Skip to content

Cost Effectiveness of Language Services in Hospital Emergency Departments (EDs)

Cost Effectiveness of Language Services in Hospital Emergency Departments

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01041014
Enrollment
447
Registered
2009-12-30
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2010-01-31
Last updated
2015-10-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Language Discordance

Keywords

Limited English proficiency, Cost-effectiveness, Emergency Departments, Language Discordance, Satisfaction, Limited English proficient patients, Spanish-speaking patients

Brief summary

Numerous studies suggest that the use of in-person, professionally trained medical interpreters can reduce health care costs associated with diagnosing and treating patients with limited English proficiency. However, few studies have specifically addressed the question of the cost-effectiveness of language services in health care settings. This study used a randomized controlled study design to compare the cost-effectiveness of using professional interpreters with Spanish-speaking patients seen in hospital emergency departments (EDs) versus using the usual language services available to these patients. The main goal of the study was to estimate the effect that professional interpreters have on resource utilization and patient/provider satisfaction in the ED compared to the language services usually offered in these settings. Our hypothesis was that use of trained interpreters would lead to more cost-effective provision of ED services.

Interventions

All treatment interpreters were certified bilingual in Spanish and English and had completed (1) at least 40 hours of training in medical terminology, ethics, patient privacy, and basic interpreting skills; and (2) an online course in protection of human subjects.

Sponsors

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Mathematica Policy Research, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* limited English proficient (LEP) Spanish-speaking patients * adults aged 18 or older * LEP parents of children seen in emergency departments

Exclusion criteria

* cognitively impaired, comatose, or traumatized patients * healthy volunteers * prisoners * hospital employees

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cost-effectiveness of in-person interpreters versus other language servicesJune 2009

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Satisfaction with ability to communicateJune 2009

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026