Skip to content

a Randomized Multicenter Trial Comparing Vacuum Assisted Delivery With the New Device iCUP Versus the Reference Cup.

Assess the Risk-benefit Balance of the New Vacuum Assisted-delivery Device iCUP Versus the Reference Vacuum. Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01058200
Acronym
ICUP
Enrollment
668
Registered
2010-01-28
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2013-07-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Failures, Medical Device, Maternal Lesions, Neonatal Lesions, Randomized Controlled Trials, Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical

Brief summary

The hypothesis is that the new vacuum assisted delivery device iCup is more effective than the reference cup, in terms of maternal and newborn morbidities and functioning

Detailed description

Currently, instrumental extractions are used in about 10% to 15% of the 860 000 annual deliveries in France and the use of vacuum extractors increases from year to year. In addition to sterilizable vacuum extractors several different types of vacuum extractor have been developed, in particular the single use Kiwi cup or the so-called 'soft' cup extractors. However, studies evaluating these new cups have not shown their superiority in comparison to the conventional metallic vacuum extractor. Accordingly, it is legitimate to assess the new vacuum extractor iCup, an innovative mix of metallic cup and 'soft' cups that should combine the advantages of both; and to compare the iCup vacuum extractor with the sterilizable metallic cup extractor, the most effective vacuum extractors available to date.

Interventions

DEVICEiCup

new vacuum extractor: sterile disposable plastic cup

DEVICEreference cup

reference cup of the obstetrical ward: metallic cup

Sponsors

University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* maternal age between 18 and 45 years old * singleton delivery after 37 weeks, in cephalic presentation, * indication of vacuum extraction, * affiliation to the french social security system or equivalent

Exclusion criteria

* no informed consent * singleton delivery before 37 weeks, in non-cephalic presentation, * patient deprived of freedom

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Composite outcome: cup detachments (failure=3 detachments), other instrument used, caesarean section, caput succedaneum, cephalohaematoma, maternal perineal lesions. If one of these criteria at least is present, outcome is noted 'failure'; else 'success'one day

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
maternal lesions: cervix lesions, postpartum haemorrhage28 days maximum
neonatal lesions: minor scalp injuries, Apgar score < 7, pH < 7.20, anaemia, jaundice, transfer28 days maximum
medico-economic criteria: cost-effectiveness analysis of the studied medical devices28 days maximum

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026