Skip to content

Robotics For Rehabilitation Therapy: Functional Versus Individual Joint Training

Robotics For Rehabilitation Therapy: Functional Versus Individual Joint Training

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01050231
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-01-15
Start date
2006-10-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2021-04-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebrovascular Accident

Keywords

stroke, cerebrovascular accident, robot

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to develop an upper extremity robotic training system for use by people with stroke to practice arm and hand movement in the clinic.

Detailed description

Each year in the U.S. over 400,000 people survive a stroke and approximately 80% of acute stroke survivors lose arm and hand movement skills. Movement impairments are typically treated with intensive, hands-on physical and occupational therapy for several weeks after the initial brain injury. Unfortunately, due to economic pressure on the U.S. health care system, stroke patients are receiving less therapy and going home sooner. Our goal for this study is to develop an upper extremity robotic training system for both acute and chronic stroke population to improve movement ability with intensive and repetitive movement in the clinic without continuous supervision from a therapist.

Interventions

DEVICEFunctional/ Multi-joints activities

Subjects participated in 4 weeks of robotic training with the device: BONES (Biomimetic Orthosis Neurorehabilitation for Elbow and Shoulder), 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with the robotic exercise program focusing on functional tasks such as cleaning the windows, driving a steering wheel, grocery shopping, etc.

DEVICEIndividual Joint Training

Subjects participated in 4 weeks of training with the robotic device BONES, 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with a robot-assisted exercise program. The robotic exoskeleton assists in arm and hand movements focusing on one joint at a time.

Sponsors

University of California, Irvine
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 73 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 73 * Sustained single stroke at least three months previously * Minimal to moderate lost motor control of the arm after stroke

Exclusion criteria

* Concurrent severe medical problems * Severe cognitive dysfunction * Severe neglect or apraxia * Severe visual deficits * Significant subluxation of the shoulder * Presence of severe elbow or wrist contracture * Any metal implants or surgical clips or mechanical devices * Metallic hardware on scalp region * prior diagnosis of seizure and epilepsy * severe migraine headache * currently pregnant or lactating * claustrophobic * currently taking medication that lower seizure threshold

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Box & Blocks TestBaseline, Post first intervention at 5 weeks, post second intervention at 11 weeks, and 3-month after the completion of the second intervention.We measured the Box and Blocks Test scores at baseline evaluation, after each intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Type I Robotic Therapy (Functional Activities Then Individual Joint Exercises)
Robotic group (Type I) Type I Robotic Group (Functional activities and individual joints): Subjects participate in 11 weeks of robotic training with the device: BONES (Biomimetic Orthosis Neurorehabilitation for Elbow and Shoulder), 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with the robotic exercise program involving multiple joints at the same time for the functional activities such as cleaning the window, driving a steering wheel, grocery shopping, etc; and then individual joint exercises focusing on one joint at a time with the individual joint exercises.
10
Type II Robotic Therapy (Individual Joints Exercises Then Functional Activities)
Robotic group (Type II) Type II Robotic therapy (Individual joints exercises then functional activities): Subjects participate in 11 weeks of training with the robotic device BONES, 3 days per week, 1 hour per day with a robot-assisted exercise program. The robotic exoskeleton assists in arm and hand movements as the patient perform individual joint exercises focusing on one joint at a time; and then functional activities like cleaning the window, driving a steering wheel, grocery shopping, etc for the functional activities.
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicType II Robotic Therapy (Individual Joints Exercises Then Functional Activities)Type I Robotic Therapy (Functional Activities Then Individual Joint Exercises)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants7 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
60 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7
Region of Enrollment
United States
10 participants10 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants6 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 200 / 20
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 200 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Box & Blocks Test

We measured the Box and Blocks Test scores at baseline evaluation, after each intervention, and at the 3-month follow up evaluation. Participants are instructed to move as many blocks as possible, one at a time, from one compartment in a box to a second compartment over a divider for a period of 60 seconds; each block that is moved is counted, and multiple blocks moved at the same time are counted as a single block. The higher scores indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: Baseline, Post first intervention at 5 weeks, post second intervention at 11 weeks, and 3-month after the completion of the second intervention.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Functional Multi-joint Training Then Individual Joint TrainingBox & Blocks TestBaseline evaluation25 blocksStandard Deviation 11
Functional Multi-joint Training Then Individual Joint TrainingBox & Blocks TestPost 2nd Intervention31 blocksStandard Deviation 11
Functional Multi-joint Training Then Individual Joint TrainingBox & Blocks TestPost 1st Intervention29 blocksStandard Deviation 18
Functional Multi-joint Training Then Individual Joint TrainingBox & Blocks Test3-month follow up evaluation28 blocksStandard Deviation 5
Individual Joint Training Then Functional Multi-joint TrainingBox & Blocks Test3-month follow up evaluation46 blocksStandard Deviation 9
Individual Joint Training Then Functional Multi-joint TrainingBox & Blocks TestBaseline evaluation36 blocksStandard Deviation 14
Individual Joint Training Then Functional Multi-joint TrainingBox & Blocks TestPost 1st Intervention42 blocksStandard Deviation 14
Individual Joint Training Then Functional Multi-joint TrainingBox & Blocks TestPost 2nd Intervention43 blocksStandard Deviation 13

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 21, 2026