Skip to content

Effects of Exenatide on Hypothalamic Obesity

Effects of Exenatide on Hypothalamic Obesity

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01061775
Enrollment
19
Registered
2010-02-03
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2019-03-15
Last updated
2019-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypothalamic Obesity

Keywords

Hypothalamic Obesity, Exenatide, Byetta, Craniopharyngioma

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Exenatide on weight status (change in body mass index) of children treated for craniopharyngioma that have developed hypothalamic obesity at Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota. We hypothesize that Exenatide given to hypothalamic obese children for 6 months will reduce their body mass index significantly from baseline.

Detailed description

Hypothalamic obesity is when individuals suffer from acute weight gain after brain tumor treatment, involving secondary damage to the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus, which may lead to obesity. The weight gain is uncontrolled and not receptive to diet and exercise interventions. The rate of long-term obesity in children diagnosed with craniopharyngioma can be as high as 50%. Exenatide, a drug indicated for diabetes, is an incretin mimicking agent that mimics the enhancement of glucose-dependent insulin secretion and several other antihyperglycemic actions of incretins has resulted in weight loss when given to diabetics. Exenatide shows potential to benefit patients suffering from hypothalamic obesity by slowing gastric emptying and therefore reducing food intake. Also increasing the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) circulation, decreased due to obesity, at the already compromised GLP-1 receptor site of the hypothalamus could potentially help with regulation of appetite.

Interventions

DRUGExenatide

5mcg twice a day for 4 weeks increased to 10 mcg twice a day for 20 weeks.

Sponsors

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
10 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* \>/=6 months post surgical or radiation or chemotherapy treatment for 1° craniopharyngiomas or other suprasellar tumors * 10-21 years old * Age-and sex-adjusted BMI \>/=95% * Parent sign consent and patient sign assent

Exclusion criteria

* \< 6 months post surgical or radiation or chemotherapy treatment for 1° craniopharyngiomas or other suprasellar tumors * Pregnant or breastfeeding, or those women who plan to get pregnant * Renal impairment * Gastroparesis * Pancreatitis * Diabetes * \<1 month post initiation of Metformin treatment * Prescription or over-the-counter weight loss medications within 3 months of screening * Are actively participating in, or have participated in a formal weight loss program within the last 3 months * Have had bariatric surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
BMI Change24 weeksBMI was collected at baseline and 24 weeks
Waist to Height Ratio (WHtR)24 weeksWaist circumference was measured at the natural waist level (midway between the lowest rib margin and the iliac crest) at baseline and 24 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Childhood Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ)24 weeksThe Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) was designed as parent-report measure comprised of 35 items, each rated on a five-point likert scale that ranges from never to always. We utilized the CEBQ as a self-report measure during this study; it has not been validated for such use. For the purposes of this study, we looked at the Satiety Responsiveness Subscale Scores (5 questions; total scores could range from 5-25 with lower scores denoting a lower level of satiety). The results reported show the change between baseline and week 24 scores.
Calorie Intake Based on 3-day Diet Records24 weeksDietary data were collected via 3-day diet records (Crawford et al. 1994) twice during the study, at baseline and week 24. Three-day diet records were collected on consecutive days including one weekend day. A registered dietitian (RD) instructed subjects on dietary data collection at baseline appointment. Depending on the age and capacity of the subject, the patient, parent or a collaboration of both recorded dietary intake. A RD entered dietary data into Nutritionist Pro software (First DataBank, SanBruno, CA) and the mean difference was analyzed.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exenatide
Exenatide: 5mcg twice a day for 4 weeks increased to 10 mcg twice a day for 20 weeks.
19
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExenatide
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
16 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants
Age, Continuous15 years
BMI35 kg/m^2
Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire11.47 units on a scale
Height160.8 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3
Hip Circumference113.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16
Region of Enrollment
United States
19 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
11 Participants
Tumor Type
Craniopharyngioma
14 participants
Tumor Type
Optic chiasm-hypothalamic glioma
2 participants
Tumor Type
Suprarasellar germinoma
2 participants
Tumor Type
Thalamic astrocytoma
1 participants
Waist Circumference111.6 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.5
Waist to Height Ratio0.98 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.08
Weight89 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.2

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

BMI Change

BMI was collected at baseline and 24 weeks

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The effects of exenatide on BMI were analyzed using a paired t-test comparing BMI at baseline with BMI after six months of treatment with each patient serving as his or her own control.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ExenatideBMI Change-0.77 kg/m^2
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Primary

Waist to Height Ratio (WHtR)

Waist circumference was measured at the natural waist level (midway between the lowest rib margin and the iliac crest) at baseline and 24 weeks

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: All analyses were performed using SPSS (version 20.0.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL).

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ExenatideWaist to Height Ratio (WHtR)-2.06 percentageStandard Deviation 0.08
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Calorie Intake Based on 3-day Diet Records

Dietary data were collected via 3-day diet records (Crawford et al. 1994) twice during the study, at baseline and week 24. Three-day diet records were collected on consecutive days including one weekend day. A registered dietitian (RD) instructed subjects on dietary data collection at baseline appointment. Depending on the age and capacity of the subject, the patient, parent or a collaboration of both recorded dietary intake. A RD entered dietary data into Nutritionist Pro software (First DataBank, SanBruno, CA) and the mean difference was analyzed.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The sample size was small due to missing data

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ExenatideCalorie Intake Based on 3-day Diet Records406.700 kcals
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Childhood Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ)

The Child Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (CEBQ) was designed as parent-report measure comprised of 35 items, each rated on a five-point likert scale that ranges from never to always. We utilized the CEBQ as a self-report measure during this study; it has not been validated for such use. For the purposes of this study, we looked at the Satiety Responsiveness Subscale Scores (5 questions; total scores could range from 5-25 with lower scores denoting a lower level of satiety). The results reported show the change between baseline and week 24 scores.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: Paired t-tests were performed to compare the satiety survey (continuous). Three subjects discontinued prior to completing the Week 24 CEBQ.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
ExenatideChildhood Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ)14 units on a scale
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026