Skip to content

Investigational Multi-purpose Contact Lens Care Solution.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01055613
Enrollment
312
Registered
2010-01-25
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contact Lens Wear

Brief summary

This study compares an investigational contact lens care multi-purpose solution to a currently marketed multi-purpose solution.

Interventions

DEVICEVistakon Investigational Multi-Purpose Solution I

Multi-purpose contact lens care solution.

Multi-purpose contact lens care solution

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* must be an adapted contact lens wearer * best corrected distance visual acuity must be 20/25 or better in each eye * must be wearing their habitual lenses on a daily wear basis * must be willing to refrain from swimming during the study

Exclusion criteria

* any systemic diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear * any clinically significant ocular disease * any ocular infection * use of certain medications * any grade 2 or greater slit lamp findings * any know sensitivity to marketed contact lens care solutions * currently pregnant or lactating * monovision corrected

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Slit Lamp Findings3 monthsEach subjects' eye was examined using a bio-microscope. Slit lamp findings were graded with a 5-point scale (i.e. Grade 0= None, Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). The number of eyes with Grade 3 or higher for each lens was reported for each assessment.
Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)Up to 3 MonthsDistance visual acuity was collected at the 1-, 2-, 3-week and 1- and 3- month follow-up evaluations. The average LogMAR across all visits for each lens type was reported.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 312 subjects were enrolled in this study. Of the enrolled subjects 12 did not meet the eligibility criteria and 300 were randomized to treatment using an allocation of 2:1 for test and control, respectively. Of the 300 randomized subjects 13 were discontinued from the study and 287 subjects completed the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Experimental Mutli-purpose Solution
Experimental multi-purpose solution (Test treatment) .
200
ReNu Multi-purpose Solution
Marketed multi-purpose solution (Control Treatment).
100
Total300

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDiscomfort21
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyNo Longer Meets Eligibility Criteria30
Overall StudyProtocol Violation11
Overall StudySubject Disinterest11
Overall StudyUnacceptable lens fit10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExperimental Mutli-purpose SolutionReNu Multi-purpose SolutionTotal
Age, Continuous32.40 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.231
31.05 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.624
31.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.928
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Native Alaskian
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
5 participants6 participants11 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or other Island Pacificer
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
6 participants3 participants9 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
185 participants88 participants273 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
200 participants100 participants300 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
145 Participants71 Participants216 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
55 Participants29 Participants84 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2000 / 100
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 2000 / 100

Outcome results

Primary

Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)

Distance visual acuity was collected at the 1-, 2-, 3-week and 1- and 3- month follow-up evaluations. The average LogMAR across all visits for each lens type was reported.

Time frame: Up to 3 Months

Population: The analysis population consists of subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Experimental Multi-purpose SolutionDistance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)-0.030 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0639
ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose SolutionDistance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)-0.031 LogMARStandard Deviation 0.0634
Primary

Slit Lamp Findings

Each subjects' eye was examined using a bio-microscope. Slit lamp findings were graded with a 5-point scale (i.e. Grade 0= None, Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). The number of eyes with Grade 3 or higher for each lens was reported for each assessment.

Time frame: 3 months

Population: The analysis population consists of all subjects that were dispensed a solution during the course of the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Experimental Multi-purpose SolutionSlit Lamp FindingsCorneal Staining11 Subjects Eyes
Experimental Multi-purpose SolutionSlit Lamp FindingsConjunctival Staining0 Subjects Eyes
Experimental Multi-purpose SolutionSlit Lamp FindingsTarsal Abnormalities14 Subjects Eyes
ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose SolutionSlit Lamp FindingsCorneal Staining16 Subjects Eyes
ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose SolutionSlit Lamp FindingsConjunctival Staining0 Subjects Eyes
ReNu MultiPlus Multi-Purpose SolutionSlit Lamp FindingsTarsal Abnormalities12 Subjects Eyes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026