Skip to content

Treatment of Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis Grade 1-4 With TomoFix™ Small or Conservatively

Treatment of Medial Compartmental Osteoarthritis Grade 1-4 (Kellgren-Lawrence) or Osteonecrosis With TomoFix™ Small or Conservatively

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01048710
Enrollment
148
Registered
2010-01-14
Start date
2009-07-01
Completion date
2018-05-07
Last updated
2018-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteonecrosis

Keywords

Knee osteoarthritis, knee osteonecrosis, osteotomy

Brief summary

The primary objective of this prospective multicenter study is to assess whether the functional outcome measured with the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) for patients with medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis and osteonecrosis of the knee treated with open wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) using the TomoFix™ Small is better than the functional outcome after conservative treatment.

Detailed description

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee (gonarthrosis) is a common medical condition and causes pain and disability. By 65 years of age, the majority of the US population has radiographic evidence of OA and 11% have symptomatic OA of the knee. In Japan, OA of the knee is more common due to the common sitting style with maximally flexed knees and parallel position of both legs. High Tibial Osteotomy (HTO) for knee OA is a standard procedure in orthopedic surgery. Six years ago, HTO using TomoFix™ was introduced. Because Asian people have different geometric dimensions of the tibiae, an adaptation of size and shape was necessary, and the new TomoFix™ Small was developed. Although there is widespread literature concerning osteotomy for treating knee OA, literature assessing patient outcome after open wedge HTO using TomoFix™ is rare and for TomoFix™ Small, this data is still nonexistent. Therefore, the primary aim of the present multicenter study is to evaluate patient functional outcome using the KOOS. Since a proportion of patients with the indication for HTO refuse surgery and opt to receive conservative treatment, the functional results of patients treated with HTO using TomoFix™ Small will be compared with these patients.

Interventions

OTHERNo intervention

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson K.K. Medical Company
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Synthes GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 40 years of age and older * Patients with OA Grade 1-4 (Kellgren-Lawrence) or osteonecrosis (ON) Stage 2-4 (according to the Koshino classification) * Indication for open wedge HTO with the TomoFix™ Small * No ligamental laxity * Signed written informed consent (by the subjects or legal guardian) and agreement to attend all planned follow-ups * Willing and able to comply with the postoperative management program * Able to understand and read country national language at an elementary level

Exclusion criteria

* Femoro-tibial angle (FTA) \> 185o (standing view x-ray) * Flexion contracture \> 15o * Total knee replacement or unicompartmental knee on the contralateral side * Infections located between the middle of the femur and the ankle * Systemic bacterial infections * Severe osteoarthritis or surgery of the hip joint * Smoking of more than 20 cigarettes per day * Immunodeficiency or compromised host * Patients who have participated in any other device or drug related clinical trial within the previous month * ACL/PCL reconstruction of the same knee * Severe osteoarthritis of the ipsilateral ankle joint For conservative group only: * HTO on the contralateral side * Major surgery on both knees (minor surgery as arthroscopic meniscectomy and synovectomy is allowed)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Clinician-evaluated function of the knee, assessed with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years
Health-related quality of life assessed by the generic Short Form-36 (SF-36) instrument1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years
Range of motion (ROM)1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years
Local and general pain, assessed with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years
Patient-evaluated function of the knee and quality of life, a. assessed with the Oxford-12-item knee score b. assessed with the WOMAC (as calculated from the KOOS)1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years
Surgery details, Postoperative treatment, Postoperative rehabilitation, Utilizationpostoperative period
Evaluation of degenerated and regenerated cartilage (arthroscopic findings assessed according to ICRS and Outerbridge / Koshino)intraoperative and after 2 years
Radiological parameters (e.g. union, delayed union, Kellgren-Lawrence classification, joint space narrowing, tibial slope, tibia vara, patella height according to Blackburne-Peel, modified Insall-Salvati ratio, subluxation of patella)1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years
Complications and mortality1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years
Possibility and duration of the Japanese sitting style3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months, 3 years, 4 years, and 5 years

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026