Skip to content

A Study of Withdrawal of Immunosuppression and Donor Lymphocyte Infusions Following Allogeneic Transplant for Pediatric Hematologic Malignancies

A Phase II Study of Preemptive Fast Withdrawal of Immunosuppression and Donor Lymphocyte Infusions for Achieving Complete Donor Chimerism Following Allogeneic Transplant for Pediatric Hematologic Malignancies

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01036009
Enrollment
43
Registered
2009-12-21
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2015-07-31
Last updated
2016-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Biphenotypic Leukemia, Bone Marrow Clonal Malformations, Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, Juvenile Myelomonocytic Leukemia, Monosomy 7, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Pre-leukemic Syndromes

Keywords

Hematologic, Malignancy, Leukemia, Pre-leukemic, Allogeneic, Transplant, Pediatric

Brief summary

There is no curative therapy once acute leukemia patients relapse after transplant. Patients who develop clinically significant graft versus host disease (GVHD) have a lower rate of relapse than those who do not develop GVHD. We are initiating this study of post-transplant fast withdrawal of immunosuppression and donor lymphocyte infusions, with a goal of achieving full donor chimerism in children with hematologic malignancies. If our hypothesis that full donor chimerism results in leukemia-free survival is correct, using immune modulation to achieve full donor chimerism should decrease relapse rate and thus increase survival. The goal of this Phase II study is to identify if achieving full donor chimerism in whole blood CD3+ and leukemia-specific (CD14/15+, CD19+, CD33+ and CD34+) subset may decrease the risk of relapse of patients undergoing allogeneic transplant for hematologic malignancy.

Detailed description

The goal of this Phase II study is to identify if achieving full donor chimerism in whole blood, CD3+, and leukemia-specific subset (CD3+, CD14/15+, CD19+, CD33+ and CD34+ subset) may decrease the risk of relapse of patients undergoing allogeneic transplant for hematologic malignancy. We estimate that total of 50 recipient patients will need to be enrolled. Of these 50 recipient patients an observation group and an intervention group will be formed. We want to enroll 25 recipient patients in the intervention group, this group will receive study intervention and their outcomes will be the focus of statistical analysis for this study. Intervention will involve fast withdrawal of immunosuppression following transplant and donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) until full donor chimerism is achieved. Chimerism is a genetic test that measures the proportion of donor's and recipient's cells in blood or bone marrow. Twenty five patients will undergo fast withdrawal of immunosuppression and 33 -50% of them (8-13) will undergo DLI following fast withdrawal of immunosuppression. Patients will have peripheral blood (PB) chimerism tested upon engraftment. A confirmatory test from PB and bone marrow (BM) will be done on day 45±7. Minimal residual disease (MRD) will be examined by immunoflow, FISH, cytogenetics or PCR. Patients with positive MRD will be on a faster schedule of immune intervention than patients with negative MRD. Interventions will be carried on until 1 year post transplant. If confirmatory testing shows no evidence of MRD and full donor chimerism is present in all subsets, the patient will be part of the observation group and be observed until 2 years post transplant. Chimerism will be repeated at 12 and 24 months post transplant. If the patient has mixed chimerism on both confirmatory tests (PB and BM), the patient will be part of the intervention group and fast withdrawal of immunosuppression will be initiated. If the patient has mixed chimerism on one of the confirmatory tests (PB or BM), the test will be repeated in 2 weeks and the patient will proceed with either observation or intervention, based on the result of the repeated test. Patients will be followed for the incidence of acute and chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (GVHD) and relapse until 2 years post transplant. The study will be considered successful if the relapse rate at 2 years post transplant is ≤20% for the entire study or ≤ 40% for the intervention group.

Interventions

OTHERWithdrawal of immunosuppression and donor lymphocyte infusion

Intervention will involve fast withdrawal of immunosuppression and DLI until full donor chimerism is achieved.

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
University of California, San Francisco
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 6 months - 25 years. * Diagnoses of acute leukemia (AML, ALL, biphenotypic leukemia), pre-leukemic syndromes (monosomy 7 or other bone marrow clonal malformations), JMML, myelodysplastic syndromes or CML. * Undergoing an allogeneic transplant as standard care. * Performance status: Karnofsky/Lansky\>60%. * Availability of pre-transplant recipient's DNA and donor's DNA for chimerism testing. This could be DNA or material from which DNA could be extracted. Frozen blood would be preferred. For some patients, post transplant specimens that are not infiltrated with donor cells may be used. * Bone marrow or PBMTC as stem cell source.HLA matching: donor and recipient should be matched at a minimum of 7/8 antigens (A,B,C and DrB1) for bone marrow and PBMTC transplants. * No history of ≥grade III acute GVHD.

Exclusion criteria

* Treatment on other experimental protocols, if withdrawal of immunosuppression interferes with procedures of follow-up on the primary study. * Leukemia relapse defined as \> 5% blasts on bone marrow exam or \>1% leukemia cells by immunoflow MRD, or presence of extramedullary leukemia. * History of acute GVHD ≥ stage III or with any degree of active acute or cGVHD. * On steroids for any reason. * Any condition that compromises compliance with the objectives and procedures of this protocol, as judged by the principal investigator. * Cells for DLI cannot be obtained from the donor.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Relapse at 2 Years Post-transplant.2 years post transplant.Definition of relapse was \>5 % blasts in bone marrow

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2 Years Post-transplant Survival.2 years post transplant
The Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD).2 years post transplantDefinition and diagnostic criteria of aGVHD according to: 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Przepiorka D1, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, Thomas ED. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jun;15(6):825-8. In this system, patients are divided into one of four grades (I-IV) depending on the degree, or stage, of involvement in three organs. The skin is staged with percent body surface involved, the liver is staged with degree of bilirubin elevation, and the gastrointestinal tract is staged with amount of diarrhea.
The Incidence of Chronic GVHD (cGVHD).2 years post transplantDiagnostic criteria of cGVHD from: Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-host disease: I Diagnosis and Staging Working Group Report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2005;11:945-955. The diagnosis of chronic GVHD requires the following: 1\) Distinction from acute GVHD; 2) Presence of at least 1 diagnostic clinical sign of chronic GVHD or presence of at least 1 distinctive manifestation confirmed by pertinent biopsy or other relevant tests; 3) Exclusion of other possible diagnoses. Scoring of organ manifestations requires careful assessment of signs, symptoms, laboratory values, and other study results. A clinical scoring system (0-3) is used for evaluation of the involvement of individual organs and sites. Global assessment of severity (mild, moderate, or severe) is derived by combining organ- and site-specific scores.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

5 eligible patients relapsed/died before assignment to a study arm

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group I: Observation
Group I (observation): Patients with full donor chimerism and no evidence of MRD continue to undergo clinical monitoring for acute and chronic graft-vs-host disease and relapse until 3 years post-transplant. Patients undergo repeat chimerism testing at 12 and 24 months post-transplant.
17
Group II: Intervention
Group II (intervention): Patients undergo withdrawal of immunosuppression and receive donor lymphocyte infusions between days 60-365 post-transplant (or until full donor chimerism is achieved). Patients also undergo clinical monitoring and repeat chimerism testing as in group I. Withdrawal of immunosuppression and donor lymphocyte infusion: Intervention will involve fast withdrawal of immunosuppression and DLI until full donor chimerism is achieved.
26
Total43

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup I: ObservationGroup II: InterventionTotal
Age, Continuous10.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.25
11.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
10.84 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
17 participants26 participants43 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants12 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants14 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 09 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 01 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Relapse at 2 Years Post-transplant.

Definition of relapse was \>5 % blasts in bone marrow

Time frame: 2 years post transplant.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: ObservationRelapse at 2 Years Post-transplant.6 participants
Group II: InterventionRelapse at 2 Years Post-transplant.4 participants
Secondary

2 Years Post-transplant Survival.

Time frame: 2 years post transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: Observation2 Years Post-transplant Survival.11 participants
Group II: Intervention2 Years Post-transplant Survival.21 participants
Secondary

The Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD).

Definition and diagnostic criteria of aGVHD according to: 1994 Consensus Conference on Acute GVHD Grading. Przepiorka D1, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J, Thomas ED. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1995 Jun;15(6):825-8. In this system, patients are divided into one of four grades (I-IV) depending on the degree, or stage, of involvement in three organs. The skin is staged with percent body surface involved, the liver is staged with degree of bilirubin elevation, and the gastrointestinal tract is staged with amount of diarrhea.

Time frame: 2 years post transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: ObservationThe Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD).11 participants
Group II: InterventionThe Incidence of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGVHD).5 participants
Secondary

The Incidence of Chronic GVHD (cGVHD).

Diagnostic criteria of cGVHD from: Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S et al. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-host disease: I Diagnosis and Staging Working Group Report. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 2005;11:945-955. The diagnosis of chronic GVHD requires the following: 1\) Distinction from acute GVHD; 2) Presence of at least 1 diagnostic clinical sign of chronic GVHD or presence of at least 1 distinctive manifestation confirmed by pertinent biopsy or other relevant tests; 3) Exclusion of other possible diagnoses. Scoring of organ manifestations requires careful assessment of signs, symptoms, laboratory values, and other study results. A clinical scoring system (0-3) is used for evaluation of the involvement of individual organs and sites. Global assessment of severity (mild, moderate, or severe) is derived by combining organ- and site-specific scores.

Time frame: 2 years post transplant

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: ObservationThe Incidence of Chronic GVHD (cGVHD).6 participants
Group II: InterventionThe Incidence of Chronic GVHD (cGVHD).2 participants
Post Hoc

Late Relapses

The number of patients who relapsed after 2-year primary endpoint. To assess a potential for late relapse-rate in the intervention arm only, patients in the intervention arm were provided additional follow-up until 3-yrs post transplant. The criterion for relapse was \>5% blasts in bone marrow.

Time frame: 24-36 months post-transplant

Population: surviving patients in the intervention arm who had not relapsed as of 24 months were followed for an additional 12 months (until 3 years post-transplant)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group I: ObservationLate Relapses4 participants
Post Hoc

Time Until Late Relapse

Number of months post-transplant until late relapse, in intervention patients relapsing after the 2-year primary study endpoint. Relapse defined as \>5% blasts in bone marrow

Time frame: 24-36 months post-transplant

Population: intervention patients who relapsed after the 2 year primary study endpoint

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group I: ObservationTime Until Late Relapse32.025 months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026