Skip to content

LBH589 Alone or in Combination With Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA) in Patients With Low or Int-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS)

A One Year, Open Label, Multicenter Trial of LBH589 Alone or in Combination With ESA in Red Blood Cell Transfusion-dependent LOW and INT-1 MDS Patients Being Either Refractory to ESA or With a Low Probability of Response - the GErman PAnobinostat Low Risk MDS Trial - GEPARD Study

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01034657
Acronym
GEPARD
Enrollment
34
Registered
2009-12-17
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2017-08-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

Keywords

MDS, bone marrow, anemia, cytopenia, transfusion dependance, EPO, ESA, erythropoietin, LBH589, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, hematopoietic improvement, IPSS Low, IPSS Int-1, HI-E, HDAC Inhibitor, HDAC-I, DAC-I, Deacetylase-Inhibitor, Histone Deacetylase-Inhibitor, red blood cell transfusions

Brief summary

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of LBH589 as single agent and in combination with ESA in red blood cell transfusion-dependent Low and Int-1 MDS patients being either refractory to ESA or with a low probability of response. The study had a non-randomized core phase followed by a randomized phase.

Interventions

DRUGLBH589

LBH589 was supplied at dose strengths of 5 mg or 20 mg hard gelatin capsules.

DRUGEpoetin Alfa

Epoetin alfa was supplied as 10000 IU/1 mL in a ready-to-use syringe.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with a lower risk MDS (LOW or INT-1 according to IPSS) * Red blood cell transfusion dependency of at least 4 Units/8 weeks. * Not responding to Erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) or having a low chance to do so * Age-adjusted normal cardiac, kidney, liver function Key

Exclusion criteria

* Concomitant use of ESA * Concomitant use of any other investigational drug * Other malignancy that is not in remission for at least 1 year * Platelet Count \< 75 x 109/L * Impaired cardiac function or clinically significant cardiac diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Hematological Response of the Erythropoetic System (HI-E) - Core Phase16 weeksHI-E was assessed according to the modified international working group (IWG) criteria for HI. Erythroid response (pretreatment, \<11 g/dL): Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk, and only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation; Platelet response (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L): absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; Neutrophil response (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L): at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 109/L; Progression or relapse after HI: At least 1 of the following: At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in Hgb by ≥1.5 g/dL, or transfusion dependence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During Core Phase16 weeksObjective response (complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) and HI-platelet (HI-P) response + HI-neutrophil (HI-N) response) was assessed according to the modified IWG criteria: CR bone marrow with 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of al cell lines (persistent dysplasia is noted) and peripheral blood with Hgb \>= 11 g/dL platelets \>=100 X 10\^9/L, neutrophils \>= 1.0 x 10\^9/L and blasts 0%. PR = All CR if abnormal before treatment except bone marrow blasts decreased by\>=50% over pretreatment but still \>5% (ellularity and morphology not relevant). HI-P (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L) = absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; HI-N (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L) = at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L.
Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized Phase32 weeks, 48 weeksObjective response (complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) and HI-platelet (HI-P) response + HI-neutrophil (HI-N) response) was assessed according to the modified IWG criteria: CR bone marrow with 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of al cell lines (persistent dysplasia is noted) and peripheral blood with Hgb \>= 11 g/dL platelets \>=100 X 10\^9/L, neutrophils \>= 1.0 x 10\^9/L and blasts 0%. PR = All CR if abnormal before treatment except bone marrow blasts decreased by\>=50% over pretreatment but still \>5% (ellularity and morphology not relevant). HI-P (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L) = absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; HI-N (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L) = at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L.
Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Core PhasebaselineThe IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized Phase52 weeksThe IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Core PhasebaselineThe IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Randomized Phase52 weeksThe IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).
Percentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase32 weeks, 52 weeksHI-E was assessed according to the modified international working group (IWG) criteria for HI. Erythroid response (pretreatment, \<11 g/dL): Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk, and only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation; Platelet response (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L): absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; Neutrophil response (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L): at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 109/L; Progression or relapse after HI: At least 1 of the following: At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in Hgb by ≥1.5 g/dL, or transfusion dependence.
Time to Response - Overall Period52 weeksTime to response was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first documented response (complete \[CR\] or partial \[PR\]) according to modified IWG criteria for HI.
Event-free Survival (EFS) - Overall Period52 weeksEFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to failure or death from any cause.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Overall Period52 weeksPFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to disease progression or death from MDS.
Disease-free Survival (DFS) - Overall Period52 weeksDFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the time to relapse.
Time to Cause-specific Death - Overall Period52 weeksTime to cause-specific death was defined as the time from start of treatment to death related to MDS.
Overall Survival (OS) - Overall Period48 weeksOS was defined as the time from start of treatment to death from any cause.

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was divided into a core phase and a randomized phase. The core phase had an open-label single arm study design. The randomized phase was open-label with two parallel treatment arms for participants with stable disease. Participants with Hematological response of the erythropoietin system remained on single agent oral LBH589.

Pre-assignment details

Participants with stable disease were eligible for randomization to single agent LBH589 or LBH589 + epoetin alfa. Participants with progressive disease were discontinued. Seven participants who completed the core phase withdrew before the randomization phase.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LBH589
During the core phase, all participants received oral LBH589 40 mg (30 mg after a protocol amendment) for 4 months. During the randomization phase, participants with hematological improvement of the erythropoetic system (HI-E) and participants with stable disease, who were randomized to single agent LBH589, continued on single agent LBH589 40mg/30mg for an additional 4 months.
34
Total34

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Core PhaseAbnormal laboratory value100
Core PhaseAdverse Event800
Core PhaseLack of Efficacy200
Core PhaseProtocol Violation200
Core PhaseWithdrawal by Subject100
Randomized PhaseAbnormal laboratory value010
Randomized PhaseAdverse Event021
Randomized PhaseLack of Efficacy510
Randomized PhaseWithdrawal by Subject020

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLBH589
Age, Continuous65.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
34 / 346 / 66 / 61 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
11 / 341 / 61 / 61 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Hematological Response of the Erythropoetic System (HI-E) - Core Phase

HI-E was assessed according to the modified international working group (IWG) criteria for HI. Erythroid response (pretreatment, \<11 g/dL): Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk, and only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation; Platelet response (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L): absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; Neutrophil response (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L): at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 109/L; Progression or relapse after HI: At least 1 of the following: At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in Hgb by ≥1.5 g/dL, or transfusion dependence.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Participants from the core phase, who had valid response data, were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LBH589Percentage of Participants With Hematological Response of the Erythropoetic System (HI-E) - Core Phase0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Disease-free Survival (DFS) - Overall Period

DFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to the time to relapse.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: DFS could not be evaluated because there was no disease-free period.

Secondary

Event-free Survival (EFS) - Overall Period

EFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to failure or death from any cause.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Event-free survival could not be evaluated because there was no response, no progression or no disease-free period.

Secondary

Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Core Phase

The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).

Time frame: baseline

Population: All participants from the core phase were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Core PhaseBaseline (core phase), Low32.4 Percentage of participants
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Core PhaseBaseline (core phase),, INT-167.6 Percentage of participants
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Core PhaseBaseline (core phase),, INT-20.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Core PhaseBaseline (core phase), High0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized Phase

The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Only participants from the randomized phase, who had values at week 52, were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), Low0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), , INT-116.7 Percentage of participants
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), INT-20.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589Frequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), HIgh0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), HIgh0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), Low0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), INT-20.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), , INT-116.7 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), HIgh0.0 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), , INT-10.0 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), INT-20.0 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedFrequency Distribution of IPSS Score Status - Randomized PhaseWeek 52 (randomized phase), Low100.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Core Phase

The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).

Time frame: baseline

Population: All participants from the core phase were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LBH589Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Core Phase0.43 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.351
Secondary

Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Randomized Phase

The IPSS score values were calculated based on the results of bone marrow analysis. A score value of 0 has bone marrow blast \<5%, karyotype of normal, sole: -Y, del 5Q, del 20q and cytopenias (lineages affected) of 0 to 1. Score value of 0.5 has 5-10 bone marrow blasts, karyotype of Others and cytopenias of 2 to 3. A score value of 1.0 has complex \>= 3 chromosomal abnormalities and/or chromosome 7 anomalies. A score of 1.5 has 11-20 bone marrow blasts and a score of 2.0 has 21-30 bone marrow blasts. The prognostic score is determined by the sum of the single scoring values. The risk groups are determined as follows: Low = 0 points (5.7 years of median survival); intermediate -1 (INT-1) = 0.5-1.0 points (3.5 years of median survival); INT-2 = 1.5-2.0 points (1.2 years of median survival); and high \>=2.5 points (6 months of median survival).

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Participants from the randomized phase, who had values at week 52, were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LBH589Mean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Randomized Phase1.0 units on a scale
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaMean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Randomized Phase1.0 units on a scale
Not RandomizedMean Single Scoring Values of the IPSS - Randomized Phase0.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) - Overall Period

OS was defined as the time from start of treatment to death from any cause.

Time frame: 48 weeks

Population: All participants from the core phase were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
LBH589Overall Survival (OS) - Overall PeriodNA months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase

HI-E was assessed according to the modified international working group (IWG) criteria for HI. Erythroid response (pretreatment, \<11 g/dL): Hgb increase by ≥ 1.5 g/dL, relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusions/8 wk compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 wk, and only RBC transfusions given for a Hgb of ≤ 9.0 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation; Platelet response (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L): absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; Neutrophil response (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L): at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 109/L; Progression or relapse after HI: At least 1 of the following: At least 50% decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets, reduction in Hgb by ≥1.5 g/dL, or transfusion dependence.

Time frame: 32 weeks, 52 weeks

Population: Participants from the randomized phase, who had valid response data, were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LBH589Percentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase32 weeks (n=5,1,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589Percentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase52 weeks (n=4,3,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase32 weeks (n=5,1,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase52 weeks (n=4,3,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedPercentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase32 weeks (n=5,1,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedPercentage of Participants With HI-E - Randomized Phase52 weeks (n=4,3,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During Core Phase

Objective response (complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) and HI-platelet (HI-P) response + HI-neutrophil (HI-N) response) was assessed according to the modified IWG criteria: CR bone marrow with 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of al cell lines (persistent dysplasia is noted) and peripheral blood with Hgb \>= 11 g/dL platelets \>=100 X 10\^9/L, neutrophils \>= 1.0 x 10\^9/L and blasts 0%. PR = All CR if abnormal before treatment except bone marrow blasts decreased by\>=50% over pretreatment but still \>5% (ellularity and morphology not relevant). HI-P (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L) = absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; HI-N (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L) = at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L.

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Participants from the core phase, who had valid data, were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LBH589Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During Core Phase0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized Phase

Objective response (complete remission (CR) + partial remission (PR) and HI-platelet (HI-P) response + HI-neutrophil (HI-N) response) was assessed according to the modified IWG criteria: CR bone marrow with 5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of al cell lines (persistent dysplasia is noted) and peripheral blood with Hgb \>= 11 g/dL platelets \>=100 X 10\^9/L, neutrophils \>= 1.0 x 10\^9/L and blasts 0%. PR = All CR if abnormal before treatment except bone marrow blasts decreased by\>=50% over pretreatment but still \>5% (ellularity and morphology not relevant). HI-P (pretreatment, \< 100 x 109/L) = absolute increase of ≥ 30 x 109/L for participants starting with \> 20 x 109/L and platelets Increase from \< 20 x 109/L to \> 20 x 109/L and by at least 100%; HI-N (pretreatment, \< 1.0 x 109/L) = at least 100% increase and an absolute increase \> 0.5 x 10\^9/L.

Time frame: 32 weeks, 48 weeks

Population: Participants from the randomized phase, who had valid data, were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LBH589Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized PhaseWeek 32 ( n=5,1,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589Percentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized PhaseWeek 48 (n=6,5,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized PhaseWeek 32 ( n=5,1,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
LBH589 + Epoetin AlfaPercentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized PhaseWeek 48 (n=6,5,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedPercentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized PhaseWeek 32 ( n=5,1,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
Not RandomizedPercentage of Participants With Objective Response During the Randomized PhaseWeek 48 (n=6,5,1)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) - Overall Period

PFS was defined as the time from start of treatment to disease progression or death from MDS.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: PFS could not be evaluated because there was no progression.

Secondary

Time to Cause-specific Death - Overall Period

Time to cause-specific death was defined as the time from start of treatment to death related to MDS.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Time to cause-specific death could not be evaluated because there was no cause-specific death.

Secondary

Time to Response - Overall Period

Time to response was defined as the time from start of treatment to the first documented response (complete \[CR\] or partial \[PR\]) according to modified IWG criteria for HI.

Time frame: 52 weeks

Population: Time to response could not be evaluated because there was no response.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026