Skip to content

The Asia-Pacific Flexible Dose Study of Dapoxetine and Patient Satisfaction in Premature Ejaculation Therapy

The Asia-Pacific Flexible Dose Study of Dapoxetine and Patient Satisfaction in Premature Ejaculation Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01063881
Enrollment
285
Registered
2010-02-05
Start date
2010-05-22
Completion date
2011-06-14
Last updated
2024-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological

Keywords

Sexual Dysfunction, physiological, R096769, Dapoxetine, Phase 3b, Premature Ejaculation

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to measure the efficacy of flexible dosing of dapoxetine in a setting similar to routine clinical practice.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, interventional study to evaluate efficacy and safety of flexible dose dapoxetine as Premature Ejaculation (PE) Therapy. The total study duration will be 16 weeks, composed of a 2-week pretreatment phase and a 12-week open-label treatment phase, followed by a telephone contact two weeks after Week 12 to follow-up adverse events. At Visit 1 (Screening) standardized assessment tool or patient questionnaires will be used to determine which of those patients with erectile dysfunction/premature ejaculation are eligible to participate in this study. Once enrolled the patient and his partner are expected to attempt sexual intercourse a minimum of 2 times (at least 24 hours apart) and to complete a Baseline Event Log. Starting at Visit 2 (Baseline), the patient (and partner) will complete the Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP) at the beginning of every treatment visit for the duration of the study. Patients will be started on study drug instructed to take 1 tablet of dapoxetine 30 mg, as needed, 1 to 3 hours prior to sexual activity. The need for adjustments in the dose of dapoxetine, as well as to assess the occurrence of adverse events and concomitant therapy use will be assessed approximately every 4 weeks. Patients will complete Treatment Event Logs during each dosing throughout the open-label treatment phase. Patients who have their dose increased to 60 mg, will be scheduled for a telephone consultation 1 week after to determine how the dose change is tolerated. At Visit 5 (Final Visit/Week 12/Early Termination), the patients and partners will complete several standardized assessment questionnaires have all final visit procedures performed and schedule a telephone follow up contact to evaluate any adverse events. The starting dose of dapoxetine is 30 mg (one 30-mg tablet), taken approximately 1 to 3 hours prior to sexual activity. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks to 60 mg taken. The maximum recommended dosing frequency is once every 24 hours.

Interventions

Starting dose is one 30-mg tablet taken approximately 1-3 hours prior to sexual activity, may be increased after 4 weeks to 60mg, taken for 12 weeks. The maximum recommended dosing frequency is once every 24 hours.

Sponsors

Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must be heterosexual males and in a stable monogamous, sexual relationship with a female partner for at least 6 months * must score =11 in the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) * Must have a self-estimated intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) of = 2 minutes * Must have an International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF) score a total of \> or = to 21 in 6 questions from the IIEF used to assess for the absence of moderate to severe erectile dysfunction (ED) * Premature ejaculation is not exclusively due to the direct effects of a substance (e.g., withdrawal from opioids) * Must be in good general health with no clinically significant abnormalities as determined by medical history, physical examination, and clinical lab results * Must have a blood pressure =180 mmHg systolic and =100 mmHg diastolic at screening and at the baseline visit * Patient's partner must not be pregnant at screening as pregnancy might affect sexual activity * Participants and partners must agree to attempt sexual intercourse at least 2 times (with a minimum of 24 hours between each event) during the 2-week baseline period and at least 4 times per month during the remainder of the study.

Exclusion criteria

* History of or current major psychiatric disorder such as mood disorder, anxiety disorder, schizophrenia, mania, suicidal ideation, other psychotic disorder * History of alcohol abuse and dependence, non-alcohol psychoactive substance use disorder (except for caffeine or nicotine/tobacco) * Suspected history of illicit or recreational drug use * Known history of moderate to severe renal impairment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine TreatmentWeek 12The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), a patient-reported scale was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. Patients were asked: Compared to the start of the study, would you describe your premature ejaculation (PE) problem as: Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, or Much better? The number of patients who described improvement with their PE of at least slightly better after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseBaseline and Week 12The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of satisfaction with intercourse on a 5-point scale. Patients were asked: Over the past month, was your satisfaction with sexual intercourse Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, or Very Good? The number of patients who rated their level of satisfaction with control over ejaculation at before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationBaseline and Week 12The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of distress related to the speed of ejaculation. Patient's were asked: Over the past month, how distressed were you by how fast you ejaculated during sexual intercourse? Not at all, A little bit, Moderately, Quite a bit, Extremely. The number of patients who rated their level of personal distress related to the speed of ejaculation before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationBaseline and Week 12The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of interpersonal difficulty related to the speed of ejaculation. Patient's were asked: Over the past month, to what extent did how fast you/your partner ejaculated during sexual intercourse cause difficulty in your relationship with your partner? Not at all, A little bit, Moderately, Quite a bit, or Extremely? The number of patients who rated their level of interpersonal difficulty before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationBaseline and Week 12The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of control over intercourse on a 5-point scale. Patients were asked: Over the past month, was your level of control over ejaculation Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, or Very Good? The number of patients who rated their level of control over ejaculation before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.
The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Dosage)Week 12The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a slightly better response to treatment by the dose of dapoxetine they received in the study. This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study in which subgroup by dosage was categorized based on dose-titration patterns observed during the course of the treatment period.
The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Disease Type)Week 12The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a slightly better response to treatment when grouped by type of PE disease (patients with life-long PE and patients with acquired PE). This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study where patients were categorized based their PE disease after enrollment in the study.
The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time [IELT])Week 12The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a slightly better response to treatment when grouped by intravaginal ejaculation latency time (patients with an IELT of \< 1 minute and patients with an IELT of \> 1 minute). This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study where patients were categorized based on IELT after enrollment in the study.
Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineWeek 12The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), a patient-reported scale was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. Patients were asked: Compared to the start of the study, would you describe your premature ejaculation (PE) problem as: Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, or Much better? The number of patients reporting improvement in their PE by category of the CGIC scale after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Countries

Australia, South Korea, Thailand

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 285 patients were enrolled in the study, of which 281 patients received at least 1 dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis set (Dapoxetine 30 mg only \[144 patients\], Dapoxetine 30 t0 60 mg \[124 patients\] and Dapoxetine 30 to 60 to 30 mg \[13 patients\]).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Dapoxetine 30 mg Only
144 of 147 patients took at least 1 dose of dapoxetine 30 mg throughout the study. The maximum recommended dosing frequency is once every 24 hours. The duration of the treatment period was 12 weeks.
144
Dapoxetine 30 to 60 mg
124 of 125 patients took at least one dose of dapoxetine 30 mg and required an increase to dapoxetine 60 mg for the remainder of the study. The maximum recommended dosing frequency is once every 24 hours. The duration of the treatment period was 12 weeks.
124
Dapoxetine 30 to 60 to 30 mg
13 patients took at least one dose of dapoxetine 30 mg, required an increase to dapoxetine 60 mg but later required a down-titration (decrease) to dapoxetine 30 mg for the remainder of the study. The maximum recommended dosing frequency is once every 24 hours. The duration of the treatment period was 12 weeks.
13
Total281

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event1220
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1371
Overall StudyReason for not completed not specified510
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2510

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDapoxetine 30 to 60 mgDapoxetine 30 to 60 to 30 mgDapoxetine 30 mg OnlyTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
121 Participants13 Participants142 Participants276 Participants
Age, Continuous46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.47
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.77
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
45.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.39
Baseline BMI25.3 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2
23.9 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.78
24.7 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.79
24.9 kg/cm^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.99
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
124 Participants13 Participants144 Participants281 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
62 / 14457 / 12412 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 1440 / 1240 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment

The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), a patient-reported scale was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. Patients were asked: Compared to the start of the study, would you describe your premature ejaculation (PE) problem as: Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, or Much better? The number of patients who described improvement with their PE of at least slightly better after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment228 Patients
Secondary

Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With Dapoxetine

The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), a patient-reported scale was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. Patients were asked: Compared to the start of the study, would you describe your premature ejaculation (PE) problem as: Much worse, Worse, Slightly worse, No change, Slightly better, Better, or Much better? The number of patients reporting improvement in their PE by category of the CGIC scale after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineMuch worse0 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineWorse0 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineSlightly worse4 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineNo change25 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineSlightly better94 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineBetter101 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)Patient Responses to Improvement With Their Premature Ejaculation After 12 Weeks of Treatment With DapoxetineMuch better33 Patients
Secondary

The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Disease Type)

The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a slightly better response to treatment when grouped by type of PE disease (patients with life-long PE and patients with acquired PE). This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study where patients were categorized based their PE disease after enrollment in the study.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Disease Type)95 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Disease Type)133 Patients
Secondary

The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Dosage)

The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a slightly better response to treatment by the dose of dapoxetine they received in the study. This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study in which subgroup by dosage was categorized based on dose-titration patterns observed during the course of the treatment period.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Dosage)109 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Dosage)107 Patients
Dapoxetine 30 to 60 to 30 mgThe Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Dosage)12 Patients
Secondary

The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time [IELT])

The Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) was used to assess the patient's improvement with premature ejaculation (PE) since initiating treatment with dapoxetine. The data provided below represent the number of patients who reported at least a slightly better response to treatment when grouped by intravaginal ejaculation latency time (patients with an IELT of \< 1 minute and patients with an IELT of \> 1 minute). This was a single-arm, open-label, non-randomized study where patients were categorized based on IELT after enrollment in the study.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time [IELT])110 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Number of Patients Who Described Their Premature Ejaculation (PE) as At Least Slightly Better in Response to Dapoxetine Treatment (Subgroups by Intravaginal Ejaculation Latency Time [IELT])118 Patients
Secondary

The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of Ejaculation

The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of interpersonal difficulty related to the speed of ejaculation. Patient's were asked: Over the past month, to what extent did how fast you/your partner ejaculated during sexual intercourse cause difficulty in your relationship with your partner? Not at all, A little bit, Moderately, Quite a bit, or Extremely? The number of patients who rated their level of interpersonal difficulty before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationA little bit40 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationQuite a bit113 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationModerately78 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationExtremely31 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationNot at all12 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationExtremely7 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationNot at all87 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationA little bit82 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationModerately65 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Degree of Interpersonal Difficulty Related to the Speed of EjaculationQuite a bit37 Patients
Secondary

The Patient's Level of Control Over Ejaculation

The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of control over intercourse on a 5-point scale. Patients were asked: Over the past month, was your level of control over ejaculation Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, or Very Good? The number of patients who rated their level of control over ejaculation before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationVery poor120 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationGood2 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationPoor132 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationVery good0 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationFair20 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationVery good21 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationVery poor22 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationFair77 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationGood101 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Control Over EjaculationPoor57 Patients
Secondary

The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of Ejaculation

The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of distress related to the speed of ejaculation. Patient's were asked: Over the past month, how distressed were you by how fast you ejaculated during sexual intercourse? Not at all, A little bit, Moderately, Quite a bit, Extremely. The number of patients who rated their level of personal distress related to the speed of ejaculation before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationNot at all2 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationModerately32 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationA little bit32 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationQuite a bit140 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationExtremely68 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationQuite a bit40 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationExtremely17 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationNot at all66 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationA little bit89 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Personal Distress Related to the Speed of EjaculationModerately66 Patients
Secondary

The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With Intercourse

The Premature Ejaculation Profile (PEP), a patient-reported outcome measure was used to rate the patient's level of satisfaction with intercourse on a 5-point scale. Patients were asked: Over the past month, was your satisfaction with sexual intercourse Very poor, Poor, Fair, Good, or Very Good? The number of patients who rated their level of satisfaction with control over ejaculation at before treatment and after 12 weeks of treatment with dapoxetine are provided in the table below.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: The full analysis set (FAS) included all patients who took at least one dose of study drug and completed at least one assessment of efficacy.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseFair53 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseGood6 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercoursePoor152 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseVery good0 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseVery poor63 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseVery good30 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseFair89 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseVery poor14 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercoursePoor40 Patients
Dapoxetine (Week 12)The Patient's Level of Satisfaction With IntercourseGood105 Patients

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026