Skip to content

The Clinical Utility of Thrombelastography in Guiding Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism Following Trauma

An Evaluation of the Clinical Utility of Thrombelastography (TEG) in Guiding Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) and Antiplatelet Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Following Trauma

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01050153
Acronym
VTEPX
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-01-15
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2019-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Venous Thromboembolism

Keywords

Prevention of venous thromboembolism

Brief summary

This study plans to learn more about how to prevent blood clots in the veins of your extremities. You are at risk of forming these clots after a major injury and when you have had surgery and are hospitalized on bed rest. Usually, patients in the SICU at Denver Health who are at risk for blood clots receive preventative treatment with a FDA-approved medicine called Fragmin. Fragmin is intended to prevent blood clots from forming but, with the way it is generally used, some patients may still develop blood clots. All patients treated with Fragmin to prevent blood clots at Denver Health, currently receive the same Fragmin dose. This treatment is called the standard of care. So far, in the US, there has not been a commonly available test that can tell us: * if the standard dose of Fragmin is enough to prevent blood clots for everyone, or * if different patients need different doses, or * if other blood clot preventing medicines, that work in a different way, should be used in addition to Fragmin. The ability of your blood to clot and the strength of the clot formed can be described by a FDA-approved blood test called thrombelastography, referred to as TEG. TEG may provide us with answers to each of the questions above. Our preliminary data indicate that it is helpful in assessing both clotting and bleeding tendencies and may prove useful in guiding treatment for the prevention of blood clots. The aim of this study is to determine if a treatment plan using Fragmin, and, if indicated, one or two additional FDA-approved medicines called anti-platelet drugs, guided by the results of TEG testing, may be better at preventing blood clots than our current standard of care.

Detailed description

This preliminary/pilot study involves a prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel group comparison of Denver Health's current standard of care for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE), commonly known as blood clots, using LMWH (Fragmin) 5000IU subcutaneously daily, with a thrombelastography (TEG)-guided, algorithm-based, individualized regimen of LMWH (Fragmin) plus/minus anti-platelet therapy (aspirin) guided by platelet mapping, in patients admitted to the SICU following trauma. Approximately 50 trauma patients for whom prevention of VTE with LMWH is indicated, will be enrolled over a six month period. The specific aims of this study are as follows: 1. To determine the incidence of, and to characterize, hypercoagulability using TEG and conventional clinical coagulation testing (APTT, INR), Antithrombin III levels and Protein C activity. 2. In the group of patients receiving LMWH (Fragmin) therapy alone for prevention of VTE: 1. to assess the anticoagulant effect of standard LMWH (Fragmin) dosing (5000IU subcutaneously once daily) using TEG and Anti-Factor Xa level measurement, and 2. to determine the extent of correlation of relevant TEG parameters with measured Anti-Factor Xa levels (U/ml). 3. To assess whether TEG is a useful clinical tool for monitoring and optimizing prophylactic LMWH (Fragmin) therapy and for identifying the need for anti-platelet therapy to minimize the risk of VTE in these patients. 4. To evaluate the clinical utility of platelet mapping for guiding anti-platelet therapy in those patients for whom it is indicated by TEG results. 5. To determine the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in each randomized group and in the subgroup receiving anti-platelet therapy in addition to LMWH (Fragmin) for prevention of VTE. The overall aim is to utilize the above data to evaluate a) the adequacy of our standard Fragmin dosing regimen (5000IU subcutaneously once daily) alone for prevention of VTE in our trauma/SICU patients, b) the need for anti-platelet agents in addition to LMWH (Fragmin) for prevention of VTE in our population, and c) to validate/further develop the TEG-guided algorithm for optimal prophylaxis of VTE using LMWH (Fragmin) plus/minus anti-platelet therapy guided by platelet mapping.

Interventions

Dalteparin sodium injection 5000IU subcutaneously daily until fully ambulatory

DRUGDalteparin sodium/aspirin

Dalteparin sodium (2500-10,000IU sc daily), aspirin (81-325mg daily) po.

Sponsors

Eisai Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age at least 18 years, * blunt or penetrating trauma requiring admission to the SICU * requirement for LMWH (Fragmin) therapy for prophylaxis of VTE as standard of care, and * informed consent by patient, legally authorized representative or proxy decision maker (if patient incompetent to provide) obtained and documented.

Exclusion criteria

Presence of any of the following absolute contraindications to LMWH (Fragmin) therapy: * known hypersensitivity to dalteparin sodium, * known hypersensitivity to heparin or pork products, * thrombocytopenia associated with positive tests for antiplatelet antibody in the presence of Fragmin, * history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), * chronic liver disease (bilirubin \>2 mg/dl) or kidney insufficiency (CrCl \<30mL/min), * intravascular thrombolytic therapy within 24 hours, * resuscitation that required massive transfusion (\>10 units RBC within 6 hours), * ongoing resuscitation for hemorrhagic shock, * known bleeding disorder or coagulopathy (INR \>2 not on warfarin), * thrombocytopenia (platelets \<20K/uL), * subdural or epidural hematoma. Or Presence of any of the following relative contraindications to LMWH (Fragmin) therapy: * new intracranial lesions, neoplasms or monitoring devices, * extravascular thrombolytic therapy, * severe uncontrolled hypertension, * arterial dissection * recent (within 12 hours) intraocular surgery (prior or planned), * recent (within 72 hours) intracranial or spine surgery (prior or planned), * conditions associated with increased risk of hemorrhage, e.g. active gastrointestinal ulceration, angiodysplastic disease, gastrointestinal bleeding within the past six months, bacterial endocarditis, history of hemorrhagic stroke, diabetic retinopathy. Or Presence, or removal within the last 12 hours, of an indwelling epidural or spinal catheter, OR recent (within the last 12 hours) or planned neuraxial (spinal/epidural) anesthesia or spinal puncture. Or Per history taken from patient or family, concomitant or known use within one week prior to hospitalization, of drugs affecting hemostasis such as NSAIDS, platelet inhibitors or other anticoagulants, except as specified in this protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
HypercoagulabilityStudy day five.To determine the incidence of, and to characterize, hypercoagulability in a sample of trauma patients admitted to the SICU at DHMC using TEG and conventional clinical coagulation testing (APTT, INR), antithrombin III levels and protein C activity. Hypercoagulability is defined as TEG parameter G (clot strength) \>10.9.
Incidence of VTEDay 28 or discharge, whichever comes first.The incidence and nature of hypercoagulability and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in each randomized group and in the subgroup receiving anti-platelet therapy in addition to Fragmin (descriptive analysis only)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Conventional Coagulation Testing ParametersStudy day five.Plasma based conventional coagulation testing parameters - Anti Xa
TEG ParametersStudy day five.R is a reaction time. The time from the start of a sample run until the first significant levels of detectable clot formation (amplitude = 2 mm in the TEG tracing). Rf is a difference in reaction time between Fragmin-active and Fragmin-neutralized samples. Achievement of a certain clot strength K is a measure of the time from R until a fixed level of clot strength is reached (amplitude = 20 mm). Angle or α measures the rapidity of fibrin build-up and cross-linking (clot strengthening). This most represents fibrinogen level. Angle relates to K, since both are a function of the rate of clot formation. MA, or Maximum Amplitude, is a direct function of the maximum clot strength. In tests where platelets are part of the clot, this parameter most reflects platelet function/aggregation. Clot strength is the result of two components - the modest contribution of fibrin and the much more significant contribution of the platelets.
International Normalized Ratio (INR)Study day five.Plasma based conventional coagulation testing parameters
Platelet CountStudy day five.Platelet count measured by CBC test

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

50 consecutive eligible patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit following trauma between March 2010 and December 2011 were enrolled in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control (Standard of Care)
Dalteparin sodium 5000IU subcutaneously daily Dalteparin sodium : Dalteparin sodium injection 5000IU subcutaneously daily until fully ambulatory
25
TEG-guided Thromboprophylaxis
Dalteparin sodium plus/minus anti-platelet medication (aspirin) per a TEG-guided algorithm Dalteparin sodium/aspirin : Dalteparin sodium (2500-10,000IU sc daily), aspirin (81-325mg daily)po.
25
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisControl (Standard of Care)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Age, Continuous38.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.34
40.04 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.18
39.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.19
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants6 Participants14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants19 Participants36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 251 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Hypercoagulability

To determine the incidence of, and to characterize, hypercoagulability in a sample of trauma patients admitted to the SICU at DHMC using TEG and conventional clinical coagulation testing (APTT, INR), antithrombin III levels and protein C activity. Hypercoagulability is defined as TEG parameter G (clot strength) \>10.9.

Time frame: Study day five.

Population: The reason for having 21 participants in the Control group and 18 participants in the TEG-guided group is that 21 and 18 participants in the respective groups stayed five days or longer. Four participants (25-21) in the Control group and seven participants (25-18) in the TEG-guided group stayed less than five days.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control (Standard of Care)Hypercoagulability16 participants
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisHypercoagulability18 participants
Primary

Incidence of VTE

The incidence and nature of hypercoagulability and the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in each randomized group and in the subgroup receiving anti-platelet therapy in addition to Fragmin (descriptive analysis only)

Time frame: Day 28 or discharge, whichever comes first.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control (Standard of Care)Incidence of VTE0 participants
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisIncidence of VTE0 participants
Secondary

Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters

Plasma based conventional coagulation testing parameters - Anti Xa

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters0.14 IU/mLStandard Error 0.01
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisConventional Coagulation Testing Parameters0.18 IU/mLStandard Error 0.01
Secondary

Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters

Plasma based conventional coagulation testing parameters - Fibrinogen

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters691.4 mg/dLStandard Error 146.69
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisConventional Coagulation Testing Parameters687.11 mg/dLStandard Error 157.75
Secondary

Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters

Plasma based conventional coagulation testing parameters - Anti-thrombin III

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters79.3 percentage of activityStandard Error 4.31
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisConventional Coagulation Testing Parameters80 percentage of activityStandard Error 4.31
Secondary

Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters

Plasma based conventional coagulation testing parameters - Protein C

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)Conventional Coagulation Testing Parameters76.65 percentage of activityStandard Error 6.17
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisConventional Coagulation Testing Parameters79.83 percentage of activityStandard Error 7.6
Secondary

International Normalized Ratio (INR)

Plasma based conventional coagulation testing parameters

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)International Normalized Ratio (INR)1.23 ratioStandard Error 0.19
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisInternational Normalized Ratio (INR)1.13 ratioStandard Error 0.09
Secondary

Platelet Count

Platelet count measured by CBC test

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)Platelet Count261.64 * 10^3 platelets/µLStandard Deviation 171.73
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisPlatelet Count267.76 * 10^3 platelets/µLStandard Deviation 83.23
Secondary

TEG Parameters

Shear elastic modulus strength (SEMS). The MA parameter can be transformed into the actual measure of clot strength (G) using the formula below, and is measured in dyn/cm2 divided by 1000 (displayed in the software as Kd/sc). The absolute SEMS of the sample can be calculated from MA as follows: G = (5000MA/(100-MA))/1000 An amplitude of 50 mm corresponds to a SEMS of 5000 dyn/cm2. An increase in MA from 50 mm to 67 mm is equivalent to a two-fold increase in the SEMS. The G parameter not only provides a measurement of clot firmness in force units, but also is more indicative of small changes in the clot strength or clot breakdown than is the amplitude in mm because it is an exponential reflection of MA.

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)TEG Parameters14.97 Kd/scStandard Error 0.91
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisTEG Parameters15.46 Kd/scStandard Error 0.6
Secondary

TEG Parameters

R is a reaction time. The time from the start of a sample run until the first significant levels of detectable clot formation (amplitude = 2 mm in the TEG tracing). Rf is a difference in reaction time between Fragmin-active and Fragmin-neutralized samples. Achievement of a certain clot strength K is a measure of the time from R until a fixed level of clot strength is reached (amplitude = 20 mm). Angle or α measures the rapidity of fibrin build-up and cross-linking (clot strengthening). This most represents fibrinogen level. Angle relates to K, since both are a function of the rate of clot formation. MA, or Maximum Amplitude, is a direct function of the maximum clot strength. In tests where platelets are part of the clot, this parameter most reflects platelet function/aggregation. Clot strength is the result of two components - the modest contribution of fibrin and the much more significant contribution of the platelets.

Time frame: Study day five.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard of Care)TEG ParametersR value5.89 MinutesStandard Error 0.38
Control (Standard of Care)TEG ParametersRf value-0.09 MinutesStandard Error 0.09
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisTEG ParametersR value5.83 MinutesStandard Error 0.35
TEG-guided ThromboprophylaxisTEG ParametersRf value-0.34 MinutesStandard Error 0.16

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026