Skip to content

Neuromodulation of Trauma Memories in PTSD & Alcohol Dependence

Treatment Implications of Trauma Memory Modulation for PTSD & Alcohol Dependence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01055171
Enrollment
44
Registered
2010-01-25
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2016-03-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Dependence, PTSD

Keywords

alcohol dependence, PTSD, propanolol, craving, beta-block, cue exposure, addiction, memory, trauma, addictive behavior

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effect of propranolol versus placebo on craving, distress and cue reactivity to trauma and alcohol cues.

Detailed description

Summary and Synthesis: Epidemiological studies have established the occurrence of high rates of AD in persons with PTSD. Likewise, studies of alcohol/drug abuse treatment seekers have documented high rates of trauma exposure and PTSD. The high prevalence of PTSD/AD comorbidity is the cause of enormous human suffering, most of which either goes untreated or is resistant to treatment efforts. Both theory and research concerning the interface between these two disorders suggests that PTSD is associated with the initiation of excessive alcohol use and/or the development of AD by way of an escape/avoidance behavioral mechanism wherein escalating alcohol use is reinforced by its ability to dampen the negative emotions and arousal associated with PTSD. If PTSD is often a primary cause of the initiation and maintenance of AD, then clinical interventions that primarily impact PTSD should lead to significant improvements in craving for, and use of, alcohol. The findings of two recent treatment studies offer especially compelling support for this expectation. Drawing on both basic neuroscience research and a developing body of suggestive clinical/applied research, we were led to consider if the putative memory modulating properties of the adrenergic antagonist propranolol might have therapeutic benefits for PTSD/AD comorbid individuals. Thus, the proposed study will test the hypothesis that the strategic administration of propranolol coupled with the elicitation/retrieval of trauma-related memories will dampen emotional distress, alcohol craving and cue reactivity during subsequent exposure to trauma- and alcohol-related cues. A two-week follow-up laboratory session and clinical assessment will permit us to evaluate whether treatment benefits are maintained over time and if there are any changes in alcohol use and PTSD symptomatology.

Interventions

DRUGPropranolol

40 mg; Single Administration.

DRUGPlacebo

40 mg; Single Dose.

Sponsors

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)
CollaboratorNIH
Medical University of South Carolina
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must meet DSM-IV criteria for current alcohol dependence * Participants must have experienced criminal victimization * Use of birth control by female participants * Live within a 50-mile radius of research site * Consent to remain abstinent of all drugs and alcohol for 24 hours prior to patient admission and follow-up * Consent to random assignment to propanol or placebo * Individuals must be able to provide informed consent and function at an intellectual level sufficient to allow accurate completion of all assessment instruments.

Exclusion criteria

* Women who are pregnant, nursing or are of childbearing potential and not using birth control. * Evidence or history of significant hematological, endocrine, cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal or neurological disease * Significant liver impairment * Currently taking anti-arrhythmic agents, psychostimulants or other agents known to interfere with heart rate and skin conductance monitoring. * Known or suspected hypersensitivity to propanol * Individuals taking medication that could adversely interact with the study medication, including the following: albuterol, insulin or significant inhibitors of CYP2D6 * Individuals with bronchial asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * Prospective participants will be excluded if they are currently receiving exposure-based therapy for PTSD. * Individuals with a history of or current psychotic disorder. * Individuals with Addison's disease, Cushing's disease or other diseases of the adrenal cortex likely to affect cortisol levels. * Individuals receiving synthetic glucocorticoid therapy, any exogenous therapy, or treatment with other agents that interfere with HPA axis function within one month of the time of testing. * Individuals with resting heart rates less than 55 bpm.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Retrieval Session Distress Scores (Session 1)Multiple times throughout cue exposure during retrieval session (Session 1)Found by using our Single Item Distress (SID) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of distress they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no distress and 100 extreme distress.
Retrieval Session Craving Scores (Session 1)Multiple times throughout cue exposure during retrieval session (Session 1)Found by using our Single Item Craving (SIC) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of craving they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no craving and 100 extreme craving for alcohol.
Test Session Distress Scores (Session 2)Multiple times throughout cue exposure during test session (Session 2)Found by using our Single Item Distress (SID) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of distress they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no distress and 100 extreme distress.
Test Session Craving Scores (Session 2)Multiple times throughout cue exposure during test session (Session 2)Found by using our Single Item Craving (SIC) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of craving they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no craving and 100 extreme craving for alcohol.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Drinking Days90 days prior to participation in study up to 2-week follow up session (Session 3)Proportion of drinking days from 90 days prior to the screening to the follow-up period.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants were considered enrolled if they completed both the retrieval and testing procedure (44).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Propranolol
Patients will receive Propranolol in this condition. Propranolol: 40 mg; Single Administration.
21
Placebo
Patient to receive placebo in this condition. Placebo: 40 mg; Single Dose.
23
Total44

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPropranololPlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
Greater than or equal to 35 years
14 Participants17 Participants31 Participants
Age, Customized
Less than 35 years
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants10 Participants22 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Retrieval Session Craving Scores (Session 1)

Found by using our Single Item Craving (SIC) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of craving they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no craving and 100 extreme craving for alcohol.

Time frame: Multiple times throughout cue exposure during retrieval session (Session 1)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PropranololRetrieval Session Craving Scores (Session 1)49.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 31.3
PlaceboRetrieval Session Craving Scores (Session 1)71.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 20.4
Primary

Retrieval Session Distress Scores (Session 1)

Found by using our Single Item Distress (SID) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of distress they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no distress and 100 extreme distress.

Time frame: Multiple times throughout cue exposure during retrieval session (Session 1)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PropranololRetrieval Session Distress Scores (Session 1)54.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 26.8
PlaceboRetrieval Session Distress Scores (Session 1)73.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 20.9
Primary

Test Session Craving Scores (Session 2)

Found by using our Single Item Craving (SIC) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of craving they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no craving and 100 extreme craving for alcohol.

Time frame: Multiple times throughout cue exposure during test session (Session 2)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PropranololTest Session Craving Scores (Session 2)51.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
PlaceboTest Session Craving Scores (Session 2)53.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
Primary

Test Session Distress Scores (Session 2)

Found by using our Single Item Distress (SID) scale. A study team member asks the participant to verbally report the level of distress they were experiencing using values between 0 and 100, with 0 representing no distress and 100 extreme distress.

Time frame: Multiple times throughout cue exposure during test session (Session 2)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PropranololTest Session Distress Scores (Session 2)35.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
PlaceboTest Session Distress Scores (Session 2)48.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
Secondary

Proportion of Drinking Days

Proportion of drinking days from 90 days prior to the screening to the follow-up period.

Time frame: 90 days prior to participation in study up to 2-week follow up session (Session 3)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PropranololProportion of Drinking Days42.2 Drinking daysStandard Error 6.4
PlaceboProportion of Drinking Days45.9 Drinking daysStandard Error 6.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026