Skip to content

A Study of Tocilizumab and Methotrexate in Combination or as Monotherapy in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

U-ACT-EARLY: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate Remission in DMARD and Biological naïve Early Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Subjects Treated With Tocilizumab (TCZ) Plus Tight Control Methotrexate (MTX) , TCZ Monotherapy or Tight Control MTX Monotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01034137
Enrollment
317
Registered
2009-12-17
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2016-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Keywords

Treat-to-target, tight control, strategy study, TCZ, MTX

Brief summary

This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will compare the efficacy with regard to sustained remission and safety of tocilizumab and methotrexate, in combination or as monotherapy, in treatment-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Patients will be randomized to receive either tocilizumab (8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks) plus weekly methotrexate (po in ascending doses), or tocilizumab (8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks) plus placebo, or methotrexate plus placebo. Anticipated time on study treatment is 2 years, and target sample size is 300.

Detailed description

Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (double placebo) three-arm parallel group, comparative study. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the following treatments: * TCZ 8 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg) + MTX (Group I: TCZ+MTX) * TCZ 8 mg/kg + placeboMTX (Group II: TCZ+placebo) * MTX + placeboTCZ (Group III: MTX+placebo) Randomization was stratified by participating center and baseline Disease Activity Score, scoring 28 joints (DAS28) level (\<5.1 vs. ≥5.1). Patients were evaluated every 4 weeks and at each visit a decision on dosage changes was made based on efficacy parameters (DAS28) and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Patients received MTX/placeboMTX in climbing dosages. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was added when remission was not reached with the maximum tolerable dosage (MTD) of MTX/placeboMTX. If after 12 additional weeks remission was not reached, HCQ was stopped and replaced by standard of care therapy (in Group I) or placebo therapy was replaced by the corresponding verum resulting in TCZ+MTX combination therapy (in Groups II and III). In case remission was reached, MTX/placeboMTX and TCZ/placeboTCZ had to be decreased. Patients were followed for a maximum of 24 months

Interventions

DRUGmethotrexate

orally weekly in ascending dosages, starting at 10mg/week

DRUGplacebo MTX

orally weekly

DRUGplacebo TCZ

iv every 4 weeks

DRUGtocilizumab [RoActemra/Actemra]

8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* adult patients, \>/=18 years of age * early rheumatoid arthritis (disease symptoms \<1 year) according to ACR criteria * disease activity DAS28 \>2.6 * body weight \</=110kg, BMI \</=36

Exclusion criteria

* rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA * current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * previous treatment with any DMARD or biologic drug used in the treatment of RA * intra-articular, parenteral or oral glucocorticoids used for the arthritis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 104Week 104Sustained remission rate (SRR) is defined as Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) \<2.6 during ≥ 23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Median Time to First Sustained RemissionUp to Week 104It is the time to event analysis for the first period of sustained remission. Sustained remission is defined as DAS28 \<2.6 during ≥23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts (range 0-28), acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission.
Mean Duration of First Sustained RemissionUp to Week 104It is the duration of the first period of sustained DAS28 remission. Participants who switch treatment strategy before reaching sustained remission considered failures.
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.
Mean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 RemissionUp to Week 104It is the duration of the first period of DAS28 remission.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.
Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) are continuous measures of RA disease activity. The CDAI is the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment; and patient's global assessment (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PhGA) assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104The simplified disease activity index (SDAI ) are continuous measures of RA disease activity.The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PhGA (assessed on 0-10 cm VAS), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates disease remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high disease activity.
Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Weeks 24, 52, and 104European league against rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point =\<3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and =\<1.2.
Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism ResponseUp to Week 104It is the time to first EULAR response. EULAR response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease.Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2. Response 1 is defined as yes (good) versus no (moderate or no response). Response 2 is defined as yes (good or moderate) versus no (no response).
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response is defined as a \>= 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104ACR50 response is defined as a \>=50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's Global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104ACR70 response is defined as a \>=70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's Assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104ACR90 response is defined as a \>=90% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104The number of swollen joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a swollen joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total SJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of SJC from 0 (best possible score; no swollen joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all joints swollen).
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104The number of tender joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a tender joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total TJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of TJC from 0 (best possible score; no tender joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all tender joints).
Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire (DC-HAQ) disability index is a self-completed participant questionnaire with 8 domains specific for RA. It assesses a participant functional ability, with scores ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A change from baseline of -0.22 is considered to be the minimal clinically important difference.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Patient health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity). An improvement (decrease) in the patient's global assessment based on disease activity relative to respective baseline values was analyzed.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Physician health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity).An improvement (decrease) in the physician's global assessment based on disease activity parameter relative to respective baseline values was analyzed.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Pain VAS is a component of ACR. VAS pain score calculated as 0 to 10 cm; where 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst possible pain.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104CRP is a component of ACR. CRP is a marker of inflammation.
Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 52 and 104The degree of joint damage was assessed using the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS). The methodology quantifies the extent of bone erosions for 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) for 42 joints, with higher scores representing greater damage. The independent read of X-ray images was performed by 2 primary readers. In case of discrepancy between the 2 primary readers, an adjudicator was involved. The mTSS can range from 0 to 448 with a higher score indicating more joint damage. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic ResponseUp to Week 104Insufficient therapeutic response (participants not responding to the drug as assessed by the physician) was selected by the investigator as a reason for the participant to withdraw from the study.
Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The StudyFrom Baseline to Week 104Participants who switched treatment strategy from monotherapy (TCZ+ placebo MTX or MTX+ placebo TCZ treatment) to combination therapy (TCZ+MTX treatment) was reported. Also, participants who switched from verum therapy to standard of care was reported in the below table.
Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EuroQol (EQ-5D) is a standard self-completed participant questionnaire that measures health outcome. The EQ-5D questionnaire consists of 2 parts: 1) EQ-5D with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale as 1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems. The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, where '1' indicating full health and '0' representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved. 2) EQ-VAS on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 = worst possible health status and 100 = best possible health status.
Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Patient global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Patient global health VAS is a component of DAS28.
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Physician global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Physician global health VAS is a component of DAS28.
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Participants assessed their pain using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as no pain and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as unbearable pain .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10.
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Participants assessed their general wellbeing using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as not active at all and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as very active .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10.
Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participants response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participants fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.
Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 52The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 104The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Median Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 RemissionUp to Week 104It is the time to event analysis for the first DAS28 remission.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Week 12Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Week 24Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Week 52Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Week 104Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationUp to Week 104An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign , symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. A serious adverse event is defined as any event which was fatal (resulted in death), lifethreatening (with immediate risk of death), resulted in a new or prolongation of a current hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, considered medically significant by the investigator, required intervention to prevent one or more of the outcomes listed above.

Countries

Netherlands

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 360 participants were screened at 21 centers in the Netherlands from 04 JAN 2010 to 30 JUL 2012.

Pre-assignment details

Of 360 participants, 43 failed screening.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab + Methotrexate
Participants received IV TCZ 8 mg/ kg every four weeks for a maximum of 26 infusions + oral capsules of MTX 10-30 mg/week in climbing dosages of 5 mg starting at 10 mg up till a maximum dosage of 30 mg/week. The weekly dose of MTX was taken on one particular day of the week.
106
Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate
Participants received IV TCZ 8 mg/kg every four weeks for a maximum of 26 infusions + weekly oral matching placebo MTX capsules in climbing dosages. The weekly dose of placebo MTX was taken on one particular day of the week.
103
Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab
Participants received weekly oral MTX in climbing dosages of 5 mg starting at 10 mg up till a maximum dosage of 30 mg/week + matching placebo TCZ IV 8 mg/kg every four week for a maximum of 26 infusions. The weekly dose of MTX was taken on one particular day of the week.
108
Total317

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdministrative or other234
Overall StudyAdverse Event9108
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy9413
Overall StudyProtocol Violation221
Overall StudyRefused treatment or did not cooperate201
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject433

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab + MethotrexateTocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMethotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
21 Participants24 Participants21 Participants66 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
85 Participants79 Participants87 Participants251 Participants
Age, Continuous53.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8
55.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9
52.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
53.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants78 Participants69 Participants212 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
41 Participants25 Participants39 Participants105 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
105 / 10699 / 103106 / 108
serious
Total, serious adverse events
16 / 10619 / 10313 / 108

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 104

Sustained remission rate (SRR) is defined as Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) \<2.6 during ≥ 23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsules and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 10485.8 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 10483.5 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 10444.4 Percentage of participants
Comparison: The SRR was compared between the treatment groups by means of the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test taking into account the stratification factors used for randomization.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.589, 2.506]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The SRR was compared between the treatment groups by means of the CMH test taking into account the stratification factors used for randomization.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [1.481, 2.323]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: The SRR was compared between the treatment groups by means of the CMH test taking into account the stratification factors used for randomization.p-value: 0.61695% CI: [0.915, 1.16]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 123.1 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 243.6 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 523.3 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 1043.3 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 1043.3 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 123.3 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 523.4 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 243.6 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 1043.2 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 242.1 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 523.3 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabAbsolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 121.4 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 12, n=72, 73, 7911.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.4
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 24, n= 72, 74, 7616.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.4
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 24, n=67, 72,759.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 52, n=62, 63, 6818.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 52, n=61, 63, 6910.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 104, n=52, 57, 6015.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 104, n=51, 57, 609.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.2
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 12, n=72, 71, 76.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 24, n=67, 72,759.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 12, n=72, 73, 7914.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 52, n=62, 63, 6820.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 12, n=72, 71, 710.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 52, n=61, 63, 6913.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 104, n=51, 57, 609.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.5
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 24, n= 72, 74, 7613.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 104, n=52, 57, 6015.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 24, n= 72, 74, 769.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 24, n=67, 72,755.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 104, n=52, 57, 6013.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 52, n=62, 63, 6815.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 104, n=51, 57, 608.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 52, n=61, 63, 6910.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104PCS Week 12, n=72, 73, 796.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104MCS Week 12, n=72, 71, 73.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participants response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participants fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=98, 98, 994.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=98, 99, 947.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 86, 856.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=74, 78, 746.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=98, 99, 946.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 86, 857.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=98, 98, 996.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=74, 78, 745.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 86, 856.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=98, 99, 944.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=74, 78, 747.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=98, 98, 993.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.5
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104

The degree of joint damage was assessed using the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS). The methodology quantifies the extent of bone erosions for 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) for 42 joints, with higher scores representing greater damage. The independent read of X-ray images was performed by 2 primary readers. In case of discrepancy between the 2 primary readers, an adjudicator was involved. The mTSS can range from 0 to 448 with a higher score indicating more joint damage. A negative change score indicates improvement.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104Week 520.50 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.495
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1041.18 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.919
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104Week 520.79 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.242
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1041.45 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.272
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104Week 520.96 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104Week 1041.53 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.421
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Participants assessed their general wellbeing using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as not active at all and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as very active .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=30, 19, 19-27.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.2
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=28, 18, 18-36.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=23, 17, 15-40.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.5
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=23, 16, 19-31.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.4
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=23, 16, 19-38.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=30, 19, 19-31.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=23, 17, 15-45.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=28, 18, 18-35.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 34
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=23, 16, 19-34.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=28, 18, 18-16.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=23, 17, 15-26.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=30, 19, 19-6.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Patient global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Patient global health VAS is a component of DAS28.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=101, 99, 103-25.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n= 97, 95, 96-33.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 90, 84-34.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=76, 83, 74-33.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=76, 83, 74-34.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=101, 99, 103-24.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 90, 84-34.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.2
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n= 97, 95, 96-29.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=76, 83, 74-36.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n= 97, 95, 96-20.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 90, 84-31.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=101, 99, 103-14.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.4
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Participants assessed their pain using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as no pain and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as unbearable pain .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=95, 96, 101-28.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 93, 92-36.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.3
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=78, 83, 82-37.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=73, 80, 72-34.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=73, 80, 72-36.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=95, 96, 101-29.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 31
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=78, 83, 82-36.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.2
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 93, 92-33.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.4
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=73, 80, 72-41.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 93, 92-28.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=78, 83, 82-38.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 27.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=95, 96, 101-19.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.5
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Physician global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Physician global health VAS is a component of DAS28.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=79, 82, 79-35.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=74, 75, 78-43.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.1
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=61, 68, 64-43.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=71, 71, 71-45.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.9
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=74, 75, 78-43.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=71, 71, 71-46.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=79, 82, 79-34.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=61, 68, 64-50.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=61, 68, 64-41.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.2
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=74, 75, 78-31.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=79, 82, 79-23.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=71, 71, 71-37.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.5
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire (DC-HAQ) disability index is a self-completed participant questionnaire with 8 domains specific for RA. It assesses a participant functional ability, with scores ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A change from baseline of -0.22 is considered to be the minimal clinically important difference.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=95, 95, 91-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 94, 87-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=81, 81, 82-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Weeks 104, n=68, 75, 71-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Weeks 104, n=68, 75, 71-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=95, 95, 91-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=81, 81, 82-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 94, 87-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Weeks 104, n=68, 75, 71-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 94, 87-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=81, 81, 82-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=95, 95, 91-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

EuroQol (EQ-5D) is a standard self-completed participant questionnaire that measures health outcome. The EQ-5D questionnaire consists of 2 parts: 1) EQ-5D with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale as 1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems. The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, where '1' indicating full health and '0' representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved. 2) EQ-VAS on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 = worst possible health status and 100 = best possible health status.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 12, n=72, 72, 780.15 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 12, n=69, 70, 7311.94 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.07
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 24, n=69, 73, 730.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 24, n=67, 69, 7113.15 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.93
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 52, n=61, 61, 690.18 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 52, n=58, 59, 6712.52 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.61
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 104, n=50,57,540.14 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.22
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 104, n=50,52,5710.88 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.43
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 24, n=69, 73, 730.15 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.3
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 104, n=50,57,540.20 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 24, n=67, 69, 7110.86 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.46
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 52, n=61, 61, 690.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.24
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 52, n=58, 59, 6713.71 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.63
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 12, n=72, 72, 780.19 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.25
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 12, n=69, 70, 739.31 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 104, n=50,52,5714.37 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.49
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 24, n=69, 73, 730.15 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.27
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 12, n=69, 70, 732.92 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.54
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 12, n=72, 72, 780.11 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.28
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 24, n=67, 69, 718.97 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.17
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 104, n=50,57,540.21 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 52, n=58, 59, 6713.40 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.45
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-5D Week 52, n=61, 61, 690.25 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.29
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104EQ-VAS Week 104, n=50,52,5710.96 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.06
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104

The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Identity, n=74, 78, 74-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=69, 75, 720.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Consequences, n=69, 76, 73-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Personal Control, n=74, 77, 740.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Treatment Control, n=72, 76, 730.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Illness Coherence, n=69, 75,720.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Timeline Cyclical, n=69, 77, 73-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Emotional Representation, n=69, 77, 73-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Consequences, n=69, 76, 73-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Timeline Cyclical, n=69, 77, 73-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Personal Control, n=74, 77, 740.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Treatment Control, n=72, 76, 730.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Illness Coherence, n=69, 75,720.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Identity, n=74, 78, 74-1.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=69, 75, 720.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Emotional Representation, n=69, 77, 73-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Consequences, n=69, 76, 73-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=69, 75, 720.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Identity, n=74, 78, 74-0.9 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Personal Control, n=74, 77, 740.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Timeline Cyclical, n=69, 77, 73-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Illness Coherence, n=69, 75,720.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Treatment Control, n=72, 76, 73-0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104Emotional Representation, n=69, 77, 73-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24

The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Identity, n=98, 99, 94-1.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=97, 96, 87-0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Consequences, n=97, 96, 89-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Personal Control, n=98, 97, 940.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Treatment Control, n=98, 95, 91,0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Illness Coherence, n=96, 94, 890.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Timeline Cyclical, n=96, 97,90-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Emotional Representation, n=96, 97, 90-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Consequences, n=97, 96, 89-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Timeline Cyclical, n=96, 97,90-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Personal Control, n=98, 97, 940.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Treatment Control, n=98, 95, 91,0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Illness Coherence, n=96, 94, 890.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Identity, n=98, 99, 94-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.9
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=97, 96, 870.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Emotional Representation, n=96, 97, 90-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Consequences, n=97, 96, 89-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=97, 96, 870.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Identity, n=98, 99, 94-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Personal Control, n=98, 97, 94-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Timeline Cyclical, n=96, 97,90-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Illness Coherence, n=96, 94, 890.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Treatment Control, n=98, 95, 91,0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24Emotional Representation, n=96, 97, 90-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52

The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 52

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Personal Control, n=84, 84, 840.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=83, 82, 83-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Timeline Cyclical, n=83, 83, 83-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Treatment Control, n=84, 84, 840.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Consequences, n=83, 82, 84-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Illness Coherence, n=83, 80, 830.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Identity, n=84, 86, 85-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Emotional Representation, n=83, 82, 83-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Illness Coherence, n=83, 80, 830.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Identity, n=84, 86, 85-1.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=83, 82, 830.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Consequences, n=83, 82, 84-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Personal Control, n=84, 84, 840.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Treatment Control, n=84, 84, 840.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Timeline Cyclical, n=83, 83, 83-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Emotional Representation, n=83, 82, 83-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Personal Control, n=84, 84, 840.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=83, 82, 830.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Timeline Cyclical, n=83, 83, 83-0.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Consequences, n=83, 82, 84-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Identity, n=84, 86, 85-1.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Emotional Representation, n=83, 82, 83-0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Treatment Control, n=84, 84, 840.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52Illness Coherence, n=83, 80, 830.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12

The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Identity, n=98, 98, 99-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=95, 97, 92-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Consequences, n=95, 96, 95-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Personal Control, n=98, 98, 980.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Treatment Control, n=98, 96, 940.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Illness Coherence, n=95, 96, 950.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Timeline Cyclical, n=95, 98, 96-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Emotional Representation, n=95, 98, 96-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Consequences, n=95, 96, 95-0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Timeline Cyclical, n=95, 98, 96-0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Personal Control, n=98, 98, 980.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Treatment Control, n=98, 96, 940.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Illness Coherence, n=95, 96, 950.3 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Identity, n=98, 98, 99-0.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=95, 97, 92-0.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Emotional Representation, n=95, 98, 96-0.6 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Consequences, n=95, 96, 95-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=95, 97, 920.0 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Identity, n=98, 98, 99-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Personal Control, n=98, 98, 98-0.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Timeline Cyclical, n=95, 98, 96-0.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Illness Coherence, n=95, 96, 950.2 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Treatment Control, n=98, 96, 940.1 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12Emotional Representation, n=95, 98, 96-0.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Mean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission

It is the duration of the first period of DAS28 remission.

Time frame: Up to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission42.99 WeeksStandard Deviation 31.79
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission37.01 WeeksStandard Deviation 30.89
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission20.49 WeeksStandard Deviation 23.95
Secondary

Mean Duration of First Sustained Remission

It is the duration of the first period of sustained DAS28 remission. Participants who switch treatment strategy before reaching sustained remission considered failures.

Time frame: Up to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Duration of First Sustained Remission65.85 WeeksStandard Deviation 26.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Duration of First Sustained Remission65.00 WeeksStandard Deviation 24.75
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Duration of First Sustained Remission52.90 WeeksStandard Deviation 25.11
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

CRP is a component of ACR. CRP is a marker of inflammation.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=99, 101, 98-64.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 72.1
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=77, 81, 78-45.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 105.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=85, 92, 88-47.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 107.2
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=103, 101, 100-47.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 216.5
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=99, 101, 98-69.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 47.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=85, 92, 88-51.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 72
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=77, 81, 78-12.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 256.5
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=103, 101, 100-69.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 39.4
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=99, 101, 98-16.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 127.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=103, 101, 100-28.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 65.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=85, 92, 88-52.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 100.4
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=77, 81, 78-46.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 65.5
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Pain VAS is a component of ACR. VAS pain score calculated as 0 to 10 cm; where 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst possible pain.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=82, 83, 77-59.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=76, 77, 78-74.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 31.4
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=76, 72, 72-77.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 30.9
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=58, 61, 63-76.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=58, 61, 63-78.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=82, 83, 77-55.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 34.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=76, 72, 72-72.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 41.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=76, 77, 78-70.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.4
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=58, 61, 63-74.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 27.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=76, 77, 78-48.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 52.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=76, 72, 72-66.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 35.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=82, 83, 77-39.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 43.5
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Patient health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity). An improvement (decrease) in the patient's global assessment based on disease activity relative to respective baseline values was analyzed.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n =96, 97, 97-43.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 75.2
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 96, 93-66.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 36.5
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=79, 82, 84-66.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=72, 72, 72-64.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 39.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=72, 72, 72-67.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 36.3
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n =96, 97, 97-40.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 74.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=79, 82, 84-63.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 36.8
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 96, 93-54.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 41.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=72, 72, 72-64.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 39.2
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=92, 96, 93-41.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 62.4
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=79, 82, 84-58.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 69.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n =96, 97, 97-25.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 69
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Physician health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity).An improvement (decrease) in the physician's global assessment based on disease activity parameter relative to respective baseline values was analyzed.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n =104, 101, 100-41.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 47.2
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n =100, 101, 98-61.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.7
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n =86, 92, 88-56.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 42.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n =78, 81, 78-63.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n =78, 81, 78-60.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 38.9
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n =104, 101, 100-36.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 42.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n =86, 92, 88-56.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 45.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n =100, 101, 98-46.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 40.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n =78, 81, 78-53.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 54.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n =100, 101, 98-26.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 57.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n =86, 92, 88-48.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 50.1
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n =104, 101, 100-18.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 52.5
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

The number of swollen joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a swollen joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total SJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of SJC from 0 (best possible score; no swollen joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all joints swollen).

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=104, 100, 98-69.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 91.1
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=100, 100, 97-91.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 18.5
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=86, 91, 87-93.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 19.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=78, 80, 77-85.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 44.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=78, 80, 77-91.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 31.3
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=104, 100, 98-68.2 Percent changeStandard Deviation 45.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=86, 91, 87-89.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 24.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=100, 100, 97-86.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 24.3
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=78, 80, 77-87.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 23.7
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=100, 100, 97-69.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 37.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=86, 91, 87-91.3 Percent changeStandard Deviation 20
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=104, 100, 98-44.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 73.9
Secondary

Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

The number of tender joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a tender joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total TJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of TJC from 0 (best possible score; no tender joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all tender joints).

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=102, 98, 99-68.0 Percent changeStandard Deviation 44.6
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=98, 98, 97-81.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 28.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 89, 87-77.8 Percent changeStandard Deviation 49.8
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=76, 79, 77-84.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 26.4
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=76, 79, 77-82.5 Percent changeStandard Deviation 30.7
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=102, 98, 99-53.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 84.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 89, 87-80.4 Percent changeStandard Deviation 33.1
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=98, 98, 97-66.1 Percent changeStandard Deviation 83.8
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=76, 79, 77-79.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 31.9
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=98, 98, 97-66.6 Percent changeStandard Deviation 34
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=84, 89, 87-77.7 Percent changeStandard Deviation 33.6
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=102, 98, 99-36.9 Percent changeStandard Deviation 65.9
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104

The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) are continuous measures of RA disease activity. The CDAI is the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment; and patient's global assessment (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PhGA) assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52-19.5 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24-20.0 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104-19.0 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52-21.0 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24-20.0 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104-21.5 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24-14.8 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104-18.0 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52-18.0 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104

The simplified disease activity index (SDAI ) are continuous measures of RA disease activity.The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PhGA (assessed on 0-10 cm VAS), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates disease remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high disease activity.

Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52-26.3 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24-31.0 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104-25.6 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52-33.5 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24-32.8 Scores on a scale
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104-32.8 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24-21.5 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104-28.0 Scores on a scale
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52-27.9 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Median Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission

It is the time to event analysis for the first DAS28 remission.

Time frame: Up to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission56.00 Days
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission57.00 Days
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission167.00 Days
Secondary

Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response

It is the time to first EULAR response. EULAR response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease.Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2. Response 1 is defined as yes (good) versus no (moderate or no response). Response 2 is defined as yes (good or moderate) versus no (no response).

Time frame: Up to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Time to First European League Against Rheumatism ResponseEULAR response 135.5 Days
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Time to First European League Against Rheumatism ResponseEULAR response 229.0 Days
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Time to First European League Against Rheumatism ResponseEULAR response 147.0 Days
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Time to First European League Against Rheumatism ResponseEULAR response 229.0 Days
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Time to First European League Against Rheumatism ResponseEULAR response 1132.0 Days
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Time to First European League Against Rheumatism ResponseEULAR response 257.0 Days
Secondary

Median Time to First Sustained Remission

It is the time to event analysis for the first period of sustained remission. Sustained remission is defined as DAS28 \<2.6 during ≥23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts (range 0-28), acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission.

Time frame: Up to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateMedian Time to First Sustained Remission69.00 days
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateMedian Time to First Sustained Remission89.00 days
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabMedian Time to First Sustained RemissionNA days
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=105, 102, 10676 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105, 102, 10684 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 99, 10371 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9971 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9967 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=105, 102, 10666 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 99, 10380 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105, 102, 10677 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9958 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105, 102, 10642 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 99, 10363 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=105, 102, 10623 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation

An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign , symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. A serious adverse event is defined as any event which was fatal (resulted in death), lifethreatening (with immediate risk of death), resulted in a new or prolongation of a current hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, considered medically significant by the investigator, required intervention to prevent one or more of the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: Up to Week 104

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAny SAE16 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAny AE105 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation23 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAny SAE19 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAny AE99 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation16 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAny AE106 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAEs Leading to Discontinuation19 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to DiscontinuationAny SAE13 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study

Participants who switched treatment strategy from monotherapy (TCZ+ placebo MTX or MTX+ placebo TCZ treatment) to combination therapy (TCZ+MTX treatment) was reported. Also, participants who switched from verum therapy to standard of care was reported in the below table.

Time frame: From Baseline to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The StudyTreatment strategy switch0 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The StudySwitch from verum to standard of care9 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The StudyTreatment strategy switch13 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The StudySwitch from verum to standard of care2 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The StudyTreatment strategy switch50 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The StudySwitch from verum to standard of care2 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104

Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.

Time frame: Week 104

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Eosinophil, n=72, 77, 740 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Creatinine, n=78, 79, 781 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104CRP, n=78, 80, 781 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104AST, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104HDL, n=76, 76, 721 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Hematocrit, n=75, 78, 771 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104LDL, n=74, 74, 720 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Total cholesterol, n=76, 76, 720 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Triglycerides, n=76, 76, 721 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104RBC, n=76, 79, 771 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Thrombocyte, n=78, 79, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104WBC, n=78, 80, 781 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=75, 78, 770 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Alkaline phosphatase, n=78, 79, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104ALT, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Hemoglobin, n=78, 80, 781 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104ALT, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104RBC, n=76, 79, 770 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Eosinophil, n=72, 77, 740 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104CRP, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Alkaline phosphatase, n=78, 79, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Thrombocyte, n=78, 79, 781 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104HDL, n=76, 76, 720 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=75, 78, 770 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104LDL, n=74, 74, 721 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Hematocrit, n=75, 78, 770 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104WBC, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Total cholesterol, n=76, 76, 722 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Hemoglobin, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104AST, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Triglycerides, n=76, 76, 722 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Creatinine, n=78, 79, 781 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Triglycerides, n=76, 76, 722 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=75, 78, 771 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Eosinophil, n=72, 77, 740 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Hemoglobin, n=78, 80, 781 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104RBC, n=76, 79, 770 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Thrombocyte, n=78, 79, 781 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104WBC, n=78, 80, 781 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Alkaline phosphatase, n=78, 79, 780 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104ALT, n=78, 80, 782 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104AST, n=78, 80, 782 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Creatinine, n=78, 79, 780 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104CRP, n=78, 80, 780 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104HDL, n=76, 76, 721 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104LDL, n=74, 74, 723 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Total cholesterol, n=76, 76, 723 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104Hematocrit, n=75, 78, 771 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12

Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Total cholesterol, n=102,100,997 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), n=99,97,985 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Alkaline phosphatase, n=104,101, 990 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12White blood cells, n=104, 101,1003 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12High-density lipoprotein (HDL), n=101,100,991 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12CRP, n=103,100,1003 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), n=104,100,1001 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Creatinine, n=104,101,1001 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Hemoglobin, n=104, 101,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=97, 94, 972 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Eosinophil, n=93, 90, 930 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Red blood cells, n=104,100,1001 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Hematocrit, n=104,100,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Triglycerides, n=102,100, 992 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Thrombocyte, n=104, 101,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Alanine transaminase (ALT), n=104, 101,1004 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12White blood cells, n=104, 101,1002 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=97, 94, 970 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Eosinophil, n=93, 90, 930 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Hematocrit, n=104,100,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Hemoglobin, n=104, 101,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Red blood cells, n=104,100,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Thrombocyte, n=104, 101,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Alkaline phosphatase, n=104,101, 990 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Creatinine, n=104,101,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12CRP, n=103,100,1000 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12High-density lipoprotein (HDL), n=101,100,990 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), n=99,97,982 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Total cholesterol, n=102,100,995 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Alanine transaminase (ALT), n=104, 101,1002 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), n=104,100,1001 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Triglycerides, n=102,100, 992 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12White blood cells, n=104, 101,1000 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12High-density lipoprotein (HDL), n=101,100,991 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), n=99,97,982 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Thrombocyte, n=104, 101,1000 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Triglycerides, n=102,100, 992 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Total cholesterol, n=102,100,992 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Red blood cells, n=104,100,1000 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Hemoglobin, n=104, 101,1001 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), n=104,100,1001 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Hematocrit, n=104,100,1000 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Creatinine, n=104,101,1000 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Alanine transaminase (ALT), n=104, 101,1002 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Eosinophil, n=93, 90, 930 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12CRP, n=103,100,1002 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Alkaline phosphatase, n=104,101, 990 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=97, 94, 970 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24

Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.

Time frame: Week 24

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24WBC, n=100, 101, 982 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Eosinophil, n=91, 93, 930 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Alkaline phosphatase, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Creatinine, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24CRP, n=100, 101, 970 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=96, 97 ,971 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24ALT, n=100, 101, 982 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Hematocrit, n=100, 99, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Hemoglobin, n=100, 100, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24RBC, n=99, 100, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Thrombocyte, n=100, 100, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24AST, n=100, 101, 982 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24RBC, n=99, 100, 981 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Thrombocyte, n=100, 100, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Hematocrit, n=100, 99, 981 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Alkaline phosphatase, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24AST, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Eosinophil, n=91, 93, 930 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24ALT, n=100, 101, 982 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Creatinine, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24WBC, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24CRP, n=100, 101, 970 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Hemoglobin, n=100, 100, 981 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=96, 97 ,970 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Hemoglobin, n=100, 100, 981 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24RBC, n=99, 100, 980 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Alkaline phosphatase, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24ALT, n=100, 101, 985 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Creatinine, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24CRP, n=100, 101, 972 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Eosinophil, n=91, 93, 930 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Hematocrit, n=100, 99, 980 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=96, 97 ,970 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24Thrombocyte, n=100, 100, 980 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24WBC, n=100, 101, 980 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24AST, n=100, 101, 981 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52

Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.

Time frame: Week 52

Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Thrombocyte, n=85, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52AST, n=86, 91, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Creatinine, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Eosinophil, n=81, 88, 820 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52CRP, n=86, 91, 871 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=83, 90, 850 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Hematocrit, n=86, 92, 870 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Hemoglobin, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52RBC, n=86, 91, 870 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52WBC, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Alkaline phosphatase, n=86, 92, 870 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52ALT, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52RBC, n=86, 91, 870 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52ALT, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Thrombocyte, n=85, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Hematocrit, n=86, 92, 870 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52AST, n=86, 91, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Alkaline phosphatase, n=86, 92, 870 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Eosinophil, n=81, 88, 820 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Creatinine, n=86, 92, 882 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=83, 90, 850 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Hemoglobin, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52CRP, n=86, 91, 870 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52WBC, n=86, 92, 881 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52CRP, n=86, 91, 870 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=83, 90, 850 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52RBC, n=86, 91, 871 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Eosinophil, n=81, 88, 824 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Hematocrit, n=86, 92, 871 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Hemoglobin, n=86, 92, 882 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Thrombocyte, n=85, 92, 881 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52WBC, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Alkaline phosphatase, n=86, 92, 870 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52ALT, n=86, 92, 887 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52AST, n=86, 91, 882 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52Creatinine, n=86, 92, 880 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104

European league against rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point =\<3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and =\<1.2.

Time frame: Weeks 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 96, 9975 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105, 97, 10393 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9663 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 96, 9985 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105, 97, 10384 Number of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexateNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9672 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105, 97, 10350 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9665 Number of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 96, 9971 Number of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response

Insufficient therapeutic response (participants not responding to the drug as assessed by the physician) was selected by the investigator as a reason for the participant to withdraw from the study.

Time frame: Up to Week 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response32.1 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response18.2 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response43.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response is defined as a \>= 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 1263.8 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 2475.2 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 5274.7 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 10463.5 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 10465.3 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 1267.6 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 5271.7 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 2475.5 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 10460.6 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 2459.4 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 5268.9 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 1241.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

ACR50 response is defined as a \>=50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's Global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 5261.6 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 10449.0 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 1247.6 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 2463.8 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 5258.6 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 1244.1 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 2458.8 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 10454.7 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 5251.5 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 10448.5 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 1221.7 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 2434.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

ACR70 response is defined as a \>=70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's Assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 1230.5 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 2443.8 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 5244.4 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 10436.5 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 10438.9 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 1223.5 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 5244.4 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 2437.3 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 10435.4 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 2415.1 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 5233.0 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Week 127.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

ACR90 response is defined as a \>=90% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 129.5 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 2418.1 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 5219.2 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 10420.8 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 10420.0 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 123.9 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 5221.2 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 2411.8 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 10414.1 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 244.7 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 526.8 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104Weeks 120.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.

Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104

Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=105,102,10672.4 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105,102,10680.0 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 99,10371.0 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9963.5 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9970.5 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=105,102,10664.7 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 99,10380.8 Percentage of participants
Tocilizumab + Placebo MethotrexatePercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105,102,10675.5 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 104, n=96, 95, 9958.6 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 24, n=105,102,10639.6 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 52, n=100, 99,10361.2 Percentage of participants
Methotrexate + Placebo TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104Week 12, n=105,102,10621.7 Percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 13, 2026