Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Keywords
Treat-to-target, tight control, strategy study, TCZ, MTX
Brief summary
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study will compare the efficacy with regard to sustained remission and safety of tocilizumab and methotrexate, in combination or as monotherapy, in treatment-naïve patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Patients will be randomized to receive either tocilizumab (8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks) plus weekly methotrexate (po in ascending doses), or tocilizumab (8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks) plus placebo, or methotrexate plus placebo. Anticipated time on study treatment is 2 years, and target sample size is 300.
Detailed description
Multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (double placebo) three-arm parallel group, comparative study. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the following treatments: * TCZ 8 milligram (mg)/kilogram (kg) + MTX (Group I: TCZ+MTX) * TCZ 8 mg/kg + placeboMTX (Group II: TCZ+placebo) * MTX + placeboTCZ (Group III: MTX+placebo) Randomization was stratified by participating center and baseline Disease Activity Score, scoring 28 joints (DAS28) level (\<5.1 vs. ≥5.1). Patients were evaluated every 4 weeks and at each visit a decision on dosage changes was made based on efficacy parameters (DAS28) and occurrence of adverse events (AEs). Patients received MTX/placeboMTX in climbing dosages. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was added when remission was not reached with the maximum tolerable dosage (MTD) of MTX/placeboMTX. If after 12 additional weeks remission was not reached, HCQ was stopped and replaced by standard of care therapy (in Group I) or placebo therapy was replaced by the corresponding verum resulting in TCZ+MTX combination therapy (in Groups II and III). In case remission was reached, MTX/placeboMTX and TCZ/placeboTCZ had to be decreased. Patients were followed for a maximum of 24 months
Interventions
orally weekly in ascending dosages, starting at 10mg/week
orally weekly
iv every 4 weeks
8mg/kg iv every 4 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* adult patients, \>/=18 years of age * early rheumatoid arthritis (disease symptoms \<1 year) according to ACR criteria * disease activity DAS28 \>2.6 * body weight \</=110kg, BMI \</=36
Exclusion criteria
* rheumatic autoimmune disease other than RA * current inflammatory joint disease other than RA * previous treatment with any DMARD or biologic drug used in the treatment of RA * intra-articular, parenteral or oral glucocorticoids used for the arthritis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 104 | Week 104 | Sustained remission rate (SRR) is defined as Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) \<2.6 during ≥ 23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Median Time to First Sustained Remission | Up to Week 104 | It is the time to event analysis for the first period of sustained remission. Sustained remission is defined as DAS28 \<2.6 during ≥23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts (range 0-28), acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission. |
| Mean Duration of First Sustained Remission | Up to Week 104 | It is the duration of the first period of sustained DAS28 remission. Participants who switch treatment strategy before reaching sustained remission considered failures. |
| Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal. |
| Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal. |
| Mean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | Up to Week 104 | It is the duration of the first period of DAS28 remission. |
| Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) are continuous measures of RA disease activity. The CDAI is the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment; and patient's global assessment (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PhGA) assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity. |
| Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | The simplified disease activity index (SDAI ) are continuous measures of RA disease activity.The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PhGA (assessed on 0-10 cm VAS), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates disease remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high disease activity. |
| Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | European league against rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point =\<3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and =\<1.2. |
| Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response | Up to Week 104 | It is the time to first EULAR response. EULAR response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease.Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2. Response 1 is defined as yes (good) versus no (moderate or no response). Response 2 is defined as yes (good or moderate) versus no (no response). |
| Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response is defined as a \>= 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate. |
| Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | ACR50 response is defined as a \>=50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's Global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate. |
| Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | ACR70 response is defined as a \>=70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's Assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate. |
| Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | ACR90 response is defined as a \>=90% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | The number of swollen joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a swollen joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total SJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of SJC from 0 (best possible score; no swollen joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all joints swollen). |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | The number of tender joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a tender joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total TJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of TJC from 0 (best possible score; no tender joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all tender joints). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire (DC-HAQ) disability index is a self-completed participant questionnaire with 8 domains specific for RA. It assesses a participant functional ability, with scores ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A change from baseline of -0.22 is considered to be the minimal clinically important difference. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Patient health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity). An improvement (decrease) in the patient's global assessment based on disease activity relative to respective baseline values was analyzed. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Physician health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity).An improvement (decrease) in the physician's global assessment based on disease activity parameter relative to respective baseline values was analyzed. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Pain VAS is a component of ACR. VAS pain score calculated as 0 to 10 cm; where 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst possible pain. |
| Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | CRP is a component of ACR. CRP is a marker of inflammation. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 52 and 104 | The degree of joint damage was assessed using the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS). The methodology quantifies the extent of bone erosions for 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) for 42 joints, with higher scores representing greater damage. The independent read of X-ray images was performed by 2 primary readers. In case of discrepancy between the 2 primary readers, an adjudicator was involved. The mTSS can range from 0 to 448 with a higher score indicating more joint damage. A negative change score indicates improvement. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response | Up to Week 104 | Insufficient therapeutic response (participants not responding to the drug as assessed by the physician) was selected by the investigator as a reason for the participant to withdraw from the study. |
| Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study | From Baseline to Week 104 | Participants who switched treatment strategy from monotherapy (TCZ+ placebo MTX or MTX+ placebo TCZ treatment) to combination therapy (TCZ+MTX treatment) was reported. Also, participants who switched from verum therapy to standard of care was reported in the below table. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EuroQol (EQ-5D) is a standard self-completed participant questionnaire that measures health outcome. The EQ-5D questionnaire consists of 2 parts: 1) EQ-5D with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale as 1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems. The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, where '1' indicating full health and '0' representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved. 2) EQ-VAS on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 = worst possible health status and 100 = best possible health status. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Patient global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Patient global health VAS is a component of DAS28. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Physician global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Physician global health VAS is a component of DAS28. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Participants assessed their pain using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as no pain and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as unbearable pain .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Participants assessed their general wellbeing using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as not active at all and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as very active .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participants response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participants fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12 | The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24 | The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 52 | The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 104 | The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study. |
| Median Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | Up to Week 104 | It is the time to event analysis for the first DAS28 remission. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Week 12 | Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Week 24 | Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Week 52 | Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Week 104 | Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table. |
| Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | Up to Week 104 | An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign , symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. A serious adverse event is defined as any event which was fatal (resulted in death), lifethreatening (with immediate risk of death), resulted in a new or prolongation of a current hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, considered medically significant by the investigator, required intervention to prevent one or more of the outcomes listed above. |
Countries
Netherlands
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 360 participants were screened at 21 centers in the Netherlands from 04 JAN 2010 to 30 JUL 2012.
Pre-assignment details
Of 360 participants, 43 failed screening.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate Participants received IV TCZ 8 mg/ kg every four weeks for a maximum of 26 infusions + oral capsules of MTX 10-30 mg/week in climbing dosages of 5 mg starting at 10 mg up till a maximum dosage of 30 mg/week. The weekly dose of MTX was taken on one particular day of the week. | 106 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate Participants received IV TCZ 8 mg/kg every four weeks for a maximum of 26 infusions + weekly oral matching placebo MTX capsules in climbing dosages. The weekly dose of placebo MTX was taken on one particular day of the week. | 103 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab Participants received weekly oral MTX in climbing dosages of 5 mg starting at 10 mg up till a maximum dosage of 30 mg/week + matching placebo TCZ IV 8 mg/kg every four week for a maximum of 26 infusions. The weekly dose of MTX was taken on one particular day of the week. | 108 |
| Total | 317 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Administrative or other | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 9 | 10 | 8 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Refused treatment or did not cooperate | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 4 | 3 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 21 Participants | 24 Participants | 21 Participants | 66 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 85 Participants | 79 Participants | 87 Participants | 251 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 53.1 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.8 | 55.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.9 | 52.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 | 53.4 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 65 Participants | 78 Participants | 69 Participants | 212 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 41 Participants | 25 Participants | 39 Participants | 105 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 105 / 106 | 99 / 103 | 106 / 108 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 16 / 106 | 19 / 103 | 13 / 108 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 104
Sustained remission rate (SRR) is defined as Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) \<2.6 during ≥ 23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission.
Time frame: Week 104
Population: The intent to treat (ITT) population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsules and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 104 | 85.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 104 | 83.5 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission Rate At Week 104 | 44.4 Percentage of participants |
Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
The DAS28 score is a measure of the participant's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12 | 3.1 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | 3.6 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | 3.3 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | 3.3 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | 3.3 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12 | 3.3 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | 3.4 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | 3.6 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | 3.2 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | 2.1 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | 3.3 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Absolute Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score 28 at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12 | 1.4 Scores on a scale |
Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 12, n=72, 73, 79 | 11.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 24, n= 72, 74, 76 | 16.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 24, n=67, 72,75 | 9.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 52, n=62, 63, 68 | 18.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 52, n=61, 63, 69 | 10.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 104, n=52, 57, 60 | 15.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 104, n=51, 57, 60 | 9.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 12, n=72, 71, 7 | 6.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 24, n=67, 72,75 | 9.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 12, n=72, 73, 79 | 14.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 52, n=62, 63, 68 | 20.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 12, n=72, 71, 7 | 10.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 52, n=61, 63, 69 | 13.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 104, n=51, 57, 60 | 9.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 24, n= 72, 74, 76 | 13.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 104, n=52, 57, 60 | 15.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 24, n= 72, 74, 76 | 9.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 24, n=67, 72,75 | 5.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 13.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 104, n=52, 57, 60 | 13.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 52, n=62, 63, 68 | 15.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 104, n=51, 57, 60 | 8.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 52, n=61, 63, 69 | 10.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | PCS Week 12, n=72, 73, 79 | 6.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | MCS Week 12, n=72, 71, 7 | 3.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.7 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participants response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participants fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the participant's health status.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=98, 98, 99 | 4.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=98, 99, 94 | 7.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 86, 85 | 6.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=74, 78, 74 | 6.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=98, 99, 94 | 6.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 86, 85 | 7.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=98, 98, 99 | 6.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=74, 78, 74 | 5.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 86, 85 | 6.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=98, 99, 94 | 4.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=74, 78, 74 | 7.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=98, 98, 99 | 3.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.5 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104
The degree of joint damage was assessed using the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (mTSS). The methodology quantifies the extent of bone erosions for 44 joints and joint space narrowing (JSN) for 42 joints, with higher scores representing greater damage. The independent read of X-ray images was performed by 2 primary readers. In case of discrepancy between the 2 primary readers, an adjudicator was involved. The mTSS can range from 0 to 448 with a higher score indicating more joint damage. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 0.50 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.495 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 1.18 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.919 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 0.79 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.242 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 1.45 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.272 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 0.96 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.87 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Sharp/Van Der Heijde Score at Weeks 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 1.53 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.421 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Participants assessed their general wellbeing using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as not active at all and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as very active .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=30, 19, 19 | -27.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=28, 18, 18 | -36.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=23, 17, 15 | -40.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=23, 16, 19 | -31.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=23, 16, 19 | -38.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=30, 19, 19 | -31.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=23, 17, 15 | -45.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=28, 18, 18 | -35.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 34 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=23, 16, 19 | -34.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=28, 18, 18 | -16.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=23, 17, 15 | -26.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient General Wellbeing Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=30, 19, 19 | -6.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Patient global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Patient global health VAS is a component of DAS28.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=101, 99, 103 | -25.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n= 97, 95, 96 | -33.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 90, 84 | -34.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=76, 83, 74 | -33.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=76, 83, 74 | -34.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=101, 99, 103 | -24.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 90, 84 | -34.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n= 97, 95, 96 | -29.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=76, 83, 74 | -36.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n= 97, 95, 96 | -20.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 90, 84 | -31.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=101, 99, 103 | -14.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.4 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Participants assessed their pain using a 0 to 10 horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 and is described as no pain and the right-hand extreme equals 10 as unbearable pain .The final VAS score will be derived by multiplying the original scores by 10.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=95, 96, 101 | -28.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 93, 92 | -36.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=78, 83, 82 | -37.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=73, 80, 72 | -34.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=73, 80, 72 | -36.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=95, 96, 101 | -29.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 31 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=78, 83, 82 | -36.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 93, 92 | -33.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.4 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=73, 80, 72 | -41.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 93, 92 | -28.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=78, 83, 82 | -38.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 27.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Patient Pain Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=95, 96, 101 | -19.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.5 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Physician global health VAS score ranges from 0 to 100 and a higher score indicates worse QoL. Physician global health VAS is a component of DAS28.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=79, 82, 79 | -35.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=74, 75, 78 | -43.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=61, 68, 64 | -43.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 26.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=71, 71, 71 | -45.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=74, 75, 78 | -43.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=71, 71, 71 | -46.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=79, 82, 79 | -34.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=61, 68, 64 | -50.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=61, 68, 64 | -41.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.2 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=74, 75, 78 | -31.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 25.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=79, 82, 79 | -23.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in Physician Global Health Visual Analog Scale Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=71, 71, 71 | -37.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire (DC-HAQ) disability index is a self-completed participant questionnaire with 8 domains specific for RA. It assesses a participant functional ability, with scores ranging from 0 (without any difficulty) to 3 (unable to do). A change from baseline of -0.22 is considered to be the minimal clinically important difference.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=95, 95, 91 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 94, 87 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=81, 81, 82 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Weeks 104, n=68, 75, 71 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Weeks 104, n=68, 75, 71 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=95, 95, 91 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=81, 81, 82 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 94, 87 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Weeks 104, n=68, 75, 71 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 94, 87 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=81, 81, 82 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Dutch Consensus Health Assessment Questionnaire of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=95, 95, 91 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
EuroQol (EQ-5D) is a standard self-completed participant questionnaire that measures health outcome. The EQ-5D questionnaire consists of 2 parts: 1) EQ-5D with five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Each dimension is rated on a 3-point response scale as 1 = no problems, 2 = some/moderate problems, 3 = extreme problems. The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, where '1' indicating full health and '0' representing dead. The positive values indicate that during the study the health status improved. 2) EQ-VAS on a scale of 0 to 100, where 0 = worst possible health status and 100 = best possible health status.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 12, n=72, 72, 78 | 0.15 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 12, n=69, 70, 73 | 11.94 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.07 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 24, n=69, 73, 73 | 0.19 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 24, n=67, 69, 71 | 13.15 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.93 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 52, n=61, 61, 69 | 0.18 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 52, n=58, 59, 67 | 12.52 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.61 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 104, n=50,57,54 | 0.14 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.22 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 104, n=50,52,57 | 10.88 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.43 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 24, n=69, 73, 73 | 0.15 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 104, n=50,57,54 | 0.20 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 24, n=67, 69, 71 | 10.86 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.46 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 52, n=61, 61, 69 | 0.21 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 52, n=58, 59, 67 | 13.71 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.63 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 12, n=72, 72, 78 | 0.19 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.25 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 12, n=69, 70, 73 | 9.31 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 104, n=50,52,57 | 14.37 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.49 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 24, n=69, 73, 73 | 0.15 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 12, n=69, 70, 73 | 2.92 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.54 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 12, n=72, 72, 78 | 0.11 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.28 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 24, n=67, 69, 71 | 8.97 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.17 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 104, n=50,57,54 | 0.21 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 52, n=58, 59, 67 | 13.40 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.45 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-5D Week 52, n=61, 61, 69 | 0.25 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.29 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The EuroQol Score of Quality of Life at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | EQ-VAS Week 104, n=50,52,57 | 10.96 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.06 |
Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104
The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Identity, n=74, 78, 74 | -1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=69, 75, 72 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Consequences, n=69, 76, 73 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Personal Control, n=74, 77, 74 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Treatment Control, n=72, 76, 73 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Illness Coherence, n=69, 75,72 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Timeline Cyclical, n=69, 77, 73 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Emotional Representation, n=69, 77, 73 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Consequences, n=69, 76, 73 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Timeline Cyclical, n=69, 77, 73 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Personal Control, n=74, 77, 74 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Treatment Control, n=72, 76, 73 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Illness Coherence, n=69, 75,72 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Identity, n=74, 78, 74 | -1.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=69, 75, 72 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Emotional Representation, n=69, 77, 73 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Consequences, n=69, 76, 73 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=69, 75, 72 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Identity, n=74, 78, 74 | -0.9 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Personal Control, n=74, 77, 74 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Timeline Cyclical, n=69, 77, 73 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Illness Coherence, n=69, 75,72 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Treatment Control, n=72, 76, 73 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 104 | Emotional Representation, n=69, 77, 73 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24
The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 24
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Identity, n=98, 99, 94 | -1.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=97, 96, 87 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Consequences, n=97, 96, 89 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Personal Control, n=98, 97, 94 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Treatment Control, n=98, 95, 91, | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Illness Coherence, n=96, 94, 89 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Timeline Cyclical, n=96, 97,90 | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Emotional Representation, n=96, 97, 90 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Consequences, n=97, 96, 89 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Timeline Cyclical, n=96, 97,90 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Personal Control, n=98, 97, 94 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Treatment Control, n=98, 95, 91, | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Illness Coherence, n=96, 94, 89 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Identity, n=98, 99, 94 | -1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=97, 96, 87 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Emotional Representation, n=96, 97, 90 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Consequences, n=97, 96, 89 | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=97, 96, 87 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Identity, n=98, 99, 94 | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Personal Control, n=98, 97, 94 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Timeline Cyclical, n=96, 97,90 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Illness Coherence, n=96, 94, 89 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.2 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Treatment Control, n=98, 95, 91, | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 24 | Emotional Representation, n=96, 97, 90 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52
The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 52
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Personal Control, n=84, 84, 84 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=83, 82, 83 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Timeline Cyclical, n=83, 83, 83 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Treatment Control, n=84, 84, 84 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Consequences, n=83, 82, 84 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Illness Coherence, n=83, 80, 83 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Identity, n=84, 86, 85 | -1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Emotional Representation, n=83, 82, 83 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Illness Coherence, n=83, 80, 83 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Identity, n=84, 86, 85 | -1.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=83, 82, 83 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Consequences, n=83, 82, 84 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Personal Control, n=84, 84, 84 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Treatment Control, n=84, 84, 84 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Timeline Cyclical, n=83, 83, 83 | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Emotional Representation, n=83, 82, 83 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Personal Control, n=84, 84, 84 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=83, 82, 83 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Timeline Cyclical, n=83, 83, 83 | -0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Consequences, n=83, 82, 84 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Identity, n=84, 86, 85 | -1.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Emotional Representation, n=83, 82, 83 | -0.7 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Treatment Control, n=84, 84, 84 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The IPQ-R Score of Quality of Life at Week 52 | Illness Coherence, n=83, 80, 83 | 0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12
The IPQ-R includes 9 domains (identity, acute or chronic timeline, consequences, personal and treatment control, illness coherence, timeline cyclical, emotional representations, and cause). For first 8 domains it scores as: 1(strongly disagree), 2(disagree), 3(neither agree/disagree), 4(agree), and 5(strongly agree), except identity as 1(yes) and 0(no). The sum of scores for identity, timeline, consequences, and cyclical domains are ranged from 0-16. High score represent strongly held beliefs about the number of symptoms attributed to RA, the chronicity of the condition, the negative consequences of the illness and the cyclical nature of the condition. The sum of scores for personal and treatment control, coherence dimensions, and emotional representations are ranged from 0-15. High score represent positive beliefs about the number of controllability of RA and a personal understanding of the condition. The data for 'Cause' domain was not considered for analysis in this study.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Week 12
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Identity, n=98, 98, 99 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=95, 97, 92 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Consequences, n=95, 96, 95 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Personal Control, n=98, 98, 98 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Treatment Control, n=98, 96, 94 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Illness Coherence, n=95, 96, 95 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Timeline Cyclical, n=95, 98, 96 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Emotional Representation, n=95, 98, 96 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Consequences, n=95, 96, 95 | -0.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Timeline Cyclical, n=95, 98, 96 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Personal Control, n=98, 98, 98 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Treatment Control, n=98, 96, 94 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Illness Coherence, n=95, 96, 95 | 0.3 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Identity, n=98, 98, 99 | -0.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=95, 97, 92 | -0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Emotional Representation, n=95, 98, 96 | -0.6 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Consequences, n=95, 96, 95 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Acute or Chronic Timeline, n=95, 97, 92 | 0.0 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Identity, n=98, 98, 99 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Personal Control, n=98, 98, 98 | -0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Timeline Cyclical, n=95, 98, 96 | -0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Illness Coherence, n=95, 96, 95 | 0.2 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Treatment Control, n=98, 96, 94 | 0.1 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Change From Baseline in The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) Score of Quality of Life at Week 12 | Emotional Representation, n=95, 98, 96 | -0.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.9 |
Mean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission
It is the duration of the first period of DAS28 remission.
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | 42.99 Weeks | Standard Deviation 31.79 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | 37.01 Weeks | Standard Deviation 30.89 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Duration of First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | 20.49 Weeks | Standard Deviation 23.95 |
Mean Duration of First Sustained Remission
It is the duration of the first period of sustained DAS28 remission. Participants who switch treatment strategy before reaching sustained remission considered failures.
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Duration of First Sustained Remission | 65.85 Weeks | Standard Deviation 26.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Duration of First Sustained Remission | 65.00 Weeks | Standard Deviation 24.75 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Duration of First Sustained Remission | 52.90 Weeks | Standard Deviation 25.11 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
CRP is a component of ACR. CRP is a marker of inflammation.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=99, 101, 98 | -64.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 72.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=77, 81, 78 | -45.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 105.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=85, 92, 88 | -47.1 Percent change | Standard Deviation 107.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=103, 101, 100 | -47.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 216.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=99, 101, 98 | -69.1 Percent change | Standard Deviation 47.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=85, 92, 88 | -51.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 72 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=77, 81, 78 | -12.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 256.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=103, 101, 100 | -69.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 39.4 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=99, 101, 98 | -16.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 127.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=103, 101, 100 | -28.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 65.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=85, 92, 88 | -52.1 Percent change | Standard Deviation 100.4 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in CRP at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=77, 81, 78 | -46.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 65.5 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Pain VAS is a component of ACR. VAS pain score calculated as 0 to 10 cm; where 0 = no pain, and 10 = worst possible pain.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=82, 83, 77 | -59.3 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=76, 77, 78 | -74.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 31.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=76, 72, 72 | -77.0 Percent change | Standard Deviation 30.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=58, 61, 63 | -76.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 35 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=58, 61, 63 | -78.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 27.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=82, 83, 77 | -55.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 34.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=76, 72, 72 | -72.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 41.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=76, 77, 78 | -70.3 Percent change | Standard Deviation 25.4 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=58, 61, 63 | -74.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 27.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=76, 77, 78 | -48.6 Percent change | Standard Deviation 52.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=76, 72, 72 | -66.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 35.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=82, 83, 77 | -39.1 Percent change | Standard Deviation 43.5 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Patient health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity). An improvement (decrease) in the patient's global assessment based on disease activity relative to respective baseline values was analyzed.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n =96, 97, 97 | -43.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 75.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 96, 93 | -66.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=79, 82, 84 | -66.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=72, 72, 72 | -64.0 Percent change | Standard Deviation 39.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=72, 72, 72 | -67.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n =96, 97, 97 | -40.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 74.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=79, 82, 84 | -63.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 36.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 96, 93 | -54.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 41.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=72, 72, 72 | -64.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 39.2 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=92, 96, 93 | -41.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 62.4 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=79, 82, 84 | -58.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 69.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Patient Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n =96, 97, 97 | -25.3 Percent change | Standard Deviation 69 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Physician health visual analog scale is a component of ACR. It is measured using a visual analogue scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate worse disease activity).An improvement (decrease) in the physician's global assessment based on disease activity parameter relative to respective baseline values was analyzed.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n =104, 101, 100 | -41.6 Percent change | Standard Deviation 47.2 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n =100, 101, 98 | -61.0 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n =86, 92, 88 | -56.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 42.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n =78, 81, 78 | -63.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n =78, 81, 78 | -60.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 38.9 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n =104, 101, 100 | -36.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 42.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n =86, 92, 88 | -56.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 45.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n =100, 101, 98 | -46.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 40.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n =78, 81, 78 | -53.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 54.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n =100, 101, 98 | -26.1 Percent change | Standard Deviation 57.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n =86, 92, 88 | -48.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 50.1 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in The Physician Health Visual Analog Scale at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n =104, 101, 100 | -18.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 52.5 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
The number of swollen joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a swollen joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total SJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of SJC from 0 (best possible score; no swollen joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all joints swollen).
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=104, 100, 98 | -69.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 91.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=100, 100, 97 | -91.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 18.5 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=86, 91, 87 | -93.3 Percent change | Standard Deviation 19.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=78, 80, 77 | -85.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 44.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=78, 80, 77 | -91.6 Percent change | Standard Deviation 31.3 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=104, 100, 98 | -68.2 Percent change | Standard Deviation 45.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=86, 91, 87 | -89.0 Percent change | Standard Deviation 24.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=100, 100, 97 | -86.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 24.3 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=78, 80, 77 | -87.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 23.7 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=100, 100, 97 | -69.3 Percent change | Standard Deviation 37.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=86, 91, 87 | -91.3 Percent change | Standard Deviation 20 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=104, 100, 98 | -44.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 73.9 |
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
The number of tender joints among 22 anatomical joints for both the right and left side of the body were assessed by a joint evaluator where the presence of a tender joint was scored as 1 and absence as 0. The total TJC was derived by the sum of the scores for a range of TJC from 0 (best possible score; no tender joints) to 44 (worse possible score; all tender joints).
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=102, 98, 99 | -68.0 Percent change | Standard Deviation 44.6 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=98, 98, 97 | -81.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 28.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 89, 87 | -77.8 Percent change | Standard Deviation 49.8 |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=76, 79, 77 | -84.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 26.4 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=76, 79, 77 | -82.5 Percent change | Standard Deviation 30.7 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=102, 98, 99 | -53.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 84.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 89, 87 | -80.4 Percent change | Standard Deviation 33.1 |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=98, 98, 97 | -66.1 Percent change | Standard Deviation 83.8 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=76, 79, 77 | -79.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 31.9 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=98, 98, 97 | -66.6 Percent change | Standard Deviation 34 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=84, 89, 87 | -77.7 Percent change | Standard Deviation 33.6 |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Mean Percent Change From Baseline in the Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=102, 98, 99 | -36.9 Percent change | Standard Deviation 65.9 |
Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104
The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) are continuous measures of RA disease activity. The CDAI is the numerical sum of four outcome parameters: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC) based on a 28-joint assessment; and patient's global assessment (PtGA) and physician's global assessment (PhGA) assessed on 0-10 cm visual analog scale (VAS). CDAI total score ranges from 0 to 76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | -19.5 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | -20.0 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | -19.0 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | -21.0 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | -20.0 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | -21.5 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | -14.8 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | -18.0 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index Score at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | -18.0 Scores on a scale |
Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104
The simplified disease activity index (SDAI ) are continuous measures of RA disease activity.The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC (based on a 28-joint assessment), PtGA and PhGA (assessed on 0-10 cm VAS), and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) (mg/dL). SDAI total score ranges from 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates disease remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high disease activity.
Time frame: From Baseline (Week 0) to Weeks 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | -26.3 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | -31.0 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | -25.6 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | -33.5 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | -32.8 Scores on a scale |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | -32.8 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24 | -21.5 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104 | -28.0 Scores on a scale |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Change From Baseline in Simplified Disease Activity Index Scores at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52 | -27.9 Scores on a scale |
Median Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission
It is the time to event analysis for the first DAS28 remission.
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | 56.00 Days |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | 57.00 Days |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Time to First Disease Activity Score 28 Remission | 167.00 Days |
Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response
It is the time to first EULAR response. EULAR response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease.Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point ≤ 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2. Response 1 is defined as yes (good) versus no (moderate or no response). Response 2 is defined as yes (good or moderate) versus no (no response).
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response | EULAR response 1 | 35.5 Days |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response | EULAR response 2 | 29.0 Days |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response | EULAR response 1 | 47.0 Days |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response | EULAR response 2 | 29.0 Days |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response | EULAR response 1 | 132.0 Days |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Time to First European League Against Rheumatism Response | EULAR response 2 | 57.0 Days |
Median Time to First Sustained Remission
It is the time to event analysis for the first period of sustained remission. Sustained remission is defined as DAS28 \<2.6 during ≥23 weeks and no more than 4 swollen joints (28 joint count) due to RA at Week 24 of remission, with the exception of up to 2 in-between DAS28 values which could be between 2.6 and 3.2. The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen and tender joint counts (range 0-28), acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission.
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Median Time to First Sustained Remission | 69.00 days |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Median Time to First Sustained Remission | 89.00 days |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Median Time to First Sustained Remission | NA days |
Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
The DAS28 is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA. The index includes swollen (range 0-28) and tender (range 0-28) joint counts, acute phase response (ESR in mm/hr), and general health status (participant global assessment of disease activity using VAS, range 1-100 mm). DAS28, which uses a 28-joint count, is derived from the original DAS, which includes a 44-swollen joint count. The DAS28 scale ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicate worsening. DAS28 \<2.6 equals (=) remission. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=105, 102, 106 | 76 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105, 102, 106 | 84 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 99, 103 | 71 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 99 | 71 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 99 | 67 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=105, 102, 106 | 66 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 99, 103 | 80 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105, 102, 106 | 77 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 99 | 58 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105, 102, 106 | 42 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 99, 103 | 63 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 Remission at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=105, 102, 106 | 23 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign , symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Preexisting conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events. A serious adverse event is defined as any event which was fatal (resulted in death), lifethreatening (with immediate risk of death), resulted in a new or prolongation of a current hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, was a congenital anomaly or birth defect, considered medically significant by the investigator, required intervention to prevent one or more of the outcomes listed above.
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | Any SAE | 16 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | Any AE | 105 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 23 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | Any SAE | 19 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | Any AE | 99 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 16 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | Any AE | 106 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | AEs Leading to Discontinuation | 19 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events, Any Serious Adverse Events, and Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation | Any SAE | 13 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study
Participants who switched treatment strategy from monotherapy (TCZ+ placebo MTX or MTX+ placebo TCZ treatment) to combination therapy (TCZ+MTX treatment) was reported. Also, participants who switched from verum therapy to standard of care was reported in the below table.
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study | Treatment strategy switch | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study | Switch from verum to standard of care | 9 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study | Treatment strategy switch | 13 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study | Switch from verum to standard of care | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study | Treatment strategy switch | 50 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Change in The Therapy Strategy During The Study | Switch from verum to standard of care | 2 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104
Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Time frame: Week 104
Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Eosinophil, n=72, 77, 74 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Creatinine, n=78, 79, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | CRP, n=78, 80, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | AST, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | HDL, n=76, 76, 72 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Hematocrit, n=75, 78, 77 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | LDL, n=74, 74, 72 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Total cholesterol, n=76, 76, 72 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Triglycerides, n=76, 76, 72 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | RBC, n=76, 79, 77 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Thrombocyte, n=78, 79, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | WBC, n=78, 80, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=75, 78, 77 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=78, 79, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | ALT, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Hemoglobin, n=78, 80, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | ALT, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | RBC, n=76, 79, 77 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Eosinophil, n=72, 77, 74 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | CRP, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=78, 79, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Thrombocyte, n=78, 79, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | HDL, n=76, 76, 72 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=75, 78, 77 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | LDL, n=74, 74, 72 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Hematocrit, n=75, 78, 77 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | WBC, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Total cholesterol, n=76, 76, 72 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Hemoglobin, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | AST, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Triglycerides, n=76, 76, 72 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Creatinine, n=78, 79, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Triglycerides, n=76, 76, 72 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=75, 78, 77 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Eosinophil, n=72, 77, 74 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Hemoglobin, n=78, 80, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | RBC, n=76, 79, 77 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Thrombocyte, n=78, 79, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | WBC, n=78, 80, 78 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=78, 79, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | ALT, n=78, 80, 78 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | AST, n=78, 80, 78 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Creatinine, n=78, 79, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | CRP, n=78, 80, 78 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | HDL, n=76, 76, 72 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | LDL, n=74, 74, 72 | 3 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Total cholesterol, n=76, 76, 72 | 3 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 104 | Hematocrit, n=75, 78, 77 | 1 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12
Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Total cholesterol, n=102,100,99 | 7 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), n=99,97,98 | 5 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=104,101, 99 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | White blood cells, n=104, 101,100 | 3 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | High-density lipoprotein (HDL), n=101,100,99 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | CRP, n=103,100,100 | 3 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), n=104,100,100 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Creatinine, n=104,101,100 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Hemoglobin, n=104, 101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=97, 94, 97 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Eosinophil, n=93, 90, 93 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Red blood cells, n=104,100,100 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Hematocrit, n=104,100,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Triglycerides, n=102,100, 99 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Thrombocyte, n=104, 101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Alanine transaminase (ALT), n=104, 101,100 | 4 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | White blood cells, n=104, 101,100 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=97, 94, 97 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Eosinophil, n=93, 90, 93 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Hematocrit, n=104,100,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Hemoglobin, n=104, 101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Red blood cells, n=104,100,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Thrombocyte, n=104, 101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=104,101, 99 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Creatinine, n=104,101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | CRP, n=103,100,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | High-density lipoprotein (HDL), n=101,100,99 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), n=99,97,98 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Total cholesterol, n=102,100,99 | 5 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Alanine transaminase (ALT), n=104, 101,100 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), n=104,100,100 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Triglycerides, n=102,100, 99 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | White blood cells, n=104, 101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | High-density lipoprotein (HDL), n=101,100,99 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Low-density lipoprotein (LDL), n=99,97,98 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Thrombocyte, n=104, 101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Triglycerides, n=102,100, 99 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Total cholesterol, n=102,100,99 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Red blood cells, n=104,100,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Hemoglobin, n=104, 101,100 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), n=104,100,100 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Hematocrit, n=104,100,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Creatinine, n=104,101,100 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Alanine transaminase (ALT), n=104, 101,100 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Eosinophil, n=93, 90, 93 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | CRP, n=103,100,100 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=104,101, 99 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 12 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=97, 94, 97 | 0 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24
Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Time frame: Week 24
Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | WBC, n=100, 101, 98 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Eosinophil, n=91, 93, 93 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Creatinine, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | CRP, n=100, 101, 97 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=96, 97 ,97 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | ALT, n=100, 101, 98 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Hematocrit, n=100, 99, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Hemoglobin, n=100, 100, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | RBC, n=99, 100, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Thrombocyte, n=100, 100, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | AST, n=100, 101, 98 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | RBC, n=99, 100, 98 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Thrombocyte, n=100, 100, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Hematocrit, n=100, 99, 98 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | AST, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Eosinophil, n=91, 93, 93 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | ALT, n=100, 101, 98 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Creatinine, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | WBC, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | CRP, n=100, 101, 97 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Hemoglobin, n=100, 100, 98 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=96, 97 ,97 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Hemoglobin, n=100, 100, 98 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | RBC, n=99, 100, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | ALT, n=100, 101, 98 | 5 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Creatinine, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | CRP, n=100, 101, 97 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Eosinophil, n=91, 93, 93 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Hematocrit, n=100, 99, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=96, 97 ,97 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | Thrombocyte, n=100, 100, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | WBC, n=100, 101, 98 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 24 | AST, n=100, 101, 98 | 1 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52
Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry and lipids. Any treatment-emergent abnormal laboratory result accompanied by clinical symptoms or leading to a change in study medication or requiring a change in concomitant therapy was considered clinically significant. Participants with clinically significant laboratory values are reported in the below table.
Time frame: Week 52
Population: The safety population consisted of all participants who received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and have at least one post-baseline safety assessment. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Thrombocyte, n=85, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | AST, n=86, 91, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Creatinine, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Eosinophil, n=81, 88, 82 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | CRP, n=86, 91, 87 | 1 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=83, 90, 85 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Hematocrit, n=86, 92, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Hemoglobin, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | RBC, n=86, 91, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | WBC, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=86, 92, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | ALT, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | RBC, n=86, 91, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | ALT, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Thrombocyte, n=85, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Hematocrit, n=86, 92, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | AST, n=86, 91, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=86, 92, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Eosinophil, n=81, 88, 82 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Creatinine, n=86, 92, 88 | 2 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=83, 90, 85 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Hemoglobin, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | CRP, n=86, 91, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | WBC, n=86, 92, 88 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | CRP, n=86, 91, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Absolute Neutrophil Count, n=83, 90, 85 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | RBC, n=86, 91, 87 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Eosinophil, n=81, 88, 82 | 4 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Hematocrit, n=86, 92, 87 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Hemoglobin, n=86, 92, 88 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Thrombocyte, n=85, 92, 88 | 1 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | WBC, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Alkaline phosphatase, n=86, 92, 87 | 0 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | ALT, n=86, 92, 88 | 7 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | AST, n=86, 91, 88 | 2 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Values at Week 52 | Creatinine, n=86, 92, 88 | 0 Number of participants |
Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104
European league against rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria classify each participant as a good, moderate or non-responder to treatment based on the degree of improvement from baseline and the level of disease activity at the endpoint. EULAR response is derived using the individual participant's DAS28 as the measure of severity of disease. Good or moderate response is defined as follows: Good response : DAS28 at the time point =\<3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2. Moderate response : DAS28 at the time point \> 3.2 and improvement from baseline \> 1.2, or DAS28 at the time point ≤ 5.1 and improvement from baseline \> 0.6 and =\<1.2.
Time frame: Weeks 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 96, 99 | 75 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105, 97, 103 | 93 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 96 | 63 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 96, 99 | 85 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105, 97, 103 | 84 Number of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 96 | 72 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105, 97, 103 | 50 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 96 | 65 Number of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Good European League Against Rheumatism Response Rate at Weeks 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 96, 99 | 71 Number of participants |
Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response
Insufficient therapeutic response (participants not responding to the drug as assessed by the physician) was selected by the investigator as a reason for the participant to withdraw from the study.
Time frame: Up to Week 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response | 32.1 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response | 18.2 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Who Withdraw Due to Lack of Sufficient Therapeutic Response | 43.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response is defined as a \>= 20% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12 | 63.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 24 | 75.2 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 52 | 74.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 104 | 63.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 104 | 65.3 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12 | 67.6 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 52 | 71.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 24 | 75.5 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 104 | 60.6 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 24 | 59.4 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 52 | 68.9 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 20 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12 | 41.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
ACR50 response is defined as a \>=50% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's Global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 61.6 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 49.0 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 12 | 47.6 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 24 | 63.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 58.6 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 12 | 44.1 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 24 | 58.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 54.7 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 51.5 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 48.5 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 12 | 21.7 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 50 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 24 | 34.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
ACR70 response is defined as a \>=70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC68 and SJC66, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: patient's Assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 12 | 30.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 24 | 43.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 44.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 36.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 38.9 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 12 | 23.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 44.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 24 | 37.3 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 104 | 35.4 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 24 | 15.1 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 52 | 33.0 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 70 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Week 12 | 7.5 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
ACR90 response is defined as a \>=90% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both tender joint count-68 joints (TJC68) and swollen joint count-66 joints (SJC66), as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS with left end of the line 0=no pain to right end of the line 100=unbearable pain; patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant, either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12 | 9.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 24 | 18.1 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 52 | 19.2 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 104 | 20.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 104 | 20.0 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12 | 3.9 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 52 | 21.2 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 24 | 11.8 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 104 | 14.1 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 24 | 4.7 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 52 | 6.8 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology 90 Response Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52 and 104 | Weeks 12 | 0.0 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
The DAS28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. Participants with missing data at visits before early study termination or who stopped the study prematurely because of insufficient therapeutic response or safety reasons considered non-responders or who stopped the study for other reasons, response set to missing after early withdrawal.
Time frame: Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104
Population: The ITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of TCZ/placebo infusion or MTX/placebo capsule and performed at least one post-baseline efficacy measurement. n = number of participants evaluable at particular time of assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=105,102,106 | 72.4 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105,102,106 | 80.0 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 99,103 | 71.0 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 99 | 63.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 99 | 70.5 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=105,102,106 | 64.7 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 99,103 | 80.8 Percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab + Placebo Methotrexate | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105,102,106 | 75.5 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 104, n=96, 95, 99 | 58.6 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 24, n=105,102,106 | 39.6 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 52, n=100, 99,103 | 61.2 Percentage of participants |
| Methotrexate + Placebo Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Remission Rate at Weeks 12, 24, 52, and 104 | Week 12, n=105,102,106 | 21.7 Percentage of participants |