Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will use Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to assess the efficacy of tocilizumab plus non-biological DMARD in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to non-biological DMARDS. Patients will be randomized to receive either intravenous tocilizumab at 8mg/kg (minimal dose 480mg, maximum dose 800mg) or placebo every 4 weeks, in addition to their stable dose of non-biological DMARD. Anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks, and target sample size is \<100.
Interventions
8mg/kg (minimal dose 480mg, maximum dose 800mg) iv infusion every 4 weeks for 24 weeks
iv every 4 weeks for 24 weeks
stable dose at investigator's prescription
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* adult patients, \>/=18 years of age * moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis of \>/=6 months duration * synovitis (swollen and tender joint) in the wrist of the dominant hand * non-biologic DMARDs at stable dose for \>/=12 weeks prior to baseline * oral corticosteroids at stable dose for at least 25 out of 28 days prior to baseline
Exclusion criteria
* rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA * history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * functional class IV (ACR classification) * intraarticular or parenteral corticosteroids within 6 weeks prior to baseline * previous treatment with a biologic agent for RA
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score | Week 12 | Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal (MCP) were assessed for synovitis via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | Week 12 | RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | Week 24 | RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | Week 24 | RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Week 12 | Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Week 24 | Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | Week 12 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | Week 12 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | Week 24 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | Week 24 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | Week 12 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | Week 12 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | Week 24 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | Week 24 | Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score | Week 12 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of initial rate of enhancement (IRE) and number of voxels (Nvox), which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined regions of interest (ROIs). A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. Maximum enhancement (ME)=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of signal intensity (SI) until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score | Week 12 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | Week 24 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | Week 24 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | Week 12 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | Week 12 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | Week 24 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | Week 24 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | Week 12 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | Week 12 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | Week 24 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | Week 24 | Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement. |
| Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hr\]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global Score | Week 12 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score | Week 24 | DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | Weeks 12 and 24 | TJC and SJC were determined using the 28 joint counts. Joints were classified as tender/not tender and swollen/not swollen and counted. The scores ranged from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicated higher disease activity. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in TJC | Week 12 | Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC | Week 24 | Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in SJC | Week 12 | Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC | Week 24 | Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 12 | General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity | Week 24 | General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded. |
| Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 | Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 12 | Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 24 | Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement. |
| Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24 | The HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | Week 12 | ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A reduction in ESR indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR | Week 24 | ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in RA. A reduction in ESR indicates improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | Week 12 | The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. CRP was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP | Week 24 | The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Cortisol | Week 12 | Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol | Week 24 | Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH) | Week 12 | Change in Plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH | Week 24 | Change in plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Androstenedione | Week 12 | Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12. |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | Week 12 | RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione | Week 24 | Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP | Week 24 | Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | Week 12 | Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA | Week 24 | Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide Y | Week 12 | Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y | Week 24 | Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24. |
| Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP) | Week 12 | Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12. |
Countries
Portugal
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received placebo IV once every 4 weeks for a maximum of 24 weeks. At 12 weeks, participants who did not respond to treatment (those who did not show improvement of ≥20% in tender joint count and swollen joint count) were offered rescue therapy with open-label tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks through Week 24. | 19 |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg Participants received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (minimum dose of 480 mg, maximum dose of 800 mg) IV once every 4 weeks for 24 weeks. | 35 |
| Total | 54 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 4 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Lack of compliance | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Other | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 54 years | 54 years | 54 years |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 17 Participants | 29 Participants | 46 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants | 6 Participants | 8 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 29 / 35 | 7 / 10 | 6 / 9 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 2 / 35 | 0 / 10 | 0 / 9 |
Outcome results
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score
Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th metacarpophalangeal (MCP) were assessed for synovitis via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population; n (number) equals (=) number of participants assessed for the specified parameter
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score | 2nd to 5th MCP joints (n=25,14) | -25.0 percent change |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score | Wrist region (n=30,17) | -20.0 percent change |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score | Total synovitis score (n=30,17) | -23.6 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score | Wrist region (n=30,17) | -37.5 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score | 2nd to 5th MCP joints (n=25,14) | 0.0 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score | Total synovitis score (n=30,17) | -25.0 percent change |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -0.002 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -0.001 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -0.002 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -0.001 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score | -0.002 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score | -0.001 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -3.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -2.0 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -0.5 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | 0.0 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score
RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -5.5 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -7.0 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score
Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Wrist region | -1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | 2nd to 5th MCP joints | -1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Total synovitis score | -2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Wrist region | -2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | 2nd to 5th MCP joints | 0.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Total synovitis score | -2.0 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population;
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | -0.003 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | 0.0002 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | -0.002 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population;
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -0.002 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | 0.001 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -0.001 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -0.002 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | 0.0001 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -0.004 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥ 20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8mg/kg group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -5.5 percent change |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -3.0 percent change |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -10.0 percent change |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥ 20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8mg/kg group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -1.5 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -2.0 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score
RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -13.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -3.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -14.0 units on a scale |
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score
Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Three wrist regions (distal radioulnar joint, radiocarpal joint, the intercarpal and intermetacarpal joint) and the 2nd to 5th MCP were assessed for synovitis via MRI and scored using a scale ranging from 0-3 where 0 is normal and scores 1-3 (mild, moderate, severe) are by thirds of the presumed volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. These values were then summed yielding scores of 0-9 in the wrist region, 0-12 for MCP joints, and 0-22 on the aggregate. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Total synovitis score | -3.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Wrist region | -1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | 2nd to 5th MCP joints | -1.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Total synovitis score | -1.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Wrist region | -2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | 2nd to 5th MCP joints | 0.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Total synovitis score | -3.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | Wrist region | -2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT-RAMRIS Synovitis Score | 2nd to 5th MCP joints | -1.0 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP)
Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP) | -0.01 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in 17 Hydroxy Progesterone (17OHP) | -0.03 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP)
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. CRP was measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -0.9 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) | -0.1 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global Score
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global Score | -2.99 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DAS28 Global Score | 0.22 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)
ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | -19.0 mm/hr |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) | 2.0 mm/hr |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide Y
Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide Y | -13.3 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Neuropeptide Y | -0.7 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity | -3.8 mm |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity | 0.2 mm |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain
Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain | -3.3 mm |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain | -0.3 mm |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH)
Change in Plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH) | 0.00 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Plasma Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone (ACTH) | 0.00 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Androstenedione
Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Androstenedione | 0.01 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Androstenedione | 0.01 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Cortisol
Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Cortisol | -1.4 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Cortisol | 2.5 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 12.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | -0.07 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Serum Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) | 0.00 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in SJC
Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in SJC | -7.0 swollen joints |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in SJC | -1.0 swollen joints |
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in TJC
Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 12. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in TJC | -6.5 tender joints |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 12 in TJC | -2.0 tender joints |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP
Change in 17OHP was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP | -0.01 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP | -0.07 mg/dL |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in 17OHP | -0.02 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP | -1.2 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP | -0.2 mg/dL |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in CRP | -0.6 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the ESR (mm/hr) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm VAS); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity. Change in DAS28 global score was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score | -3.4 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score | -1.2 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DAS28 Global Score | -2.9 units on a scale |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR
ESR is an inflammatory marker and is used to assess disease activity in RA. A reduction in ESR indicates improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR | -20.0 mm/hr |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR | -9.0 mm/hr |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in ESR | -27.0 mm/hr |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y
Change in Neuropeptide Y was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y | -11.1 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y | -2.5 mg/dL |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Neuropeptide Y | -13.9 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity
General health was assessed using the Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity, a 0 to 10 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 10 mm = extremely bad. Participants were asked to answer the following question: In general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?. Participants responded by marking the line and the distance from the left edge was recorded.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity | -4.4 mm |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity | -1.5 mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity | -1.4 mm |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain
Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded. Change in Patient Global Assessment of Pain was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain | -3.7 mm |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain | -3.4 mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Patient Global Assessment of Pain | -1.5 mm |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH
Change in plasma ACTH was determined as the difference in the scores at baseline and Week 24.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH | -0.4 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH | -0.3 mg/dL |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Plasma ACTH | 0.8 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione
Change in serum androstenedione was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione | 0.02 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione | 0.01 mg/dL |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Androstenedione | -0.002 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol
Change in serum cortisol was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population;
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol | -2.5 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol | -5.2 mg/dL |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum Cortisol | -5.1 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA
Change in DHEA was determined as the difference in the scores at Baseline and Week 24.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA | 0.17 mg/dL |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA | -0.73 mg/dL |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in Serum DHEA | 0.40 mg/dL |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC
Change in SJC was determined as the difference in the number of swollen joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC | -8.5 swollen joints |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC | -7.0 swollen joints |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in SJC | -5.0 swollen joints |
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC
Change in TJC was determined as the difference in the number of tender joints at baseline and the number at Week 24. A negative number indicated improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC | -8.5 tender joints |
| Placebo | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC | -5.0 tender joints |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Change From Baseline to Week 24 in TJC | -7.5 tender joints |
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28)
DAS28 was calculated from the number of swollen joints and tender joints (SJC and TJC) using the 28-joint count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour \[mm/hr\]) and global health assessment (participant rated global assessment of disease activity using 10-mm visual analog scale \[VAS\]); DAS28 score ranged from 0 to 10, where higher scores correspond to greater disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Week 24 (n=24,7,10) | 2.1 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Baseline (n=32,17,0) | 5.7 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 2.6 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Week 24 (n=24,7,10) | 3.9 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Baseline (n=32,17,0) | 6.2 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 5.6 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Week 24 (n=24,7,10) | 3.2 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) | Baseline (n=32,17,0) | NA units on a scale |
Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores
The HAQ-DI includes 20 questions concerning participant's activities of daily life, grouped in 8 scales of 2 to 3 questions for each activity. To respond to each question, a four-level response (score of 0 to 3 points), with higher scores showing larger functional limitations, was chosen. Scoring was as follows with respect to performance of participant's everyday activities: 0=without difficulties; 1=with some difficulties; 2=with great difficulties; and 3=unable to perform these actions at all. Minimum score was 0, maximum score was 3.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 12 and 24
Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Baseline (n=30,16,0) | 2.1 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Week 12 (n=28,13,0) | 1.5 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 1.3 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Week 12 (n=30,16,0) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Baseline (n=32,19,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Week 12 (n=27,10,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Week 24 (n=24,7,9) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Baseline (n=32,19,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Baseline (n=31,18,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Baseline (n=24,12,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Week 12 (n=26,10,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Week 24 (n=23,7,8) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Baseline (n=29,18,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Week 12 (n=29,14,0) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Week 24 (n=26,7,9) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Baseline (n=31,15,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Week 12 (n=29,14,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Week 24 (n=25,7,8) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Baseline (n=31,18,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 1.0 units on a scale |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Baseline (n=26,14,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Week 24 (n=25,7,8) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Baseline (n=32,19,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Baseline (n=30,16,0) | 2.3 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Baseline (n=31,18,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.1 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Baseline (n=24,12,0) | 3.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Week 12 (n=26,10,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Week 24 (n=23,7,8) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Week 24 (n=26,7,9) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Week 12 (n=28,13,0) | 2.3 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Baseline (n=32,19,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Baseline (n=31,18,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Baseline (n=31,15,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Week 12 (n=30,16,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Baseline (n=26,14,0) | 3.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Week 12 (n=27,10,0) | 3.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Week 12 (n=29,14,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Baseline (n=29,18,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Week 12 (n=29,14,0) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Week 24 (n=24,7,9) | 3.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Baseline (n=32,19,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Baseline (n=30,16,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Baseline (n=32,19,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Week 24 (n=25,7,8) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Week 24 (n=26,7,9) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Baseline (n=24,12,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Week 12 (n=28,13,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Baseline (n=31,18,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Week 12 (n=27,10,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Week 12 (n=29,14,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Global score, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.1 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Baseline (n=31,18,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Hygiene, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Baseline (n=29,18,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Week 24 (n=24,7,9) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Week 12 (n=30,16,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Activity, Baseline (n=31,15,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Week 12 (n=26,10,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Walking, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Reach, Week 24 (n=23,7,8) | 2.5 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Eating, Baseline (n=26,14,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Dressing/grooming, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Grip, Week 12 (n=29,14,0) | NA units on a scale |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disease Index (HAQ-DI) Scores | Arising, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.0 units on a scale |
Patient Global Assessment of Pain
Patient's Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 10-mm horizontal VAS (0 to 10 mm) where 0=pain absent and 10=intolerable pain. Participants responded by placing a mark on the line to indicate their current level of pain; the distance from the left edge to the mark was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specific parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 8 (n=31,17,0) | 2.8 mm |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 1.2 mm |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 16 (n=26,7,10) | 2.4 mm |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 20 (n=26,7,10) | 1.5 mm |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 2.2 mm |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Baseline (n=32,19,0) | 5.2 mm |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 4 (n= 31,18,0) | 3.2 mm |
| Placebo | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 8 (n=31,17,0) | 4.9 mm |
| Placebo | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 4 (n= 31,18,0) | 5.1 mm |
| Placebo | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Baseline (n=32,19,0) | 5.1 mm |
| Placebo | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 16 (n=26,7,10) | 3.8 mm |
| Placebo | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 5.3 mm |
| Placebo | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 4.8 mm |
| Placebo | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 20 (n=26,7,10) | 5.0 mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Baseline (n=32,19,0) | NA mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 20 (n=26,7,10) | 3.8 mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 3.1 mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 4 (n= 31,18,0) | NA mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 8 (n=31,17,0) | NA mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | NA mm |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Week 16 (n=26,7,10) | 5.2 mm |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -29.8 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -10.9 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -24.8 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -19.1 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of initial rate of enhancement (IRE) and number of voxels (Nvox), which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined regions of interest (ROIs). A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. Maximum enhancement (ME)=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of signal intensity (SI) until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score | -38.7 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE)-MRI Early Enhancement Rate (EER) Global Score | -12.1 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -17.1 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -15.0 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 centimeter (cm) (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -3.7 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | 0.0 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score
RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score plus (+) Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT population. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -10.6 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -15.4 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from all the assessed ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | -45.4 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | 23.0 percent change |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Global Score | -32.7 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the MCP ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population;
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -32.3 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | 15.0 percent change |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER MCP Score | -29.1 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score
Contrast enhancement was quantified in terms of IRE and Nvox, which are extracted by examining individual signal intensity vs time curves derived from defined ROIs. A volume ROI was manually drawn around wrist and MCP 2-5 joints at each visit representative of size/volume of enhancement and underlying inflammation. ME=mean of ME and Nplateau+Nwashout (Nvoxels) are number of voxels that have a plateau and washout, used to assess volume of enhancing voxels within drawn ROIs. IRE=percentage increase of SI until l ME is reached calculated as maximum increase in post-contrast SI divided by baseline SI; IRE=increase in SI in %/s from time of onset of enhancement to ME. EER reflects the IRE parameter and the output is the mean from the wrist ROIs (range=between 0 and 1; 0=no change/enhancement, 1=maximum change/enhancement. Negative change from Baseline score=improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -27.0 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | 1.4 percent change |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in DCE-MRI EER Wrist Score | -54.8 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for edema via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of bone with edema. Scoring ranged from 0 to 3 as follows: 0: no edema; 1: 1-33% of bone edematous; 2: 34-66% of bone edematous; 3: 67-100%. Summing these values yielded a scale from 0-45 for the wrist region, 0-24 for the MCP joints, and 0-69 on aggregate.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥ 20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8mg/kg group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -37.5 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -37.5 percent change |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Edema Score | -51.9 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score
Bones from the wrist regions (carpal bones, distal radius, distal ulna and metacarpal bases) and the MCP joints (metacarpal heads and phalangeal bases) were assessed for erosion via MRI and scored separately based on the proportion of eroded bone compared to the 'assessed bone volume' judged from all available images. Scoring ranges from 0 (no erosion) to 10 (91-100%). For long bones, the 'assessed bone volume' is from the articular surface to a depth of 1 cm (if the articular surface is absent its best estimated position is used), and in carpal bones it is the whole bone. Results were summed, resulting in scores from 0 to 80 for the wrist region, 0 to 150 for the MCP joints, and 0 to 230 on aggregate. A negative value in change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -6.6 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -12.0 percent change |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Bone Erosion Score | -5.0 percent change |
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score
RAMRIS score is the sum of its core components: Synovitis Score, Edema Score, and Erosion Score. Synovitis scored from 0 (normal) to 9 (maximum distension of synovial cavity). Edema scored 0 (normal) to 69 (maximum articular bone involvement). Erosion scored from 0 (normal) to 230 (maximum erosion of articular bone). RAMRIS=Synovial Score + Edema Score + Erosion Score. Minimum RAMRIS score=0 (normal), maximum RAMRIS score=308 (severe structural damage). For Synovial Score, Edema Score, Erosion Score, and RAMRIS score, increasing number=increasing severity.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: ITT population; participants from the placebo group who did not show an improvement of ≥20% in TJC and SJC were offered recovery therapy with tocilizumab 8 mg/kg and were placed in Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -24.2 percent change |
| Placebo | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -17.3 percent change |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 24 in OMERACT RAMRIS Score | -36.8 percent change |
Tender and Swollen Joint Counts
TJC and SJC were determined using the 28 joint counts. Joints were classified as tender/not tender and swollen/not swollen and counted. The scores ranged from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicated higher disease activity.
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Population: ITT population; n=number of participants assessed for the specified parameter at a given visit. After Week 12, participants receiving placebo could have been switched to tocilizumab.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | TJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 1.0 joints |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | TJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 3.5 joints |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | SJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 1.5 joints |
| Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | SJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 0.0 joints |
| Placebo | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | SJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 5.0 joints |
| Placebo | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | TJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 7.0 joints |
| Placebo | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | SJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 8.0 joints |
| Placebo | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | TJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | 8.0 joints |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | SJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | NA joints |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | TJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 5.5 joints |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | TJC, Week 12 (n=30,17,0) | NA joints |
| Placebo-Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg | Tender and Swollen Joint Counts | SJC, Week 24 (n=26,7,10) | 2.5 joints |