Skip to content

Canakinumab in the Treatment of Acute Gout Flares and Prevention of New Flares in Patients Unable to Use Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and/or Colchicine Including a 12 Weeks Extension and an Open-label 48 Weeks Extension Study

A 12 Weeks Randomized, Controlled Core Study of ACZ885 (Canakinumab) on the Treatment and Prevention of Gout Flares in Patients With Frequent Flares for Whom NSAIDs and/or Colchicine Are Contraindicated, Not Tolerated or Ineffective, Including a 12-week Double-blind Extension Study and an Open-label 48 Week Extension Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01029652
Acronym
β-RELIEVED
Enrollment
230
Registered
2009-12-10
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2014-01-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Gout

Keywords

frequent flares, gout, anti-interleukin-1β monoclonal antibody

Brief summary

The purpose of the 12-week core study was to demonstrate that canakinumab given upon acute gout flares relieves the signs and symptoms and prevents recurrence of gout flares in patients with frequent flares of gout for whom non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/ or colchicine are contraindicated, not tolerated, or ineffective. The efficacy of canakinumab was compared to the corticosteroid triamcinolone acetonide. The purpose of the first 12-week extension study was to collect additional safety, tolerability and efficacy data in patients who have completed the core study CACZ885H2356. The purpose of the second 48 week open-label extension study was to collect additional long-term safety and tolerability data in patients who have completed the first extension study CACZ885H2356E1.

Detailed description

Masking: Core: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Extension 1: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Extension 2: Open-label, terminated

Interventions

Canakinumab 150 mg was supplied in 6 mL glass vials each containing nominally 150 mg canakinumab (plus 20% overfill).

Triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg was supplied as a suspension.

Placebo to canakinumab was supplied in 6 mL glass vials containing placebo powder as a lyophilized cake.

Placebo triamcinolone acetonide was supplied as a lipid emulsion similar in appearance to triamcinolone acetonide.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Core Study: Inclusion criteria: * Meeting the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1977 preliminary criteria for the classification of acute arthritis of primary gout * Onset of current acute gout flare within 5 days prior to study entry * Baseline pain intensity ≥ 50 mm on the 0-100 mm visual analog scale (VAS) * History of ≥ 3 gout flares within the 12 months prior to study entry * Contraindication, intolerance, or lack of efficacy for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or colchicine

Exclusion criteria

* Rheumatoid arthritis, evidence/suspicion of infectious/septic arthritis, or other acute inflammatory arthritis * Presence of severe renal function impairment * Use of specified pain relief medications or biologics ( corticosteroids, narcotics, paracetamol/acetominophen, ibuprofen, colchicine, IL-blocker, and tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) within specified periods prior to study entry * Live vaccinations within 3 months prior to randomization * Requirement for administration of antibiotics against latent tuberculosis (TB) * Refractory heart failure (Stage D) * Unstable cardiac arrhythmias or unstable symptomatic coronary ischemia * Any active or recurrent bacterial, fungal, or viral infection Extension Study 1: Inclusion Completion of the Core study. A patient was defined as completing the core study if they completed the study up to and including visit 7. Exclusion \- Continuation in this extension study was considered inappropriate by the treating physician. Extension Study 2: Inclusion Completed of the first extension study CACZ885H2356E1. A patient was defined as completing the first extension study if they completed the study up to and including Visit 10). Exclusion -Continuation in this extension study was considered inappropriate by the treating physician Other protocol-defined inclusion-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to First New Flare12 weeksKaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.
Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)72 hours post-dose (randomization)Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), at 72 hours post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)24 weeks overallThis was the primary endpoint of both extension studies. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding),syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or,if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)72 weeks overallThis was the primary endpoint of both extension studies. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding),syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or,if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient12 weeksPatients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.
SF36 Physical Function Score at Week 12Week 12The SF-36 measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). This 36-item survey has 8 subscales that can be aggregated into physical- and mental-component summary scores. Scores are standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on an assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL. A negative change score indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment group and baseline SF-36 physical function subscore as covariates.
Time to First New Flare24 weeksKaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.
Mean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During the 24 Weeks of the Study24 weeksPatients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.
Time to First Intake of Rescue Medication After the Last Post Baseline Flare.72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)The Kaplan-Meier estimates of medians and 95% confidence intervals were used to calculate the endpoint.
Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in Extension72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.
Percentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)Maximum severity is the maximum Likert score recorded after the start of the flare. Participant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). It participant had a new flare, they also scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of a new flare on 5 point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme).
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken7 days last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks)Patients who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, patients were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolon as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare.
Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medicationduring 12 weeks core, 24 weeks overallPatients who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments. Permitted rescue medications included acetaminophen 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as needed. If they had insufficient pain relief, patients were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as needed per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as needed per day for 3 subsequent days within 7 days after randomization or after re-dose/injection administration.
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks Overall72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analytes were measured by a central laboratory. The analysis included treatment group, log-transformed protein level at baseline, and body mass index (BMI) at baseline as covariates.
Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The physician completed the assessment without viewing any of the patient's assessments (pain intensity \[Visual Analog Scale and Likert scale\] and patient's global assessment of response to treatment).
Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)Patients made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor. Percentage of participants in each category for both core and extension periods were measured.
Time to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)From baseline to 7 days post dose (randomization)The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to at least a 50% reduction in self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected at baseline was determined along with the 95% confidence interval. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.
Physician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (24 weeks overall)The study physician assessed the range of motion of the most affected joint for range of motion on a 5-point Likert scale: Normal, mildly restricted, moderately restricted, severely restricted, immobilized. The percentage of patients in each category is reported.
Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)7 days post dose (randomization), 24 weeks post-doseParticipant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). It participant had a new flare, they also scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of a new flare on 5 point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme).
Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment (72 Weeks Overall)72 weeks overallKaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.
Flare Rate Per Year72 weeks overallFlare rate was calculated as the number of new flares over the period of observation in years. Flare rate was calculated using only those new flares before switching to canakinumab. Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.
High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analytes were measured by a central laboratory. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) levels were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analytes were measured by a central laboratory. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose , 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The physician completed the assessment without viewing any of the patient's assessments (pain intensity \[Visual Analog Scale and Likert scale\] and patient's global assessment of response to treatment). The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)Participant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). It participant had a new flare, they also scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of a new flare on 5 point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)Patients made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor. Percentage of participants in each category for both core and extension periods were measured. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Physician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Tenderness on a 0-3 point scale: No pain, patient states that there is pain, patient states there is pain and winces, and patient states there is pain, winces, and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint; The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Physician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Swelling on a 0-3 point scale: No swelling, palpable, visible, and bulging beyond the joint margins; The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Physician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)The study physician assessed the most affected joint for Erythema: Present or absent. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.
Physician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Tenderness on a 0-3 point scale: No pain, patient states that there is pain, patient states there is pain and winces, and patient states there is pain, winces, and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint; Swelling on a 0-3 point scale: No swelling, palpable, visible, and bulging beyond the joint margins; and Erythema: Present or absent. The percentage of patients in each category is reported.
Time to Complete Resolution of Pain7 days post-dose (randomization)Patients scored their pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). Complete Resolution of Pain is defined as no pain (None) on the Likert Scale. Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to complete resolution of self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected and their confidence intervals were determined.
Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Pain7 days post-dose (randomization)Patients scored their pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose. Complete Resolution of Pain is defined as no pain (None) on the Likert Scale. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative event rate = percentage of participants with event up to the end of the time interval.
Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks12 weeksPatients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Colombia, Estonia, Germany, Guatemala, Latvia, Lithuania, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Russia, Singapore, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Two patients randomized to canakinumab did not receive any study medication and were discontinued from the core study on the day of randomization, with the reason for discontinuation listed as Administrative Problems.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Canakinumab 150 mg
Patients received 1 subcutaneous (sc) injection of canakinumab 150 mg and 1 intramuscular (im) injection of placebo to triamcinolone acetonide on Day 1. Patients could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. Patients completing the 12 weeks core study were allowed to continue to be treated in another 12 weeks extension study for any new gout flare on demand with the same treatment as assigned in the core study.
113
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg
Patients received 1 intramuscular (im) injection of triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg and 1 subcutaneous (sc) injection of placebo to canakinumab on Day 1. Patients could receive a re-dose of study drug on demand upon the occurrence of new flares, but re-dosing could not occur until 14 days had elapsed after the previous dose. Patients completing the 12 weeks core study were allowed to continue to be treated in another 12 weeks extension study for any new gout flare on demand with the same treatment as assigned in the core study.
115
Total228

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Core Study (0-12 Weeks)Administrative problems21
Core Study (0-12 Weeks)Death01
Core Study (0-12 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up31
Core Study (0-12 Weeks)Patient Withdrew Consent13
Core Study (0-12 Weeks)Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect04
Extension Study 1 (12-24 Weeks)Lost to Follow-up23
Extension Study 1 (12-24 Weeks)Protocol Deviation10
Extension Study 1 (12-24 Weeks)Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect01
Extension Study 1 (12-24 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject01
Extension Study 2 (25-72 Weeks)Death11
Extension Study 2 (25-72 Weeks)Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect01
Extension Study 2 (25-72 Weeks)Withdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCanakinumab 150 mgTriamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTotal
Age, Continuous54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.18
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.71
54.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.93
Age, Customized
≥ 65 - 74 years
16 participants21 participants37 participants
Age, Customized
< 65 years
92 participants92 participants184 participants
Age, Customized
≥ 75 years
5 participants2 participants7 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants7 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
101 Participants108 Participants209 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
47 / 11319 / 6919 / 6922 / 1157 / 3912 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
19 / 1136 / 698 / 6911 / 1152 / 390 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)

This was the primary endpoint of both extension studies. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding),syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or,if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: 24 weeks overall

Population: Safety population consisted of all patients who received study drug in the core study and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event71 Participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)Death0 Participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event11 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event56 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)Death1 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (24 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event6 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)

This was the primary endpoint of both extension studies. Adverse event is defined as any unfavorable and unintended diagnosis, symptom, sign(including an abnormal laboratory finding),syndrome or disease which either occurs during the study, having been absent at baseline, or,if present at baseline, appears to worsen. Serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that results in death, is life threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect.

Time frame: 72 weeks overall

Population: Safety population consisted of all patients who received study drug in the core study and had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death1 Participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event76 Participants
Canakinumab 150 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event19 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event41 Participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event6 Participants
Randomized to Canakinumab :After Re-treated With CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death1 Participants
Randomized to Canakinumab :After Re-treated With CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event38 Participants
Randomized to Canakinumab :After Re-treated With CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event8 Participants
Randomized to Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triam)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death2 Participants
Randomized to Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triam)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event60 Participants
Randomized to Triamcinolone Acetonide (Triam)Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event11 Participants
Randomized to Triam: Before Switched to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 Participants
Randomized to Triam: Before Switched to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event20 Participants
Randomized to Triam: Before Switched to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event2 Participants
Randomized to Triam: After Switched to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Adverse Event19 Participants
Randomized to Triam: After Switched to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Serious Adverse Event0 Participants
Randomized to Triam: After Switched to CanakinumabNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AE), Death and Serious Adverse Events (72 Weeks Overall)Death0 Participants
Primary

Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)

Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100), at 72 hours post-dose. Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose (randomization)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute post dose measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)28.1 mmStandard Error 2.42
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSelf-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)39.5 mmStandard Error 2.44
Primary

Time to First New Flare

Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First New FlareNA Days
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First New FlareNA Days
Secondary

Amount of Rescue Medication Taken

Patients who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments as follows: * Acetaminophen (paracetamol) 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as required. A maximum of 1 g/dose or 3 g/day of acetaminophen and 30 mg/ dose or 180 mg/day of codeine was allowed. * If they had insufficient pain relief, patients were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolon as required per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as required subsequent days within 7 days of a gout flare.

Time frame: 7 days last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Patients with observations at 7 days last post-baseline flare were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenAcetaminophen1931.4 mgStandard Deviation 3266.12
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenCodeine7.7 mgStandard Deviation 25.56
Canakinumab 150 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenPrednisolone/Prednisone4.1 mgStandard Deviation 17.34
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenAcetaminophen2058.1 mgStandard Deviation 3331.33
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenCodeine46.0 mgStandard Deviation 118.26
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgAmount of Rescue Medication TakenPrednisolone/Prednisone21.6 mgStandard Deviation 47.42
Secondary

Flare Rate Per Year

Flare rate was calculated as the number of new flares over the period of observation in years. Flare rate was calculated using only those new flares before switching to canakinumab. Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: 72 weeks overall

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgFlare Rate Per Year1.16 New flares per patient per yearStandard Deviation 1.511
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgFlare Rate Per Year2.81 New flares per patient per yearStandard Deviation 4.399
Secondary

High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks Overall

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analytes were measured by a central laboratory. The analysis included treatment group, log-transformed protein level at baseline, and body mass index (BMI) at baseline as covariates.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Patients with baseline flare and data at 72 hours post-dose in core and patients with a new flare and data at 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall) were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallhsCRP : Core(n= 109, 107)4.50 mg/L
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallSAA protein : Core (n=105, 106)6.77 mg/L
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallhsCRP : 24 weeks(n= 31, 32)5.18 mg/L
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallSAA protein : 24 weeks (n=28, 33)11.43 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallSAA protein : 24 weeks (n=28, 33)21.11 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallhsCRP : Core(n= 109, 107)7.08 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallhsCRP : 24 weeks(n= 31, 32)7.18 mg/L
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) and Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Core and 24 Weeks OverallSAA protein : Core (n=105, 106)17.00 mg/L
Secondary

High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analytes were measured by a central laboratory. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours post dose (n= 45, 24)28.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 42.26
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post dose (n=45, 34)10.6 mg/LStandard Deviation 14.69
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post dose (n=67, 39)3.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.38
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post dose (n=52, 35)9.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 48.57
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post dose (n=45, 37)2.6 mg/LStandard Deviation 3
Canakinumab 150 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post dose (n=42, 33)6.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 12.99
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post dose (n=45, 37)3.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 6.74
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours post dose (n= 45, 24)26.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 29.07
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post dose (n=52, 35)3.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.95
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post dose (n=45, 34)7.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.06
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post dose (n=42, 33)4.3 mg/LStandard Deviation 11.9
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgHigh-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post dose (n=67, 39)3.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 3.57
Secondary

Mean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient

Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgMean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient0.21 New flares/patient/12 weeksStandard Deviation 0.472
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgMean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient0.53 New flares/patient/12 weeksStandard Deviation 0.892
Secondary

Mean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During the 24 Weeks of the Study

Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgMean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During the 24 Weeks of the Study0.40 New flares/patient/24 weeksStandard Deviation 0.634
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgMean Number of New Gout Flares Per Patient During the 24 Weeks of the Study0.87 New flares/patient/24 weeksStandard Deviation 1.104
Secondary

Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)

Participant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). It participant had a new flare, they also scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of a new flare on 5 point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)19.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)30.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)45.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)4.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)41.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)38.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)18.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)1.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)5.7 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)20.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)57.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)61.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)2.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)15.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)34.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (7 days post dose) (n=65, 35)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Currently Most-affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (72 hours post dose) (n=66, 39)2.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)

Participant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). It participant had a new flare, they also scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of a new flare on 5 point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme).

Time frame: 7 days post dose (randomization), 24 weeks post-dose

Population: Full Analysis Set includes all patients that received study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations analyzed for this endpoint at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]32.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]48.2 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]16.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]2.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]47.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]38.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]12.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]1.2 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]15.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]28.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)None (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]46.2 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]41.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Moderate (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]16.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Mild (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]37.2 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]12.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Severe (24 weeks post-dose) [N= 85, 78]1.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint (Likert Scale)Extreme (7 days post-dose) [N= 110, 107]1.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in Extension

Patients scored their pain intensity in the joint most affected at baseline on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. The ANCOVA analysis included treatment group, Baseline VAS score, and body mass index (BMI) at Baseline as covariates.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was applied to impute post dose measurements.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in Extension34.6 mmStandard Error 4.35
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Assessment of Gout Pain Intensity in the Most Affected Joint on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in Extension44.9 mmStandard Error 4.01
Secondary

Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment

Patients made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor. Percentage of participants in each category for both core and extension periods were measured.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations analyzed for this endpoint at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentSlight (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]1.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentExcellent (Core) [N=113, 111]12.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentAcceptable (Core) [N=113, 111]37.2 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentSlight (Core) [N=113, 111]8.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (Core) [N=113, 111]2.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentExcellent (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]31 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]46 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentAcceptable (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]20.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]1.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (Core) [N=113, 111]38.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentAcceptable (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]25.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentExcellent (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]17.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentExcellent (Core) [N=113, 111]12.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (Core) [N=113, 111]28.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentSlight (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]9.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentAcceptable (Core) [N=113, 111]30.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]44.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentSlight (Core) [N=113, 111]12.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (24 weeks) [N=87, 78]2.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (Core) [N=113, 111]15.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Patient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

Patients made a global assessment of response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Excellent, good, acceptable, slight, poor. Percentage of participants in each category for both core and extension periods were measured. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabExcellent (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)15.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)26.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAcceptable (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)50.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabSlight (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)6.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)1.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabExcellent (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)23.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)41.2 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAcceptable (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)27.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabSlight (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)7.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAcceptable (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)16.7 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabExcellent (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)19.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabExcellent (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)27.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)44.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAcceptable (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)27.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)52.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabSlight (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)2.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabSlight (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)2.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPatient's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (72 hours post dose) (n=60, 36)5.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication

Patients who had difficulty in tolerating their pain were allowed to take rescue medication after the 6-hour post-dose pain assessments. Permitted rescue medications included acetaminophen 500 mg and/ or codeine 30 mg as needed. If they had insufficient pain relief, patients were allowed to take a maximum of 30 mg of oral prednisolone as needed per day for 2 days followed by up to 20 mg of prednisolone as needed per day for 3 subsequent days within 7 days after randomization or after re-dose/injection administration.

Time frame: during 12 weeks core, 24 weeks overall

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 12 weeks:Core consisted of patients taking rescue medication during baseline flare of Core study and 24 weeks:Overall consisted of patients who took rescue medication during last post-baseline flare during 24 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication12 weeks :Core (N=113, 115)31.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication24 weeks: Overall (N=35, 43)48.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication12 weeks :Core (N=113, 115)52.2 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication24 weeks: Overall (N=35, 43)44.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks

Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks18.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With at Least 1 New Gout Flare During the 12 Weeks34.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Pain

Patients scored their pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose. Complete Resolution of Pain is defined as no pain (None) on the Likert Scale. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of cumulative event rate = percentage of participants with event up to the end of the time interval.

Time frame: 7 days post-dose (randomization)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Pain34.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Complete Resolution of Pain31.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)

Maximum severity is the maximum Likert score recorded after the start of the flare. Participant scored their current pain intensity in the most affected joint of the gout flare on a 5-point Likert Scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). It participant had a new flare, they also scored the maximum amount of acute gout pain in the most affected joint since the onset of a new flare on 5 point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme).

Time frame: Last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Participants with baseline and last post-baseline observations were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Mild0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Severe77.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Moderate14.3 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Extreme8.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)None0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Extreme20.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)None0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Mild2.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Moderate16.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPercentage of Participants With Maximum Severity of Last Post-baseline Flare (5-point Likert Scale)Severe60.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for Erythema: Present or absent. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAbsent (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)82.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPresent (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)18.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAbsent (7 days post dose) (n=67, 36)95.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPresent (7 days post dose) (n=67, 36)4.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPresent (7 days post dose) (n=67, 36)5.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAbsent (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)80.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabAbsent (7 days post dose) (n=67, 36)94.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Erythema for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPresent (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)20.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Swelling on a 0-3 point scale: No swelling, palpable, visible, and bulging beyond the joint margins; The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo Pain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)29.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)42.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)24.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=61, 35)3.3 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo pain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)64.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)25.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)7.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=68, 36)2.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=68, 36)2.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo Pain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)42.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo pain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)75.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)48.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)5.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)8.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)16.7 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Swelling for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=61, 35)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Tenderness on a 0-3 point scale: No pain, patient states that there is pain, patient states there is pain and winces, and patient states there is pain, winces, and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint; The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose , 7 days post dose last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or the first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients who switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo Pain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)27.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)54.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)16.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=61, 35)1.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo pain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)52.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)44.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)2.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=61, 36)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=61, 36)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo Pain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)28.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabNo pain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)69.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)68.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)2.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain and winces (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 35)2.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain (7 days post dose) (n=68, 36)27.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Joint Tenderness for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPain, winces, withdraw(72 hrs post dose)(n=61, 35)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected Joint

The study physician assessed the range of motion of the most affected joint for range of motion on a 5-point Likert scale: Normal, mildly restricted, moderately restricted, severely restricted, immobilized. The percentage of patients in each category is reported.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (24 weeks overall)

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS): All patients that received study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations analyzed for this endpoint at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointNormal (Core) [N=113, 111]25.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointMildly restricted (Core) [N=113, 111]50.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointModerately restricted (Core) [N=113, 111]21.2 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointSeverely restricted (Core) [N=113, 111]2.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointImmobilized (Core) [N=113, 111]0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointNormal (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]66.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointMildly restricted (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]31.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointModerately Restricted (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]2.3 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointSeverely Restricted (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointImmobilized (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointModerately Restricted (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]3.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointNormal (Core) [N=113, 111]31.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointNormal (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]65.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointMildly restricted (Core) [N=113, 111]29.7 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointImmobilized (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointModerately restricted (Core) [N=113, 111]27.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointMildly restricted (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]29.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointSeverely restricted (Core) [N=113, 111]8.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointSeverely Restricted (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]1.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Range of Motion of the Most Affected JointImmobilized (Core) [N=113, 111]3.6 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected Joint

The study physician assessed the most affected joint for: Tenderness on a 0-3 point scale: No pain, patient states that there is pain, patient states there is pain and winces, and patient states there is pain, winces, and withdraws on palpation or passive movement of the affected study joint; Swelling on a 0-3 point scale: No swelling, palpable, visible, and bulging beyond the joint margins; and Erythema: Present or absent. The percentage of patients in each category is reported.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations analyzed for this endpoint at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointTENDERNESS - No pain (Core) [N=113, 110]33.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain (Core) [N=113, 110]56.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain and winces (Core) [N=113, 110]8.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain,winces,withdraws (Core) [N=113,110]1.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointSWELLING - No swelling (Core) [N=113, 110]38.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPalpable (Core) [N=113, 110]38.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointVisible (Core) [N=113, 110]21.2 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointBulging beyond joint margin (Core) [N=113, 110]1.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointERYTHEMA - Absent (Core) [N=112, 109]78.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPresent (Core) [N=112, 109]21.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointTENDERNESS - No pain (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]82.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]17.2 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain and winces (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain,winces,withdraws (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointSWELLING - No swelling (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]88.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPalpable (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]8.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointVisible (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]3.4 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointBulging beyond joint margin (24 week)[N=87,80]0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointERYTHEMA - Absent (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]98.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPresent (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]1.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointBulging beyond joint margin (24 week)[N=87,80]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointTENDERNESS - No pain (Core) [N=113, 110]26.4 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointTENDERNESS - No pain (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]85.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain (Core) [N=113, 110]51.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPalpable (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]5.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain and winces (Core) [N=113, 110]17.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]13.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain,winces,withdraws (Core) [N=113,110]4.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPresent (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointSWELLING - No swelling (Core) [N=113, 110]30.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain and winces (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]1.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPalpable (Core) [N=113, 110]35.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointVisible (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]1.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointVisible (Core) [N=113, 110]29.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPain,winces,withdraws (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointBulging beyond joint margin (Core) [N=113, 110]5.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointERYTHEMA - Absent (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]100 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointERYTHEMA - Absent (Core) [N=112, 109]65.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointSWELLING - No swelling (24 weeks) [N=87, 80]93.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Assessment of Tenderness, Swelling, and Erythema of the Most Affected JointPresent (Core) [N=112, 109]34.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment

The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The physician completed the assessment without viewing any of the patient's assessments (pain intensity \[Visual Analog Scale and Likert scale\] and patient's global assessment of response to treatment).

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose (randomization), 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. 'N' in each category indicates participants with observations analyzed for this endpoint at specified time points.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery good (Core) [N=113,110]16.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (Core) [N=113, 110]47.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentFair (Core) [N= 113, 110]26.5 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (Core) [N= 113, 110]7.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery poor (Core) [N=113, 110]1.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery Good ( 24 weeks) [N=87, 79]43.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]50.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentFair (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]5.7 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery Poor (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentFair (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]17.7 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery good (Core) [N=113,110]15.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery Good ( 24 weeks) [N=87, 79]27.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (Core) [N=113, 110]30.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery Poor (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentFair (Core) [N= 113, 110]32.7 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentGood (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]50.6 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (Core) [N= 113, 110]14.5 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentPoor (24 weeks) [N=87, 79]3.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to TreatmentVery poor (Core) [N=113, 110]7.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to Canakinumab

The study physician made a global assessment of the patient's response to treatment using a 5-point Likert scale: Very good, good, fair, poor, very poor. The percentage of patients in each category is reported. The physician completed the assessment without viewing any of the patient's assessments (pain intensity \[Visual Analog Scale and Likert scale\] and patient's global assessment of response to treatment). The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose , 7 days post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery good (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)21.3 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)41.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabFair (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)31.1 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)6.6 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery poor (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery Good (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)36.8 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)52.9 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabFair (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)10.3 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)0.0 Percentage of participants
Canakinumab 150 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery Poor (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabFair (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery good (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)22.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery Good (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)33.3 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)57.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery Poor (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)2.8 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabFair (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)17.1 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabGood (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)63.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)2.9 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabPoor (7 days post dose) (n=68, 34)0.0 Percentage of participants
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgPhysician's Global Assessment of Response to Treatment for Patients Re-treated or Switched to CanakinumabVery poor (72 hours post dose) (n=61, 34)0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab

Serum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) levels were determined in blood serum in order to identify the presence of inflammation, to determine its severity, and to monitor the response to treatment. Analytes were measured by a central laboratory. The treatment effect reported for canakinumab arm was for last post-baseline flare after re-treated with canakinumab and for patient which switched to Canakinumab arm was for first post-baseline flare after receiving the first dose of canakinumab.

Time frame: 24 hours, 72 hours, 7 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks post-dose for the last post-baseline flare for patients re-treated with canakinumab or first post-baseline flare treated with canakinumab for patients switched treatment (during 72 weeks overall)

Population: Modified Analysis Set (MAS) consists of all FAS patients who were either re-treated or switched to canakinumab during 72 weeks. At each timepoint only patients with a value at both baseline flare and the new flare are included

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours post dose (n= 45, 27)151.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 310.09
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post dose (n=45, 36)42.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 116.89
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post dose (n=67, 39)5.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.83
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post dose (n=52, 35)31.0 mg/LStandard Deviation 193.64
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post dose (n=45, 37)4.2 mg/LStandard Deviation 4.26
Canakinumab 150 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post dose (n=42, 33)10.7 mg/LStandard Deviation 24.62
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab8 weeks post dose (n=45, 37)5.4 mg/LStandard Deviation 8.36
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab24 hours post dose (n= 45, 27)86.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 188.46
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab4 weeks post dose (n=52, 35)8.5 mg/LStandard Deviation 19.75
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab72 hours post dose (n=45, 36)26.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 73.37
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab12 weeks post dose (n=42, 33)7.8 mg/LStandard Deviation 22.98
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSerum Amyloid A Protein (SAA) Levels for Patients Re-treated With or Switched to Canakinumab7 days post dose (n=67, 39)4.9 mg/LStandard Deviation 6.56
Secondary

SF36 Physical Function Score at Week 12

The SF-36 measures the impact of disease on overall quality of life (QoL). This 36-item survey has 8 subscales that can be aggregated into physical- and mental-component summary scores. Scores are standardized with the use of norm-based methods based on an assessment of the general U.S. population free of chronic conditions. Scores range from 1-100 with a mean=50 and a standard deviation=10. A higher score indicates less impact on QoL. A negative change score indicates improvement. An ANCOVA model was used with treatment group and baseline SF-36 physical function subscore as covariates.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Participant observations at Week 12 were included in the analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Canakinumab 150 mgSF36 Physical Function Score at Week 1271.76 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.688
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgSF36 Physical Function Score at Week 1271.48 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.745
Secondary

Time to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)

The Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to at least a 50% reduction in self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected at baseline was determined along with the 95% confidence interval. Patients scored their pain intensity on a 0-100 mm VAS, ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). Scores on the 100 mm linear scale were measured to the nearest millimeter from the left. Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose.

Time frame: From baseline to 7 days post dose (randomization)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) method was used to impute post dose measurement.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)48.0 Hours
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to at Least a 50% Reduction in Self-assessed Pain Intensity in the Joint Most Affected at Baseline Measured on a Visual Analog Scale (0-100mm VAS)72.0 Hours
Secondary

Time to Complete Resolution of Pain

Patients scored their pain intensity on a 5-point Likert scale (none, mild, moderate, severe, extreme). Complete Resolution of Pain is defined as no pain (None) on the Likert Scale. Pain was scored at Baseline; at 6 and 12 hours post-dose; and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days post-dose. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to complete resolution of self-assessed pain intensity in the joint most affected and their confidence intervals were determined.

Time frame: 7 days post-dose (randomization)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to Complete Resolution of PainNA Hours
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to Complete Resolution of PainNA Hours
Secondary

Time to First Intake of Rescue Medication After the Last Post Baseline Flare.

The Kaplan-Meier estimates of medians and 95% confidence intervals were used to calculate the endpoint.

Time frame: 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare (during 24 weeks overall)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug. Patients with observations 72 hours post-dose for the last post-baseline flare during 24 weeks were included in analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First Intake of Rescue Medication After the Last Post Baseline Flare.NA Hours
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First Intake of Rescue Medication After the Last Post Baseline Flare.NA Hours
Secondary

Time to First New Flare

Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before the flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: 24 weeks

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First New FlareNA Days
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First New Flare119 Days
Secondary

Time to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment (72 Weeks Overall)

Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to first new flare and confidence intervals were determined. For patients with event, time to event = (date of event - date of first dose of study drug + 1). Patients met definition of new flare if they had: * Flare in joint, not a previously affected joint (at baseline or during study) * Flare in joint previously affected (at baseline or during study) after previous flare in joint has resolved completely. Patients did not meet criterion of having new gout flare if: · Increasing/renewed gout pain in an affected joint before flare has resolved completely.

Time frame: 72 weeks overall

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) consisted of all patients as randomized in the core study who had taken at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Canakinumab 150 mgTime to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment (72 Weeks Overall)222.0 days
Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mgTime to First New Flare: Survival Analysis by Treatment (72 Weeks Overall)119.0 days

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026