Skip to content

Comparison of the Efficacy of a Biological Implant to Reinforce Overlapping Sphincter Repair Versus Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone

Comparison of the Efficacy of a Biological Implant to Reinforce Overlapping Sphincter Repair Versus Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01044589
Enrollment
13
Registered
2010-01-08
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2017-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anal Incontinence, Fecal Incontinence

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Biodesign™ Surgisis® Tissue Graft to reinforce an overlapping sphincter repair versus the standard overlapping sphincter repair in controlling episodes of incontinence in patients who have fecal incontinence and a defect in the anal sphincter.

Interventions

DEVICEBiodesign Tissue Repair Graft

Biodesign Tissue Repair Graft reinforcement

OTHEROverlapping Sphincter Repair

Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone

Sponsors

Cook Group Incorporated
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Massarat Zutshi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Female * Age 18 years or older * fecal incontinence due to an anterior defect in the external anal sphincter or both external and internal anal sphincter muscles * Fecal incontinence severity score of 10 or more * Fecal incontinence episodes of 4 or more over a 2 week period

Exclusion criteria

* History of diabetes * History of allergy to porcine derivatives * History of infection in the anal area (abscess, fistula) * History of inflammatory bowel disease * History of hidradenitis suppurativa * History of immunosuppression * History of HIV positivity * History of radiation to the study site within the last 12 months * Patients who cannot travel to keep follow up appointments * Patients who are prisoners * Patients who are mentally handicapped * Patients who are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study period, or who are currently breastfeeding * Patients with significant posterior pelvic organ prolapse and who would be candidates for concomitant treatment. * Patients with a FIQL baseline score of ≤ 4 * Patients participating in another clinical trial for the same indication * Patients unwilling to give informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Number of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week24 months

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Overlapping Sphincter Repair
Control Overlapping Sphincter Repair: Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone
6
Biodesign Tissue Repair Graft
Biodesign Tissue Repair Graft Biodesign Tissue Repair Graft: Biodesign Tissue Repair Graft reinforcement Overlapping Sphincter Repair: Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone
7
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOverlapping Sphincter RepairBiodesign Tissue Repair GraftTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants6 Participants11 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants7 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants7 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 61 / 7
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 60 / 7
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 61 / 7

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Overlapping Sphincter RepairNumber of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week2 Participants
Biodesign Tissue Repair GraftNumber of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week2 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week

Time frame: 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Overlapping Sphincter RepairNumber of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week1 Participants
Biodesign Tissue Repair GraftNumber of Participants Reporting a Decrease in Incontinence Episodes Per Week1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026