Skip to content

Stress and Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students

Physiological and Psychological Responses to Stress in Year 6 Medical Students Faced to Ambulatory Symptomatic Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01061255
Enrollment
62
Registered
2010-02-03
Start date
2009-11-09
Completion date
2010-04-12
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stress

Keywords

Stress, Cortisol, Clinical reasoning, Ambulatory setting, Medical students, Year 6 medical students

Brief summary

Solving a problem in ambulatory setting may contain peripheral stress due to socio-evaluative stressors (patient's expectations about explanations) and task contingent stress due to time pressure, the necessity to take into account patient's mood, to deal with uncertainty of their own data collection and with complex clinical situations. In France, excepted for family medicine, undergraduate medical students and residents are currently not trained to perform consultations and are never exposed to ambulatory patients during training. The investigators postulate that this lack of practice may generate a significant state of stress during the first consultations and consequently modify or even impair clinical reasoning. The primary objective of this study is to compare subjective and physiological levels of acute stress in ambulatory versus hospitalization setting in medical students confronted to a real patient with a diagnostic problem. Measures: The French version of the Anxiety Spielberger test is administered just before and after each problem solving session. Cortisol salivary samples are taken before and after each problem solving session. Salivary cortisol levels have been shown to be correlated to stressful situations and some personality traits but with some difference according to gender. Cognitive appraisal (threat/challenge) is assessed before and after the tasks by the ratio of primary appraisal to secondary appraisal according to Tomaka et al.

Detailed description

Participants and Method: Year 6 medical students who attend a one-month full-time course in an Internal Medicine Department are eligible. Since no consultations in the ambulatory setting are currently structured for medical students, the following adjustments have been done within the internal medicine consultation department, with the approval of the department director: * the consultation duration has been increased (1 hour instead of 30 minutes) * during the first 30 minutes, consultation is performed by the participant * during the following 30 minutes, the patient is examined by his/her own physician. * The consent of the patient has been obtained by phone (prior to the consultation).

Interventions

OTHEREvaluation of the stress

Medical Students having to solve a medical problem in ambulatory setting (studied group) vs. in hospitalisation setting (control group). Measures: The French version of the Anxiety Spielberger test is administered just before and after each problem solving session. Cortisol salivary samples are taken before and after each problem solving session. Salivary cortisol levels have been shown to be correlated to stressful situations and some personality traits but with some difference according to gender.

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Year 6 medical students who attend a one-month full-time course in an Internal Medicine Department

Exclusion criteria

* Student who repeats his year 6 of medicine * Student treated with corticoids

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Increase in salivary cortisol and in Spielberger scoreone hour

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in the cognitive appraisal (challenge or threat)one hour

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPierre POTTIER, Dr

Nantes University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026