Skip to content

Comparison of Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid With Oral Cephalexin for the Treatment of Cellulitis

Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid vs. Oral Cephalexin for the Treatment of Cellulitis: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01029782
Enrollment
206
Registered
2009-12-10
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2014-10-31
Last updated
2018-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cellulitis

Keywords

Cellulitis, Emergency Department, Cefazolin, Probenecid, Cephalexin

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether oral cephalexin is equivalent to intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid for the treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections in patients that present to the emergency department.

Detailed description

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a common reason for presentation to an Emergency Department (ED) in Canada. Although many patients with mild SSTI are able to be managed at home with oral antibiotics, those with mild-moderate infections are often treated with parenteral antibiotics. Current practice patterns in Canadian EDs indicate this patient population is often treated with intravenous cefazolin once daily along with oral probenecid and return to the ED or other ambulatory setting for daily medication administration and assessment. This parenteral regimen has been found to result in success rates comparable to studies which have evaluated treatment success with oral antibiotics in this patient population (89-97%). Although successful outcome can be achieved with this approach, it is often inconvenient for the patient to return to the ED/ambulatory care unit daily and does contribute to overall ED/ambulatory care visit volumes and overall health care costs. Unfortunately, there has never been a study which has evaluated the relative efficacy and safety or oral antibiotics to the aforementioned parenteral approach in this patient population and thus there remains a significant knowledge gap which must be addressed before a change in current practice can be explored. The objective of the study is to determine whether oral cephalexin is equivalent to intravenous cefazolin plus oral probenecid for the treatment of uncomplicated SSTIs in patients that present to the ED. This study will be a prospective, multi-centered, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing cephalexin 500 mg orally four times to cefazolin 2 g IV plus probenecid 1 g orally, in patients presenting to the ED with presumed diagnosis of SSTI. The primary outcome will be to compare the proportion of patients failing therapy for their cellulitis after 72 hours of antibiotic treatment with oral cephalexin or IV cefazolin/oral probenecid 1 g daily. Secondary outcomes include the clinical cure rate at 7 days, percentage of patients requiring hospital admission, percentage of patients stepped down to oral antibiotics on or before day 7 of therapy, percentage of patients requiring an additional antibiotic prescription on day 7, and the frequency of adverse events.

Interventions

DRUGIV cefazolin plus oral probenecid and placebo cephalexin

Intravenous cefazolin 2 g IV plus probenecid 1 g daily plus cephalexin placebo orally four times daily.

DRUGOral cephalexin and saline IV plus probenecid placebo

Cephalexin 500 mg orally four times daily plus saline IV and oral probenecid placebo daily

Sponsors

Canadian Society of Hospital Pharmacists
CollaboratorOTHER
Capital Health, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Interior Health Authority, Canada
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Kelowna General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting to the emergency department with a presumed diagnosis of mild to moderate skin and soft tissue infection * Deemed well enough to be treated as an outpatient * 19 years of age or older

Exclusion criteria

* known allergy to study drugs * known chronic kidney disease with a creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min * known previous methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection * use of antibiotics for greater than 24 hours in the past 7 days * wound/abscess requiring operative debridement or incision and drainage * suspected necrotizing fasciitis, osteomyelitis or septic arthritis * febrile neutropenia * concomitant documented bacteremia * Two or more signs of systemic sepsis * new altered mental status * infections at a site involving prosthetic materials * animal or human bite wound infections * post-operative wound infections * known peripheral vascular disease * superficial thrombophlebitis * pregnant/breastfeeding * obesity (BMI \> 30 kg/m2)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The Number of Patients Failing Therapy After 72 Hours of Antibiotic Treatment With Oral Cephalexin or Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid.72 hours

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were included if they presented to the ED with presumed diagnosis of mild-moderate SSTI and were deemed well enough to be treated as outpatients and be able to return to the ED daily.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
IV Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid and Placebo Cephalexin
IV cefazolin plus oral probenecid and placebo cephalexin: Intravenous cefazolin 2 g IV plus probenecid 1 g daily plus cephalexin placebo orally four times daily.
102
Oral Cephalexin and Saline IV Plus Probenecid Placebo
Oral cephalexin and saline IV plus probenecid placebo: Cephalexin 500 mg orally four times daily plus saline IV and oral probenecid placebo daily
101
Total203

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event01
Overall StudyDiagnosis changed11
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22
Overall StudyPhysician Decision01
Overall StudyProtocol Violation02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOral Cephalexin and Saline IV Plus Probenecid PlaceboTotalIV Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid and Placebo Cephalexin
Age, Continuous52.01 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.64
53.62 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.72
55.21 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.71
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
101 participants203 participants102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
30 Participants66 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
71 Participants137 Participants66 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1020 / 101
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 1025 / 101
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1020 / 101

Outcome results

Primary

The Number of Patients Failing Therapy After 72 Hours of Antibiotic Treatment With Oral Cephalexin or Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid.

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Per-Protocol Analysis at 72 hours.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
IV Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid and Placebo CephalexinThe Number of Patients Failing Therapy After 72 Hours of Antibiotic Treatment With Oral Cephalexin or Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid.6 Participants
Oral Cephalexin and Saline IV Plus Probenecid PlaceboThe Number of Patients Failing Therapy After 72 Hours of Antibiotic Treatment With Oral Cephalexin or Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid.4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 24, 2026