Skip to content

A Comparison of the Success Rate Of Cannulation Between The Accuvein Apparatus And Standard Technique

A Comparison of the Success Rate Of Cannulation Between The Accuvein Apparatus And Standard Technique

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01042613
Enrollment
146
Registered
2010-01-05
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2011-03-31
Last updated
2011-12-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cannulation

Keywords

AccuVein AV300 device;, Intravenous cannulation

Brief summary

1. This study will compare the first attempt success rate of cannulation in research participants randomized to using a new FDA approved AccuVein AV300 device for intravenous access with research participants randomized to standard cannulation methods. 2. This study will assess if insertion of intravenous cannula is faster when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV300 device as compared to the standard technique. 3. This study will assess if the number of skin punctures is fewer when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV300 device as compared to the standard technique.

Detailed description

Patients agreeing to participate in this study will be randomized to one of two groups for intravenous access. One group will use the standard cannulation method and the other group will use the new FDA approved AccuVein AV300 device for cannulation. After pre-anesthetic evaluation, the research participant will be brought to the operating room or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Suite and standard monitoring will be applied (EKG, SpO2, BP) if tolerated. Anesthesia will be induced via a face mask with sevoflurane in 100% O2. When the supervising anesthesiologist deems it appropriate, attempt at cannulation will begin. A tourniquet will be applied. A 22-gauge cannula will be used. Randomization will take place before the patient is taken back to the Operating Room or MRI Suite. If the research participant has been randomized to the standard treatment group then cannulation will be attempted in the standard manner. If the research participant has been randomized to the AV300 device group then intravenous cannulation will be attempted using the AV300 device following the manufacturer's instructions. A research team member will time cannulation access for all participants. Participation ends once successful cannulation is achieved or when a maximum of 4 skin punctures have been made. Only the study coordinator will know which randomization group the patient has been assigned. Once the anesthesiologist has determined a potential IV access site, s/he will be informed to which group the patient was assigned. If the parent/guardian requests, s/he will be told after the procedure to which group the child was randomized.

Interventions

PROCEDURECannulation using Accuvein device

If the research participant has been randomized to the AV300 device group A, then intravenous cannulation will be attempted using the AV300 device following manufacturer's instructions by four anesthesiologists.

PROCEDUREStandard Cannulation method

If the research participant has been randomized to the standard treatment group B then cannulation will be attempted in the standard manner. A research team member will time cannulation access for all participants. Participation ends once successful cannulation is achieved or when a maximum of 4 skin punctures have been made.

Sponsors

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Infants and children under 18 years of age. 2. American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) Physical Status I, II or III. 3. Patients undergoing elective surgery,examination under anesthesia,or MRI who do not have existing intravenous access. 4. Able to understand English. 5. Parent/guardian willing to sign consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Existing intravenous access. 2. Malformations or infections at the potential site of insertion. 3. Inability or unwillingness of research participant or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent. 4. Need for emergency surgery.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First Attempt Success Rate of CannulationAt cannulationThis study will compare the first attempt success rate of cannulation in research participants randomized to using a new FDA approved AccuVein AV300 device for intravenous access with research participants randomized to standard cannulation methods. There is one timepoint for outcome data collection and it is prior to cannulation. Success (yes) is defined as needle insertion into target vein.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time Between Tourniquet Application and Successful Cannulation is Achieved or 4 Attempts Have Been Made (in Minutes).At cannulationTo assess if insertion of intravenous cannula is faster when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV 300 device as compared to the standard technique
Number of Skin PuncturesAt cannulationTo assess if the number of skin punctures is fewer when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV300 device as compared to the standard technique

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

148 total patients were recruited at single institution (SJCRH) study between Jan 13, 2010, and March 03, 2011.

Pre-assignment details

148 total patients were enrolled on the study. The report is based on results for 146 patients. Two patients were excluded from this study. One patient was excluded due to MD's decision and the other patient was deemed to be inevaluable after study enrollment (cannula gauge other than 22 were used).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ACVein
Research participants are randomly assigned into group A (Accuvein AV300 assisted intravenous catheter insertion)
72
Standard
(standard technique of insertion of the intravenous cannula)
74
Total146

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandardTotalACVein
Age Continuous5.37 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.88
5.54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.79
5.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.72
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants78 Participants35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants68 Participants37 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 720 / 74
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 720 / 74

Outcome results

Primary

First Attempt Success Rate of Cannulation

This study will compare the first attempt success rate of cannulation in research participants randomized to using a new FDA approved AccuVein AV300 device for intravenous access with research participants randomized to standard cannulation methods. There is one timepoint for outcome data collection and it is prior to cannulation. Success (yes) is defined as needle insertion into target vein.

Time frame: At cannulation

Population: Patients (age 17 years or less) undergoing elective surgery or examination under anesthesia who do not have existing intravenous access.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ACVeinFirst Attempt Success Rate of CannulationSuccessful first attempt54 Participants
ACVeinFirst Attempt Success Rate of CannulationUnsuccessful first attempt18 Participants
StandardFirst Attempt Success Rate of CannulationSuccessful first attempt54 Participants
StandardFirst Attempt Success Rate of CannulationUnsuccessful first attempt20 Participants
p-value: 0.851Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Skin Punctures

To assess if the number of skin punctures is fewer when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV300 device as compared to the standard technique

Time frame: At cannulation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACVeinNumber of Skin Punctures1.33 Skin puncturesStandard Deviation 0.75
StandardNumber of Skin Punctures1.26 Skin puncturesStandard Deviation 0.62
p-value: 0.8Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Time Between Tourniquet Application and Successful Cannulation is Achieved or 4 Attempts Have Been Made (in Minutes).

To assess if insertion of intravenous cannula is faster when intravenous access is assisted by the AccuVein AV 300 device as compared to the standard technique

Time frame: At cannulation

Population: Of the 146 patients, two patients were excluded due to missing time records.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ACVeinTime Between Tourniquet Application and Successful Cannulation is Achieved or 4 Attempts Have Been Made (in Minutes).1.48 MinutesStandard Deviation 0.97
StandardTime Between Tourniquet Application and Successful Cannulation is Achieved or 4 Attempts Have Been Made (in Minutes).1.26 MinutesStandard Deviation 0.84
p-value: 0.105Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026