Skip to content

LEO 29102 Cream in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

A Phase 2, Proof of Concept and Dose Finding Study, Investigating Treatment Efficacy of LEO 29102 Cream, LEO 29102 Cream Vehicle, and Elidel® Cream 10 mg/g, After Cutaneous Administration Twice Daily for 4 Weeks

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01037881
Enrollment
183
Registered
2009-12-23
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2025-03-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atopic Dermatitis

Brief summary

This is a proof of concept and dose finding Phase II trial comparing 5 dose strengths with vehicle and an active comparator (Elidel cream 10 mg/g) in a 4 week, twice daily treatment regimen in mild to moderate atopic dermatitis patients.

Interventions

comparison of different dosages of drug

DRUGElidel®

comparison

Sponsors

LEO Pharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of atopic dermatitis defined according to Hanifin and Rajka * IGA assessment scored as mild (2) to moderate (3) atopic dermatitis * Treatment lesions located on the trunk and limbs * Treatment lesions involving 3% to 10% of the total body surface area * Patients of either gender between 18 years and 65 years of age

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to randomisation * Topical treatment with immunomodulators (pimecrolimus, tacrolimus) within 2 weeks prior to randomisation * Topical treatment with corticosteroids from WHO groups II, III or IV within 1 week prior to randomisation * Use of topical or systemic antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to randomisation * PUVA or UVB therapy within 4 weeks prior to randomisation * Clinical infection (viral, fungal or bacterial) on the treatment area * Known or suspected severe renal insufficiency or severe hepatic disorders * Patients with history of an immunocompromised disease (e.g., lymphoma, HIV, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome) * Patients with concomitant serious disease (e.g., cancer) which might affect the AD treatment in this trial * Females who are pregnant or are breast feeding * Females intending to temporarily or permanently stop their hormonal contraceptive regime during and up to one month post study termination visit

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])Baseline (Day 0) and end of treatment (Day 28)The EASI is a composite score based on the evaluation of four characteristic atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms; erythema, oedema/induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification together with the area involved. For each body region, the investigator rated four clinical signs of AD using the following severity scale: 0 = none/absent 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The EASI score ranges from 0-12, a higher score equals a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as Day 0. Mean values in table are least squares mean adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)At end of treatment (Day 28)The IGA (Investigator's global assessment) of disease severity on the body (trunk and limbs excluding the hands) was assessed based on visual evaluation by use of the following definitions of severity: 0\. Clear - no inflammatory signs of AD 1. Almost clear - just perceptible erythema, and just perceptible papulation/infiltration 2. Mild - mild erythema, and mild papulation/infiltration 3. Moderate - moderate erythema, and moderate papulation/infiltration 4. Severe - severe erythema, and-severe papulation/infiltration 5. Very severe - severe erythema, and severe papulation/infiltration with oozing/crusting. Symptom free responders were defined as an IGA of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost clear) at the end of treatment.
Participants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAt end of treatment (Day 28)Participants' assessment of pruritus on trunk and limbs was assessed at end of treatment by use of the scale below. * Absent - no itching * Mild - occasional, slight itching * Moderate - constant or intermittent itching which is not disturbing sleep * Severe - intolerable itching which is disturbing sleep The assessment was based on the average degree of pruritus over the last 24 hours.
Participants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityAt end of treatment (Day 28)Participants' overall assessment of disease severity on trunk and limbs (excluding the hands) was assessed at end of treatment by use of the following scale: clear, very mild, mild, moderate, severe. The assessment was based on the condition of the disease at the time of the evaluation and not in relation to the condition at a previous visit.
Number of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitAt Visit 2 (Day 7), Visit 3 (Day 14), Visit 4 (Day 21) and end of treatment (Day 28)Symptom free responders were defined as an IGA of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost clear) according to Investigator's global assessment of disease severity on trunk and limbs at the end of treatment.
Absolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitBaseline and at Visit 2 (Day 7), Visit 3 (Day 14), Visit 4 (Day 21)The EASI is a composite score based on the evaluation of four characteristic atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms; erythema, oedema/induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification together with the area involved. For each body region, the investigator rated four clinical signs of AD using the following severity scale: 0 = none/absent 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The EASI score ranges from 0-12, a higher score equals a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as Day 0. Mean values in table are least squares mean adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.

Countries

Canada, Finland, Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants received investigational medicinal products for up to 4-weeks followed by a 28 day follow-up period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LEO 29102 Vehicle
Treatment with LEO 29102 cream vehicle twice daily - in the morning and in the evening - for up to 4 weeks
25
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/g
Treatment with LEO 29102 0.03 mg/g cream twice daily - in the morning and in the evening - for up to 4 weeks
24
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/g
Treatment with LEO 29102 0.1 mg/g cream twice daily - in the morning and in the evening - for up to 4 weeks
25
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/g
Treatment with LEO 29102 0.3 mg/g cream twice daily - in the morning and in the evening - for up to 4 weeks
25
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/g
Treatment with LEO 29102 1.0 mg/g cream twice daily - in the morning and in the evening - for up to 4 weeks
29
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/g
Treatment with LEO 29102 2.5 mg/g cream twice daily - in the morning and in the evening - for up to 4 weeks
30
Elidel® 10 mg/g
Treatment with Elidel® twice daily - in the morning and in the evening - for up to 4 weeks
25
Total183

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLEO 29102 VehicleLEO 29102 0.03 mg/gLEO 29102 0.1 mg/gLEO 29102 0.3 mg/gLEO 29102 1.0 mg/gLEO 29102 2.5 mg/gElidel® 10 mg/gTotal
Age, Continuous39.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
36.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4
34.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
38.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6
32.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
29.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
35.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
Region of Enrollment
Canada
4 participants6 participants5 participants6 participants6 participants6 participants4 participants37 participants
Region of Enrollment
Finland
3 participants0 participants2 participants2 participants6 participants6 participants3 participants22 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
18 participants18 participants18 participants17 participants17 participants18 participants18 participants124 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants8 Participants10 Participants4 Participants15 Participants13 Participants9 Participants70 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants16 Participants15 Participants21 Participants14 Participants17 Participants16 Participants113 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
EG012
affected / at risk
EG013
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 2511 / 248 / 258 / 258 / 288 / 308 / 251 / 250 / 242 / 250 / 252 / 284 / 302 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 250 / 240 / 250 / 250 / 280 / 300 / 250 / 250 / 240 / 250 / 250 / 280 / 300 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Absolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])

The EASI is a composite score based on the evaluation of four characteristic atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms; erythema, oedema/induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification together with the area involved. For each body region, the investigator rated four clinical signs of AD using the following severity scale: 0 = none/absent 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The EASI score ranges from 0-12, a higher score equals a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as Day 0. Mean values in table are least squares mean adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and end of treatment (Day 28)

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
LEO 29102 VehicleAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])-0.85 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.85
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])-2.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])-1.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.81
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])-2.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])-2.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.38
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])-2.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.28
Elidel® 10 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline (Last Observation Carried Forward [LOCF])-3.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.51
Comparison: Active treatment minus vehicle, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.2795% CI: [-3.6, 1.03]ANOVA
Comparison: Active treatment minus vehicle, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.8395% CI: [-2.53, 2.04]ANOVA
Comparison: Active treatment minus vehicle, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.0895% CI: [-4.3, 0.28]ANOVA
Comparison: Active treatment minus vehicle, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.1695% CI: [-3.77, 0.65]ANOVA
Comparison: Active treatment minus vehicle, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.1495% CI: [-3.84, 0.54]ANOVA
Comparison: Active treatment minus vehicle, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [-4.47, -0.17]ANOVA
Comparison: LEO 29102 treatment minus Elidel, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.0495% CI: [0.17, 4.74]ANOVA
Comparison: LEO 29102 treatment minus Elidel, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.3295% CI: [-1.14, 3.48]ANOVA
Comparison: LEO 29102 treatment minus Elidel, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.0695% CI: [-0.08, 4.5]ANOVA
Comparison: LEO 29102 treatment minus Elidel, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.795% CI: [-1.84, 2.73]ANOVA
Comparison: LEO 29102 treatment minus Elidel, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.4295% CI: [-1.31, 3.1]ANOVA
Comparison: LEO 29102 treatment minus Elidel, adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.p-value: 0.4795% CI: [-1.38, 3]ANOVA
Secondary

Absolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by Visit

The EASI is a composite score based on the evaluation of four characteristic atopic dermatitis (AD) signs and symptoms; erythema, oedema/induration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification together with the area involved. For each body region, the investigator rated four clinical signs of AD using the following severity scale: 0 = none/absent 1. = mild 2. = moderate 3. = severe The EASI score ranges from 0-12, a higher score equals a worse outcome. Baseline was defined as Day 0. Mean values in table are least squares mean adjusted for the effect of (pooled) country.

Time frame: Baseline and at Visit 2 (Day 7), Visit 3 (Day 14), Visit 4 (Day 21)

Population: Data was tabulated using an observed cases approach and therefore only contains data from participants who attended the specific visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LEO 29102 VehicleAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)-1.62 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.18
LEO 29102 VehicleAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)-1.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.77
LEO 29102 VehicleAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)-0.09 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.27
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)-1.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.19
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)-1.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.72
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)-1.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)-0.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.94
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)-0.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.82
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)-1.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)-1.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)-2.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)-1.67 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.15
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)-1.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.71
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)-1.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.57
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)-1.48 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.28
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)-2.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.18
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)-1.52 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.17
Elidel® 10 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)-2.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.22
Elidel® 10 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)-1.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.39
Elidel® 10 mg/gAbsolute Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score From Baseline by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)-1.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.17
Secondary

Number of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by Visit

Symptom free responders were defined as an IGA of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost clear) according to Investigator's global assessment of disease severity on trunk and limbs at the end of treatment.

Time frame: At Visit 2 (Day 7), Visit 3 (Day 14), Visit 4 (Day 21) and end of treatment (Day 28)

Population: Occurrences of early withdrawal, non-compliance, prohibited medication, missing application of study medication and participants missing visits resulted in not all participants being analyzed at all visits.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Non-responder23 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Responder6 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Responder4 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Responder2 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Non-responder13 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Responder4 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Non-responder17 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Non-responder16 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Non-responder23 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Responder2 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Non-responder20 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Non-responder22 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Responder2 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Responder1 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Responder1 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Non-responder20 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Non-responder17 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Responder5 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Responder6 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Non-responder17 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Responder2 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Non-responder23 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Non-responder20 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Responder3 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Non-responder16 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Responder9 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Responder1 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Responder3 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Non-responder23 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Non-responder15 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Non-responder21 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Responder7 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Non-responder20 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Responder5 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Responder5 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Responder10 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Non-responder23 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Non-responder16 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Responder5 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Non-responder22 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Non-responder16 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Responder5 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Non-responder25 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Responder7 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Non-responder22 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Responder11 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Responder12 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Non-responder15 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Non-responder11 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 5 (Day 28)Responder12 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Non-responder16 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 3 (Day 14)Responder8 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Non-responder23 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 2 (Day 7)Responder2 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Non-responder15 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders by VisitVisit 4 (Day 21)Responder8 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)

The IGA (Investigator's global assessment) of disease severity on the body (trunk and limbs excluding the hands) was assessed based on visual evaluation by use of the following definitions of severity: 0\. Clear - no inflammatory signs of AD 1. Almost clear - just perceptible erythema, and just perceptible papulation/infiltration 2. Mild - mild erythema, and mild papulation/infiltration 3. Moderate - moderate erythema, and moderate papulation/infiltration 4. Severe - severe erythema, and-severe papulation/infiltration 5. Very severe - severe erythema, and severe papulation/infiltration with oozing/crusting. Symptom free responders were defined as an IGA of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Almost clear) at the end of treatment.

Time frame: At end of treatment (Day 28)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Non-responder19 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Responder6 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Non-responder22 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Responder2 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Responder5 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Non-responder20 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Non-responder16 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Responder9 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Non-responder19 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Responder10 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Responder13 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Non-responder17 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Non-responder13 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gNumber of Participants That Were Symptom Free Responders (LOCF)Responder12 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and Limbs

Participants' assessment of pruritus on trunk and limbs was assessed at end of treatment by use of the scale below. * Absent - no itching * Mild - occasional, slight itching * Moderate - constant or intermittent itching which is not disturbing sleep * Severe - intolerable itching which is disturbing sleep The assessment was based on the average degree of pruritus over the last 24 hours.

Time frame: At end of treatment (Day 28)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsSevere4 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAbsent5 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsModerate8 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsMild8 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsMild7 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsSevere7 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAbsent1 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsModerate9 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAbsent4 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsMild9 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsModerate9 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsSevere3 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsMild7 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsModerate11 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAbsent7 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsSevere0 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAbsent5 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsMild15 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsModerate8 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsSevere1 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsMild13 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAbsent7 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsSevere4 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsModerate6 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsSevere1 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsAbsent6 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsModerate4 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Assessment of Pruritus on Trunk and LimbsMild14 Participants
Secondary

Participants' Overall Assessment of Disease Severity

Participants' overall assessment of disease severity on trunk and limbs (excluding the hands) was assessed at end of treatment by use of the following scale: clear, very mild, mild, moderate, severe. The assessment was based on the condition of the disease at the time of the evaluation and not in relation to the condition at a previous visit.

Time frame: At end of treatment (Day 28)

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityVery mild5 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityMild8 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeveritySevere4 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityModerate6 Participants
LEO 29102 VehicleParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityClear2 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityVery mild1 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityClear1 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityMild10 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityModerate9 Participants
LEO 29102 0.03 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeveritySevere3 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityModerate7 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityClear2 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeveritySevere3 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityVery mild4 Participants
LEO 29102 0.1 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityMild9 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeveritySevere1 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityModerate11 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityMild5 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityClear3 Participants
LEO 29102 0.3 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityVery mild5 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityVery mild5 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityClear4 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityMild10 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityModerate10 Participants
LEO 29102 1.0 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeveritySevere0 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityMild10 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityModerate4 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityClear1 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityVery mild12 Participants
LEO 29102 2.5 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeveritySevere3 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeveritySevere1 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityMild8 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityModerate3 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityVery mild11 Participants
Elidel® 10 mg/gParticipants' Overall Assessment of Disease SeverityClear2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026