Skip to content

Erlotinib Versus Oral Etoposide in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma

A Randomized, Phase 2 Study of Single-agent Erlotinib Versus Oral Etoposide in Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01032070
Acronym
PETEY
Enrollment
25
Registered
2009-12-15
Start date
2010-09-27
Completion date
2012-11-26
Last updated
2024-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recurrent or Refractory Pediatric Ependymoma

Keywords

pediatric, etoposide, erlotinib, phase 2, ependymoma

Brief summary

This is a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of single-agent erlotinib versus oral etoposide in patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma.

Detailed description

This is a phase 2 study involving a 1:1 randomization of 40 patients with recurrent or refractory pediatric ependymoma who will receive either erlotinib or oral etoposide.

Interventions

DRUGerlotinib

oral

DRUGetoposide

oral

Sponsors

OSI Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Recurrent of refractory ependymoma or subependymoma * Performance Status (PS): Lansky ≥ 50% for patients ≤ 10 years of age or Karnofsky ≥ 50% for patients \>10 years of age * Measurable disease, defined as 1 measurable lesion that can be accurately measured in 2 planes that has not received radiation therapy within 12 weeks * Recovered from the acute toxic effects of all prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiotherapy * ≥ 1 year to ≤ 21 years * Serum creatinine for patients ≤ 5 years in age is ≤ 0.8 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) ≥ 70 mL/min/m\^2 * Serum creatinine for patients \> 5 and ≤ 10 years in age is ≤ 1.0 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m\^2 * Serum creatinine for patients \> 10 and ≤ 15 years in age is ≤ 1.2 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m\^2 * Serum creatinine for patients \> 15 years in age is ≤ 1.5 mg/dL or Creatinine Clearance/GFR ≥ 70 mL/min/m\^2 * Total bilirubin is ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal for age * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal * Absolute neutrophil count \> 1000/µL * Platelet count \> 100,000/µL * Hemoglobin \> 8 gm/dL * Neurologically stable for at least 7 days prior to randomization * If receiving corticosteroids, patients must be on a stable or decreasing dose for at least 7 days before randomization * Patients of reproductive potential must agree to proactive effective contraceptive measures for the duration of the study and for at least 90 days after completion of study drug

Exclusion criteria

* Previously received epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy * Previously received oral etoposide * Received craniospinal radiotherapy within 24 weeks prior to randomization * Received field radiotherapy to the target lesion within 12 weeks prior to randomization * Received symptomatic metastatic disease within 14 days prior to randomization * Received myelosuppressive chemotherapy within 21 days before randomization * Received growth factors within 7 days prior to randomization * Participating in another investigational drug trial * Received a biologic agent within 7 days prior to randomization * Received a monoclonal antibody within 28 days prior to randomization * Taking cytochrome P450 (CYP)3A4 or CYP1A2 inhibitors/inducers within 14 days prior to randomization * Taking proton pump inhibitors within 14 days prior to randomization * Smoking during treatment * Pregnant or breast-feeding females

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With an Objective ResponseFrom randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.Objective response is defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), evaluated using modified International Society of Pediatric Oncology Brain, Tumor Subcommittee for the Reporting of Trials criteria. Response was confirmed at least 28 days after the first assessment where the response criteria were met. Response was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 8 weeks. CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids (or receiving only adrenal replacement doses) • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times at consecutive samplings). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of ResponseFrom randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.Duration of response (complete or partial response \[CR/PR\]) was defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (CR/PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of overall response was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of response was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a \> 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.
Percentage of Participants With a Minor ResponseFrom randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.Participants with a best overall response of minor response (MR), defined as: • ≥ 25% to \< 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.
Percentage of Participants With Disease ControlFrom randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.Disease control is a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or Stable disease (SD). CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If CSF evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times consecutively). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. MR: • ≥ 25% to \< 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. SD: • Neurologic examination is at least stable • Maintenance corticosteroid dose is not increased • MRI meets neither the criteria for minor response nor for progressive disease • Sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression based on central nervous system (CNS)-specific evaluation criteria as assessed by the investigator or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants did not progress or die before the data cutoff date for analysis were censored at the date of last disease assessment (including both radiologic assessment and neurologic assessment) where non-progression was documented. If a participant received any further anticancer therapy without prior documentation of disease progression, the participant was censored at the date of last disease assessment before starting new anti-cancer treatment. Participants were also censored at the date of last disease assessment with no documented progression if patients discontinued treatment for undocumented progression, toxicity or other reason before the data cutoff date for analysis.
Percentage of Participants With Prolonged Stable DiseaseFrom randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.Prolonged stable disease (SD) was defined as SD with a duration of at least 16 weeks. The percentage of participants with prolonged SD was defined as participants who achieved a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or SD, and did not progress within 16 weeks from randomization. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a \> 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.
Duration of Stable DiseaseFrom randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.Duration of stable disease (SD; defined as participants with an overall best response of complete, partial or minor response or stable disease) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of SD was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of SD was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR or MR or SD. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a \> 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization up to 12 months after the last dose. Median duration of follow-up was 12.9 months for erlotinib and 14.4 months for etoposide.Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the documented date of death. Participants who were still alive by the data cutoff date for analysis were censored on the last day the participant was known to be alive.
Safety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)From the date of first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Clinically significant vital sign assessments, findings on physical or neurological examination, and laboratory findings associated with signs and/or symptoms requiring withdrawal, dose modification or medical intervention were recorded as AEs. An AE was considered serious if it resulted in death, a life-threatening situation, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient who received study drug or other important medical events. The relationship of each AE to study drug was assessed as either related or not related.
Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for ErlotinibDay 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (the dosing interval) measured at steady state using sparse sampling.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Cmax)Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Cmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.
Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Tmax)Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Time to the maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Tmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.
Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of ErlotinibDay 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Apparent body clearance (CL/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of ErlotinibDay 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. The apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

Countries

Canada, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Erlotinib
Erlotinib was administered orally at a dose of 85 mg/m\^2 per day continuously until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity.
13
Etoposide
Etoposide 50 mg/m\^2 per day was administered orally for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period until either progression, death, patient request or investigator decision to discontinue study drug or intolerable toxicity.
12
Total25

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDisease progression138
Overall StudyMedical or ethical reasons02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject02

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicErlotinibEtoposideTotal
Age, Continuous12.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.87
9.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.99
11.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.67
Body Surface Area (BSA)1.51 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.556
1.17 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.439
1.35 m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.521
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Indian Subcontinent
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Southeast Asia
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic/Latino
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic/Latino
12 participants10 participants22 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
11 participants9 participants20 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants9 Participants19 Participants
Total Number of Disease Recurrences3 recurrences
FULL_RANGE 2.1
2 recurrences
FULL_RANGE 0.8
2 recurrences
FULL_RANGE 1.7
Tumor Type for Initial Disease Diagnosis
Anaplastic Ependymoma
6 participants9 participants15 participants
Tumor Type for Initial Disease Diagnosis
Ependymoma
6 participants3 participants9 participants
Tumor Type for Initial Disease Diagnosis
Myxopapillary Ependymoma
1 participants0 participants1 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 1311 / 12
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 135 / 12

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response

Objective response is defined as a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), evaluated using modified International Society of Pediatric Oncology Brain, Tumor Subcommittee for the Reporting of Trials criteria. Response was confirmed at least 28 days after the first assessment where the response criteria were met. Response was assessed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 8 weeks. CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids (or receiving only adrenal replacement doses) • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times at consecutive samplings). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.

Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all randomized participants. Following the intent-to-treat (ITT) principle, participants were analyzed according to the treatment arm they were assigned to at randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With an Objective Response0 percentage of participants
EtoposidePercentage of Participants With an Objective Response16.7 percentage of participants
Comparison: The study was not powered for this comparison due to small sample size.p-value: 0.22Fisher Exact
Secondary

Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of Erlotinib

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Apparent body clearance (CL/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
ErlotinibApparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of Erlotinib2922.1 mL/h/m^2
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Erlotinib

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. The apparent volume of distribution (Vz/F) of erlotinib was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
ErlotinibApparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of Erlotinib71628.5 mL/m^2
Secondary

Area Under the Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Erlotinib

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (the dosing interval) measured at steady state using sparse sampling.

Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set (PKAS) consisted of the participants treated with erlotinib for whom sufficient analyte concentration data were available to facilitate derivation of at least 1 primary pharmacokinetic parameter. Participants may have been excluded from the PKAS for reasons such as missing data or protocol deviation.

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
ErlotinibArea Under the Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours Post-dose for Erlotinib26716.7 h*ng/mL
Secondary

Duration of Response

Duration of response (complete or partial response \[CR/PR\]) was defined as the time from the date of the first documented response (CR/PR) to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of overall response was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of response was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a \> 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.

Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: Full Analysis Set participants whose best overall response was CR or PR.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EtoposideDuration of ResponseNA days
Secondary

Duration of Stable Disease

Duration of stable disease (SD; defined as participants with an overall best response of complete, partial or minor response or stable disease) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documented progression or death due to underlying cancer. If a participant had not progressed or died, the duration of SD was censored at the date of last adequate disease assessment. Duration of SD was only defined for participants whose best overall response was CR or PR or MR or SD. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a \> 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.

Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: Full Analysis Set participants whose best overall response was CR, PR, MR or SD.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibDuration of Stable Disease79 days
EtoposideDuration of Stable DiseaseNA days
Secondary

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Cmax)

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Cmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
ErlotinibMaximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Cmax)1969.5 ng/mL
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the documented date of death. Participants who were still alive by the data cutoff date for analysis were censored on the last day the participant was known to be alive.

Time frame: From randomization up to 12 months after the last dose. Median duration of follow-up was 12.9 months for erlotinib and 14.4 months for etoposide.

Population: The Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibOverall Survival (OS)NA days
EtoposideOverall Survival (OS)261 days
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Minor Response

Participants with a best overall response of minor response (MR), defined as: • ≥ 25% to \< 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks.

Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: The Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With a Minor Response0 percentage of participants
EtoposidePercentage of Participants With a Minor Response25.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease Control

Disease control is a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or Stable disease (SD). CR: • Complete disappearance of all enhancing tumor and mass effect • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks • If CSF evaluation was positive, it must become negative (confirmed at least 2 times consecutively). PR: • ≥ 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. MR: • ≥ 25% to \< 50% reduction in tumor size by bi-dimensional measurement • On a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids • Stable or improving neurologic examination sustained for ≥ 4 weeks. SD: • Neurologic examination is at least stable • Maintenance corticosteroid dose is not increased • MRI meets neither the criteria for minor response nor for progressive disease • Sustained for ≥ 8 weeks.

Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: The Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With Disease Control15.4 percentage of participants
EtoposidePercentage of Participants With Disease Control41.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Prolonged Stable Disease

Prolonged stable disease (SD) was defined as SD with a duration of at least 16 weeks. The percentage of participants with prolonged SD was defined as participants who achieved a best overall response of CR or PR or MR or SD, and did not progress within 16 weeks from randomization. Progression was defined as a worsening of neurologic status that could not be explained by other causes, a \> 25% increase in tumor size, the appearance of new lesions or CSF positivity, or increasing doses of corticosteroids required to maintain stable status.

Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: The Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibPercentage of Participants With Prolonged Stable Disease0 percentage of participants
EtoposidePercentage of Participants With Prolonged Stable Disease41.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization to disease progression based on central nervous system (CNS)-specific evaluation criteria as assessed by the investigator or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Participants did not progress or die before the data cutoff date for analysis were censored at the date of last disease assessment (including both radiologic assessment and neurologic assessment) where non-progression was documented. If a participant received any further anticancer therapy without prior documentation of disease progression, the participant was censored at the date of last disease assessment before starting new anti-cancer treatment. Participants were also censored at the date of last disease assessment with no documented progression if patients discontinued treatment for undocumented progression, toxicity or other reason before the data cutoff date for analysis.

Time frame: From randomization until the end of treatment. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: The Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ErlotinibProgression Free Survival (PFS)52 days
EtoposideProgression Free Survival (PFS)65 days
Secondary

Safety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)

An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant and did not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment. Clinically significant vital sign assessments, findings on physical or neurological examination, and laboratory findings associated with signs and/or symptoms requiring withdrawal, dose modification or medical intervention were recorded as AEs. An AE was considered serious if it resulted in death, a life-threatening situation, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect in the offspring of a patient who received study drug or other important medical events. The relationship of each AE to study drug was assessed as either related or not related.

Time frame: From the date of first dose of study drug until 30 days after the last dose. The median time on treatment was 52 days for erlotinib and 58 days for etoposide.

Population: All enrolled participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug (Safety Analysis Set).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event13 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related adverse event11 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Adverse event leading to death1 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related adverse event leading to death0 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event6 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related serious adverse event0 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to discontinuation0 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related AE leading to discontinuation0 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to dose interruption2 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related AE leading to dose interruption1 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to dose interruption and reduction1 participants
ErlotinibSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Related AE leading to dose interruption/ reduction1 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to dose interruption and reduction2 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event11 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to discontinuation0 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related adverse event10 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related AE leading to dose interruption3 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Adverse event leading to death0 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related AE leading to discontinuation0 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related adverse event leading to death0 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Related AE leading to dose interruption/ reduction2 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse event5 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)AE leading to dose interruption5 participants
EtoposideSafety Assessed Through Evaluation of Physical Exams, Vital Signs, Clinical Laboratory Tests and Adverse Events (AEs)Drug-related serious adverse event1 participants
Secondary

Time to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Tmax)

Pharmacokinetic parameters were determined from the serial plasma concentration data obtained for erlotinib. Time to the maximum observed plasma concentration of erlotinib (Tmax) was measured at steady state on Day 14 using sparse sampling.

Time frame: Day 14 predose and 0.5 to 1.5 hours, 2 to 3 hours and 4 to 8 hours post-dose.

Population: The Pharmacokinetics Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
ErlotinibTime to Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration of Erlotinib (Tmax)2.100 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026