Skip to content

Recto Anal Repair or Milligan Morgans Operation of Grade 3 and 4 Symptomatic Haemorrhoidal Disease

Recto Anal Repair or Milligan Morgans Operation of Grade 3 and 4 Symptomatic Haemorrhoidal Disease. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01038141
Enrollment
80
Registered
2009-12-23
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2014-07-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Symptomatic Haemorrhoidal Disease

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare a new mini invasive surgical procedure (Recto Anal Repair) to the traditional Milligan-Morgan procedure in patients suffering from severe piles.

Detailed description

An estimated 4% of the adult population suffers from haemorrhoidal disease. In 1937 E. T. Milligan and C. N. Morgan described a method for operating piles that still is regarded the gold standard in the treatment of severe haemorrhoidal disease. This procedure is followed by a prolonged and painful recovery. To overcome the long recovery often combined with long sick leaves, less invasive methods for treating piles have been introduced during the last decade. However, few studies have compared patient benefits and the long term outcome of these techniques, and the choice of treatment is often based on the skills and experience of the individual surgeon. A new and promising mini invasive approach utilizes doppler-guided ligation of the haemorrhoidal arteries. All haemorrhoidal arteries are identified and then ligated approximately 2 cm above the anal canal. Thereafter the rectal mucosa with the piles is repositioned and fixed in the rectum with running sutures. This procedure is termed Recto Anal Repair (RAR) and leads to shrinking of the piles and restored anatomy of the anus and the rectum. The investigators want to execute a randomized, consecutive, prospective, controlled study with long term follow up to compare the RAR procedure to Milligans operation for the treatment of severe haemorrhoidal disease. The primary goals are evaluation of pain and sick leave 7, 14 and 21 days after surgery and reported reduction of pile symptoms after 3, 6 and 12 months. In addition the investigators want to compare the overall satisfaction with the two procedures.

Interventions

PROCEDURESurgery for advanced haemorrhoidal disease

Milligan Morgan vs Recto Anal Repair

Sponsors

University Hospital, Akershus
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with symptomatic grade 3 and 4 haemorrhoidal disease * Age 18-80 * Patients who are fitted for local and general anaesthesia * Patients who are able to understand the information given and are willing to give a written consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous operated for piles * Previous operated in the anal canal * Faecal incontinence * Inflammatory bowel disease with affection of the anal canal * Chronic diarrhea * Fissura ani * Fistula in ano * Chronic anal pain * Neurological illness with affection of anal sensation * Patients not able to follow the study protocol * Patients taking immunosuppressant medication * Pregnancy * Disability * Anal polyps * Medication affecting the coagulation system * Circular anal prolapse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of painup to 21 days

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluation of sick leaveup to 21 days

Countries

Norway

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026