Skip to content

Alisertib in Adults With Nonhematological Malignancies, Followed by Alisertib in Lung, Breast, Head and Neck or Gastroesophageal Malignancies

A Phase 1 Dose Escalation Study of MLN8237, an Aurora A Kinase Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Nonhematological Malignancies, Followed by a Phase 2 of MLN8237 in Lung, Breast, Head and Neck, or Gastroesophageal Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01045421
Enrollment
273
Registered
2010-01-11
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2016-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced Nonhematological Malignancies, Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Small Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

NSCLC, SCLC, HNSCC

Brief summary

This is an open-label, multicenter study with a phase 1 dose escalation portion and a 2-stage, phase 2 portion, investigating MLN8237 (alisertib) in patients with advanced nonhematological malignancies.

Detailed description

Following the determination of the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) and schedule (Phase 1), 20 response-evaluable patients in each of the 5 tumor indications will be enrolled (Phase 2-Stage 1). An interim analysis will determine which tumor indications will proceed to enroll an additional 25 patients (Phase 2-Stage 2) to further evaluate Overall Response Rate (ORR) and other secondary endpoints.

Interventions

DRUGMLN8237 (Alisertib)

Phase 1: MLN8237 will be administered orally twice a day on a 7-day dosing schedule Phase 2: MLN8237 will be administered orally at the maximum tolerated dose determined in Phase 1 for 7-days followed by a minimum 14-day rest period.

Sponsors

Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Each patient must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be enrolled in the study: * 18 years or older * Histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic and/or advanced solid tumor (Phase 1 only) * Phase 2 requires Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); Small-cell lung cancer; Breast adenocarcinoma (female patients only); Squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (HNSCC); or Gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1 * Female patients who are post menopausal, surgically sterile, or agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception or abstain from heterosexual intercourse * Male patients who agree to practice effective barrier contraception or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse * Voluntary written consent * Wiling to comply with scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other trial procedures * Measurable disease (Phase 2 only)

Exclusion criteria

Patients meeting any of the following

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)Phase 1: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 21Toxicity according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.0. DLT defined as any of the following considered related to alisertib by investigator: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \<500 cells/cubic meter \[cells/mm\^3\]) for \>7 days; Grade 4 neutropenia with coincident fever; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets \<25,000 cells/mm3) for \>7 days; Platelet count \<10,000 cells/mm3; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; Delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by \>7 days due to treatment-related toxicity; \>=Grade 3 nonhematological toxicity except \>=Grade 3 nausea/emesis occurred in the absence of optimal antiemetic therapy; \>=Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in the absence of optimal supportive therapy with loperamide/comparable antidiarrheal; Grade 3 fatigue for \<1 week; Other Grade 3 nonhematological toxicity that could be safely, reliably controlled to \<=Grade 2 with appropriate treatment.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective ResponseBaseline until complete response or partial response, assessed every 2 cycles up to end of study (up to 50 cycles)Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis less than \[\<\] 10 millimeter \[mm\]). No new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)Baseline up to Week 50Time in days from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cancer. Duration of tumor response=(the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1). CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, except nodal disease; all nodes decreased to normal; no new lesions. PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions; no unequivocal progression of non-target disease; no new lesions. Tumor progression: \>=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study); absolute increase of \>=5 mm; appearance of \>=1 new lesions is also considered progression. DOR calculated for the subgroup of participants with objective response.
Phase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsBaseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drugAn adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.
Phase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDays 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-doseMaximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.
Phase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDays 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdoseTmax: Time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax.
Phase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDays 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdoseArea under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval, where tau is the length of the dosing interval.
Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)Baseline until progressive disease, assessed every 2 cycles up to end of study (up to 50 cycles)PFS was defined as the time from randomization (or the first dose of study treatment for non-randomized studies) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1or more new lesions is also considered progression.
Phase 1: Rac- Accumulation Ratio for AlisertibDays 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdoseRac was estimated as a ratio of AUC (0-tau) at Day 7 and AUC (0-tau) at Day 1. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval, where tau is the length of the dosing interval.
Phase 1: Peak to Trough Ratio for AlisertibDay 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdosePeak to trough ratio was estimated as a ratio of Cmax at Day 7 and the minimum observed plasma concentration (Ctrough) of alisertib at Day 7. Cmax is the peak plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. Ctrough is the minimum plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.
Phase 1: Steady State Oral Clearance (CLss/F) for AlisertibDay 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdoseCL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the plasma, calculated as the drug dose divided AUC(0-tau), expressed in liter per hour (L/hr).
Phase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of Response12 monthsIn SCLC,chemo-sensitive/resistant population were analyzed;in breast cancers,ER2 and ER2 status were analyzed.HR+ =estrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive. HER+ =human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Triple negative =negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and HER2.Clinical response according to RECIST version 1.1. CR:complete disappearance of all target lesions,non-target disease,except nodal disease;all nodes decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm);no new lesions. PR:\>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions (SLD);short axis was used in the sum for target nodes,longest diameter used in the sum for all other target lesions;no unequivocal progression of non-target disease;no new lesions. Progressive Disease (PD): \>=20% rise in SLD from the smallest value on study;unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable Disease (SD):Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD.
Phase 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for AlisertibDay 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdoseTerminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma.
Phase 2: Time to Disease Progression (TTP)Baseline until disease progression, assessed every 2 cycles up to end of study (up to 50 cycles)Time in days from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression. Tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1or more new lesions is also considered progression.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in the study at 42 investigative sites in France, Poland, the Czech Republic, and the United States from 16 February 2010 to 25 April 2014.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with a historical diagnosis of relapsed or refractory advanced nonhematological malignancies were enrolled in 1 of the 2 stages, Phase 1 (lead-in alisertib dose escalation stage) and Phase 2 (efficacy and safety assessment stage for alisertib dose determined in Phase 1).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phase 1: MLN8237- All Participants
MLN8237 (alisertib) 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, or 60 mg enteric-coated tablets, orally, twice daily, for 7 days followed by 14 days of rest period in 21-day treatment cycles for a maximum of 24 months, or until progressive disease, unacceptable treatment-related toxicity, or initiation of a different anticancer therapy in participants enrolled in dose-escalation or pancreatic cancer cohort during Phase 1 portion of the study.
24
Phase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- Breast Cancer
MLN8237 (alisertib) 50 mg, enteric-coated tablets, orally, twice daily for 7 days followed by 14 days of rest period in 21-day treatment cycles for a maximum of 24 months, or until progressive disease, unacceptable treatment-related toxicity, or initiation of a different anticancer therapy in participants with breast cancer during Phase 2 portion of the study.
53
Phase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- Gastric Cancer
MLN8237 (alisertib) 50 mg, enteric-coated tablets, orally, twice daily for 7 days followed by 14 days of rest period in 21-day treatment cycles for a maximum of 24 months, or until progressive disease, unacceptable treatment-related toxicity, or initiation of a different anticancer therapy in participants with gastric cancer during Phase 2 portion of the study.
55
Phase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- HNSCC
MLN8237 (alisertib) 50 mg, enteric-coated tablets, orally, twice daily for 7 days followed by 14 days of rest period in 21-day treatment cycles for a maximum of 24 months, or until progressive disease, unacceptable treatment-related toxicity, or initiation of a different anticancer therapy in participants with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) during Phase 2 portion of the study.
55
Phase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- NSCLC
MLN8237 (alisertib) 50 mg, enteric-coated tablets, orally, twice daily for 7 days followed by 14 days of rest period in 21-day treatment cycles for a maximum of 24 months, or until progressive disease, unacceptable treatment-related toxicity, or initiation of a different anticancer therapy in participants with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) during Phase 2 portion of the study.
26
Phase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- SCLC
MLN8237 (alisertib) 50 mg, enteric-coated tablets, orally, twice daily for 7 days followed by 14 days of rest period in 21-day treatment cycles for a maximum of 24 months, or until progressive disease, unacceptable treatment-related toxicity, or initiation of a different anticancer therapy in participants with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) during Phase 2 portion of the study.
60
Total273

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010
Phase 1Progressive Disease00001000000
Phase 1Withdrawal by Subject00010000000
Phase 2Death00000001120
Phase 2Other00000003001
Phase 2Progressive Disease00000001111

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPhase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- Gastric CancerPhase 1: MLN8237- All ParticipantsPhase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- HNSCCPhase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- Breast CancerPhase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- NSCLCPhase 2: MLN8237 50 mg- SCLCTotal
Age, Customized
18-64 years
33 participants17 participants38 participants37 participants17 participants38 participants180 participants
Age, Customized
65-84 years
21 participants7 participants17 participants16 participants9 participants22 participants92 participants
Age, Customized
85 years and over
1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IA
0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Disease stage at study entry
II
0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Disease stage at study entry
III
1 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants4 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IIIA
0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants3 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IIIB
0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants5 participants2 participants10 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IIIC
0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IV
54 participants19 participants2 participants48 participants21 participants57 participants201 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IVA
0 participants1 participants23 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants24 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IVB
0 participants1 participants2 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants3 participants
Disease stage at study entry
IVC
0 participants0 participants25 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants25 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
0
21 participants4 participants17 participants23 participants7 participants13 participants85 participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status
1
34 participants20 participants38 participants30 participants19 participants47 participants188 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 participants2 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants4 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
3 participants3 participants2 participants1 participants2 participants4 participants15 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Chinese
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 participants3 participants1 participants4 participants1 participants1 participants12 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
49 participants19 participants50 participants48 participants25 participants57 participants248 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not reported
1 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
0 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants0 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
51 participants18 participants53 participants49 participants22 participants56 participants249 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
20 participants0 participants8 participants19 participants7 participants15 participants69 participants
Region of Enrollment
France
8 participants0 participants11 participants10 participants3 participants8 participants40 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants0 participants7 participants9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
27 participants24 participants35 participants23 participants16 participants30 participants155 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants9 Participants3 Participants53 Participants12 Participants28 Participants117 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants15 Participants52 Participants0 Participants14 Participants32 Participants156 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
23 / 231 / 152 / 5352 / 5554 / 5526 / 2655 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
13 / 231 / 123 / 5330 / 5519 / 558 / 2628 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

Toxicity according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.0. DLT defined as any of the following considered related to alisertib by investigator: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \<500 cells/cubic meter \[cells/mm\^3\]) for \>7 days; Grade 4 neutropenia with coincident fever; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets \<25,000 cells/mm3) for \>7 days; Platelet count \<10,000 cells/mm3; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; Delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by \>7 days due to treatment-related toxicity; \>=Grade 3 nonhematological toxicity except \>=Grade 3 nausea/emesis occurred in the absence of optimal antiemetic therapy; \>=Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in the absence of optimal supportive therapy with loperamide/comparable antidiarrheal; Grade 3 fatigue for \<1 week; Other Grade 3 nonhematological toxicity that could be safely, reliably controlled to \<=Grade 2 with appropriate treatment.

Time frame: Phase 1: Cycle 1 Day 1 to Cycle 2 Day 21

Population: DLT-Evaluable population: all participants in the Phase 1 portion of the study who either experienced DLT during Cycle 1 or completed at least 85% of the planned doses of alisertib and had sufficient follow-up data to allow the investigators and sponsor to determine whether DLT occurred.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)2 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mg- Pancreatic CancerPhase 1: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)0 participants
Primary

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response

Percentage of participants with objective response based assessment of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST). CR was defined as complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, with the exception of nodal disease. All nodes, both target and non-target, must decrease to normal (short axis less than \[\<\] 10 millimeter \[mm\]). No new lesions. PR was defined as greater than or equal to (\>=) 30 percent (%) decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions. The short axis was used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter was used in the sum for all other target lesions. No unequivocal progression of non-target disease. No new lesions.

Time frame: Baseline until complete response or partial response, assessed every 2 cycles up to end of study (up to 50 cycles)

Population: Response-Evaluable population included all participants with measurable disease who received at least 1 dose of alisertib and had at least 1 post-baseline response assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response18 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response9 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response9 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response4 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response21 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for Alisertib

Area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval, where tau is the length of the dosing interval.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Population: PK-Evaluable population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and alisertib concentration-time data to permit calculation of alisertib PK parameters in Phase 1 where Days 1 and 7 assessment were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)2640 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 11, 2)8660 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)3495 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 19
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 11, 2)10184 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)5015 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 57
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 11, 2)13694 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 59
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 11, 2)20867 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)10736 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)13932 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 42
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: AUC(0-tau): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time Tau Over the Dosing Interval for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 11, 2)28709 nanomole*hour (nM*hr)
Secondary

Phase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Alisertib

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours post-dose

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK)-Evaluable population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and alisertib concentration-time data to permit calculation of alisertib PK parameters in Phase 1 where Days 1 and 7 assessment were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)981 nanomole (nM)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)297 nanomole (nM)
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)1279 nanomole (nM)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)602 nanomole (nM)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 15
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)1830 nanomole (nM)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)949 nanomole (nM)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)1619 nanomole (nM)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)2907 nanomole (nM)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 49
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)3027 nanomole (nM)
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Cmax- Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)1696 nanomole (nM)Geometric Coefficient of Variation 37
Secondary

Phase 1: Peak to Trough Ratio for Alisertib

Peak to trough ratio was estimated as a ratio of Cmax at Day 7 and the minimum observed plasma concentration (Ctrough) of alisertib at Day 7. Cmax is the peak plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. Ctrough is the minimum plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.

Time frame: Day 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Population: PK-Evaluable population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and alisertib concentration-time data to permit calculation of alisertib PK parameters in Phase 1 where Days 1 and 7 assessment were available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Peak to Trough Ratio for Alisertib1.7 ratio
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Peak to Trough Ratio for Alisertib2.1 ratioStandard Deviation 0.7
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Peak to Trough Ratio for Alisertib2.3 ratioStandard Deviation 1.4
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Peak to Trough Ratio for Alisertib2.3 ratioStandard Deviation 0.8
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Peak to Trough Ratio for Alisertib1.8 ratio
Secondary

Phase 1: Rac- Accumulation Ratio for Alisertib

Rac was estimated as a ratio of AUC (0-tau) at Day 7 and AUC (0-tau) at Day 1. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve during a dosing interval, where tau is the length of the dosing interval.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Population: PK-Evaluable population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and alisertib concentration-time data to permit calculation of alisertib PK parameters in Phase 1 where Days 1 and 7 assessment were available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Rac- Accumulation Ratio for Alisertib3.3 ratio
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Rac- Accumulation Ratio for Alisertib3.0 ratioStandard Deviation 1
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Rac- Accumulation Ratio for Alisertib2.3 ratioStandard Deviation 0.4
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Rac- Accumulation Ratio for Alisertib2.2 ratioStandard Deviation 0.9
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Rac- Accumulation Ratio for Alisertib2.4 ratio
Secondary

Phase 1: Steady State Oral Clearance (CLss/F) for Alisertib

CL/F is apparent clearance of the drug from the plasma, calculated as the drug dose divided AUC(0-tau), expressed in liter per hour (L/hr).

Time frame: Day 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Population: PK-Evaluable population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and alisertib concentration-time data to permit calculation of alisertib PK parameters in Phase 1 where Day 7 assessment was available.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Steady State Oral Clearance (CLss/F) for Alisertib2.2 L/hr
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Steady State Oral Clearance (CLss/F) for Alisertib3.8 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Steady State Oral Clearance (CLss/F) for Alisertib5.6 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 72
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Steady State Oral Clearance (CLss/F) for Alisertib4.6 L/hrGeometric Coefficient of Variation 39
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Steady State Oral Clearance (CLss/F) for Alisertib4.0 L/hr
Secondary

Phase 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Alisertib

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma.

Time frame: Day 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Population: PK-Evaluable population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and alisertib concentration-time data to permit calculation of alisertib PK parameters in Phase 1 where Day 7 assessment was available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Alisertib20.6 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Alisertib16.0 hoursStandard Deviation 1.2
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Alisertib19.0 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Alisertib20.8 hoursStandard Deviation 10.3
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for Alisertib27.8 hours
Secondary

Phase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Alisertib

Tmax: Time to reach the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax.

Time frame: Days 1 and 7: predose, 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours postdose

Population: PK-Evaluable population included all participants who had sufficient dosing data and alisertib concentration-time data to permit calculation of alisertib PK parameters in Phase 1 where Day 1 and Day 7 assessment were available.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)2.9 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)3.1 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)2.0 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)3.0 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)3.2 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)3.0 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)2.4 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)2.2 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 1 (n = 1, 3, 4, 13, 3)6.0 hours
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 1: Tmax- Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for AlisertibDay 7 (n = 1, 3, 3, 12, 2)2.8 hours
Secondary

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

Time in days from the first documentation of objective tumor response to objective tumor progression or death due to any cancer. Duration of tumor response=(the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression or death due to cancer minus the date of the first CR or PR that was subsequently confirmed plus 1). CR: complete disappearance of all target lesions and non-target disease, except nodal disease; all nodes decreased to normal; no new lesions. PR: \>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions; no unequivocal progression of non-target disease; no new lesions. Tumor progression: \>=20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study); absolute increase of \>=5 mm; appearance of \>=1 new lesions is also considered progression. DOR calculated for the subgroup of participants with objective response.

Time frame: Baseline up to Week 50

Population: Included a subset of response-evaluable population who had objective tumor response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)169 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)198 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)79 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)NA days
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)125 days
Secondary

Phase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.

Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug

Population: Safety population included all participants who received any amount of alisertib.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAdverse Events52 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events23 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events30 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAdverse Events52 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events19 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAdverse Events54 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAdverse Events26 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events8 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsAdverse Events57 participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Events28 participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from randomization (or the first dose of study treatment for non-randomized studies) to the first documentation of objective tumor progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this included the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1or more new lesions is also considered progression.

Time frame: Baseline until progressive disease, assessed every 2 cycles up to end of study (up to 50 cycles)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received any amount of alisertib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)164 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)49 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)72 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)92 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Progression-free Survival (PFS)49 days
Secondary

Phase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of Response

In SCLC,chemo-sensitive/resistant population were analyzed;in breast cancers,ER2 and ER2 status were analyzed.HR+ =estrogen receptor-positive or progesterone receptor-positive. HER+ =human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). Triple negative =negative for estrogen receptors, progesterone receptors, and HER2.Clinical response according to RECIST version 1.1. CR:complete disappearance of all target lesions,non-target disease,except nodal disease;all nodes decrease to normal (short axis \<10 mm);no new lesions. PR:\>=30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target lesions (SLD);short axis was used in the sum for target nodes,longest diameter used in the sum for all other target lesions;no unequivocal progression of non-target disease;no new lesions. Progressive Disease (PD): \>=20% rise in SLD from the smallest value on study;unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Stable Disease (SD):Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: Response-Evaluable population. Data is reported only for SCLC and breast cancer cohorts becuase these cohorts showed clinical meaningful single agent activity, thus subgroup analysis were done to assess whether a particular subgroup of participants was more or less responsive to alisertib. Rest of the cohorts did not show meaningful activity.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: CR (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)0 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: CR (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)0 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: PD (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)12 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:PD(n=0,0,0,0,12)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: CR(n=0,0,0,0,36)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: SD (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)65 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: PR(n=0,0,0,0,36)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: SD (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)36 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: SD(n=0,0,0,0,36)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: PR (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)23 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: SD (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)36 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: PR (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)22 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: PD (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)57 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: PR (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)7 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:PR(n=0,0,0,0,12)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:SD(n=0,0,0,0,12)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: PD (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)44 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:CR(n=0,0,0,0,12)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: PD(n=0,0,0,0,36)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: CR (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)0 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: PD(n=0,0,0,0,36)44 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: CR (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: SD (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: PD (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: CR (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: PR (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: PD (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: CR (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: PR (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: SD (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseTriple Negative: PD (n=14, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:CR(n=0,0,0,0,12)0 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:PR(n=0,0,0,0,12)25 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:SD(n=0,0,0,0,12)25 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: CR(n=0,0,0,0,36)0 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: PR(n=0,0,0,0,36)19 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHR+: PR (n=26, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseHER+: SD (n=9, 0, 0, 0, 0)NA percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Refractory:PD(n=0,0,0,0,12)50 percentage of participants
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Relationship Between Clinical Response and Molecular Markers of ResponseChemotherapy Sensitive: SD(n=0,0,0,0,36)36 percentage of participants
Secondary

Phase 2: Time to Disease Progression (TTP)

Time in days from start of study treatment to first documentation of objective tumor progression. Tumor progression as per RECIST 1.1 was defined as at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of 1or more new lesions is also considered progression.

Time frame: Baseline until disease progression, assessed every 2 cycles up to end of study (up to 50 cycles)

Population: Safety population included all participants who received any amount of alisertib.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phase 1: MLN8237 10 mgPhase 2: Time to Disease Progression (TTP)164 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 20 mgPhase 2: Time to Disease Progression (TTP)46 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 40 mgPhase 2: Time to Disease Progression (TTP)72 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 50 mgPhase 2: Time to Disease Progression (TTP)92 days
Phase 1: MLN8237 60 mgPhase 2: Time to Disease Progression (TTP)78 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 18, 2026