Skip to content

Furosemide vs Placebo for Brain Relaxation

The Effect of Furosemide Versus Placebo on Brain Relaxation and Incidence of Significant Intravascular Volume Depletion in Human Subjects Receiving Mannitol

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01054404
Enrollment
23
Registered
2010-01-22
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2013-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Edema, Brain Swelling, Dehydration

Keywords

Brain Swelling, Brain Edema, Dehydration

Brief summary

Increased brain bulk may be problematic during brain surgery for tumors because it may limit surgical exposure and access to the surgical site. Mannitol, an osmotic diuretic, is commonly given to alleviate brain bulk, and sometimes furosemide in a small dose is added if mannitol alone is insufficient. It is unclear if adding this furosemide truly helps to diminish brain bulk, and it is possible that furosemide may cause too much diuresis, leading to dehydration and its side effects (e.g., low blood pressure). Our purpose is to investigate what the effects of furosemide are in the setting of brain surgery for tumors, specifically with regards to decreasing brain bulk and/or causing dehydration. Study Hypothesis: The addition of furosemide to mannitol will result in improved brain relaxation in human subjects undergoing craniotomy for brain tumor resection than that seen with mannitol alone. However, the combination of mannitol and furosemide will also lead to more significant intravascular volume depletion than that seen with mannitol alone.

Detailed description

Rating of brain relaxation will be on a 4-point scale: 0 = brain very relaxed under dura, acceptable 1. = brain adequately relaxed under dura, acceptable 2. = brain slightly tense under dura, acceptable 3. = brain very tense under bulging dura, unacceptable

Interventions

DRUGFurosemide

Furosemide 0.3 mg/kg

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo (up to 5mL)

Sponsors

Northwestern University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Inclusion criteria include: * ASA PS I-III * Age 18 or older * Presenting for elective resection of primary or metastatic supratentorial brain tumor(s)

Exclusion criteria

* • ASA PS IV or V * Age less than 18 * Emergency surgery due to severely elevated ICP/impending brainstem herniation * Concurrent use of diuretics for any indication * Infratentorial/posterior fossa/cerebellar tumor resection * Moderate/severe cardiac disease with limitation in contractility as measured by preoperative echocardiogram (EF \< 30%) * Severe pulmonary hypertension as measured and/or observed by preoperative studies * Preoperative use of steroids (within 6 months, including those on standing doses) * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acceptable vs. Unacceptable Brain Relaxation at Dural Openingjust prior to dural opening for each subjectRating of brain relaxation will be on a 4-point scale: 0 = brain very relaxed under dura, acceptable 1. = brain adequately relaxed under dura, acceptable 2. = brain slightly tense under dura, acceptable 3. = brain very tense under bulging dura, unacceptable

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

23 patients enrolled sequentially, no dropouts

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Furosemide
Furosemide : Furosemide 0.3 mg/kg
10
Placebo
Placebo : Placebo (up to 5mL)
13
Total23

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboFurosemideTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants8 Participants18 Participants
Age Continuous52.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
51 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.6
51.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
Region of Enrollment
United States
13 participants10 participants23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants6 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 100 / 13
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 13

Outcome results

Primary

Acceptable vs. Unacceptable Brain Relaxation at Dural Opening

Rating of brain relaxation will be on a 4-point scale: 0 = brain very relaxed under dura, acceptable 1. = brain adequately relaxed under dura, acceptable 2. = brain slightly tense under dura, acceptable 3. = brain very tense under bulging dura, unacceptable

Time frame: just prior to dural opening for each subject

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FurosemideAcceptable vs. Unacceptable Brain Relaxation at Dural Opening1.5 units on a scale 0-3Standard Error 0.17
PlaceboAcceptable vs. Unacceptable Brain Relaxation at Dural Opening1.3 units on a scale 0-3Standard Error 0.13

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026