Skip to content

Oral CF101 Tablets Treatment in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Phase IIB Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Daily CF101 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Elevated Baseline Expression Levels of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell A3 Adenosine Receptors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01034306
Enrollment
79
Registered
2009-12-17
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2022-05-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This trial will test the hypothesis that the administration of CF101, a novel anti-inflammatory agent, to patients with rheumatoid arthritis and high A3AR expression at baseline will relieve signs and symptoms of the disease.

Detailed description

This will be a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, study in which patients with active RA and high A3AR expression at baseline will be randomized to the addition of either CF101 1.0 mg or placebo given orally q12h for 12 weeks. Screening examinations will occur within 1 month prior to dosing. Washout of other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including biological agents, will occur prior to dosing; if washout is necessary, patients must re-qualify for inclusion following the washout. Doses of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) and corticosteroids must be stable for \>=1 month prior to dosing and remain so during protocol participation. Disease activity will be assessed using swollen and tender joint counts, physician and patient global assessments (by visual analog scale, VAS), patient reported pain (by VAS), a Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Disability Index (DI), Westergren erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR, Screening, Weeks 0 and12), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Assessments will take place at Screening, Baseline (Week 0), and at Weeks 2, 4, 8, and 12.

Interventions

DRUGCF101

orally q12h

DRUGPlacebo control

orally q12 hours

Sponsors

Can-Fite BioPharma
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males and females ages 18-75 years * Meet the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for RA (Arnett FC et al. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315-324, Appendix 1) * Not bed- or wheelchair-bound * Active RA, as indicated by the presence of (a) \>=6 swollen joints (28 joint count); AND (b) \>=6 tender joints (28 joint count); AND either: (c) Westergren ESR of \>=28 mm/hour; OR (d) CRP level above the upper limit of normal for the central reference laboratory * Elevated PBMC A3AR expression level, defined as \>= 1.5-fold over a predetermined normal population standard, following the appropriate DMARD/biologic washout period (see

Exclusion criteria

) but within 2 weeks of beginning dosing * If taking a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAID), dose has been stable for at least 1 month prior to the A3AR Qualification Visit, and will remain unchanged during protocol participation * If taking an oral corticosteroid, dose is \<=10 mg/day prednisone or equivalent, has been stable for at least 1 month prior to the A3AR Qualification Visit, and will remain unchanged during protocol participation * In the Investigator's opinion, the ability to understand the nature of the study and any hazards of participation, and to communicate satisfactorily with the Investigator and to participate in, and to comply with, the requirements of the entire protocol * Negative screening serum pregnancy test for female patients of childbearing potential * Females of childbearing potential must utilize, throughout the course of the trial, 2 methods of contraception deemed adequate by the Investigator (for example, oral contraceptive pills plus a barrier method) * All aspects of the protocol explained and written informed consent obtained

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response (20% Improvement)12 weeksACR20 Response is defined as a 20% improvement from baseline in disease: 1. \>20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC), and 2. \>20% improvement in swollen joint count (SJC), and 3. \>20% improvement in at least 3 of following 5: 1. Physician global assessment (PGA), 2. Patient global assessment (PAGA), 3. Patient pain assessment (PPA), 4. Patient's assessment of physical function using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5. Most improved response of ESR and CRP

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Subjects Achieving an ACR50 Response (50% Improvement)12 weeksACR50 Response is defined as a 50% improvement from baseline in disease: 1. \>50% improvement in TJC, and 2. \>50% improvement in SJC, and 3. \>50% improvement in at least 3 of following 5: 1. Physician global assessment (PGA), 2. Patient global assessment (PAGA), 3. Patient pain assessment (PPA), 4. Patient's assessment of physical function using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5. Most improved response of ESR and CRP
Number of Subjects Achieving an ACR70 Response (70% Improvement)12 weeksACR70 Response is defined as a 70% improvement from baseline in disease: 1. \>70% improvement in TJC, and 2. \>70% improvement in SJC, and 3. \>70% improvement in at least 3 of following 5: 1. Physician global assessment (PGA), 2. Patient global assessment (PAGA), 3. Patient pain assessment (PPA), 4. Patient's assessment of physical function using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5. Most improved response of ESR and CRP

Countries

Bulgaria, Israel

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CF101 1mg
CF101 1mg q12 for 12 weeks
42
Placebo
MAtching placebo q12 for 12 weeks
37
Total79

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall Studyhospitalized and decided to stop10
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyNoncomplience10
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCF101 1mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous56.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.87
61.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.89
59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.92
Sex: Female, Male
Female
32 Participants32 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants5 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 420 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 421 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response (20% Improvement)

ACR20 Response is defined as a 20% improvement from baseline in disease: 1. \>20% improvement in tender joint count (TJC), and 2. \>20% improvement in swollen joint count (SJC), and 3. \>20% improvement in at least 3 of following 5: 1. Physician global assessment (PGA), 2. Patient global assessment (PAGA), 3. Patient pain assessment (PPA), 4. Patient's assessment of physical function using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5. Most improved response of ESR and CRP

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT population, all-cause dropouts considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CF101 1mgNumber of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response (20% Improvement)18 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) Response (20% Improvement)8 Participants
p-value: 0.0352t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving an ACR50 Response (50% Improvement)

ACR50 Response is defined as a 50% improvement from baseline in disease: 1. \>50% improvement in TJC, and 2. \>50% improvement in SJC, and 3. \>50% improvement in at least 3 of following 5: 1. Physician global assessment (PGA), 2. Patient global assessment (PAGA), 3. Patient pain assessment (PPA), 4. Patient's assessment of physical function using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5. Most improved response of ESR and CRP

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT population, all-cause dropouts considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CF101 1mgNumber of Subjects Achieving an ACR50 Response (50% Improvement)7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Achieving an ACR50 Response (50% Improvement)3 Participants
p-value: 0.2472t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Number of Subjects Achieving an ACR70 Response (70% Improvement)

ACR70 Response is defined as a 70% improvement from baseline in disease: 1. \>70% improvement in TJC, and 2. \>70% improvement in SJC, and 3. \>70% improvement in at least 3 of following 5: 1. Physician global assessment (PGA), 2. Patient global assessment (PAGA), 3. Patient pain assessment (PPA), 4. Patient's assessment of physical function using Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and 5. Most improved response of ESR and CRP

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: ITT population, all-cause dropouts considered non-responders

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CF101 1mgNumber of Subjects Achieving an ACR70 Response (70% Improvement)4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Subjects Achieving an ACR70 Response (70% Improvement)1 Participants
p-value: 0.1972t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026