Skip to content

Spinal Cord Stimulation With Precision® System Versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Spinal Cord Stimulation With Precision® Spinal Cord Stimulation System Versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01036529
Acronym
Evidence
Enrollment
28
Registered
2009-12-21
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2020-11-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Pain

Keywords

Spinal Cord Stimulation, Decompression, Fusion with or without instrumentation, Discectomy, Laminectomy, Laminotomy, Foraminotomy

Brief summary

The EVIDENCE trial is a randomized controlled trial comparing the therapeutic effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Precision® Spinal Cord Stimulation with that of reoperation as a treatment of pain in patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). FBSS is defined as persistent or recurrent pain following one or more lumbosacral spine surgical procedures. Surgical procedures that can result in FBSS can be categorized as either decompression or decompression followed by fusion with or without instrumentation. The pain of FBSS is categorized as neuropathic, which involves pathological nerve activity and is commonly characterized by patients as shooting or burning and/or nociceptive, which signals actual or impending tissue damage or inflammation.

Detailed description

The co-primary study endpoints are proportion of subjects with ≥50% leg pain relief without crossover at 6 and at 24 months.

Interventions

DEVICEPrecision Spinal Cord Stimulator

Programming settings will be specific to the individual needs in accordance with the labeling

PROCEDUREBack Surgery

Different types of back surgery may be performed

Sponsors

Boston Scientific Corporation
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Primary pain type - neuropathic with concordant radicular or neurological findings * Significant complaint of persistent or recurrent radicular leg pain, with or without low back pain * One or more prior lumbosacral surgical procedures (no upper limit) * At least 6 months duration of persistent or recurrent radicular leg pain, with or without low back pain * Study candidates meet the criteria for a specific surgical intervention as recorded by a surgeon: pain refractory to conservative care, with concordant neurologic, tension, and/or mechanical signs and imaging findings of surgically remediable neural compression * MRI or CT myelogram of the lumbar and thoracic spine (within 12 months prior to screening) that rules out pathology that might compromise SCS electrode placement or pathology, in addition to neural compression, that might contribute to the subject's pain * All study candidates must pass study site's routine psychological/psychiatric evaluation for SCS before randomization to SCS or reoperation * At least 18 years of age * Subject signs informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Chief complaint of mechanical low back pain (e.g. pain that a recumbent position relieves completely) * Pain intensity of always 10 on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale over the past 6 months based on subject recall * Radiographic evidence of frank instability (grossly mobile spondylolisthesis or abnormal subluxation) requiring fusion, calcific arachnoiditis, or severe thoracic stenosis * Radiographically demonstrated (by myelographic block or its MRI equivalent) critical cauda equinal compression * A disabling or potentially disabling neurologic deficit (e.g., foot drop, neurogenic bladder) in the distribution of a nerve root or roots caused by surgically remediable compression * A predominance of non-organic signs on physical exam * A concurrent clinically significant or disabling chronic pain problem or condition that is likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints (e.g., chronic migraine, significant arthrosis of the hip associated with groin pain as primary complaint) * Significant substance abuse issues * Major untreated psychiatric comorbidity * Unresolved issues of secondary gain (e.g., litigation) * Expected inability to report treatment outcome adequately * Expected inability to operate SCS system * Pregnancy (actual or planned) * Life expectancy less than 3 years due to other serious medical condition(s) * Active local or systemic infection * Prior SCS procedure * Presence of intrathecal drug pump * Participation in another clinical study that would confound data of this study * Occupational risk that would rule out SCS * Medical or cardiac condition(s) or therapies, or foreseeable need for therapies or diagnostic tests (e.g., MRI), that preclude SCS and/or reoperation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment3, 6- and 12- months post-index procedure

Countries

Canada, France, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited for participation from February 2010 to June 2012.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 274 subjects were screened for participation.After screening, 75 subjects were eligible for participation. Of the eligible subjects, 47 declined randomization. A total of 28 subjects were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulation System
11
Back Surgery
Discectomy, laminotomy, laminectomy, foraminotomy, fusion with or without instrumentation
14
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision10
Overall StudySponsor study termination1112
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBack SurgeryTotalPrecision Spinal Cord Stimulator
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.3
54.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
52.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
12 Participants19 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants11 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants14 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 132 / 15
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 134 / 15

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment

Time frame: 3, 6- and 12- months post-index procedure

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Precision Spinal Cord StimulatorProportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment3 Month (7 subject Stimulation, 9 Subjects Surger)0.86 proportion of participants
Precision Spinal Cord StimulatorProportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment6 Month (6 subjects for Stimulation and Surgery)0.5 proportion of participants
Precision Spinal Cord StimulatorProportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment12 month (4 subjects for Stim, 3 subjects Surgery)1.0 proportion of participants
Back SurgeryProportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment3 Month (7 subject Stimulation, 9 Subjects Surger)0.44 proportion of participants
Back SurgeryProportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment6 Month (6 subjects for Stimulation and Surgery)0.5 proportion of participants
Back SurgeryProportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment12 month (4 subjects for Stim, 3 subjects Surgery)0.33 proportion of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026