Skip to content

Comparison of Sugammadex With Neostigmine as Reversal Agents for Rocuronium at Reappearance of T2 (Study P06101)

A Randomized Safety-Assessor Blinded Trial Comparing Sugammadex With Neostigmine in Korean Subjects Scheduled for Surgeries Requiring Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01050543
Acronym
DANCHEONG
Enrollment
128
Registered
2010-01-15
Start date
2010-02-01
Completion date
2010-08-20
Last updated
2017-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuromuscular Blockade

Brief summary

This is a randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, single-dose, multi-site, safety-assessor blinded study comparing sugammadex to neostigmine for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in Korean subjects undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia that require rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade. Study medication will be administered at reappearance of T2. Time to recovery will be measured from start of study medication administration to recovery of the T4/T1 ratio of 0.9. The primary hypothesis is that the time to recovery of the T4/T1 ratio of 0.9 is shorter with sugammadex than with neostigmine.

Interventions

DRUGsugammadex

sugammadex 2.0 mg/kg, single intravenous bolus dose administered within 10 seconds into a fast flowing venous infusion

DRUGneostigmine

neostigmine 50 mcg/kg (total dose not to exceed 5.0 mg) combined with glycopyrrolate 10 mcg/kg, single intravenous bolus dose administered within 10 seconds into a fast flowing venous infusion

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists Class 1 or 2 or 3 * \>=18 years of age and of either sex * scheduled for elective surgical procedure under general anesthesia requiring the use of rocuronium for endotracheal intubation and/or maintenance of neuromuscular blockade in a supine position allowing neuromuscular transmission monitoring and requiring reversal of neuromuscular blockade * Korean descent born in Korea, never emigrated out of Korea, and have a Korean home address

Exclusion criteria

* expected difficult intubation due to anatomic malformations * expected transfer to intensive care unit after surgery * neuromuscular disorders affecting neuromuscular blockade * significant hepatic or renal dysfunction * require use of pneumatic tourniquet during surgery * (family) history of malignant hyperthermia * allergy to cyclodextrins (including sugammadex) or other medication(s) used during general anesthesia; use of toremifene or fusidic acid within 24 hours of study drug administration; contraindication to use of neostigmine or glycopyrrolate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 (estimated from 2 minutes up to ~15 minutes)Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive Train-Of-Four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds & assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 & T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the 1st & 4th twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade. In this study, twitch responses were recorded until the T4/T1 Ratio reached \>= 0.9, the minimum acceptable ratio that indicated complete recovery.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sugammadex
sugammadex 2 mg/kg
60
Neostigmine
neostigmine 50 mcg/kg
60
Total120

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative41
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSugammadexNeostigmineTotal
Age, Continuous41.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
42.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants23 Participants44 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants37 Participants76 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 6042 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 602 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Time From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9

Neuromuscular functioning was monitored by applying repetitive Train-Of-Four (TOF) electrical stimulations to the ulnar nerve every 15 seconds & assessing twitch response at the adductor pollicis muscle. T1 & T4 refer to the magnitudes (height) of the 1st & 4th twitches, respectively, after TOF nerve stimulation. The T4/T1 Ratio (expressed as a decimal of up to 1.0) indicates the extent of recovery from neuromuscular blockade. In this study, twitch responses were recorded until the T4/T1 Ratio reached \>= 0.9, the minimum acceptable ratio that indicated complete recovery.

Time frame: From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.9 (estimated from 2 minutes up to ~15 minutes)

Population: Full Analysis Set, defined as all participants who received randomized treatment and had at least one efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
SugammadexTime From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.91.77 minutes
NeostigmineTime From Start of Study Drug Administration to Recovery of the T4/T1 Ratio to 0.914.80 minutes
Comparison: To evaluate the efficacy of sugammadex compared to the efficacy of neostigmine, the ratio of the geometric means of time to recovery of the T4/T1 ratio to 0.9 was calculated using a 2-way ANOVA model adjusted for trial site.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [6.8, 9.6]ANOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026