Skip to content

A Study to Determine the Safety and Effectiveness of RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

An Exploratory, Open-label, Non-randomized, Within-patient Multiple Dose-escalation Safety, Tolerability, PK and Efficacy Trial of RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients With Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01059318
Enrollment
24
Registered
2010-01-29
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2020-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Keywords

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis,, High Resolution CT scan,, chest x-ray,, 6 minute walk test,, pulse oximetry,, renal MRI,, Pikometer

Brief summary

This was an exploratory study to determine whether escalating doses of RAD001 (everolimus) were safe and effective in patients with Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Detailed description

In addition to the data collected in this study, historical data from 43 patients treated with placebo from the multicenter trial of sirolimus in LAM (MILES) study (NCT00414648) were down weighted to an effective sample size of 18 for comparison of FEV1 and FVC endpoints. Reference to the publication of the MILES study has been provided under Result Publication.

Interventions

DRUGEverolimus

Everolimus was formulated as tablets in strengths of 2.5mg, 5mg and 10mg.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female aged \>/= 18 years with a diagnosis of LAM * Pulmonary function abnormalities as follows: * FEV1 of ≤ 80% of the predicted value following administration of a standard dose of a short acting β2-agonist (\*200 µg Salbutamol, measured between 10 and 15 minutes of inhalation) OR * FEV1 \< 90% of the predicted value of bronchodilator following administration of a standard dose of a short acting β2-agonist (\*200 µg Salbutamol, measured between 10 and 15 minutes of inhalation) and DLco (uncorrected) \<80% predicted. * Female patients including those of childbearing potential will be included in this study. * Negative pregnancy test at screening and baseline

Exclusion criteria

* FEV1\<50% of predicted post-bronchodilator. * Change in FVC (ml) \> ± 15% of screening value at baseline visit (not less than 14d after screening visit). * Use of any medicine containing estrogen in the 4 months prior to the screening visit and for the duration of the study * Significant hematologic, renal, hepatic laboratory abnormality or amylase \> 1.5x the upper limit of the normal range at the screening or baseline visits * Fasting blood glucose \> 126mg/dl or random blood glucose \>200mg/dl at screening and/or baseline * Recent surgery (involving entry into a body cavity or requiring sutures) within 2 months of the screening visit or any evidence of unhealed surgical wound. * Uncontrolled hyperlipidemia (defined as persistent elevation of total cholesterol or triglycerides \>6.5nM/L) or a history of clinical atherosclerotic disease including heart attack, angina, peripheral vascular disease or stroke. * Previous organ transplantation * Inability to give informed consent * Inability to perform pulmonary function or 6 minute walk tests and imaging assessments Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D (VEGF-D) ConcentrationsBaseline, 26 weeksBlood samples (1 mL) for determination of VEGF-D were collected from a forearm vein (direct venipuncture or from an indwelling cannula) and 2 aliquots of serum were collected. VEGF-D levels were determined from only 1 of the 2 serum aliquots, with the second acting as a back-up. A serum VEGF-D \>800 pg/mL level supports a diagnosis of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)
Mean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady Statepre-dose and at 2 hour post dose at week 26Venous blood samples (2 mL) for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected pre dose and 2 hours post dose at preselected visits.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function TestingBaseline, 26 weeksExtended pulmonary function testing such as Total Lung Capacity (TLC), Thoracic Gas Volume (TGV), Residual Volume (RV) were measured using a body plethysmograph
Change From Baseline in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)Baseline, 26 weeksCarbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO) one of the extended pulmonary function testing which was also measured using a body plethysmograph.
Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)Baseline, 26 weeksAll spirometry evaluation followed recommendations of the Standardization of Lung Function Testing. All spirometry maneuvers were performed in sitting position whilst wearing nose clips. At least three acceptable maneuvers were performed for each time point, and results met within-test and between-test criteria for acceptability. The highest value was obtained of FVC from any of the three maneuvers that met acceptability criteria. Change from baseline in FVC was compared between everolimus and historical placebo data from multicenter trial of sirolimus in LAM. (MILES NCT00414648) due to absence of placebo group in this current study on a rare lung disease. These two studies had different study designs, so the change from baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) in MILES study was estimated from the publicly reported rate of change per month to provide a meaningful comparison. This historical control be can be viewed on the Novartis Clinical Trial Results website.
Change From Baseline in Oxygen SaturationBaseline, 26 weeksOxygen saturation means the amount of oxygen in blood stream. Oxygen saturation was measured by using a Pulse Oximeter.
Change From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Test Score to Measure Exercise CapacityBaseline, 26 weeksA standardized 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society 2002. The test was done about the same time of day to avoid diurnal variation in an environment that had an adequate temperature to avoid additional burden to the patient due to heat or cold air. The distance walked in six minutes (6MWD) was recorded.
Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)Baseline, 26 weeksAll spirometry evaluation followed the recommendations of the Standardization of Lung Function Testing. All spirometry maneuvers were performed in the sitting position whilst wearing nose clips. At least three acceptable maneuvers were performed for each time point, and the results met within-test and between-test criteria for acceptability. The highest value was obtained of FEV1 from any of the three maneuvers that met acceptability criteria. Change from baseline in FEV1 was compared between everolimus and historical placebo data from the MILES study (NCT00414648) due to the absence of a placebo group in this current study on a rare lung disease. These two studies had different study designs, so the change from baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) in MILES study was estimated from the publicly reported rate of change per month in order to provide a meaningful comparison. This historical control can be viewed on the Novartis Clinical Trial Results website.

Countries

France, Italy, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Everolimus
All patients received a starting dose of everolimus 2.5mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by a dose of 5 mg/day for 4 weeks and finally a dose of 10mg/day for 18 weeks. The 26 week treatment period was followed by an optional extension period wherein patients continued therapy until the last patient had completed 26-weeks of treatment. The longest period a patient participated in the study was 62 weeks. Everolimus : Everolimus was formulated as tablets in strengths of 2.5mg, 5mg and 10mg.
24
Total24

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Core Study (26 Week)Adverse Event3
Core Study (26 Week)Withdrawal by Subject1
Extension (36 Week)Adverse Event3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimus
Age, Continuous44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
24 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D (VEGF-D) Concentrations

Blood samples (1 mL) for determination of VEGF-D were collected from a forearm vein (direct venipuncture or from an indwelling cannula) and 2 aliquots of serum were collected. VEGF-D levels were determined from only 1 of the 2 serum aliquots, with the second acting as a back-up. A serum VEGF-D \>800 pg/mL level supports a diagnosis of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM)

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis included patients who received study drug without any major protocol violation. Same patients in different dose groups were included in this analysis with available data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D (VEGF-D) Concentrations-464.3 pg/mLStandard Deviation 745.23
Everolimus 5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D (VEGF-D) Concentrations-1113.2 pg/mLStandard Deviation 1468.9
Everolimus 10 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-D (VEGF-D) Concentrations-1771.7 pg/mLStandard Deviation 2091.6
Primary

Mean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady State

Venous blood samples (2 mL) for pharmacokinetic evaluation were collected pre dose and 2 hours post dose at preselected visits.

Time frame: pre-dose and at 2 hour post dose at week 26

Population: Pharmacokinetics analysis set. Patients with measurable data at particular time points were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayMean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady StateTrough (C0, ss)3.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 1.33
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayMean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady StatePeak (C2, ss)12.1 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.56
Everolimus 5 mg/DayMean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady StateTrough (C0, ss)5.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.02
Everolimus 5 mg/DayMean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady StatePeak (C2, ss)22.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.22
Everolimus 10 mg/DayMean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady StateTrough (C0, ss)11.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 3.45
Everolimus 10 mg/DayMean Trough (C0,ss) and Peak (C2,ss) Drug Concentration at Steady StatePeak (C2, ss)45.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 12.52
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Test Score to Measure Exercise Capacity

A standardized 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the American Thoracic Society 2002. The test was done about the same time of day to avoid diurnal variation in an environment that had an adequate temperature to avoid additional burden to the patient due to heat or cold air. The distance walked in six minutes (6MWD) was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Test Score to Measure Exercise Capacity46.9 meters (m)Standard Deviation 115.3
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)

Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO) one of the extended pulmonary function testing which was also measured using a body plethysmograph.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Carbon Monoxide Diffusing Capacity (DLCO)-0.782 ml/min/mmHgStandard Deviation 1.5351
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function Testing

Extended pulmonary function testing such as Total Lung Capacity (TLC), Thoracic Gas Volume (TGV), Residual Volume (RV) were measured using a body plethysmograph

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function TestingTGV0.267 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 1.0368
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function TestingRV0.169 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.9055
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Extended Pulmonary Function TestingTLC0.199 Liters (L)Standard Deviation 0.8645
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)

All spirometry evaluation followed the recommendations of the Standardization of Lung Function Testing. All spirometry maneuvers were performed in the sitting position whilst wearing nose clips. At least three acceptable maneuvers were performed for each time point, and the results met within-test and between-test criteria for acceptability. The highest value was obtained of FEV1 from any of the three maneuvers that met acceptability criteria. Change from baseline in FEV1 was compared between everolimus and historical placebo data from the MILES study (NCT00414648) due to the absence of a placebo group in this current study on a rare lung disease. These two studies had different study designs, so the change from baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) in MILES study was estimated from the publicly reported rate of change per month in order to provide a meaningful comparison. This historical control can be viewed on the Novartis Clinical Trial Results website.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set for everolimus reporting arm. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1)114 mL
Comparison: Proof of Concept was proposed as follows:~* 90% level of proof that difference in FEV1 change from baseline everolimus vs. Historical Placebo Control arm from MILES study \> 0 mL~* 50% level of proof that difference in FEV1 change from baseline everolimus vs. Historical Placebo Control arm from MILES study \>= 100 mL~Historical data from 43 patients treated with placebo from the MILES study were down weighted to an effective sample size of 18 for comparison.95% CI: [93, 279]Bayesian analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)

All spirometry evaluation followed recommendations of the Standardization of Lung Function Testing. All spirometry maneuvers were performed in sitting position whilst wearing nose clips. At least three acceptable maneuvers were performed for each time point, and results met within-test and between-test criteria for acceptability. The highest value was obtained of FVC from any of the three maneuvers that met acceptability criteria. Change from baseline in FVC was compared between everolimus and historical placebo data from multicenter trial of sirolimus in LAM. (MILES NCT00414648) due to absence of placebo group in this current study on a rare lung disease. These two studies had different study designs, so the change from baseline to 6 months (26 weeks) in MILES study was estimated from the publicly reported rate of change per month to provide a meaningful comparison. This historical control be can be viewed on the Novartis Clinical Trial Results website.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set for everolimus reporting arm. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)10 mL
Comparison: Proof of Concept was proposed as follows:~* 90% level of proof that difference in FVC change from baseline everolimus vs. Historical Placebo Control arm from MILES study \> 0 mL~* 50% level of proof that difference in FVC change from baseline everolimus vs. Historical Placebo Control arm from MILES study \>= 100 mL~Historical data from 43 patients treated with placebo from the MILES study were down weighted to an effective sample size of 18 for comparison.95% CI: [-45, 196]Bayesian analysis
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation

Oxygen saturation means the amount of oxygen in blood stream. Oxygen saturation was measured by using a Pulse Oximeter.

Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamic analysis set. Patients with both baseline and 26 weeks assessment were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Everolimus 2.5 mg/DayChange From Baseline in Oxygen Saturation0.8 percentage of oxygenStandard Deviation 2.13

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026