo on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, a blood test used to measure the control of diabetes) after 26 weeks of treatment and to assess the safety and tolerability of canagliflozin from time of signed informed consent to study end (includes up to 30 days following the last dose of study drug). All patients will take a single-blind placebo capsule once daily for 2 weeks before randomization to double-blind study drug. After randomization, patients will take one capsule of canagliflozin (either 100 mg or 300 mg) or matching placebo orally (by mouth) with liquid once daily for 52 weeks before the first meal each day except on days when fasting or pharmacokinetic blood samples are collected in which case study drug will be taken after the visit immediately before the patient's next meal.

Interventions

DRUGCanagliflozin

One 100 mg or 300 mg over-encapsulated tablet orally (by mouth) once daily for 52 weeks in addition to the patient's AHA regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information

DRUGPlacebo

One matching placebo capsule orally once daily for 52 weeks in addition to the patient's AHA regimen used in accordance with local prescribing information

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with T2DM not on an AHA or on any AHA in monotherapy or combination therapy (including oral or non oral agents) * Patients with reduced kidney function

Exclusion criteria

* History of diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), pancreas or beta cell transplantation, or diabetes secondary to pancreatitis or pancreatectomy * Have proliferative diabetic retinopathy for which treatment is planned during the course of the study * Kidney disease that required treatment with immunosuppressive therapy, history of dialysis or kidney transplant, presence of nephrotic syndrome (eg, severe proteinuria with hypoalbuminemia and/or edema), or inflammatory kidney disease * Receiving anti hypertensive or anti-hyperlipidemic therapy not on a stable regimen * History of a severe hypoglycemic episode within 6 months before screening

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26Week 26The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c \<7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, India, Latvia, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Poland, Romania, Russia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and moderate renal impairment. The study was conducted between 02 March 2010 and 19 January 2012 and recruited patients from 89 study centers located in 19 countries worldwide.

Pre-assignment details

272 patients were randomly allocated to the 3 treatment arms. 269 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug and were included in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis set and safety analysis set. Participant flow is presented in two parts: for Baseline to Week 26 as Core Period, and for Week 26 to Week 52 as Extension Period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Each patient received matching placebo once daily for 52 weeks.
90
Canagliflozin 100 mg
Each patient received 100 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks.
90
Canagliflozin 300 mg
Each patient received 300 mg of canagliflozin once daily for 52 weeks.
89
Total269

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Core Period: Baseline to Week 26Adverse Event442
Core Period: Baseline to Week 26Death010
Core Period: Baseline to Week 26Noncompliance with study drug010
Core Period: Baseline to Week 26Other472
Core Period: Baseline to Week 26Protocol Violation101
Core Period: Baseline to Week 26Withdrawal by Subject422
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Adverse Event212
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Death010
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Lost to Follow-up100
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Noncompliance with study drug100
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Other521
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Physician Decision100
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Protocol Violation111
Extension Period: Week 26 to Week 52Withdrawal by Subject101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCanagliflozin 100 mgPlaceboTotalCanagliflozin 300 mg
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
66 Participants63 Participants186 Participants57 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
24 Participants27 Participants83 Participants32 Participants
Age Continuous69.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
68.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
68.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.28
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.24
Region of Enrollment
AUSTRALIA
6 participants3 participants14 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
BELGIUM
1 participants5 participants12 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
BRAZIL
4 participants4 participants13 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
CANADA
11 participants7 participants21 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
FRANCE
5 participants7 participants16 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
GERMANY
10 participants6 participants18 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
INDIA
3 participants3 participants9 participants3 participants
Region of Enrollment
ITALY
1 participants4 participants6 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
LATVIA
1 participants2 participants7 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
MALAYSIA
4 participants2 participants14 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
MEXICO
2 participants0 participants4 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
NEW ZEALAND
2 participants7 participants14 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
POLAND
5 participants5 participants14 participants4 participants
Region of Enrollment
ROMANIA
1 participants2 participants5 participants2 participants
Region of Enrollment
RUSSIAN FEDERATION
11 participants10 participants30 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
SOUTH AFRICA
3 participants2 participants6 participants1 participants
Region of Enrollment
SOUTH KOREA
1 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants
Region of Enrollment
SPAIN
5 participants4 participants17 participants8 participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED STATES
14 participants16 participants47 participants17 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants33 Participants106 Participants41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants57 Participants163 Participants48 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 9021 / 9033 / 8946 / 9046 / 9048 / 89
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 9010 / 9010 / 8924 / 9018 / 9021 / 89

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Population: Analysis used mITT analysis set (all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug). Last-observation-carried-forward method used for missing Week 26 values. Measurements taken pre-rescue used as last observation in patients receiving glycemic rescue therapy. Table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26-0.03 PercentStandard Error 0.09
Canagliflozin 100 mgChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26-0.33 PercentStandard Error 0.09
Canagliflozin 300 mgChange in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26-0.44 PercentStandard Error 0.089
p-value: 0.01295% CI: [-0.529, -0.066]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-0.635, -0.174]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change.

Time frame: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Population: Analysis used mITT analysis set (all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug). Last-observation-carried-forward method used for missing Week 26 values. Measurements taken pre-rescue used as last observation in patients receiving glycemic rescue therapy. Table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 260.49 mg/dLStandard Error 5.089
Canagliflozin 100 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26-14.9 mg/dLStandard Error 5.089
Canagliflozin 300 mgChange in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26-11.7 mg/dLStandard Error 5.099
p-value: 0.02195% CI: [-28.45, -2.307]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.06995% CI: [-25.36, 0.962]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c \<7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage.

Time frame: Week 26

Population: Analysis used mITT analysis set (all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug). Last-observation-carried-forward method used for missing Week 26 values. Measurements taken pre-rescue used as last observation in patients receiving glycemic rescue therapy. Table includes only patients with both baseline and post baseline values.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 2617.2 Percentage of patients
Canagliflozin 100 mgPercentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 2627.3 Percentage of patients
Canagliflozin 300 mgPercentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 2632.6 Percentage of patients
p-value: 0.22795% CI: [0.73, 3.77]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.01795% CI: [1.19, 6.04]Regression, Logistic

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026