Skip to content

Trial of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of a Specialist Expert Mood Disorder Team for Refractory Unipolar Depressive Disorder

Randomised Control Trial of the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of a Specialist Expert Mood Disorder Team for Refractory Unipolar Depressive Disorder

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01047124
Enrollment
219
Registered
2010-01-12
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2016-09-30
Last updated
2015-12-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Unipolar Depressive Disorder

Keywords

Depression, Collaborative Care, Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, Mental Health Services, Antidepressants

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is determine whether a specialised mood disorder service, which offers tailored psychological and pharmacological treatment, is more effective in the treatment of chronic unipolar depressive disorder then treatment as usual.

Detailed description

A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of a specialist mood disorder intervention versus treatment as usual will be conducted. Patients will be individually randomised with stratification by mental health trust to either treatment by a specialist team offering tailored psychological and pharmacological treatment or treatment as usual. The specialist mood disorders team will include a psychiatrist and health professionals providing cognitive behaviour therapy. Together the team will assess participants and then provide a co-ordinated and supervised combination of pharmacological and psychological treatment according to guidelines developed by NICE and the British Association of Psychopharmacology. Each participant will receive a treatment plan that is tailored to his/her specific needs. The participants in the treatment as usual team will have their usual access to the same treatments. The outcome in terms of improvement in depressive symptoms, function and costs will be examined after one year in service users with chronic depression. Eligible patients will be followed for 12 months and the primary outcomes will be observer rated depressive symptoms and cost effectiveness from a health and social care perspective. Along side the RCT, implementation analysis and audit of the standard care and specialised care for depression will be carried out.

Interventions

OTHERSpecialist Mood Disorders Team

The specialist mood disorders team will include a psychiatrist and health professionals providing cognitive behaviour therapy. Together the team will assess participants and then provide a co-ordinated and supervised combination of pharmacological and psychological treatment according to guidelines developed by NICE and the British Association of Psychopharmacology. Each participant will receive a treatment plan that is tailored to his/her specific needs.

Sponsors

National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Nottingham
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The responsible medical officer or care coordinator leading care considers the patient to be suffering from a primary unipolar depressive disorder which is not a consequence of having another axis 1 or 2 psychiatric disorder. * Age over 18 years. * Able and willing to give oral and written informed consent to participation in the study. * From the date of first assessment by a health professional working for the index mental health trust, they have been offered or received direct care from one or more health professionals from the Trust three or more occasions for 6 months. * Meet NICE criteria for moderate depression, namely the presence of five out of nine symptoms of (NICE, 2004), have a Hamilton Depression Rating Scale of at least 20, and score 60 or less on the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (American Psychiatric Association, 1994).

Exclusion criteria

* Is receiving emergency care for suicide risk, risk of severe neglect or homicide risk and requires it; however, patients will not be excluded because of such risk provided the risk is adequately contained with their current care setting and the primary medical responsibility for care remains with the referring team. * Does not speak fluent English. * Is pregnant

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - Grid version6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Change in self rated depression measures: Beck Depression Inventory version 1; Personal Health Questionnaire; Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomology3 months
Cost utility or cost effectiveness using the Euroqol 5D as a measure of quality of life and costs from health and social care and society perspectives.6 months
Change in social adjustment (Cooper, Osborn, Gath & Feggetter, 1982), an assessment of social and occupational functioning.6 months
Patient satisfaction and patient/doctor relationship6 months

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

Primary ContactSarah E Marttunen, MSc
sarah.marttunen@nottingham.ac.uk+44(0)1158232478
Backup ContactRichard Morriss
richard.morriss@nottingham.ac.uk+44(0)115820427

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026