Skip to content

Study Evaluating Chemotherapy in Combination With Inotuzumab Ozogamicin In Subjects With Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma

AN OPEN-LABEL, PHASE 1 STUDY OF R-CVP OR R-GDP IN COMBINATION WITH INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN IN SUBJECTS WITH CD22-POSTIVE NON-HODGKIN'S LYMPHOMA

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01055496
Enrollment
103
Registered
2010-01-25
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2014-03-31
Last updated
2019-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lymphoma, B-Cell

Keywords

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Brief summary

This is a phase 1 trial designed to evaluate safety and tolerability of chemotherapy in combination with inotuzumab ozogamicin, an investigational product, in adults with CD22-positive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The trial will involve two arms. In one arm, subjects will receive chemotherapy regimen R-CVP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone). In the other arm, subjects will receive R-GDP (rituximab, gemcitabine, cisplatinum and dexamethasone). Subjects in both arms will also receive inotuzumab ozogamicin.

Interventions

DRUGinotuzumab ozogamicin+rituximab +cyclophosphamide+vincristine+prednisone

Day 1: Rituximab at 375 mg/m2 Cyclophosphamide at 375 mg/m2 (cohort 1), 550mg/m2 (cohort 2), 750 mg/m2 (cohort 3, 4) Vincristine at 1.4 mg/m2 (max 2 mg) Day 2 Inotuzumab ozogamicin at 0.8 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2, 3), 1.3 mg/m2 (cohort 4) Days 1-5: Prednisone at 40 mg/m2 Each cycle is 3 weeks, with a maximum of 6 cycles total.

DRUGinotuzumab ozogamicin+rituximab+gemcitabine+cisplatinum+dexamethasone

Day 1: Rituximab at 375 mg/m2 Gemcitabine at 500 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2b, 3b), 1000mg/m2 (cohort 2a, 3a, 4, 5) Cisplatin at 37.5 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2a), 50mg/m2 (cohort 2b, 3a), 75mg/m2 (cohort 3b, 4, 5) Day 2: Inotuzumab ozogamicin at 0.8 mg/m2 (cohort 1, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 4), 1.3mg/m2 (cohort 5) Days 1-4: Dexamethasone at 40 mg Each cycle is 3 weeks, with a maximum of 6 cycles total.

Sponsors

UCB Pharma
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Dose escalation cohorts: subjects with diagnosis of CD22-positive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) who have had at least 1 prior anticancer treatment, including prior treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy. * Expanded maximum tolerated dose (MTD) confirmation and preliminary efficacy cohorts: subjects with diagnosis of CD22-positive NHL who have had at least 1 prior anticancer treatment, including prior treatment with rituximab and chemotherapy or newly diagnosed subjects who are not candidates for anthracycline-based therapy. * At least 1 measurable disease lesion that is \> 1 cm in the longest transverse diameter, with a product of the diameters \> 2.25 cm2 by CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Exclusion criteria

* Candidate for potentially curative therapy such as stem cell transplantation. * Prior allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). * Prior autologous transplantation, radioimmunotherapy, or other anti CD22 immunotherapy \<= 6 months before the first dose of investigational product. * More than 3 previous combination chemotherapy (2 or more cytotoxics) anticancer regimens.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.
Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.
Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE CohortsFrom first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks.OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (less than or equal to \[≤\]1.5 centimeters \[cm\] in their greatest transverse diameter (GTD) for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the sum of the product diameters (SPD) of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.
Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESAEs were assessed from informed consent through and including the end of treatment visit (at least 28 calendar days after last study drug administration). Non-SAEs were recorded from time of the first dose of study drug through last participant visit.An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event may not necessarily have had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those occurring on or after the first study drug dose day through and including 56 days post last dose of study drug. The severity of all AEs was graded by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AE Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0).
Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During TherapyWithin 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, on Day 8 of each cycle, on Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.The following parameters were analyzed for blood chemistry: blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, phosphorus, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin (and direct bilirubin, if total bilirubin was elevated), alkaline phosphatase, uric acid (or urate), albumin and total protein. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling.
Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During TherapyWithin 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, Day 8 of each cycle, Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.The following parameters were analyzed for hematology: lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, prothrombin international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts6, 12, and 24 monthsOS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE CohortsFrom first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up periodOS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.
Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE CohortsFrom first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks.OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (≤1.5 cm in their GTD for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.
Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsPre-dose on Cycle 1, Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 3 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 2; 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 3 and 168 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 8.Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were required for participants enrolled in the confirmatory and preliminary efficacy MTD cohorts only (Parts 2 and 3). Concentrations of inotuzumab ozogamicin in serum were determined using appropriate, validated unconjugated (also known as free) bioanalytical assays.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts6, 12, and 24 MonthsOS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE CohortsFrom first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeksPFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with overall response of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or disease progression (PD), but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts6, 12 and 24 monthsMeasure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE CohortsFrom first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeksPFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with OR of CR, PR, SD, or PD, but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose.
Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.6, 12, and 24 monthsMeasure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE CohortsFrom first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up periodOS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, France, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Screening included CD-20 & CD-22 immunophenotyping of NHL, international prognostic index or follicular lymphoma international prognostic index score, B-symptom and lymphoma evaluation, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, left ventricular ejection fraction assessment, computed tomography scans, bone marrow aspirate and/or biopsy.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1 (R-CVP) Plus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin
IV inotuzumab ozogamicn (0.8 or 1.3 mg/m\^2 on Day 2 of each 21-day cycle) in combination with rituximab (375 mg/m\^2) and vincristine (1.4mg/m\^2) administererd IV on day 1, prednisone (40mg/m\^2) PO on Day 1-5 and cyclophosphamid IV (375, 550 or 750 mg/m\^2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (R-CVP) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
48
Arm 2 (R-GDP) Plus Inotuzumab Ozogamicin
IV inotuzumab ozogamicin (0.8 mg/m\^2 on Day 2 of each 21-day cycle) in combination with IV Rituximab (375 mg/m\^2 on Day 1), dexamethasone (40 mg PO on Days 1 to 4), and escalating doses of IV gemcitabine (500 or 1000 mg/m\^2) or IV cisplatinum (0, 37.5, 50 or 75 mg/m\^2) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle (R-GDP) for a maximum of 6 cycles.
55
Total103

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath1323
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02
Overall StudyOther - Unspecified01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject24

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1 (R-CVP) Plus Inotuzumab OzogamicinArm 2 (R-GDP) Plus Inotuzumab OzogamicinTotal
Age, Continuous62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
62.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
62.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants18 Participants39 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
27 Participants37 Participants64 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 4855 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
15 / 4825 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 2

DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.

Population: Safety Analysis Population includes all subjects who received at least 1 cycle of study drug. Analysis population for DLT is participants evaluable for DLT.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 20 Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 22 Participants
Cohort 3, Arm 1Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 21 Participants
Cohort 4, Arm 1Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 22 Participants
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 20 Participants
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2Participants Reporting DLT AEs for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 23 Participants
Primary

Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 1

DLT was defined as: febrile neutropenia, Grade (Gr) 4 neutropenia ≥7 days, Gr 4 thrombocytopenia ≥7 days, Gr 3/4 thrombocytopenia associated with bleeding requiring a transfusion, Gr 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity (except alopecia) ≥7 days or treatment-related and clinically significant irrespective of duration, ≥Gr 3 QTc prolongation, Gr 4 alanine or aspartate aminotransferase, Gr 2 hyperbilirubinemia (greater than (\>)1.5 x upper normal limit) \>7 days, delayed recovery from a treatment-related toxicity that prevented re-dosing by \>7 days, or Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor treatment during the first cycle.

Time frame: From the first dose of study medication (Study Day 1) to the completion of the first 21-day cycle.

Population: Safety Analysis Population includes all subjects who received at least 1 cycle of study drug. Analysis population for DLT is participants evaluable for DLT.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 10 Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 10 Participants
Cohort 3, Arm 1Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 11 Participants
Cohort 4, Arm 1Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 12 Participants
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Participants Reporting Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Adverse Events (AEs) for Participants in the DE Cohort and the MTD Confirmation Cohort for Arm 12 Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy

The following parameters were analyzed for blood chemistry: blood urea nitrogen (or urea), creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, phosphorus, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin (and direct bilirubin, if total bilirubin was elevated), alkaline phosphatase, uric acid (or urate), albumin and total protein. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling.

Time frame: Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, on Day 8 of each cycle, on Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy21.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Chemistry Abnormality During Therapy36.4 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy

The following parameters were analyzed for hematology: lymphocytes, basophils, eosinophils, erythrocytes, hematocrit, hemoglobin, leukocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, platelets, prothrombin international normalized ratio, prothrombin time, fibrinogen, and activated partial thromboplastin time. Laboratory test results were graded using the NCI CTCAE v3.0 where CTCAE Grade 3 equals severe and CTCAE Grade 4 equals life threatening or disabling.

Time frame: Within 3 days prior to the start of each cycle, Day 8 of each cycle, Day 15 of Cycles 1, 2, and 3, and the end-of-treatment visit. Each Cycle is 21 Days.

Population: Safety population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy91.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With Any Grade 3/4 Hematology Abnormality During Therapy96.4 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AE

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event may not necessarily have had a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. A serious adverse event (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as those occurring on or after the first study drug dose day through and including 56 days post last dose of study drug. The severity of all AEs was graded by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for AE Version 3.0 (NCI CTCAE v3.0).

Time frame: SAEs were assessed from informed consent through and including the end of treatment visit (at least 28 calendar days after last study drug administration). Non-SAEs were recorded from time of the first dose of study drug through last participant visit.

Population: Safety population - included all participants who received ≥1 cycle of investigational product

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with dose reduced due to AEs16.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with Grade 3 or 4 AEs89.6 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects discontinued due to AEs27.1 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with AEs100 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with temporary discontinuation due to AEs54.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with SAEs31.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with Grade 5 AEs4.2 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with SAEs45.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with Grade 5 AEs5.5 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects discontinued due to AEs36.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with dose reduced due to AEs32.7 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with temporary discontinuation due to AEs67.3 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with Grade 3 or 4 AEs96.4 Percentage of Participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Treatment Emergent AESubjects with AEs100 Percentage of Participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts

OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (less than or equal to \[≤\]1.5 centimeters \[cm\] in their greatest transverse diameter (GTD) for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the sum of the product diameters (SPD) of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks.

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population: all participants enrolled into the study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts81.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response (OR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the MTD and EE Cohorts53.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts

OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE CohortsNA Months
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the OS in the MTD Confirmation/EE CohortsNA Months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE Cohorts

OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE CohortsNA Months
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Overall Survival (OS) in the DE CohortsNA Months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts

PFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with OR of CR, PR, SD, or PD, but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts14.36 Months
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the PFS in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts6.14 Months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE Cohorts

PFS was defined as time from date of first dose to the earlier date of progression (including symptomatic deterioration), date of death from any cause, or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. Participants without an event were censored at the date of the last valid tumour assessment. A valid tumour assessment visit was defined as the tumour assessment visit with overall response of CR, PR, stable disease (SD), or disease progression (PD), but not 'Not Done' or 'Unknown'. Participants without a post-baseline tumour assessment and without a PFS event were censored on the date of first dose.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE Cohorts16.36 Months
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimate of the Progression-Free Survival (PFS) in the DE Cohorts10.12 Months
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts

Measure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive.

Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts12 months66.67 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts24 months22.22 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts6 months80.00 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts12 months47.92 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts24 months33.54 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts6 months60.98 Percent Probability
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.

Measure includes death from any cause, PD (including symptomatic deterioration) during and after treatment or initiation of new anticancer therapy for the lymphoma. PD was defined as symptomatic deterioration and according to the International Response Criteria for NHL: 1) appearance of any new lesion \>1.5 cm in any axis during or at EOT, even if other lesions are decreasing, 2) at least a 50% increase from nadir in the SPD of any previously involved or single involved nodes, or the size of other lesions (splenic or hepatic). Lymph nodes with a short axis diameter of \<1.0 cm must increase by ≥50% and to a size of 1.5x1.5 cm or \>1.5 cm in the long axis, 3) 50% increase in the longest diameter of any single previously identified node \>1 cm in its short axis. PD was defined as clinical PD, new non-nodal lesions or new nodal lesion ≥1.5 cm in GTD, progression of existing non-index lesions or bone marrow that was negative and now positive.

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.12 months51.54 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.24 months44.67 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.6 months61.85 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.6 months54.74 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.12 months24.88 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive and Free From PD or New Anticancer Therapy at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts.24 monthsNA Percent Probability
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts

OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts12 months80.00 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts24 months80.00 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts6 months100.00 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts12 months62.96 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts24 months55.09 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the DE Cohorts6 months74.07 Percent Probability
Secondary

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts

OS was defined from date of first dose to date of death due to any cause, censoring at the date of last contact.

Time frame: 6, 12, and 24 Months

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts12 months78.13 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts6 months84.38 Percent Probability
Cohort 1, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts24 months71.61 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts6 months88.00 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts12 months59.11 Percent Probability
Cohort 2, Arm 1Kaplan-Meier Estimates of the Probability of Being Alive at 6, 12, and 24 Months in the MTD Confirmation/EE Cohorts24 months53.74 Percent Probability
Secondary

Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum Concentrations

Pharmacokinetic (PK) samples were required for participants enrolled in the confirmatory and preliminary efficacy MTD cohorts only (Parts 2 and 3). Concentrations of inotuzumab ozogamicin in serum were determined using appropriate, validated unconjugated (also known as free) bioanalytical assays.

Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1, Day 2; Pre-dose, 1 and 3 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 2; 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 3 and 168 hours post-dose on Cycle 3, Day 8.

Population: PK population - included all participants who provided samples for PK analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cohort 1, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 1 Day 2, 0hNA ng/mL
Cohort 2, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 1 Day 2, 0hNA ng/mL
Cohort 3, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 1 Day 2, 0hNA ng/mL
Cohort 4, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 1 Day 2, 0hNA ng/mL
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 3, 24h110.39 ng/mLStandard Deviation 37.468
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 2, 0hNA ng/mL
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 2, 3h213.95 ng/mLStandard Deviation 71.692
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 8, 168hNA ng/mL
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 2, 1h189.74 ng/mLStandard Deviation 81.528
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 1Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 1 Day 2, 0hNA ng/mL
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 8, 168hNA ng/mL
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 2, 1h283.27 ng/mLStandard Deviation 127.151
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 2, 3h280.33 ng/mLStandard Deviation 119.12
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 3, 24h154.25 ng/mLStandard Deviation 81.608
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 3 Day 2, 0h25.00 ng/mLStandard Deviation 76.151
MTD Confirmation Cohort, Arm 2Mean Inotuzumab Ozogamicin Serum ConcentrationsCycle 1 Day 2, 0hNA ng/mL
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE Cohorts

OR was evaluated according to the International Response Criteria for NHLs. CR was defined as complete disappearance of all lesions and disease-related symptoms; all nodes must have decreased to normal (≤1.5 cm in their GTD for nodes \>1.5 cm before therapy) or ≤1 cm (short axis) in previously involved node; enlarged spleen prior to therapy must have regressed and be non-palpable; bone marrow lymphoma: infiltrate must have been cleared on repeat bone marrow aspirate and biopsy. PR was defined as \>50% decrease in the SPD of up to 6 index lesions. No increase in size of other nodes, liver or spleen. Splenic and hepatic nodules must have regressed by ≥50% in the SPD or GTD (for single nodules). With the exception of splenic and hepatic nodules, involvement of other organs is usually assessable and no measurable disease should be present. No progression of non-target disease or new lesions.

Time frame: From first dose of study medication through 2 year follow-up period, including but not limited to planned assessments scheduled every 9 to 24 weeks.

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Cohort 1, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE Cohorts81.3 Percentage of participants
Cohort 2, Arm 1Percentage of Participants With a Best OR of CR or PR According to International Response Criteria for NHLs in the DE Cohorts51.9 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026