Skip to content

Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Trial Of Pregabalin Versus Placebo In The Treatment Of Neuropathic Pain Associated With HIV Neuropathy (Pregabalin A0081244)

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01049217
Enrollment
377
Registered
2010-01-14
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2021-01-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neuropathy

Keywords

neuropathy, pain, HIV-1, HIV Infections

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of pregabalin compared to placebo in reducing neuropathic pain associated with HIV neuropathy.

Detailed description

Based on DMC interim efficacy analysis results indicating a low probability for success the study was terminated on April 2, 2012; the termination was unrelated to any safety findings that could impact patient health.

Interventions

DRUGpregabalin

Pregabalin 75 mg-300mg twice daily during the course of the study.

DRUGplacebo

Subjects may be assigned to placebo during this study. The study duration is approximately 19 weeks.

Sponsors

Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men and women, ages of 18 or greater * Documented evidence of HIV-1 infection * Documented diagnosis of HIV-associated Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy (DSP) with subjective sensory symptom of pain * Pain starts in the feet

Exclusion criteria

* Subject has untreated vitamin B12 deficiency (serum B12 level \<200 pg/ml) or if treated B12 deficiency -treatment is less than 6 months of B12 supplementation (injection or intranasal B12) prior to screening * Diabetes mellitus requiring regular medical treatment (other than diet and exercise) or HbA1C \>6.9 * Subjects with peripheral neuropathic pain that is not associated with HIV infection; including subjects with conditions such as: Post Herpetic Neuralgia (PHN), Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN), familial neuropathies; compression related neuropathy, radicular pain, other infection related neuropathies (eg, leprosy); neuropathy related to: metabolic abnormalities; nutritional factors; vascular insults; inflammation; autoimmune disease; and malignancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method, modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors and 2 temporal items. Results reported for the 10 descriptors (burning, squeezing, pressure, electric shocks, stabbing, light touching of area, pressure of area, cold of area, pins and needles, tingling) quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) scale. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Sleep EfficiencyBaseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Sleep efficiency is the time spent asleep divided by total time between sleep onset and sleep end, multiplied by 100. Sleep efficiency was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Total Activity CountsBaseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the day (non sleep period). A total activity count was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary LevelBaseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Percentage of time above sedentary level is number of epochs (60 seconds) with greater than (\>) 200 activity counts per minute divided by total number of epochs during the day (non sleep period) multiplied by 100. This was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.
Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal SleepBaseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.
Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical \[R-P\], role-emotional \[R-E\]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 16, 17WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which specific health problem (SHP) affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded Yes/No to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.
Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 16, 17WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days. A participant who had responded 'no' to question 1 regarding employment status reported hours of work and as this was a self-reported questionnaire the source data were included.
Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline, Week 16, 17WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).
Diagnostic Neuropathy AssessmentScreening
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Week 16PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category is reported.
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Week 16The CGIC scale measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition at final visit in terms of change relative to the start of treatment (CGIC). At final visit, the participants CGIC will be categorized into a three point scale as: improvement: CGI response of very much improved, much improved or minimally improved; no change: CGI response of no change; worsening: CGI response of very much worse, much worse or minimally worse. Number of participants in each category is reported.
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how HIV neuropathy pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Weekly current pain score was defined as the mean of the daily current pain diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated current (right now) HIV neuropathy pain an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)BPI-sf:5-item self-administered questionnaire to assess severity,impact of pain on daily functions. Pain Severity Index (PSI):average of Question 1-4 each measured severity of pain over past 24-hours on 11-point scale (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain). Pain Interference Index (PII):average of 7 pain interference items of Question 5 that measured level of interference of pain on daily function on 11-point scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). For PSI, PII range:0-10 higher score=higher pain/interference. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.
Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors, and 2 temporal items. Results reported for categorical change in temporal items assessed on 5-point scale for duration of spontaneous pain (1=continuously, 2=8-12 hours \[hrs\], 3=4-7 hrs, 4=1-3 hrs, 5=less than 1 hr), numbers of pain attacks (1=more than 20, 2=11-20 attacks, 3=6-10 attacks, 4=1-5 attacks, 5=no attack). Change data categorized as worsened (negative change), unchanged (no change), and improved (positive change). Endpoint=last observation as per imputation method.
Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (subscales: burning \[superficial\] spontaneous pain, pressing \[deep\] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia \[P/D\]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. The relevant subscales and total score were transformed to 0-1, higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.
Total Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)Total sleep time is the number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening and MIS is the number of minutes spent awake after sleep onset to final awakening. TST and MIS were determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.
Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)SFI is a measure to quantify sleep restlessness. SFI calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. SFI determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Positive Serum and Urine PregnancyScreening for serum pregnancy test, Week 1 for urine pregnancy testSerum pregnancy test (regardless of childbearing potential) and urine pregnancy test for all female participants were performed.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening, Week 8, 17A physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, chest, pulses, pulmonary, cardiovascular, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, abdominal, and extremities.
Body WeightScreening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17
Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureScreening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle of heart. Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles of heart.
Sitting Heart RateScreening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17
Number of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsScreeningA neurological examination consisted of examination of the mental state, cranial nerve function, motor function (reflexes of patellar, achilles, biceps, babinski and coordination) and sensory function (sharp sensation of dorsal surface of right and left great toe, light touch of lower extremities \[LE\], right and left first metatarsal joint position sense, and vibration sensation \[vibration is felt for \< 6 seconds = markedly diminished, 6 to 10 seconds = mild loss, \> 10 seconds = normal\]).
Number of Participants Who Met Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) CriteriaScreeningMINI: short structured clinical interview to make diagnoses of psychiatric disorders according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) or International Classifications of Disease-10 (ICD-10). In the MINI Modules, participants were asked a series of Yes/No questions.
Number of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening, Post-Baseline (Week 4 up to Week 17)S-STS:8-item clinician/participant administered prospective rating scale to assess TE suicidal(Su) ideation(ID),behavior(BHV).Items 1a,2-6,7a,8 scored on 5-point Likert scale 0(not at all) to 4(extremely). Items 1,1b,7 require yes/no response. S-STS total score range 0-30. Lower score=reduced Su tendency. Responses on S-STS were mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA) as 1:Completed Su; 2: Su attempt; 3: Preparatory acts; 4: Su ID; 5: Self-injurious (SI) BHV, intent unknown; 6: Not enough information; 7: SI BHV, no Su intent; 8: Other, no deliberate self harm.
Number of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)ScreeningPHQ-8: 8-item self-administered validated subset of PHQ-9, which comprises first 8 items of measure. Participant rated Over past 2 weeks, how often bothered by any of following problems?: little interest in doing things(1); feeling down(2); trouble falling or staying asleep/sleeping too much(3); feeling tired(4); poor appetite/overeating(5); feeling bad about self(6); trouble concentrating(7); moving or speaking slowly or being so fidgety/moving around more than usual (8). Each item scored on scale of 0(not at all)-3(nearly every day). Total score range: 0-24, higher score=greater severity.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test FindingsScreening up to Week 17Laboratory tests included hematology, chemistry, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) count, HIV plasma viral load, B12, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL), toxic screens for drugs and alcohol, reflex thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), urinalysis. Number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time was reported.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline up to 28 days after last doseAn AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Countries

Colombia, Dominican Republic, India, Peru, Poland, Puerto Rico, South Africa, Thailand, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

All participants received placebo matched to pregabalin capsule orally twice daily for 2 weeks in placebo lead-in phase prior to randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pregabalin
Pregabalin 75 milligram (mg) capsule orally twice daily up to Week 1, followed by pregabalin 150 mg capsule orally twice daily up to Week 2, then pregabalin 225 mg capsule orally twice daily up to Week 3, participants who had inadequate pain control and had tolerated pregabalin 225 mg twice daily received pregabalin 300 mg capsule orally twice daily up to Week 4, during 4-week titration (adjustment) phase. Pregabalin capsule 75 mg, 150 mg, 225 mg, or 300 mg orally twice daily (as per tolerability in titration phase) from Week 5 to Week 16, during 12-week maintenance phase. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
183
Placebo
Placebo matched to pregabalin 75 mg capsule orally twice daily up to Week 1, followed by placebo matched to pregabalin 150 mg capsule orally twice daily up to Week 2, then placebo matched to pregabalin 225 mg capsule orally twice daily up to Week 3, participants who had inadequate pain control and had tolerated placebo matched to pregabalin 225 mg twice daily received placebo matched to pregabalin 300 mg capsule orally twice daily up to Week 4, during 4-week titration (adjustment) phase. Placebo matched to pregabalin capsule 75 mg, 150 mg, 225 mg, or 300 mg orally twice daily (as per tolerability in titration phase) from Week 5 to Week 16, during 12-week maintenance phase. Participants underwent an end-of-study medication taper over a 1-week period.
192
Total375

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event21
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up38
Overall StudyOther12
Overall StudyPregnancy10
Overall StudyProtocol Violation13
Overall StudyRandomized but not Treated02
Overall StudyStudy Terminated by Sponsor4343
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalPregabalin
Age, Continuous42.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7
41.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
Sex: Female, Male
Female
116 Participants237 Participants121 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
76 Participants138 Participants62 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
64 / 18347 / 192
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 1837 / 192

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings. Participants rated their Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) neuropathy pain over the past 24 hours on an 11-point numeric rating scale ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method, modified Baseline Observation Carried Forward (mBOCF).

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. Imputation: mBOCF, baseline data was carried forward for participants who discontinued due to adverse events or had no post-baseline observations; otherwise last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline6.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.194
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint-2.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline6.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.222
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint-2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.288
Comparison: Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, dideoxynucleoside analogue (D-drug) anti-retroviral agent (ART) use and baseline score.p-value: 0.70995% CI: [-0.3, 0.45]ANCOVA
Secondary

Absenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 2 and 3 assesses absenteeism as: Hours of work missed in past 7 days due to leg/foot pain or other reason, respectively. Question 4 assesses presenteeism as: Hours of work performed in past 7 days. A participant who had responded 'no' to question 1 regarding employment status reported hours of work and as this was a self-reported questionnaire the source data were included.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=57, 54)2.05 hoursStandard Deviation 5.044
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=58, 48)7.72 hoursStandard Deviation 17.887
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=57, 58)12.77 hoursStandard Deviation 21.253
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Hours Worked (n=57, 58)32.54 hoursStandard Deviation 17.367
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=58, 48)3.03 hoursStandard Deviation 5.364
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Hours Worked (n=57, 54)37.44 hoursStandard Deviation 19.441
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=57, 54)7.53 hoursStandard Deviation 15.121
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Hours Worked (n=58, 48)34.83 hoursStandard Deviation 20.67
PregabalinAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=57, 58)5.58 hoursStandard Deviation 10.601
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Hours Worked (n=58, 48)38.15 hoursStandard Deviation 21.399
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=57, 58)4.86 hoursStandard Deviation 11.488
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=57, 54)2.41 hoursStandard Deviation 6.603
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17, Hours Missed,Leg/Foot Pain (n=58, 48)1.27 hoursStandard Deviation 2.703
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=57, 58)7.31 hoursStandard Deviation 15.144
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=57, 54)6.74 hoursStandard Deviation 14.07
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17, Hours Missed,Other Reason (n=58, 48)2.94 hoursStandard Deviation 6.635
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Hours Worked (n=57, 58)28.76 hoursStandard Deviation 18.78
PlaceboAbsenteeism and Presenteeism Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Hours Worked (n=57, 54)32.72 hoursStandard Deviation 19.835
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 domains of functional health and well being: physical and social (So) functioning (Fn), physical and emotional role (role-physical \[R-P\], role-emotional \[R-E\]) limitations, bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (Vit), mental health (MnH). Two summary scores include Physical Component (Ph C) and Mental Component (Mn C). The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores. Score range for domain scores and summary scores: 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: GH (n=183, 192)58.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.583
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Ph Fn (n=183, 192)55.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.913
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Ph Fn (n=173, 176)8.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.438
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: R-P (n=183, 192)55.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.806
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: R-P (n=173, 176)9.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.012
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: BP (n=183, 192)48.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.149
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: BP (n=172, 176)13.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.846
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: GH (n=173, 176)8.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.985
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Ph C (n=183, 192)39.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.632
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Ph C (n=171, 176)4.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.53
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Vit (n=183, 192)61.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.338
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Vit (n=172, 176)2.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.196
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: So Fn (n=183, 192)68.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.498
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: So Fn (n=173, 176)2.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.866
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: R-E (n=183, 192)63.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.333
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: R-E (n=173, 176)6.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.536
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: MnH (n=183, 192)69.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.902
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: MnH (n=172, 176)3.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.698
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Mn C (n=183, 192)47.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.037
PregabalinChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Mn C (n=171, 176)1.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.394
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: MnH (n=172, 176)4.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.776
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Vit (n=183, 192)59.80 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.443
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Ph Fn (n=183, 192)56.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.444
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: R-E (n=173, 176)1.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.307
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Ph Fn (n=173, 176)6.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.839
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Vit (n=172, 176)4.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.014
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: R-P (n=183, 192)58.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.078
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Mn C (n=171, 176)1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.519
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: R-P (n=173, 176)7.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.122
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: So Fn (n=183, 192)66.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.825
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: BP (n=183, 192)48.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.855
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: MnH (n=183, 192)68.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.133
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: BP (n=172, 176)12.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.888
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: GH (n=183, 192)59.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.808
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: So Fn (n=173, 176)6.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.299
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: GH (n=173, 176)7.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Mn C (n=183, 192)47.18 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.473
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Ph C (n=183, 192)40.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.11
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: R-E (n=183, 192)67.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.214
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Ph C (n=171, 176)4.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.528
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Ph Fn: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.611495% CI: [-3.49, 5.92]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, R-P: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.820995% CI: [-4.39, 5.53]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, BP: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.973795% CI: [-4.52, 4.67]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, GH: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.696695% CI: [-3.05, 4.57]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Ph C: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.856995% CI: [-1.44, 1.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Vit: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.473495% CI: [-4.96, 2.31]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, So Fn: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.362595% CI: [-6.22, 2.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, R-E: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.273695% CI: [-2.21, 7.79]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, MnH: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.819995% CI: [-3.98, 3.15]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Mn C: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.936195% CI: [-1.82, 1.98]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

BPI-sf:5-item self-administered questionnaire to assess severity,impact of pain on daily functions. Pain Severity Index (PSI):average of Question 1-4 each measured severity of pain over past 24-hours on 11-point scale (0=no pain to 10=worst possible pain). Pain Interference Index (PII):average of 7 pain interference items of Question 5 that measured level of interference of pain on daily function on 11-point scale (0=does not interfere to 10=completely interferes). For PSI, PII range:0-10 higher score=higher pain/interference. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, 8, 12, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4: PSI (n=158, 169)-1.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.725
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: PII (n=182, 192)5.51 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.963
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12: PSI (n=126, 137)-2.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.311
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4: PII (n=158, 169)-1.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.068
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: PSI (n=182, 192)6.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.175
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8: PII (n=146, 154)-2.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.319
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16: PSI (n=166, 166)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.335
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12: PII (n=126, 137)-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8: PSI (n=146, 154)-2.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.142
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: PSI (n=175,182)-2.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.291
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: PII (n=175,182)-2.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.415
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16: PII (n=166, 165)-2.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.434
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: PII (n=175,182)-2.31 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.306
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: PSI (n=182, 192)6.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.292
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4: PSI (n=158, 169)-1.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.811
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8: PSI (n=146, 154)-2.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.117
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12: PSI (n=126, 137)-2.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.169
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16: PSI (n=166, 166)-2.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.354
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: PSI (n=175,182)-2.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.334
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: PII (n=182, 192)5.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.013
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4: PII (n=158, 169)-1.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.358
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8: PII (n=146, 154)-1.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.312
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12: PII (n=126, 137)-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.183
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score at Week 4, 8, 12, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16: PII (n=166, 165)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.29
Comparison: Change at Week 4, PSI: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.094895% CI: [-0.64, 0.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 8, PSI: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.416795% CI: [-0.57, 0.23]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 12, PSI: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.817995% CI: [-0.39, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 16, PSI: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.691395% CI: [-0.33, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, PSI: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.947595% CI: [-0.39, 0.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4, PII: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.741295% CI: [-0.47, 0.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 8, PII: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.971595% CI: [-0.41, 0.43]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 12, PII: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.816395% CI: [-0.38, 0.48]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 16, PII: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.368295% CI: [-0.22, 0.58]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, PII: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.351195% CI: [-0.21, 0.58]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: HADS-A (n=183, 192)5.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.065
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: HADS-A (n=173, 176)-1.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.55
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: HADS-D (n=183, 192)4.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.478
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: HADS-D (n=173, 176)0.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.238
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: HADS-D (n=173, 176)-1.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.038
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: HADS-A (n=183, 192)6.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.216
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: HADS-D (n=183, 192)5.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.885
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: HADS-A (n=173, 176)-1.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.593
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, HADS-A: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.825895% CI: [-0.67, 0.84]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, HADS-D: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.08495% CI: [-0.09, 1.38]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Participant-rated 12-item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week; 7 subscales: sleep disturbance (range 0-100), snoring (range 0-100), awaken short of breath (SOB) or with headache (range 0-100), sleep adequacy (range 0-100), somnolence (range: 0-100); sleep quantity (range: 0-24), optimal sleep (yes/no), and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index (range 0-100). Except adequacy, optimal sleep and quantity, higher scores=more impairment. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Sleep Disturbance (n=183, 192)35.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.127
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Sleep Disturbance (n=173, 175)-6.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.856
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Snoring (n=181, 192)25.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.456
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Snoring (n=171, 175)0.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.301
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: SOB (n= 183, 192)22.08 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.216
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: SOB (n=173, 175)-3.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.938
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Quantity (n= 183, 192)7.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.969
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Quantity (n=173, 175)0.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.814
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Adequacy (n= 183, 192)57.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.776
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Adequacy (n=173, 175)5.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.319
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Somnolence (n= 183, 192)26.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.078
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Somnolence (n=173, 175)-0.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.946
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Sleep Problems Index (n= 183, 192)32.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.726
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint:Sleep Problems Index(n=173,175)-4.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.382
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Somnolence (n= 183, 192)29.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.773
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Sleep Disturbance (n=183, 192)39.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Quantity (n=173, 175)0.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.082
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Sleep Disturbance (n=173, 175)-8.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.317
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Sleep Problems Index (n= 183, 192)36.91 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.862
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Snoring (n=181, 192)26.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 34.077
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Adequacy (n= 183, 192)54.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.801
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Snoring (n=171, 175)-3.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.862
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Somnolence (n=173, 175)-4.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.136
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: SOB (n= 183, 192)25.83 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.567
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Adequacy (n=173, 175)4.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.091
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: SOB (n=173, 175)-7.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.552
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint:Sleep Problems Index(n=173,175)-6.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.358
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS) at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Quantity (n= 183, 192)7.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.976
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Sleep Disturbance: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.852895% CI: [-4.42, 3.66]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Snoring: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.36595% CI: [-3.37, 9.14]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, SOB: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.723795% CI: [-4.07, 5.86]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Quantity: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.278395% CI: [-0.5, 0.15]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Adequacy: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.247595% CI: [-2.11, 8.16]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Somnolence: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.549295% CI: [-2.64, 4.96]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Sleep Problems Index: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.911395% CI: [-3, 3.36]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors and 2 temporal items. Results reported for the 10 descriptors (burning, squeezing, pressure, electric shocks, stabbing, light touching of area, pressure of area, cold of area, pins and needles, tingling) quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) scale. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Burning (n=183, 192)6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.33
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Burning (n=173, 176)-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Squeezing (n=183, 192)5.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Squeezing (n=173, 176)-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pressure (n=183, 192)5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pressure (n=172, 176)-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.19
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Electric Shocks (n=183, 192)5.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Electric Shocks (n=173, 176)-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Stabbing (n=183, 192)5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.46
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Stabbing (n=173, 176)-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Light Touching (n=183, 192)5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Light Touching (n=173, 176)-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pressure of Area (n=183, 192)6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.12
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pressure of Area (n=173, 176)-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Cold of Area (n=183, 192)5.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.56
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Cold of Area (n=173, 176)-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pins and Needles (n=183, 192)6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.14
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pins and Needles (n=173, 176)-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Tingling (n=183, 192)5.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.49
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Tingling (n=173, 176)-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.01
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pins and Needles (n=173, 176)-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Burning (n=183, 192)6.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.52
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Light Touching (n=183, 192)5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Burning (n=173, 176)-2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Cold of Area (n=173, 176)-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.07
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Squeezing (n=183, 192)5.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Light Touching (n=173, 176)-1.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.05
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Squeezing (n=173, 176)-2.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Tingling (n=173, 176)-2.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pressure (n=183, 192)5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pressure of Area (n=183, 192)6.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pressure (n=172, 176)-2.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.15
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pins and Needles (n=183, 192)6.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.23
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Electric Shocks (n=183, 192)5.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pressure of Area (n=173, 176)-2.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Electric Shocks (n=173, 176)-2.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Tingling (n=183, 192)6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.42
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Stabbing (n=183, 192)6.1 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.58
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Cold of Area (n=183, 192)5.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Item Scores at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Stabbing (n=173, 176)-2.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.11
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Burning: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.968695% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Squeezing: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.447695% CI: [-0.6, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Pressure: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.56395% CI: [-0.6, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Electric Shocks: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.993795% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Stabbing: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.871895% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Light Touching: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.824195% CI: [-0.5, 0.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Pressure of Area: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.316495% CI: [-0.7, 0.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Cold of Area: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.899695% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Pins and Needles: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.967695% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Tingling: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.909195% CI: [-0.5, 0.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (subscales: burning \[superficial\] spontaneous pain, pressing \[deep\] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia \[P/D\]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. The relevant subscales and total score were transformed to 0-1, higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain. Endpoint=last observation for participant as per imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Burning Pain (n=183, 192)0.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.233
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Burning Pain (n=173, 176)-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.291
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pressing Pain (n=182, 192)0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.227
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pressing Pain (n=173, 176)-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Paroxysmal Pain (n=183, 192)0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.227
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Paroxysmal Pain (n=173, 176)-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.272
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Evoked Pain (n=183, 192)0.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.202
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Evoked Pain (n=173, 176)-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.243
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: P/D (n=183, 192)0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.211
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: P/D (n=173, 176)-0.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.282
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Total Score (n=182, 192)0.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.173
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Total Score (n=173,176)-0.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.231
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Total Score (n=182, 192)0.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.175
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Burning Pain (n=183, 192)0.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.252
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Evoked Pain (n=183, 192)0.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.206
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Burning Pain (n=173, 176)-0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.306
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: P/D (n=173, 176)-0.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.277
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Pressing Pain (n=182, 192)0.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.248
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Evoked Pain (n=173, 176)-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.253
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Pressing Pain (n=173, 176)-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.279
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Total Score (n=173,176)-0.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.236
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: Paroxysmal Pain (n=183, 192)0.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.236
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline: P/D (n=183, 192)0.63 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.199
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Subscales and Total Intensity Score at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint: Paroxysmal Pain (n=173, 176)-0.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.279
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Burning Pain: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.968695% CI: [-0.05, 0.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Pressing Pain: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.471195% CI: [-0.06, 0.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Paroxysmal Pain: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.921595% CI: [-0.04, 0.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Evoked Pain: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.604295% CI: [-0.05, 0.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, P/D: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.939495% CI: [-0.05, 0.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint, Total Score: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.780195% CI: [-0.04, 0.03]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Weekly current pain score was defined as the mean of the daily current pain diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated current (right now) HIV neuropathy pain an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. A rating of 1-3 was considered as mild pain; 4-6 = moderate pain; and 7-10 = severe pain. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline (n=183, 192)6.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.208
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 5 (n=157, 166)-1.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.893
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16 (n=111, 128)-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.37
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 6 (n=152, 157)-1.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.042
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 1 (n=181, 190)-0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 7 (n=153, 153)-1.92 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.074
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 15 (n=120, 132)-2.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.283
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8 (n=148, 153)-2.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.106
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 2 (n=174, 179)-0.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.236
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 9 (n=143, 148)-2.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.199
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint (n=183, 191)-2.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.239
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 10 (n=138, 142)-2.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.172
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 3 (n=170, 172)-1.10 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.44
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 11 (n=132, 136)-2.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.25
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 14 (n=124, 131)-2.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.307
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12 (n=128, 135)-2.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.241
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4 (n=158, 169)-1.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.682
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 13 (n=126, 133)-2.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.241
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4 (n=158, 169)-1.17 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.649
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 14 (n=124, 131)-2.74 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.303
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 15 (n=120, 132)-2.78 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.283
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16 (n=111, 128)-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.353
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint (n=183, 191)-2.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.302
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline (n=183, 192)6.71 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.245
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 1 (n=181, 190)-0.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.917
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 2 (n=174, 179)-0.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.282
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 3 (n=170, 172)-0.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 13 (n=126, 133)-2.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.208
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 5 (n=157, 166)-1.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.845
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 6 (n=152, 157)-1.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.965
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 7 (n=153, 153)-1.88 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.006
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8 (n=148, 153)-1.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.105
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 9 (n=143, 148)-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 10 (n=138, 142)-2.24 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.225
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 11 (n=132, 136)-2.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.218
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Current Pain Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12 (n=128, 135)-2.44 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.247
Comparison: Change at Week 1: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.309895% CI: [-0.25, 0.08]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 2: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.242995% CI: [-0.37, 0.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 3: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.050495% CI: [-0.54, 0]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.114195% CI: [-0.58, 0.06]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 5: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.066795% CI: [-0.66, 0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 6: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.210495% CI: [-0.61, 0.13]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 7: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.48395% CI: [-0.53, 0.25]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 8: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.575795% CI: [-0.51, 0.29]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 9: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.323195% CI: [-0.62, 0.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 10: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.314395% CI: [-0.63, 0.2]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 11: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.6395% CI: [-0.54, 0.33]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.575295% CI: [-0.57, 0.32]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 13: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.890595% CI: [-0.46, 0.4]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 14: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.999195% CI: [-0.45, 0.45]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 15: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.892795% CI: [-0.48, 0.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 16: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.806795% CI: [-0.54, 0.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.900995% CI: [-0.35, 0.4]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Weekly mean sleep interference score was defined as the mean of the daily sleep interference diary ratings split into 7 day intervals. Participants rated how HIV neuropathy pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 = does not interfere with sleep to 10 = completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline (n=183, 191)6.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.643
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 1 (n=177, 182)-0.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.067
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 2 (n=168, 170)-0.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.317
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 3 (n=163, 163)-1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.505
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4 (n=153, 160)-1.42 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.804
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 5 (n=150, 159)-1.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.952
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 6 (n=144, 152)-1.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.125
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 7 (n=145, 145)-2.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.234
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8 (n=139, 145)-2.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.194
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 9 (n=135, 137)-2.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.382
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 10 (n=131, 135)-2.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.315
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 11 (n=125, 133)-2.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.393
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12 (n=122, 131)-2.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.354
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 13 (n=118, 127)-2.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.337
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 14 (n=118, 129)-2.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.442
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 15 (n=117, 127)-2.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.438
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16 (n=103, 121)-3.14 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.475
PregabalinChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint (n=183, 189)-2.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.323
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 13 (n=118, 127)-2.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.262
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Baseline (n=183, 191)6.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.456
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 9 (n=135, 137)-2.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.154
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 1 (n=177, 182)-0.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.003
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Endpoint (n=183, 189)-2.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.296
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 2 (n=168, 170)-0.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.292
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 10 (n=131, 135)-2.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.175
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 3 (n=163, 163)-0.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.373
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 14 (n=118, 129)-2.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.346
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 4 (n=153, 160)-1.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.665
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 11 (n=125, 133)-2.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.207
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 5 (n=150, 159)-1.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.824
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 16 (n=103, 121)-2.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.324
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 6 (n=144, 152)-1.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.903
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 12 (n=122, 131)-2.59 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.291
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 7 (n=145, 145)-1.94 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.987
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 15 (n=117, 127)-2.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.325
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Sleep Interference Score at Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and Endpoint (up to Week 16)Change at Week 8 (n=139, 145)-2.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.103
Comparison: Change at Week 1: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.208495% CI: [-0.31, 0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 2: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.151695% CI: [-0.43, 0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 3: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.046895% CI: [-0.56, 0]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 4: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.122495% CI: [-0.62, 0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 5: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.037395% CI: [-0.75, -0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 6: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.16695% CI: [-0.67, 0.12]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 7: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.324695% CI: [-0.63, 0.21]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 8: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.487995% CI: [-0.58, 0.28]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 9: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.266995% CI: [-0.69, 0.19]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 10: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.545295% CI: [-0.56, 0.3]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 11: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.546995% CI: [-0.59, 0.31]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 12: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.784395% CI: [-0.54, 0.41]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 13: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.900895% CI: [-0.5, 0.44]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 14: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.906495% CI: [-0.45, 0.5]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 15: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.720595% CI: [-0.57, 0.39]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Week 16: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.433495% CI: [-0.71, 0.31]ANCOVA
Comparison: Change at Endpoint: ANCOVA model was used with terms of treatment, pooled site, D-drug ART use and baseline score.p-value: 0.840295% CI: [-0.43, 0.35]ANCOVA
Secondary

Diagnostic Neuropathy Assessment

Time frame: Screening

Population: Data were not collected since this was a screening tool for investigators and there was no analysis planned for this measure.

Secondary

Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep

MOS-SS: participant-rated 12 item questionnaire to assess constructs of sleep over past week. It included 7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awaken short of breath or with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep, and 9 item index measures of sleep disturbance provide composite scores: sleep problems index. Participants responded whether their sleep was optimal or not optimal by choosing yes or no. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinMedical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal SleepBaseline (n=183, 192)80 participants
PregabalinMedical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal SleepEndpoint (n=173, 176)80 participants
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal SleepBaseline (n=183, 192)77 participants
PlaceboMedical Outcomes Study-Sleep Scale (MOS-SS): Number of Participants With Optimal SleepEndpoint (n=173, 176)80 participants
Comparison: Endpoint: Overall p-value was derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled site and D-drug ART use using modified ridit scores.p-value: 0.7399Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)

NPSI: participant-rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain. It includes 10 descriptors, and 2 temporal items. Results reported for categorical change in temporal items assessed on 5-point scale for duration of spontaneous pain (1=continuously, 2=8-12 hours \[hrs\], 3=4-7 hrs, 4=1-3 hrs, 5=less than 1 hr), numbers of pain attacks (1=more than 20, 2=11-20 attacks, 3=6-10 attacks, 4=1-5 attacks, 5=no attack). Change data categorized as worsened (negative change), unchanged (no change), and improved (positive change). Endpoint=last observation as per imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Worsened (n=173,172)31 participants
PregabalinNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Unchanged(n=173,172)56 participants
PregabalinNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Improved (n=173,172)86 participants
PregabalinNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Number of Pain Attacks, Worsened (n=173, 176)40 participants
PregabalinNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Number of Pain Attacks, Unchanged (n=173, 176)49 participants
PregabalinNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Number of Pain Attacks, Improved (n=173, 176)84 participants
PlaceboNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Number of Pain Attacks, Unchanged (n=173, 176)54 participants
PlaceboNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Worsened (n=173,172)33 participants
PlaceboNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Number of Pain Attacks, Worsened (n=173, 176)25 participants
PlaceboNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Unchanged(n=173,172)50 participants
PlaceboNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Number of Pain Attacks, Improved (n=173, 176)97 participants
PlaceboNeuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI): Change From Baseline in Number of Participants With Duration of Spontaneous Pain and Number of Pain Attacks at Endpoint (up to Week 16)Duration of Spontaneous Pain, Improved (n=173,172)89 participants
Comparison: Duration of Spontaneous Pain: Overall p-value was derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled site and D-drug ART use using modified ridit scores.p-value: 0.73Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Number of Pain Attacks: Overall p-value was derived from CMH test adjusted for pooled site and D-drug ART use using modified ridit scores.p-value: 0.0559Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which specific health problem (SHP) affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Number of participants who responded Yes/No to Question 1: Are you currently employed (working for pay)? are reported.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Employed (n=183, 192)57 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Employed (n=169, 170)57 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Employed (n=167, 171)58 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Unemployed (n=183, 192)126 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Unemployed (n=169, 170)112 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Unemployed (n=167, 171)109 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Unemployed (n=169, 170)119 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Employed (n=183, 192)57 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Unemployed (n=183, 192)135 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Employed (n=169, 170)51 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Unemployed (n=167, 171)124 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Were Employed or Unemployed Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Employed (n=167, 171)47 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

The CGIC scale measures a physician's global impression of a participant's clinical condition at final visit in terms of change relative to the start of treatment (CGIC). At final visit, the participants CGIC will be categorized into a three point scale as: improvement: CGI response of very much improved, much improved or minimally improved; no change: CGI response of no change; worsening: CGI response of very much worse, much worse or minimally worse. Number of participants in each category is reported.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Minimally Improved48 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Minimally Worse3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Much Improved59 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Much Worse0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)No Change17 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Very Much Worse0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Very Much Improved45 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Very Much Worse0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Very Much Improved47 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Much Improved53 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Minimally Improved49 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)No Change25 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Minimally Worse2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinician Global Impression of Change (CGIC)Much Worse0 participants
Comparison: Overall p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled site and D-drug ART use using modified ridit scores.p-value: 0.4271Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Number of participants in each category is reported.

Time frame: Week 16

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Improved42 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Improved69 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Improved42 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No Change13 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse5 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Worse0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)No Change17 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Very Much Improved51 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Worse4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Much Improved66 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Worse2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)Minimally Improved36 participants
Comparison: Overall p-value was derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test adjusted for pooled site and D-drug ART use using modified ridit scores.p-value: 0.5049Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level

Percentage of time above sedentary level is number of epochs (60 seconds) with greater than (\>) 200 activity counts per minute divided by total number of epochs during the day (non sleep period) multiplied by 100. This was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population. N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF. Data for Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16 were collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinPercentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level52.43 percentage of day timeStandard Error 0.51
PlaceboPercentage Day Time Above Sedentary Level52.28 percentage of day timeStandard Error 0.53
p-value: 0.8241ANCOVA
Secondary

Productivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) Questionnaire

WPAI: 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the degree to which SHP affected work productivity while at work and affected activities outside of work. It assesses amount of absenteeism, presenteeism and daily activity impairment attributable to a HIV neuropathy pain. Question 5 and 6 assesses: How much leg/foot pain affect productivity and daily activity, respectively in past 7 days? on 11-point scale, where 0 (not affected/no impairment) to 10 (completely affected/impaired).

Time frame: Baseline, Week 16, 17

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Productivity Affected (n=55, 57)5.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.48
PregabalinProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Productivity Affected (n=60, 54)3.60 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.402
PregabalinProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Productivity Affected (n=58, 48)3.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.615
PregabalinProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Daily Activity Affected (n=183, 192)6.03 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.078
PregabalinProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Daily Activity Affected (n=169, 170)3.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.547
PregabalinProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Daily Activity Affected (n=167, 171)3.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.568
PlaceboProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Daily Activity Affected (n=169, 170)3.66 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.769
PlaceboProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Productivity Affected (n=55, 57)5.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.513
PlaceboProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireBaseline: Daily Activity Affected (n=183, 192)6.12 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
PlaceboProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 16: Productivity Affected (n=60, 54)3.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.771
PlaceboProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Daily Activity Affected (n=167, 171)3.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.754
PlaceboProductivity and Activity Impairment Assessed by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI: SHP) QuestionnaireWeek 17: Productivity Affected (n=58, 48)3.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.806
Secondary

Sleep Efficiency

Sleep efficiency is the time spent asleep divided by total time between sleep onset and sleep end, multiplied by 100. Sleep efficiency was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population. N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF. Data for Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16 were collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinSleep Efficiency85.80 Percent time between sleep onset and endStandard Error 0.39
PlaceboSleep Efficiency84.84 Percent time between sleep onset and endStandard Error 0.41
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment as a fixed effect and D-drug ART, pooled site value, baseline value as covariates.p-value: 0.0611ANCOVA
Secondary

Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)

SFI is a measure to quantify sleep restlessness. SFI calculated from analysis of the periods that participant was not moving (immobile bouts). It is number of immobile bouts that were exactly 1 minute long divided by total number of immobile bouts. Value ranges from 0-100 percent, with low number representing more restful sleep. SFI determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population. N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF. Data for Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16 were collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinSleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)18.57 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Error 0.47
PlaceboSleep Fragmentation Index (SFI)19.60 percentage of immobile boutsStandard Error 0.49
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment as a fixed effect and D-drug ART, pooled site value, baseline value as covariates.p-value: 0.0966ANCOVA
Secondary

Total Activity Counts

Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the day (non sleep period). A total activity count was determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population. N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF. Data for Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16 were collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinTotal Activity Counts297350 activity counts per dayStandard Error 5280.2
PlaceboTotal Activity Counts305787 activity counts per dayStandard Error 5480.9
Comparison: ANCOVA model was used with treatment as a fixed effect and D-drug ART, pooled site value, baseline value as covariates.p-value: 0.2195ANCOVA
Secondary

Total Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)

Total sleep time is the number of minutes asleep between time of sleep onset to morning awakening and MIS is the number of minutes spent awake after sleep onset to final awakening. TST and MIS were determined by actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn. Endpoint was the last observation for a participant assessed using specified imputation method.

Time frame: Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16, Endpoint (up to Week 16)

Population: ITT population. N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. Missing data for endpoint (up to Week 16) imputed using LOCF. Data for Baseline (Day -14 to 1), Week 1 through Week 4, Week 12 through Week 16 were collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinTotal Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)Endpoint: TST396.84 minutesStandard Error 5.04
PregabalinTotal Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)Endpoint: MIS41.48 minutesStandard Error 1.45
PlaceboTotal Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)Endpoint: TST400.29 minutesStandard Error 5.29
PlaceboTotal Sleep Time (TST) and Minutes of Interrupted Sleep (MIS)Endpoint: MIS45.14 minutesStandard Error 1.5
Comparison: Endpoint TST: ANCOVA model was used with treatment as a fixed effect and D-drug ART, pooled site value, baseline value as covariates.p-value: 0.6012ANCOVA
Comparison: Endpoint MIS: ANCOVA model was used with treatment as a fixed effect and D-drug ART, pooled site value, baseline value as covariates.p-value: 0.0534ANCOVA
Other Pre-specified

Body Weight

Time frame: Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to study drug and had at least one safety assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinBody WeightWeek 17 (n=167, 171)73.6 kilogramStandard Deviation 18.13
PregabalinBody WeightScreening (n=183, 192)70.8 kilogramStandard Deviation 17.7
PregabalinBody WeightWeek 1 (n=183, 192)71.2 kilogramStandard Deviation 17.76
PregabalinBody WeightWeek 4 (n=158, 169)72.6 kilogramStandard Deviation 19.02
PregabalinBody WeightWeek 8 (n=146, 154)73.1 kilogramStandard Deviation 19.35
PregabalinBody WeightWeek 12 (n=127, 137)74.0 kilogramStandard Deviation 19.01
PregabalinBody WeightWeek 16 (n=170, 176)73.6 kilogramStandard Deviation 18.06
PlaceboBody WeightWeek 17 (n=167, 171)72.6 kilogramStandard Deviation 16.95
PlaceboBody WeightWeek 8 (n=146, 154)72.1 kilogramStandard Deviation 17.17
PlaceboBody WeightScreening (n=183, 192)72.0 kilogramStandard Deviation 17.3
PlaceboBody WeightWeek 16 (n=170, 176)72.5 kilogramStandard Deviation 17
PlaceboBody WeightWeek 1 (n=183, 192)72.5 kilogramStandard Deviation 17.84
PlaceboBody WeightWeek 12 (n=127, 137)72.7 kilogramStandard Deviation 17.2
PlaceboBody WeightWeek 4 (n=158, 169)71.8 kilogramStandard Deviation 16.88
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Met Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) Criteria

MINI: short structured clinical interview to make diagnoses of psychiatric disorders according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) or International Classifications of Disease-10 (ICD-10). In the MINI Modules, participants were asked a series of Yes/No questions.

Time frame: Screening

Population: Data for this pre-specified outcome measure was collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis.

Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Findings

Laboratory tests included hematology, chemistry, cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count and cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) count, HIV plasma viral load, B12, Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL), toxic screens for drugs and alcohol, reflex thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), urinalysis. Number of participants with a laboratory abnormality meeting specified criteria while on study treatment or during lag time was reported.

Time frame: Screening up to Week 17

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to study drug and had at least one safety assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Findings165 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Test Findings170 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination Findings

A physical examination included an examination of the general appearance, skin, chest, pulses, pulmonary, cardiovascular, head, eyes, ears, nose, throat, abdominal, and extremities.

Time frame: Screening, Week 8, 17

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to open label study drug and had at least one safety assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: General (n=183, 192)16 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: General (n=146, 154)12 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: General (n=170, 174)11 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Skin (n=183, 192)30 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Skin (n=146, 154)20 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Skin (n=170, 174)21 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Chest (n=183, 192)6 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Chest (n=146, 154)2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Chest (n=170, 174)4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Pulses (n=183, 191)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Pulses (n=146, 153)2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Pulses (n=170, 174)1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Lungs (n=183, 192)2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Lungs (n=146, 154)2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Lungs (n=170, 174)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Heart (n=183, 192)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Heart (n=146, 154)4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Heart (n=170, 174)4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Abdomen (n=183, 192)11 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Abdomen (n=146, 154)9 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Abdomen (n=170, 174)8 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Extremities (n=183, 192)50 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Extremities (n=146, 154)28 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Extremities (n=170, 174)29 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Head (n=183, 192)2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Head (n=146, 154)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Head (n=170, 174)2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Ears (n=181, 191)1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Ears (n=145, 154)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Ears (n=170, 174)1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Eyes (n=183, 192)12 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Eyes (n=146, 154)8 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Eyes (n=170, 174)9 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Nose (n=183, 192)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Nose (n=146, 154)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Nose (n=170, 174)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Throat (n=183, 192)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Throat (n=146, 154)4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Throat (n=170, 174)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Abdomen (n=146, 154)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: General (n=183, 192)13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Ears (n=170, 174)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: General (n=146, 154)7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Abdomen (n=170, 174)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: General (n=170, 174)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Nose (n=146, 154)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Skin (n=183, 192)37 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Extremities (n=183, 192)46 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Skin (n=146, 154)20 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Eyes (n=183, 192)7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Skin (n=170, 174)32 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Extremities (n=146, 154)26 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Chest (n=183, 192)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Throat (n=170, 174)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Chest (n=146, 154)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Extremities (n=170, 174)23 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Chest (n=170, 174)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Eyes (n=146, 154)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Pulses (n=183, 191)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Head (n=183, 192)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Pulses (n=146, 153)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Nose (n=170, 174)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Pulses (n=170, 174)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Head (n=146, 154)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Lungs (n=183, 192)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Eyes (n=170, 174)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Lungs (n=146, 154)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Head (n=170, 174)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Lungs (n=170, 174)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Throat (n=146, 154)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Heart (n=183, 192)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Ears (n=181, 191)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Heart (n=146, 154)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Nose (n=183, 192)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 17: Heart (n=170, 174)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsWeek 8: Ears (n=145, 154)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Abdomen (n=183, 192)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Physical Examination FindingsScreening: Throat (n=183, 192)3 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Neurological Examination Findings

A neurological examination consisted of examination of the mental state, cranial nerve function, motor function (reflexes of patellar, achilles, biceps, babinski and coordination) and sensory function (sharp sensation of dorsal surface of right and left great toe, light touch of lower extremities \[LE\], right and left first metatarsal joint position sense, and vibration sensation \[vibration is felt for \< 6 seconds = markedly diminished, 6 to 10 seconds = mild loss, \> 10 seconds = normal\]).

Time frame: Screening

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to study drug and had at least one safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: None/Absent8 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Increased14 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Absent173 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Normal178 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Abnormal4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Not Done0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Normal169 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Not Evaluable2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Mild Ataxia7 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Moderate Ataxia3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Severe Ataxia1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Normal174 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Abnormal6 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Not Done2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: None/Absent7 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Normal124 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Not Done0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Hypoactive (Diminished)43 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Hyperactive (More Brisk)8 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Abnormal1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Normal124 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Not Done1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Hypoactive (Diminished)42 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Hyperactive (More Brisk)7 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: None/Absent92 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Normal14 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Not Done0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Hypoactive (Diminished)73 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Hyperactive (More Brisk)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: None/Absent90 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Normal14 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Not Done0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Hypoactive (Diminished)75 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Hyperactive (More Brisk)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: None/Absent1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Normal166 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Not Done3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Hypoactive (Diminished)8 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Hyperactive (More Brisk)4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: None/Absent1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Normal169 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Not Done2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Hypoactive (Diminished)7 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Hyperactive (More Brisk)3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Missing3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Normal179 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Missing2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Not Done0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Absent63 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Diminished99 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Normal5 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Increased15 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Absent61 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Diminished102 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Normal5 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Missing2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Not Done7 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Unable to Detect39 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Hyposensitivity99 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Normal Sensation28 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Hypersensitivity8 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Normal129 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Abnormal52 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Not Done1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Normal129 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Abnormal51 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Not Done2 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Not Done1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Absent27 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Markedly Diminished42 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Mild Loss86 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Normal25 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Not Evaluable3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Absent173 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Present6 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Missing1 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Not Evaluable3 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Present6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Present6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Normal8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Hyperactive (More Brisk)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Hyposensitivity102 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Absent24 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Normal192 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Abnormal0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Normal Sensation25 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCranial Nerve Function: Not Done0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: None/Absent2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Missing1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Absent180 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Normal181 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Normal180 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Not Evaluable2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Hypersensitivity8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Mild Ataxia7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Not Done1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Moderate Ataxia1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Markedly Diminished52 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Gait: Severe Ataxia0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Hypoactive (Diminished)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Normal188 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Hyperactive (More Brisk)3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Abnormal2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Not Evaluable6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsCoordination, Romberg Test: Not Done2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Biceps: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Normal143 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: None/Absent13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Normal130 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Mild Loss79 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Not Done0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Normal192 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Hypoactive (Diminished)41 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Abnormal0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Hyperactive (More Brisk)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Abnormal47 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Patellar: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Present6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsMental State: Not Done0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: None/Absent13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Metatarsal Sense: Not Done2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Normal129 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Not Done0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Normal34 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Hypoactive (Diminished)41 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Absent57 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Hyperactive (More Brisk)9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Patellar: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Diminished114 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Absent180 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: None/Absent100 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Normal7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Normal13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Normal143 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Not Done0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Right Great Toe: Increased14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Hypoactive (Diminished)78 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Hyperactive (More Brisk)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Achilles: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Abnormal46 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Absent58 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: None/Absent100 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Left Babinski: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Normal9 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Diminished112 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Not Done0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Metatarsal Sense: Not Done3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Hypoactive (Diminished)82 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function, Left Great Toe: Increased14 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Hyperactive (More Brisk)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Missing2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Achilles: Clonus (Very Intense)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Missing3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Missing0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Babinski: Not Evaluable6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: None/Absent2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Not Done6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Normal178 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsVibration Sensation: Not Done1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Not Done2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsSensory Function-Light Touch, LE: Unable to Detect48 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Neurological Examination FindingsReflexes, Right Biceps: Hypoactive (Diminished)7 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Positive Serum and Urine Pregnancy

Serum pregnancy test (regardless of childbearing potential) and urine pregnancy test for all female participants were performed.

Time frame: Screening for serum pregnancy test, Week 1 for urine pregnancy test

Population: Data for this pre-specified outcome measure was collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis.

Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)

PHQ-8: 8-item self-administered validated subset of PHQ-9, which comprises first 8 items of measure. Participant rated Over past 2 weeks, how often bothered by any of following problems?: little interest in doing things(1); feeling down(2); trouble falling or staying asleep/sleeping too much(3); feeling tired(4); poor appetite/overeating(5); feeling bad about self(6); trouble concentrating(7); moving or speaking slowly or being so fidgety/moving around more than usual (8). Each item scored on scale of 0(not at all)-3(nearly every day). Total score range: 0-24, higher score=greater severity.

Time frame: Screening

Population: ITT population: all randomized participants who took at least 1 dose of study drug. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: Not at All (n=182, 192)63 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: Several Days (n=183, 192)63 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: > 1/2 Days (n=183,192)23 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)20 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: Not at All (n=183, 192)105 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: Several Days (n=183, 192)61 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: > 1/2 Days the Days (n=183, 192)13 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: Not at All (n=183, 192)77 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: Several Days (n=182, 192)69 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: > 1/2 Days (n=182, 192)26 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: Nearly Every Day (n=182, 192)24 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: Not at All (n=183, 192)57 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: Several Days (n=183, 192)87 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)27 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)12 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: Not at All (n=183, 192)99 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: Several Days (n=183, 192)53 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)21 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: Nearly Everyday (n=183,192)10 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: Not at All (n=183, 192)124 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: Several Days (n=183, 192)41 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)12 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: Nearly Everyday(n=183,192)6 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: Not at All (n=183, 192)131 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: Several Days (n=183, 192)35 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)11 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: Nearly Everyday (n=183,192)6 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety: Not at All (n=183,192)144 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety:Several Days(n=183,192)23 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety: >1/2 Days (n=183, 192)10 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety:Nearly Everyday(n=183,192)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety:Nearly Everyday(n=183,192)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: Not at All (n=183, 192)89 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: Not at All (n=183, 192)116 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: Several Days (n=183, 192)72 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: Not at All (n=183, 192)140 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: > 1/2 Days (n=183,192)20 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: Several Days (n=183, 192)56 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Little Interest: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)11 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety: Not at All (n=183,192)143 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: Not at All (n=183, 192)109 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)15 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: Several Days (n=183, 192)59 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: Several Days (n=183, 192)33 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: > 1/2 Days the Days (n=183, 192)12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Poor Appetite/Overeat: Nearly Everyday (n=183,192)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Down: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)12 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety: >1/2 Days (n=183, 192)10 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: Not at All (n=182, 192)68 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: Not at All (n=183, 192)138 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: Several Days (n=182, 192)86 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)13 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: > 1/2 Days (n=182, 192)22 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: Several Days (n=183, 192)43 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble With Sleep: Nearly Every Day (n=182, 192)16 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Move-Speak Slow/Fidgety:Several Days(n=183,192)33 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: Not at All (n=183, 192)56 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: Several Days (n=183, 192)100 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Trouble Concentrating: Nearly Everyday (n=183,192)6 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: > 1/2 Days (n=183, 192)29 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Bad About Self: Nearly Everyday(n=183,192)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8)Feeling Tired: Nearly Every Day (n=183, 192)7 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) Categories

S-STS:8-item clinician/participant administered prospective rating scale to assess TE suicidal(Su) ideation(ID),behavior(BHV).Items 1a,2-6,7a,8 scored on 5-point Likert scale 0(not at all) to 4(extremely). Items 1,1b,7 require yes/no response. S-STS total score range 0-30. Lower score=reduced Su tendency. Responses on S-STS were mapped to Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment(C-CASA) as 1:Completed Su; 2: Su attempt; 3: Preparatory acts; 4: Su ID; 5: Self-injurious (SI) BHV, intent unknown; 6: Not enough information; 7: SI BHV, no Su intent; 8: Other, no deliberate self harm.

Time frame: Screening, Post-Baseline (Week 4 up to Week 17)

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to study drug and had at least one safety assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: Preparatory Acts (n=183, 192)5 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Su Attempt (n=178, 185)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: SI BHV, no Su intent (n=183, 192)4 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Preparatory Acts (n=178, 185)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: Su ID (n=183, 192)28 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Su ID (n=178, 185)5 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Completed Suicide (n=178, 185)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: SI BHV, no Su intent (n=178, 185)0 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: Su Attempt (n=183, 192)5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: SI BHV, no Su intent (n=178, 185)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: Su Attempt (n=183, 192)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: Preparatory Acts (n=183, 192)8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: Su ID (n=183, 192)37 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesScreening: SI BHV, no Su intent (n=183, 192)4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Completed Suicide (n=178, 185)0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Su Attempt (n=178, 185)1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Preparatory Acts (n=178, 185)2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Response to Sheehan-Suicidality Tracking Scale (S-STS) Mapped to the Columbia Classification Algorithm of Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) CategoriesPost-Baseline: Su ID (n=178, 185)11 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Time frame: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to study drug and had at least one safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs126 participants
PregabalinNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs7 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs117 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent (TE) Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs7 participants
Other Pre-specified

Sitting Heart Rate

Time frame: Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to study drug and had at least one safety assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinSitting Heart RateScreening (n=183, 192)75.2 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 12.44
PregabalinSitting Heart RateWeek 1 (n=183, 192)76.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 11.46
PregabalinSitting Heart RateWeek 16 (n=171, 176)76.2 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 11.03
PregabalinSitting Heart RateWeek 4 (n=159, 169)77.5 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.75
PregabalinSitting Heart RateWeek 8 (n=147, 154)77.4 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.52
PregabalinSitting Heart RateWeek 12 (n=127, 137)78.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 11.09
PregabalinSitting Heart RateWeek 17 (n=167, 171)76.0 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.91
PlaceboSitting Heart RateWeek 16 (n=171, 176)76.5 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 11.17
PlaceboSitting Heart RateScreening (n=183, 192)74.6 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 11.1
PlaceboSitting Heart RateWeek 8 (n=147, 154)77.1 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.32
PlaceboSitting Heart RateWeek 17 (n=167, 171)76.2 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.35
PlaceboSitting Heart RateWeek 1 (n=183, 192)74.9 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 9.27
PlaceboSitting Heart RateWeek 12 (n=127, 137)77.5 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 11.09
PlaceboSitting Heart RateWeek 4 (n=159, 169)77.2 beats per minute (bpm)Standard Deviation 10.63
Other Pre-specified

Sitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is contracting; it is the maximum arterial pressure during contraction of left ventricle of heart. Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) is the blood pressure (pressure exerted by circulating blood on the walls of blood vessels) when heart is relaxing; it is the minimum arterial pressure during relaxation and dilation of ventricles of heart.

Time frame: Screening, Week 1, 4, 8, 12, 16, 17

Population: Safety population included all participants who signed the informed consent, had exposure to study drug and had at least one safety assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified time points for each arm group, respectively.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureScreening: SBP (n=183, 192)121.2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 16.18
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 1: SBP (n=183, 192)119.9 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.58
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 4: SBP (n=159, 169)117.9 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 16.42
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 8: SBP (n=147, 154)118.6 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.24
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 12: SBP (n=127, 137)120.2 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.33
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 16: SBP (n=171, 176)119.3 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.71
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 17: SBP (n=167, 171)120.1 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.89
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureScreening: DBP (n=183, 192)78.7 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11.08
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 1: DBP (n=183, 192)76.9 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.48
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 4: DBP (n=159, 169)76.0 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 12.01
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 8: DBP (n=147, 154)76.0 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11.25
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 12: DBP (n=127, 137)77.5 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.62
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 16: DBP (n=171, 176)76.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11.07
PregabalinSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 17: DBP (n=167, 171)76.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11.28
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 8: DBP (n=147, 154)77.6 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11.27
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureScreening: SBP (n=183, 192)122.1 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.02
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureScreening: DBP (n=183, 192)78.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.84
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 1: SBP (n=183, 192)120.4 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.79
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 16: DBP (n=171, 176)78.1 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 9.52
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 4: SBP (n=159, 169)119.8 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.07
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 1: DBP (n=183, 192)77.5 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.4
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 8: SBP (n=147, 154)120.7 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 15.18
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 12: DBP (n=127, 137)78.0 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.07
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 12: SBP (n=127, 137)121.7 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.3
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 4: DBP (n=159, 169)76.5 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 10.43
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 16: SBP (n=171, 176)122.9 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 13.67
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 17: DBP (n=167, 171)78.5 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 11.48
PlaceboSitting Systolic and Diastolic Blood PressureWeek 17: SBP (n=167, 171)121.6 millimeter of mercury (mmHg)Standard Deviation 14.35

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026