Skip to content

A Study of Tocilizumab Plus Non-biological DMARD in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis and an Inadequate Response to Non-biological DMARDs

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess Efficacy of Tocilizumab+Non-biological DMARD in Reducing Synovitis as Measured by MRI at 12 Weeks After Initiation of Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis With Inadequate Response to Non-biological DMARDs

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01034397
Enrollment
54
Registered
2009-12-17
Start date
2010-03-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2018-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will use Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to assess the efficacy of tocilizumab plus non-biological DMARD in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to non-biological DMARDS. Patients will be randomized to receive either intravenous tocilizumab at 8mg/kg (minimal dose 480mg, maximum dose 800mg) or placebo every 4 weeks, in addition to their stable dose of non-biological DMARD. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, and target sample size is \<100.

Interventions

DRUGtocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

8mg/kg (minimal dose 480mg, maximum dose 800mg) iv infusion every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

DRUGplacebo

iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks

DRUGnon-biological DMARDs

stable dose at investigator's prescription

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>/=18 years of age * moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis of \>/=6 months duration * synovitis (swollen and tender joint) in the wrist of the dominant hand * non-biologic DMARDs at stable dose for \>/=12 weeks prior to baseline * oral corticosteroids at stable dose for at least 25 out of 28 days prior to baseline

Exclusion criteria

* rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA * history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * functional class IV (ACR classification) * intraarticular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to baseline * previous treatment with a biologic agent for RA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) ScoreWeek 12Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal (MCP) were assessed for synovitis via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS ScoreWeek 12RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS ScoreWeek 24RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS ScoreWeek 24RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreWeek 12Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreWeek 24Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion ScoreWeek 12Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion ScoreWeek 12Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion ScoreWeek 24Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion ScoreWeek 24Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema ScoreWeek 12Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema ScoreWeek 12Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema ScoreWeek 24Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema ScoreWeek 24Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global ScoreWeek 12Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of initial rate of enhancement (IRE) and number of voxels (Nvox), which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined regions of interest (ROIs). A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. Maximum enhancement (ME)=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of signal intensity (SI) until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global ScoreWeek 12Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global ScoreWeek 24Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global ScoreWeek 24Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP ScoreWeek 12Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP ScoreWeek 12Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP ScoreWeek 24Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP ScoreWeek 24Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist ScoreWeek 12Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist ScoreWeek 12Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist ScoreWeek 24Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist ScoreWeek 24Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hr\]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global ScoreWeek 12DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global ScoreWeek 24DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Tender and Swollen Joint CountsWeeks 12 and 24TJC and SJC were determined using the 28 joint counts. Joints were classified as tender/not tender and swollen/not swollen and counted. The scores ranged from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicated higher disease activity.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in TJCWeek 12Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in TJCWeek 24Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in SJCWeek 12Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SJCWeek 24Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 12General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease ActivityWeek 24General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded.
Patient Global Assessment of PainBaseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of PainWeek 12Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of PainWeek 24Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresBaseline, Weeks 12 and 24The HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)Week 12ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in ESRWeek 24ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in RA. A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)Week 12The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. CRP was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRPWeek 24The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum CortisolWeek 12Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum CortisolWeek 24Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH)Week 12Change in Plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTHWeek 24Change in plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum AndrostenedioneWeek 12Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS ScoreWeek 12RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum AndrostenedioneWeek 24Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHPWeek 24Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)Week 12Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEAWeek 24Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide YWeek 12Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide YWeek 24Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP)Week 12Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.

Countries

Portugal

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo IV once every 4 weeks for a maximum of 24 weeks. At 12 weeks, participants who did not respond to treatment (those who did not show improvement of ≥20% in tender joint count and swollen joint count) were offered rescue therapy with open-label tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks through Week 24.
19
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg
Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (minimum dose of 480 mg, maximum dose of 800 mg) IV once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks.
35
Total54

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event40
Overall StudyLack of compliance01
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy30
Overall StudyOther01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTocilizumab 8 mg/kgTotal
Age, Continuous54 years54 years54 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants29 Participants46 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 357 / 106 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 350 / 100 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score

Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal (MCP) were assessed for synovitis via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population; n (number) equals (=) number of participants assessed for the specified parameter

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score2nd to 5th MCP joints (n=25,14)-25.0 percent change
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) ScoreWrist region (n=30,17)-20.0 percent change
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) ScoreTotal synovitis score (n=30,17)-23.6 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) ScoreWrist region (n=30,17)-37.5 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score2nd to 5th MCP joints (n=25,14)0.0 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) ScoreTotal synovitis score (n=30,17)-25.0 percent change
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.026t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-0.002 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-0.001 units on a scale
p-value: 0.37t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-0.002 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-0.001 units on a scale
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score-0.002 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score-0.001 units on a scale
p-value: 0.239t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-3.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-2.0 units on a scale
p-value: 0.337t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-0.5 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score0.0 units on a scale
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score

RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-5.5 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-7.0 units on a scale
p-value: 0.434t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score

Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreWrist region-1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score2nd to 5th MCP joints-1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreTotal synovitis score-2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreWrist region-2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score2nd to 5th MCP joints0.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreTotal synovitis score-2.0 units on a scale
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 0.065t-test, 1 sided
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population;

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score-0.003 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score0.0002 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score-0.002 units on a scale
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population;

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-0.002 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score0.001 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-0.001 units on a scale
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-0.002 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score0.0001 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-0.004 units on a scale
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥ 20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8mg/kg group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-5.5 percent change
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-3.0 percent change
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-10.0 percent change
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥ 20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8mg/kg group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-1.5 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-2.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score

RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-13.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-3.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-14.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score

Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreTotal synovitis score-3.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreWrist region-1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score2nd to 5th MCP joints-1.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreTotal synovitis score-1.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreWrist region-2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score2nd to 5th MCP joints0.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreTotal synovitis score-3.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis ScoreWrist region-2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgAbsolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score2nd to 5th MCP joints-1.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP)

Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP)-0.01 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP)-0.03 mg/dL
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. CRP was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-0.9 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)-0.1 mg/dL
p-value: 0.002t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global Score

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global Score-2.99 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global Score0.22 units on a scale
p-value: <0.001t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)

ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)-19.0 mm/hr
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)2.0 mm/hr
p-value: 0.001t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide Y

Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide Y-13.3 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide Y-0.7 mg/dL
p-value: 0.051t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-3.8 mm
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity0.2 mm
p-value: 0.002t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain

Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain-3.3 mm
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain-0.3 mm
p-value: 0.007t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH)

Change in Plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH)0.00 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH)0.00 mg/dL
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Androstenedione

Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Androstenedione0.01 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Androstenedione0.01 mg/dL
p-value: 0.437t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Cortisol

Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Cortisol-1.4 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Cortisol2.5 mg/dL
p-value: 0.118t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)

Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)-0.07 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)0.00 mg/dL
p-value: 0.19t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in SJC

Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in SJC-7.0 swollen joints
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in SJC-1.0 swollen joints
p-value: 0.001t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 12 in TJC

Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 12 in TJC-6.5 tender joints
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 12 in TJC-2.0 tender joints
p-value: 0.067t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP

Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP-0.01 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP-0.07 mg/dL
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP-0.02 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP-1.2 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP-0.2 mg/dL
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP-0.6 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score-3.4 units on a scale
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score-1.2 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score-2.9 units on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR

ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in RA. A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR-20.0 mm/hr
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR-9.0 mm/hr
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR-27.0 mm/hr
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y

Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y-11.1 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y-2.5 mg/dL
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y-13.9 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity

General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-4.4 mm
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-1.5 mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity-1.4 mm
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain

Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain-3.7 mm
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain-3.4 mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain-1.5 mm
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH

Change in plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH-0.4 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH-0.3 mg/dL
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH0.8 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione

Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione0.02 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione0.01 mg/dL
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione-0.002 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol

Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population;

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol-2.5 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol-5.2 mg/dL
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol-5.1 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA

Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA0.17 mg/dL
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA-0.73 mg/dL
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA0.40 mg/dL
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC

Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC-8.5 swollen joints
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC-7.0 swollen joints
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC-5.0 swollen joints
Secondary

Change From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC

Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC-8.5 tender joints
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC-5.0 tender joints
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgChange From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC-7.5 tender joints
Secondary

Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)

DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hr\]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Week 24 (n=24,7,10)2.1 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Baseline (n=32,17,0)5.7 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Week 12 (n=30,17,0)2.6 units on a scale
PlaceboDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Week 24 (n=24,7,10)3.9 units on a scale
PlaceboDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Baseline (n=32,17,0)6.2 units on a scale
PlaceboDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Week 12 (n=30,17,0)5.6 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Week 24 (n=24,7,10)3.2 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Week 12 (n=30,17,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)Baseline (n=32,17,0)NA units on a scale
Secondary

Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores

The HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24

Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Baseline (n=30,16,0)2.1 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Week 12 (n=28,13,0)1.5 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)1.3 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Week 12 (n=30,16,0)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Baseline (n=32,19,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Week 12 (n=27,10,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Week 24 (n=24,7,9)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Baseline (n=32,19,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Baseline (n=31,18,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Baseline (n=24,12,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Week 12 (n=26,10,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Week 24 (n=23,7,8)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Baseline (n=29,18,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Week 12 (n=29,14,0)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Week 24 (n=26,7,9)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Baseline (n=31,15,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Week 12 (n=29,14,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Week 24 (n=25,7,8)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Baseline (n=31,18,0)2.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)1.0 units on a scale
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Baseline (n=26,14,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Week 24 (n=25,7,8)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Baseline (n=32,19,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Baseline (n=30,16,0)2.3 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Baseline (n=31,18,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.1 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Baseline (n=24,12,0)3.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Week 12 (n=26,10,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Week 24 (n=23,7,8)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Week 24 (n=26,7,9)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Week 12 (n=28,13,0)2.3 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Baseline (n=32,19,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Baseline (n=31,18,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Baseline (n=31,15,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Week 12 (n=30,16,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Baseline (n=26,14,0)3.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Week 12 (n=27,10,0)3.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Week 12 (n=29,14,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Baseline (n=29,18,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Week 12 (n=29,14,0)2.0 units on a scale
PlaceboHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Week 24 (n=24,7,9)3.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Baseline (n=32,19,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Baseline (n=30,16,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Baseline (n=32,19,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Week 24 (n=25,7,8)2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Week 24 (n=26,7,9)2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Baseline (n=24,12,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Week 12 (n=28,13,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Baseline (n=31,18,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Week 12 (n=27,10,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Week 12 (n=29,14,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGlobal score, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.1 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Baseline (n=31,18,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresHygiene, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Baseline (n=29,18,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Week 24 (n=24,7,9)2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Week 12 (n=30,16,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresActivity, Baseline (n=31,15,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Week 12 (n=26,10,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresWalking, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresReach, Week 24 (n=23,7,8)2.5 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresEating, Baseline (n=26,14,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresDressing/grooming, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresGrip, Week 12 (n=29,14,0)NA units on a scale
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgHealth Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) ScoresArising, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.0 units on a scale
Secondary

Patient Global Assessment of Pain

Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24

Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specific parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 8 (n=31,17,0)2.8 mm
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 24 (n=26,7,10)1.2 mm
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 16 (n=26,7,10)2.4 mm
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 20 (n=26,7,10)1.5 mm
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 12 (n=30,17,0)2.2 mm
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainBaseline (n=32,19,0)5.2 mm
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 4 (n= 31,18,0)3.2 mm
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 8 (n=31,17,0)4.9 mm
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 4 (n= 31,18,0)5.1 mm
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment of PainBaseline (n=32,19,0)5.1 mm
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 16 (n=26,7,10)3.8 mm
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 24 (n=26,7,10)5.3 mm
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 12 (n=30,17,0)4.8 mm
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 20 (n=26,7,10)5.0 mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainBaseline (n=32,19,0)NA mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 20 (n=26,7,10)3.8 mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 24 (n=26,7,10)3.1 mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 4 (n= 31,18,0)NA mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 8 (n=31,17,0)NA mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 12 (n=30,17,0)NA mm
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPatient Global Assessment of PainWeek 16 (n=26,7,10)5.2 mm
p-value: <0.001Friedman's T test
p-value: 0.5Friedman's T test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-29.8 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-10.9 percent change
p-value: 0.271t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-24.8 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-19.1 percent change
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of initial rate of enhancement (IRE) and number of voxels (Nvox), which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined regions of interest (ROIs). A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. Maximum enhancement (ME)=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of signal intensity (SI) until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score-38.7 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score-12.1 percent change
p-value: 0.114t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-17.1 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-15.0 percent change
p-value: 0.266t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-3.7 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score0.0 percent change
p-value: 1t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score

RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-10.6 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-15.4 percent change
p-value: 0.421t-test, 1 sided
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score-45.4 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score23.0 percent change
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score-32.7 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population;

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-32.3 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score15.0 percent change
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score-29.1 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score

Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-27.0 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score1.4 percent change
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score-54.8 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥ 20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8mg/kg group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-37.5 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-37.5 percent change
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score-51.9 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score

Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-6.6 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-12.0 percent change
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score-5.0 percent change
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score

RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg group.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-24.2 percent change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-17.3 percent change
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score-36.8 percent change
Secondary

Tender and Swollen Joint Counts

TJC and SJC were determined using the 28 joint counts. Joints were classified as tender/not tender and swollen/not swollen and counted. The scores ranged from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicated higher disease activity.

Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24

Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsTJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)1.0 joints
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsTJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)3.5 joints
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsSJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)1.5 joints
Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsSJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)0.0 joints
PlaceboTender and Swollen Joint CountsSJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)5.0 joints
PlaceboTender and Swollen Joint CountsTJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)7.0 joints
PlaceboTender and Swollen Joint CountsSJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)8.0 joints
PlaceboTender and Swollen Joint CountsTJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)8.0 joints
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsSJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)NA joints
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsTJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)5.5 joints
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsTJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0)NA joints
Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kgTender and Swollen Joint CountsSJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10)2.5 joints

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026