Skip to content

Physiology of Cough in Asthma: Comparison of Sensory-Mechanical Responses to Mannitol and Methacholine Challenge Tests

Physiology of Cough in Asthma: Comparison of Sensory-Mechanical Responses to Mannitol and Methacholine Challenge Tests

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01064245
Enrollment
29
Registered
2010-02-08
Start date
2010-02-01
Completion date
2021-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma, Cough Variant Asthma

Keywords

Asthma, Cough Variant Asthma, Mannitol, Methacholine, Cough, Hypersensitivity

Brief summary

Cough is a common, disruptive and at times disabling symptom which often prompts patients to seek medical attention. Determining the cause(s) of chronic cough can be challenging, and costly. Asthma and other airway disorders are among the most common causes of chronic cough; and cough can be the sole symptom of asthma. Little is known about why some patients with asthma primarily cough and do not develop the other symptoms of asthma such as shortness of breath or wheeze. Improved understanding of the reasons for these different manifestations may lead to new and more effective treatment strategies. We have notices differences in pressure measurements inside the chest in patients who mostly cough during induced bronchoconstriction, which might be part of the explanation for varying symptoms. This study will compare lung mechanical responses during methacholine and mannitol-induced induced airway narrowing between typical asthma, cough variant asthma (CVA) and an airway inflammatory disorder that is not asthma.The purpose of this research is to explore the pathophysiology and sensory-mechanics of cough in individuals with asthma, CVA and methacholine-induced cough but normal airway sensitivity using mannitol and high-dose methacholine bronchoprovocation testing.

Interventions

DRUGhigh-dose methacholine challenge test

nebulized liquid inhalation, 0.0625 - 256 mg/mL, doubling doses

OTHERmannitol challenge test

inhaled powder, 0 - 635 mg, increments of 5,10, 20 and 40 mg

Sponsors

The Ontario Thoracic Society of the Ontario Lung Association
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Queen's University (William M Spear / Start Memorial Fund)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Dr. Diane Lougheed
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Subjects with asthma or suspected CVA who have previously participated in or who have expressed interest in participating in studies will be invited to participate in the study. Previous treatment with inhaled or systemic corticosteroids is not an exclusion criterion, but medication use will be recorded and examined in the analysis.

Exclusion criteria

1. An exacerbation necessitating any alteration in medication, emergency department visit or hospitalizations within the previous 4 weeks; 2. Inability to perform acceptable quality spirometry; 3. Medical contraindications to methacholine challenge testing 35, including: 1. Severe airflow limitation (FEV1 \<50% predicted or \<1.0 L); 2. Heart attack or stroke in last 3 months; 3. Uncontrolled hypertension, systolic BP \> 200 or diastolic BP \> 100; 4. Known aortic aneurysm; 5. Moderate airflow limitation \< 60% predicted or \<1.5 L); 6. Inability to perform acceptable quality spirometry; 7. Current use of cholinesterase inhibitor medication (for myasthenia gravis); and 8. Pregnant or nursing mothers. 4. Smoking history in excess of 10 pack years; 5. Medical contraindications to mannitol challenge testing, including: 1. Aortic or cerebral aneurysm; 2. Uncontrolled hypertension; and 3. Myocardial infarction or a cerebral vascular accident in the previous six months). 6. Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding because the effects of a possible hyperresponsiveness reaction to mannitol in mothers and/or fetuses are unknown and many compounds are excreted in human milk therefore caution should be taken.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
PD15 (15% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline during challenge test visits)baseline and several time points collected throughout test (high-dose methacholine challenge test or mannitol challenge test)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
%ΔFEV1 (percentage change in forced expiratory volume in one second)baseline and several time points collected throughout test (high-dose methacholine challenge test or mannitol challenge test)
Plateau responsebaseline and several time points collected throughout test (high-dose methacholine challenge test or mannitol challenge test)
Dose-response slopebaseline and several time points collected throughout test (high-dose methacholine challenge test or mannitol challenge test)
Expiratory Flow Limitation (EFL)baseline and several time points collected throughout test (high-dose methacholine challenge test or mannitol challenge test)

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026