Skip to content

Low-Cost Contingency Management for Smoking Cessation

Low-Cost Contingency Management for Smoking Cessation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01040260
Enrollment
103
Registered
2009-12-29
Start date
2009-06-30
Completion date
2012-05-31
Last updated
2018-06-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tobacco Use Cessation

Keywords

tobacco use disorder

Brief summary

An innovative low-cost form of contingency management has been developed in which participants receive the chance to draw vouchers from a fish bowl depending on whether or not their abstinence from tobacco is confirmed by expired-air carbon monoxide. The vouchers can be redeemed for prizes of varying value. This form of contingency management has been shown to be effective in the treatment of a variety of substance use disorders, but has not been investigated in a clinical trial focusing on smoking cessation. Thus, the primary purpose of the proposed study will be to investigate the effects of a low-cost prize-based form of contingency management in the treatment of nicotine dependence. To accomplish this objective, we enrolled 103 current smokers into the study. The participants in Study Arm 1 received the contingency management intervention for 8 weeks, and the participants in Study Arm 2 had their smoking status assessed but did not receive the contingency management intervention. Both interventions received brief counseling and nicotine replacement therapy. The counseling was conducted in two 60-minute individual sessions scheduled one week apart with two follow-up phone calls at weeks 3, 4, and 6. The primary outcome for this study was biochemically-validated smoking status at 3 months (end of treatment), and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Both continuous and point-prevalent abstinence rates were determined. Saliva cotinine levels were measured in all participants reporting abstinence at each assessment. This study had 80% power to detect a 10% absolute difference in smoking cessation rates between the two treatment conditions (i.e., a 28% quit rate in Study Arm 1 versus a 18% quit rate in Study Arm 2) with alpha set at 0.05. These estimates included an anticipated 15% loss to follow-up over the 12-month study period.

Detailed description

Contingency management as a treatment for substance use disorders involves the use of tangible rewards for confirmed abstinence. There is preliminary evidence that contingency management shows promise as a smoking cessation intervention. An innovative low-cost form of contingency management has been developed in which participants receive the chance to draw vouchers from a fish bowl depending on whether or not their abstinence from tobacco is confirmed by expired-air carbon monoxide. The vouchers can be redeemed for prizes of varying value. This form of contingency management has been shown to be effective in the treatment of a variety of substance use disorders, but has not been investigated in a clinical trial focusing on smoking cessation. Thus, the primary purpose of the proposed study was to investigate the effects of a low-cost prize-based form of contingency management in the treatment of nicotine dependence. To accomplish this objective, we enrolled 103 current smokers into the study. The participants in Study Arm 1 received the contingency management intervention for 8 weeks, and the participants in Study Arm 2 had their smoking status assessed but did not receive the contingency management intervention. Both interventions received brief counseling and nicotine replacement therapy. The counseling was conducted in two 60-minute individual sessions scheduled one week apart with two follow-up phone calls at weeks 3, 4, and 6. The primary outcome for this study was biochemically-validated smoking status at 3 months (end of treatment), and at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Both continuous and point-prevalent abstinence rates were determined. Saliva cotinine levels were measured in all participants reporting abstinence at each assessment. This study had 80% power to detect a 10% absolute difference in smoking cessation rates between the two treatment conditions (i.e., a 28% quit rate in Study Arm 1 versus a 18% quit rate in Study Arm 2) with alpha set at 0.05. These estimates included an anticipated 15% loss to follow-up over the 12-month study period.

Interventions

OTHERCounseling

Smoking cessation counseling

BEHAVIORALContingency management

Use of tangible rewards for abstinence from smoking

Nicotine patches

Sponsors

University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Smoke at least 5 cigarettes per day * Interested in quitting

Exclusion criteria

* Cognitive impairment or unstable psychotic disorder that would significantly interfere with the individual's ability to participate in the study. * Self-reported problem with alcohol or other drugs during the past three months * Current use of any smoking cessation medication * Presence of any contraindications for nicotine patches, lozenges, or gum * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Abstinence Rate52 weeksNumber of participants who abstained from smoking during the 7 day period verified by CO testing

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Contingency Management
Use of tangible rewards for verified abstinence
53
Counseling Plus Nicotine Patches
Counseling plus nicotine patches, CO testing without contingency management
50
Total103

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up35
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject126

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCounseling Plus Nicotine PatchesContingency ManagementTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
49 Participants51 Participants100 Participants
Age, Continuous47.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.5
46.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 participants53 participants103 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants12 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
39 Participants41 Participants80 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 532 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 530 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Abstinence Rate

Number of participants who abstained from smoking during the 7 day period verified by CO testing

Time frame: 52 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Contingency ManagementAbstinence Rate8 participants
Counseling Plus Nicotine PatchesAbstinence Rate10 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026