Lymphoma, B-Cell
Conditions
Keywords
Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Brief summary
This is a phase 1 trial designed to evaluate safety and tolerability of chemotherapy in combination with inotuzumab ozogamicin, an investigational product, in adults with CD22-positive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The trial will involve two arms. In one arm, subjects will receive chemotherapy regimen R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone). In the other arm, subjects will receive R-GDP (rituximab, gemcitabine, cisplatinum and dexamethasone). Subjects in both arms will also receive inotuzumab ozogamicin.
Interventions
Day 1: Rituximab at 375 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide at 375 mg/m2 (cohort 1), 550mg/m2 (cohort 2), 750 mg/m2 (cohort 3, 4) Vincristine at 1.4 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) Day 2 Inotuzumab ozogamicin at 0.8 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2, 3), 1.3 mg/m2 (cohort 4) Days 1-5: Prednisone at 40 mg/m2 Each cycle is 3 weeks, with a maximum of 6 cycles total.
Day 1: Rituximab at 375 mg/m2 Gemcitabine at 500 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2b, 3b), 1000mg/m2 (cohort 2a, 3a, 4, 5) Cisplatin at 37.5 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2a), 50mg/m2 (cohort 2b, 3a), 75mg/m2 (cohort 3b, 4, 5) Day 2: Inotuzumab ozogamicin at 0.8 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4), 1.3mg/m2 (cohort 5) Days 1-4: Dexamethasone at 40 mg Each cycle is 3 weeks, with a maximum of 6 cycles total.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Dose escalation cohorts: subjects with diagnosis of CD22-positive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) who have had at least 1 prior anticancer treatment, including prior treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy. * Expanded maximum tolerated dose (MTD) confirmation and preliminary efficacy cohorts: subjects with diagnosis of CD22-positive NHL who have had at least 1 prior anticancer treatment, including prior treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy or newly diagnosed subjects who are not candidates for anthracycline-based therapy. * At least 1 measurable disease lesion that is \> 1 cm in the longest transverse diameter, with a product of the diameters \> 2.25 cm2 by CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Exclusion criteria
* Candidate for potentially curative therapy such as stem cell transplantation. * Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). * Prior autologous transplantation, radioimmunotherapy, or other anti CD22 immunotherapy \<= 6 months before the first dose of investigational product. * More than 3 previous combination chemotherapy (2 or more cytotoxics) anticancer regimens.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1 | From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle. | DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle. |
| Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2 | From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle. | DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle. |
| Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts | From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks. | OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (less than or equal to \[≤\]1.5 centimeters \[cm\] in their greatest transverse diameter (GTD) for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the sum of the product diameters (SPD) of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | SAEs were assessed from informed consent through and including the end of treatment visit (at least 28 calendar days after last study drug administration). Non-SAEs were recorded from time of the first dose of study drug through last participant visit. | An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event may not necessarily have had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those occurring on or after the first study drug dose day through and including 56 days post last dose of study drug. The severity of all AEs was graded by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AE Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0). |
| Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy | Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, on Day 8 of each cycle, on Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days. | The following parameters were analyzed for blood chemistry: blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, phosphorus, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin (and direct bilirubin, if total bilirubin was elevated), alkaline phosphatase, uric acid (or urate), albumin and total protein. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling. |
| Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy | Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, Day 8 of each cycle, Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days. | The following parameters were analyzed for hematology: lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, prothrombin international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 6, 12, and 24 months | OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period | OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. |
| Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE Cohorts | From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks. | OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (≤1.5 cm in their GTD for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions. |
| Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Pre-dose on Cycle 1, Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 3 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 2; 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 3 and 168 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 8. | Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were required for participants enrolled in the confirmatory and preliminary efficacy MTD cohorts only (Parts 2 and 3). Concentrations of inotuzumab ozogamicin in serum were determined using appropriate, validated unconjugated (also known as free) bioanalytical assays. |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 6, 12, and 24 Months | OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE Cohorts | From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks | PFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with overall response of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or disease progression (PD), but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose. |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 6, 12 and 24 months | Measure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive. |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks | PFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with OR of CR, PR, SD, or PD, but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose. |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts. | 6, 12, and 24 months | Measure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive. |
| Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE Cohorts | From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period | OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact. |
Countries
Belgium, Canada, France, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Screening included CD-20 & CD-22 immunophenotyping of NHL, international prognostic index or follicular lymphoma international prognostic index score, B-symptom and lymphoma evaluation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, left ventricular ejection fraction assessment, computed tomography scans, bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Arm 1 (R-CVP) Plus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin IV inotuzumab ozogamicn (0.8 or 1.3 mg/m\^2 on Day 2 of each 21-day cycle) in combination with rituximab (375 mg/m\^2) and vincristine (1.4mg/m\^2) administererd IV on day 1, prednisone (40mg/m\^2) PO on Day 1-5 and cyclophosphamid IV (375, 550 or 750 mg/m\^2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (R-CVP) for a maximum of 6 cycles. | 48 |
| Arm 2 (R-GDP) Plus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin IV inotuzumab ozogamicin (0.8 mg/m\^2 on Day 2 of each 21-day cycle) in combination with IV Rituximab (375 mg/m\^2 on Day 1), dexamethasone (40 mg PO on Days 1 to 4), and escalating doses of IV gemcitabine (500 or 1000 mg/m\^2) or IV cisplatinum (0, 37.5, 50 or 75 mg/m\^2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (R-GDP) for a maximum of 6 cycles. | 55 |
| Total | 103 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 13 | 23 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Other - Unspecified | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 4 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Arm 1 (R-CVP) Plus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Arm 2 (R-GDP) Plus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 62.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9 | 62.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | 62.2 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 21 Participants | 18 Participants | 39 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 27 Participants | 37 Participants | 64 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 48 / 48 | 55 / 55 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 15 / 48 | 25 / 55 |
Outcome results
Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2
DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.
Time frame: From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.
Population: Safety Analysis Population includes all subjects who received at least 1 cycle of study drug. Analysis population for DLT is participants evaluable for DLT.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2 | 2 Participants |
| Cohort 3, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 4, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2 | 2 Participants |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2 | 0 Participants |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2 | Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2 | 3 Participants |
Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1
DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.
Time frame: From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.
Population: Safety Analysis Population includes all subjects who received at least 1 cycle of study drug. Analysis population for DLT is participants evaluable for DLT.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1 | 0 Participants |
| Cohort 3, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1 | 1 Participants |
| Cohort 4, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1 | 2 Participants |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1 | 2 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy
The following parameters were analyzed for blood chemistry: blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, phosphorus, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin (and direct bilirubin, if total bilirubin was elevated), alkaline phosphatase, uric acid (or urate), albumin and total protein. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling.
Time frame: Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, on Day 8 of each cycle, on Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy | 21.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy | 36.4 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy
The following parameters were analyzed for hematology: lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, prothrombin international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling.
Time frame: Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, Day 8 of each cycle, Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.
Population: Safety population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy | 91.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy | 96.4 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event may not necessarily have had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those occurring on or after the first study drug dose day through and including 56 days post last dose of study drug. The severity of all AEs was graded by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AE Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0).
Time frame: SAEs were assessed from informed consent through and including the end of treatment visit (at least 28 calendar days after last study drug administration). Non-SAEs were recorded from time of the first dose of study drug through last participant visit.
Population: Safety population - included all participants who received ≥1 cycle of investigational product
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with dose reduced due to AEs | 16.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 89.6 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects discontinued due to AEs | 27.1 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with AEs | 100 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with temporary discontinuation due to AEs | 54.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with SAEs | 31.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with Grade 5 AEs | 4.2 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with SAEs | 45.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with Grade 5 AEs | 5.5 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects discontinued due to AEs | 36.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with dose reduced due to AEs | 32.7 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with temporary discontinuation due to AEs | 67.3 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with Grade 3 or 4 AEs | 96.4 Percentage of Participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE | Subjects with AEs | 100 Percentage of Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts
OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (less than or equal to \[≤\]1.5 centimeters \[cm\] in their greatest transverse diameter (GTD) for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the sum of the product diameters (SPD) of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks.
Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all participants enrolled into the study
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts | 81.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts | 53.6 Percentage of participants |
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts
OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | NA Months |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | NA Months |
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE Cohorts
OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE Cohorts | NA Months |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE Cohorts | NA Months |
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts
PFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with OR of CR, PR, SD, or PD, but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 14.36 Months |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 6.14 Months |
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE Cohorts
PFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with overall response of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or disease progression (PD), but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE Cohorts | 16.36 Months |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE Cohorts | 10.12 Months |
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts
Measure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive.
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 12 months | 66.67 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 24 months | 22.22 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 6 months | 80.00 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 12 months | 47.92 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 24 months | 33.54 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 6 months | 60.98 Percent Probability |
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.
Measure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive.
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts. | 12 months | 51.54 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts. | 24 months | 44.67 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts. | 6 months | 61.85 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts. | 6 months | 54.74 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts. | 12 months | 24.88 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts. | 24 months | NA Percent Probability |
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts
OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 12 months | 80.00 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 24 months | 80.00 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 6 months | 100.00 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 12 months | 62.96 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 24 months | 55.09 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts | 6 months | 74.07 Percent Probability |
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts
OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.
Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 Months
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 12 months | 78.13 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 6 months | 84.38 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 24 months | 71.61 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 6 months | 88.00 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 12 months | 59.11 Percent Probability |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts | 24 months | 53.74 Percent Probability |
Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations
Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were required for participants enrolled in the confirmatory and preliminary efficacy MTD cohorts only (Parts 2 and 3). Concentrations of inotuzumab ozogamicin in serum were determined using appropriate, validated unconjugated (also known as free) bioanalytical assays.
Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1, Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 3 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 2; 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 3 and 168 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 8.
Population: PK population - included all participants who provided samples for PK analysis.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 1 Day 2, 0h | NA ng/mL | — |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 1 Day 2, 0h | NA ng/mL | — |
| Cohort 3, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 1 Day 2, 0h | NA ng/mL | — |
| Cohort 4, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 1 Day 2, 0h | NA ng/mL | — |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 3, 24h | 110.39 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 37.468 |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 2, 0h | NA ng/mL | — |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 2, 3h | 213.95 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 71.692 |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 8, 168h | NA ng/mL | — |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 2, 1h | 189.74 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 81.528 |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 1 Day 2, 0h | NA ng/mL | — |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 8, 168h | NA ng/mL | — |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 2, 1h | 283.27 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 127.151 |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 2, 3h | 280.33 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 119.12 |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 3, 24h | 154.25 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 81.608 |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 3 Day 2, 0h | 25.00 ng/mL | Standard Deviation 76.151 |
| MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2 | Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations | Cycle 1 Day 2, 0h | NA ng/mL | — |
Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE Cohorts
OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (≤1.5 cm in their GTD for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.
Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks.
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE Cohorts | 81.3 Percentage of participants |
| Cohort 2, Arm 1 | Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE Cohorts | 51.9 Percentage of participants |