Skip to content

Laparotomy vs. Drainage for Infants With Necrotizing Enterocolitis

A Multi-center Randomized Trial of Laparotomy vs. Drainage as the Initial Surgical Therapy for ELBW Infants With Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP): Outcomes at 18-22 Months Adjusted Age

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01029353
Acronym
NEST
Enrollment
529
Registered
2009-12-10
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2024-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Enterocolitis, Necrotizing, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Intestinal Perforation

Keywords

NICHD Neonatal Research Network, Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW), Extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW), Prematurity, Laparotomy, Drainage, Isolated intestinal perforation, Focal intestinal perforation

Brief summary

This study will compare the effectiveness of two surgical procedures -laparotomy versus drainage - commonly used to treat necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or isolated intestinal perforations (IP) in extremely low birth weight infants (≤1,000 g). Infants diagnosed with NEC or IP requiring surgical intervention, will be recruited. Subjects will be randomized to receive either a laparotomy or peritoneal drainage. Primary outcome is impairment-free survival at 18-22 months corrected age.

Detailed description

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a condition, generally affecting premature infants, in which the intestines become ischemic (lack oxygen and/or blood flow). NEC occurs in up to 5-15% of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. Isolated or focal intestinal perforation (IP) is a less common condition, affecting an estimated 4% of ELBWs, in which a hole develops in the intestines leaking fluid into the abdominal cavity. Outcome for infants with NEC and/or IP is poor: 49% die and half of the surviving infants are neurodevelopmentally impaired. Surgical options for NEC and IP include two possible procedures: peritoneal drainage, in which a tube is placed in the abdominal cavity through a small incision for fluid to drain out; or laparotomy, in which an incision is made in the abdomen and necrotic intestine is removed. Drainage may be followed by a laparotomy. The Neonatal Research Network's observational study of 156 ELBW infants with NEC or IP (Pediatrics. 2006 Apr; 117(4): e680-7) showed comparable outcomes for the two procedures before hospital discharge, but suggested an advantage of laparotomy over drainage at 18-22 months corrected age with lower rates of death or neurodevelopmental impairment. However, the infants that underwent laparotomy were more mature; infants with drains were smaller and more premature. We hypothesize that initial laparotomy may improve an infant's long-term neurodevelopmental outcome, potentially by reducing the maximum severity or duration of inflammation. This study included a randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of laparotomy versus drainage for treating NEC or IP in extremely low birth weight infants. Target enrollment is 300 infants diagnosed with NEC or IP for randomization to receive initially either a laparotomy or drainage. Subsequent laparotomies may be performed on infants in either group, if their condition continues to deteriorate. Surviving infants will return for a follow-up assessment at 18-22 months corrected age. This study also attempted to use a comprehensive cohort design that would have added additional information beyond the conventional randomized trial component. The cohort component included trial data among eligible, non-randomized infants with NEC/IP, who consented for the non-randomized cohort, would be collected and analyzed as a secondary specific aim. This additional cohort was called the preference cohort.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparotomy

Initial laparotomy will be performed. Standard procedures will be used, including inspection of the bowel with removal of diseased areas, creation of stoma(s), and other procedures deemed indicated by the surgeon.

PROCEDUREDrainage

Initial drainage will involve placing a Penrose drain in the abdomen.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
National Center for Research Resources (NCRR)
CollaboratorNIH
NICHD Neonatal Research Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 8 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Infants born at ≤1,000 g birth weight * Infant is ≤8 0/7 weeks of age at the time of eligibility assessment * Pediatric surgeon decision to perform surgery for suspected NEC or IP * Subject is at a center able to perform both laparotomy and drainage

Exclusion criteria

* Major anomaly that influences likelihood of developing primary outcome or affects surgical treatment considerations * Congenital infection * Prior laparotomy or peritoneal drain placement * Prior NEC or IP * Infant for whom full support is not being provided * Follow-up unlikely

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)at 18-22 months corrected ageDeath or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Deathby 18-22 months corrected ageDeath by 18-22 months corrected age
Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsyup to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age
Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.
Death or Blindnessup to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age
Death or Hearing Lossup to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age
Subsequent Laparotomybetween initial surgery and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthSubsequent laparotomy after initial surgery
Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgerybetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny intraoperative complications during any surgery
Any Wound Dehiscencebetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny wound dehiscence during any surgery
Any Intra-abdominal Abscessbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery
Any Intestinal Stricturebetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny intestinal stricture during any surgery
Any Late Onset Sepsisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny late onset sepsis after randomization
Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery
Any Severe IVHbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny severe IVH ater randomization
Duration of Mechanical Ventilationbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthDuration of mechanical ventilation while on study
Duration of Parenteral Nutritionbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthDuration of parenteral nutrition while on study
Final Bowel Lengthbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthFinal bowel length after last surgery
Time to Full Feedsbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthTime to full feeds while on study
Length of Hospital Stayfrom randomization up to 1 year following birthLength of hospital stay while on study
Death or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisat 18-22 months corrected ageDeath or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)by 18-22 months corrected ageNDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors)
Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisby 18-22 months corrected ageNDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors). Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisup to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisup to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP). Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.
Death or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisup to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Death or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisup to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age windowDeath within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Subsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthSubsequent laparotomy after initial surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny intraoperative complications during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Any Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny wound dehiscence during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Any Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Any Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny intestinal stricture during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Any Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny late onset sepsis after randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Any Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthAny severe IVH ater randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthDuration of mechanical ventilation while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Duration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthDuration of parenteral nutrition while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Final Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthFinal bowel length after last surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Time to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisbetween randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birthTime to full feeds while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Length of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisfrom randomization up to 1 year following birthLength of hospital stay while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).
Death Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosisby 18-22 months corrected ageDeath within 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Randomized Trial: Initial Laparotomy
Under general anesthesia in the NICU or operating room, a laparotomy will be performed following standard procedures.
146
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Place a one-fourth inch Penrose drain in the lower abdomen with local anesthesia and sedation.
162
Preference Cohort: Initial Laparotomy
Under general anesthesia in the NICU or operating room, a laparotomy will be performed following standard procedures.
100
Preference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Place a one-fourth inch Penrose drain in the lower abdomen with local anesthesia and sedation.
119
Total527

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyConsent Withdrawn2000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up4554
Overall StudyPrimary Outcome Indeterminate1320

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRandomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyRandomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainPreference Cohort: Initial LaparotomyPreference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal Drain
Age, Continuous33.3 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 81
11.6 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
12.1 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.9
79.9 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 125.4
49.9 days
STANDARD_DEVIATION 111.7
Inborn status
In born
312 Participants82 Participants90 Participants65 Participants75 Participants
Inborn status
Out born
215 Participants64 Participants72 Participants35 Participants44 Participants
Infant Apgar score at 1 minute3 units on a scale3 units on a scale3 units on a scale4 units on a scale4 units on a scale
Infant Apgar score at 5 minute7 units on a scale6 units on a scale6 units on a scale7 units on a scale7 units on a scale
Infant baseline risk of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI)70.3 Percent probability
STANDARD_DEVIATION 25
63.4 Percent probability
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27
70.7 Percent probability
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.7
88.1 Percent probability
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.7
85.8 Percent probability
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.1
Infant birth weight707.6 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 146.2
721.2 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 138.4
711.4 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 135.9
719.8 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 150.5
675.6 gram
STANDARD_DEVIATION 161.7
Infant fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) closest to enrollment49.6 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.6
44.8 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.3
45.9 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.1
57.8 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.7
53.5 Percent
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30
Infant gestational age25 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
25 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
24.9 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
24.6 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1
24.5 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2
Infant had early onset sepsis before or on enrollment
Missing
8 Participants2 Participants5 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Infant had early onset sepsis before or on enrollment
No
509 Participants143 Participants151 Participants98 Participants117 Participants
Infant had early onset sepsis before or on enrollment
Yes
10 Participants1 Participants6 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Infant had late onset sepsis before or on enrollment
Missing
3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Infant had late onset sepsis before or on enrollment
No
370 Participants109 Participants113 Participants72 Participants76 Participants
Infant had late onset sepsis before or on enrollment
Yes
154 Participants37 Participants47 Participants27 Participants43 Participants
Infant had patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) prior to enrollment
Missing
31 Participants10 Participants15 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Infant had patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) prior to enrollment
No
270 Participants77 Participants85 Participants52 Participants56 Participants
Infant had patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) prior to enrollment
Yes
226 Participants59 Participants62 Participants46 Participants59 Participants
Infant had severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 or 4)
Missing
16 Participants6 Participants5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Infant had severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 or 4)
No
431 Participants123 Participants134 Participants86 Participants88 Participants
Infant had severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (grade 3 or 4)
Yes
80 Participants17 Participants23 Participants13 Participants27 Participants
Infant lowest platelet count148.7 1000 platelets per microliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 87.3
155.7 1000 platelets per microliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 96
150.4 1000 platelets per microliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 80.9
156.2 1000 platelets per microliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 91.4
131.5 1000 platelets per microliter
STANDARD_DEVIATION 79.6
Infant mean blood pressure37.2 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
37.1 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
37.0 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.5
39.0 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
36.1 mmHG
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Infant on vasopressors at Enrollment
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Infant on vasopressors at Enrollment
No
334 Participants105 Participants103 Participants55 Participants71 Participants
Infant on vasopressors at Enrollment
Yes
192 Participants41 Participants59 Participants45 Participants47 Participants
Infant pH closest to enrollment7.2 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
7.2 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
7.2 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
7.2 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1
7.2 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Infant preoperative diagnosis (NEC or IP)
IP
310 Participants104 Participants109 Participants25 Participants72 Participants
Infant preoperative diagnosis (NEC or IP)
NEC
217 Participants42 Participants53 Participants75 Participants47 Participants
Infant received enteral feedings before or on enrollment
Missing
112 Participants33 Participants38 Participants16 Participants25 Participants
Infant received enteral feedings before or on enrollment
No
68 Participants23 Participants29 Participants5 Participants11 Participants
Infant received enteral feedings before or on enrollment
Yes
347 Participants90 Participants95 Participants79 Participants83 Participants
Infant received HFOV or HFJV at randomization
No
345 Participants114 Participants114 Participants51 Participants66 Participants
Infant received HFOV or HFJV at randomization
Yes
182 Participants32 Participants48 Participants49 Participants53 Participants
Infant received indomethacin before or on Randomization
Missing
19 Participants3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants7 Participants
Infant received indomethacin before or on Randomization
No
232 Participants69 Participants74 Participants51 Participants38 Participants
Infant received indomethacin before or on Randomization
Yes
276 Participants74 Participants82 Participants46 Participants74 Participants
Infant received postnatal steroids
No
384 Participants119 Participants115 Participants67 Participants83 Participants
Infant received postnatal steroids
Yes
143 Participants27 Participants47 Participants33 Participants36 Participants
Infant was small for gestational age
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Infant was small for gestational age
No
458 Participants131 Participants145 Participants84 Participants98 Participants
Infant was small for gestational age
Yes
68 Participants15 Participants16 Participants16 Participants21 Participants
Married, Customized
Missing
15 Participants1 Participants6 Participants4 Participants4 Participants
Married, Customized
No
288 Participants81 Participants95 Participants50 Participants62 Participants
Married, Customized
Yes
224 Participants64 Participants61 Participants46 Participants53 Participants
Maternal Age, Continuous27.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
27.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
26.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
26.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2
Maternal Education, Customized
College graduate
83 Participants18 Participants21 Participants19 Participants25 Participants
Maternal Education, Customized
High school graduate
124 Participants42 Participants38 Participants19 Participants25 Participants
Maternal Education, Customized
Less than high school
83 Participants21 Participants28 Participants22 Participants12 Participants
Maternal Education, Customized
Missing
156 Participants42 Participants51 Participants25 Participants38 Participants
Maternal Education, Customized
Some college
81 Participants23 Participants24 Participants15 Participants19 Participants
Maternal hispanic ethnicity
Missing
22 Participants1 Participants9 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Maternal hispanic ethnicity
No
397 Participants107 Participants120 Participants75 Participants95 Participants
Maternal hispanic ethnicity
Yes
108 Participants38 Participants33 Participants22 Participants15 Participants
Maternal hypertension
Missing
80 Participants26 Participants31 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
Maternal hypertension
No
332 Participants85 Participants98 Participants65 Participants84 Participants
Maternal hypertension
Yes
115 Participants35 Participants33 Participants25 Participants22 Participants
Mother had private insurance
Missing
4 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Mother had private insurance
No
347 Participants98 Participants113 Participants71 Participants65 Participants
Mother had private insurance
Yes
176 Participants48 Participants46 Participants29 Participants53 Participants
Mother received antenatal magnesium
Missing
245 Participants52 Participants68 Participants59 Participants66 Participants
Mother received antenatal magnesium
No
51 Participants17 Participants21 Participants6 Participants7 Participants
Mother received antenatal magnesium
Yes
231 Participants77 Participants73 Participants35 Participants46 Participants
Mother received antibiotics
Missing
98 Participants28 Participants37 Participants15 Participants18 Participants
Mother received antibiotics
No
119 Participants39 Participants42 Participants19 Participants19 Participants
Mother received antibiotics
Yes
310 Participants79 Participants83 Participants66 Participants82 Participants
Mother received prenatal care
Missing
15 Participants1 Participants3 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Mother received prenatal care
No
20 Participants3 Participants10 Participants2 Participants5 Participants
Mother received prenatal care
Yes
492 Participants142 Participants149 Participants92 Participants109 Participants
Mother received steroids
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Mother received steroids
No
82 Participants22 Participants31 Participants11 Participants18 Participants
Mother received steroids
Yes
444 Participants124 Participants130 Participants89 Participants101 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
202 Participants62 Participants67 Participants31 Participants42 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
12 Participants5 Participants5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
29 Participants6 Participants8 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
284 Participants73 Participants82 Participants59 Participants70 Participants
Rupture of membranes > 18 hours
Missing
64 Participants22 Participants29 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Rupture of membranes > 18 hours
No
375 Participants101 Participants108 Participants69 Participants97 Participants
Rupture of membranes > 18 hours
Yes
88 Participants23 Participants25 Participants24 Participants16 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
230 Participants66 Participants63 Participants48 Participants53 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Male
296 Participants80 Participants98 Participants52 Participants66 Participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Missing
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
41 / 14648 / 16248 / 10060 / 119
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1460 / 1620 / 1000 / 119
serious
Total, serious adverse events
41 / 14649 / 16249 / 10060 / 119

Outcome results

Primary

Death or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)

Death or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame: at 18-22 months corrected age

Population: Analysis of randomized trial data included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization. Analysis of preference cohort data included all eligible participants who were consented, enrolled, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)No44 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)Yes97 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)Yes108 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)No46 Participants
Preference Cohort: LaparotomyDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)No27 Participants
Preference Cohort: LaparotomyDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)Yes66 Participants
Preference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)No28 Participants
Preference Cohort: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)Yes87 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-operative diagnosis (Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP)) as covariates.95% CI: [0.87, 1.14]
Comparison: A frequentist analysis. Using Robust Poisson regression with log link and center as repeated measure, and effect coding, test for an interaction between treatment (Initial Laparotomy/Initial Peritoneal Drain) and pre-operative diagnosis (Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP)) as covariates. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-operative diagnosis as covariates.p-value: 0.03Robust Poisson regression
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Comparison: A frequentist analysis. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, and pre-operative diagnosis (Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP)) covariates.95% CI: [0.75, 1.26]
Secondary

Any Intestinal Stricture

Any intestinal stricture during any surgery

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intestinal StrictureNo139 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intestinal StrictureYes7 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intestinal StrictureNo153 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intestinal StrictureYes9 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.34, 2.2]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Any Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any intestinal stricture during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo101 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes3 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo38 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes4 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes3 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo103 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo50 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intestinal Stricture Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes6 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.35, 8.05]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.1, 2.44]
Secondary

Any Intra-abdominal Abscess

Any intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intra-abdominal AbscessNo141 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intra-abdominal AbscessYes5 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intra-abdominal AbscessNo158 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intra-abdominal AbscessYes4 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Any Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any intra-abdominal abscess during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo101 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes3 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo40 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes2 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes1 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo106 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo52 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intra-abdominal Abscess Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes3 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.82, 3.86]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.42, 3.2]
Secondary

Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery

Any intraoperative complications during any surgery

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intraoperative Complications During Any SurgeryNo116 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intraoperative Complications During Any SurgeryYes29 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intraoperative Complications During Any SurgeryNo141 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intraoperative Complications During Any SurgeryYes21 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [1.04, 2.36]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Any Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any intraoperative complications during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo83 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes21 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo33 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes8 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes7 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo95 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo46 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Intraoperative Complications During Any Surgery Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes14 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.58, 3.57]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [1.06, 2.5]
Secondary

Any Late Onset Sepsis

Any late onset sepsis after randomization

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Late Onset SepsisNo123 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Late Onset SepsisYes23 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Late Onset SepsisNo126 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Late Onset SepsisYes34 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.37, 1.42]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Any Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any late onset sepsis after randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo88 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes16 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo35 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes7 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes7 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo80 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo46 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Late Onset Sepsis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes27 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.62, 2.69]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.27, 1.32]
Secondary

Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis

Any Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated CholestasisNo110 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated CholestasisYes36 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated CholestasisNo116 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated CholestasisYes46 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.7, 1.15]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Any Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any Parenteral nutrition (PN)-associated cholestasis during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo79 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes25 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo31 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes11 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes19 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo82 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo34 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Parenteral Nutrition (PN)-Associated Cholestasis Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes27 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.41, 1.36]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.69, 1.42]
Secondary

Any Severe IVH

Any severe IVH ater randomization

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Severe IVHNo122 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Severe IVHYes18 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Severe IVHNo132 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Severe IVHYes25 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.44, 1.36]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Any Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any severe IVH ater randomization. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo84 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes17 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo38 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes1 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes3 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo84 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo48 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Severe IVH Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes22 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.04, 4.45]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.44, 1.49]
Secondary

Any Wound Dehiscence

Any wound dehiscence during any surgery

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Wound DehiscenceNo135 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Wound DehiscenceYes11 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Wound DehiscenceNo154 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Wound DehiscenceYes8 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.71, 3.5]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Any Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Any wound dehiscence during any surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo99 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes5 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo36 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes6 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes3 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo104 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo50 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainAny Wound Dehiscence Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes5 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.84, 7.55]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.38, 2.88]
Secondary

Death

Death by 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeathYes41 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeathNo105 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeathNo114 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeathYes48 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.69, 1.45]
Secondary

Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85No46 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85Yes95 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85No51 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85Yes100 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.89, 1.18]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or Bayley cognitive composite score less than 85 at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP). Higher values of the Bayley cognitive composite score is better than lower values. Normal values are greater than or equal to 85. A moderate value is in the 70-84 range, and a severe value is \<70.

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo32 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes67 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo14 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes28 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes41 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo42 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo9 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Bayley Cognitive Composite Score Less Than 85 Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes59 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.61, 1.06]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [1.01, 1.37]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Within pre-operative diagnosis, Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, baseline risk, and the treatment by Preoperative diagnosis were the covariates. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or Blindness

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or BlindnessNo101 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or BlindnessYes41 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or BlindnessNo105 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or BlindnessYes52 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.64, 1.31]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or blindness at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo76 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo25 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes17 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes24 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes30 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo83 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes22 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Blindness Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo22 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.46, 1.01]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.74, 2.01]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Within pre-operative diagnosis, Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, baseline risk, and the treatment by Preoperative diagnosis were the covariates. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or Hearing Loss

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Hearing LossYes43 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Hearing LossNo98 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Hearing LossYes51 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Hearing LossNo105 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.69, 1.36]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or hearing loss at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo73 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes26 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo25 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes17 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes28 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo81 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo24 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Hearing Loss Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes23 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.51, 1.04]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.82, 1.93]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Within pre-operative diagnosis, Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, baseline risk, and the treatment by Preoperative diagnosis were the covariates. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral PalsyNo84 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral PalsyYes58 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral PalsyNo78 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral PalsyYes79 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.66, 1.06]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age or moderate to severe cerebral palsy at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: up to the follow-up visit completed within the 18-22 months corrected age window

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo64 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo20 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes36 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes22 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes41 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo64 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes38 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or Moderate to Severe Cerebral Palsy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo14 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.47, 1.05]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.76, 1.19]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Within pre-operative diagnosis, Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, baseline risk, and the treatment by Preoperative diagnosis were the covariates. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death or NDI at 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: at 18-22 months corrected age

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo31 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes68 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo13 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes29 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes44 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo38 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo8 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath or NDI Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes64 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.64, 1.04]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.95, 1.31]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Within pre-operative diagnosis, Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, baseline risk, and the treatment by Preoperative diagnosis were the covariates. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Death Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Death within 18-22 months corrected age. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo80 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes24 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo25 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes17 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes27 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo88 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo26 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDeath Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes21 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.52, 1.13]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.79, 2.06]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Within pre-operative diagnosis, Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, baseline risk, and the treatment by Preoperative diagnosis were the covariates. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

Duration of mechanical ventilation while on study

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDuration of Mechanical Ventilation33.3 daysStandard Deviation 25.6
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDuration of Mechanical Ventilation38.9 daysStandard Deviation 26.7
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [-12.77, 0.75]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using a hierarchical linear regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Duration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Duration of mechanical ventilation while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDuration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP34.1 daysStandard Deviation 26.6
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDuration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC31 daysStandard Deviation 22.6
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDuration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP42.2 daysStandard Deviation 28
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDuration of Mechanical Ventilation Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC31.7 daysStandard Deviation 22.5
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [-14.1, 11.6]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [-15.84, 0.13]
Secondary

Duration of Parenteral Nutrition

Duration of parenteral nutrition while on study

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDuration of Parenteral Nutrition55.5 daysStandard Deviation 34.1
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDuration of Parenteral Nutrition64.1 daysStandard Deviation 36.4
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [-17.05, -0.46]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using a hierarchical linear regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Duration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Duration of parenteral nutrition while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDuration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP56.3 daysStandard Deviation 35.2
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyDuration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC53.5 daysStandard Deviation 31.3
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDuration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP63.6 daysStandard Deviation 33.7
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainDuration of Parenteral Nutrition Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC65.3 daysStandard Deviation 42
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [-27.15, 4.01]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [-17.46, 2.2]
Secondary

Final Bowel Length

Final bowel length after last surgery

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyFinal Bowel Length74.4 cmStandard Deviation 24.6
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainFinal Bowel Length68.7 cmStandard Deviation 35.7
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [-9.09, 22.27]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using a hierarchical linear regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Final Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Final bowel length after last surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyFinal Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP83.1 cmStandard Deviation 20.9
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyFinal Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC62.7 cmStandard Deviation 25
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainFinal Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP74.7 cmStandard Deviation 22.4
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainFinal Bowel Length Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC64 cmStandard Deviation 44.2
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [-18.84, 26.83]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [-13.29, 31.38]
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay

Length of hospital stay while on study

Time frame: from randomization up to 1 year following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyLength of Hospital Stay101.2 daysStandard Deviation 71.2
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainLength of Hospital Stay113.8 daysStandard Deviation 73.8
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [-30.54, 2.63]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using a hierarchical linear regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Length of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Length of hospital stay while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: from randomization up to 1 year following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyLength of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP109.6 daysStandard Deviation 67
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyLength of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC80.2 daysStandard Deviation 77.8
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainLength of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP121.3 daysStandard Deviation 64.7
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainLength of Hospital Stay Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC99.2 daysStandard Deviation 87.7
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [-48.41, 11.55]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [-31.96, 8.06]
Secondary

Subsequent Laparotomy

Subsequent laparotomy after initial surgery

Time frame: between initial surgery and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySubsequent LaparotomyNo110 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySubsequent LaparotomyYes35 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSubsequent LaparotomyNo81 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSubsequent LaparotomyYes81 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [0.35, 0.63]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Subsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Subsequent laparotomy after initial surgery. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo81 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes23 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo29 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes12 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes30 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo58 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo23 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSubsequent Laparotomy Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes51 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.31, 0.89]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.29, 0.66]
Secondary

Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)

NDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors)

Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, survived until follow-up visit at 18-22 months, and provided sufficient information to determine if NDI occurred.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)No44 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)Yes56 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)No46 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI)Yes60 Participants
Comparison: A frequentist analysis. Estimate based on model fit using only data from study survivors.95% CI: [0.78, 1.34]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis among study survivors. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Survival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

NDI at 18-22 months corrected age (among survivors). Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: by 18-22 months corrected age

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, survived until follow-up visit at 18-22 months, and provided sufficient information to determine if NDI occurred.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo31 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes44 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo13 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomySurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes12 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECYes17 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPNo38 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNECNo8 Participants
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainSurvival With Neurodevelopmental Impairment (NDI) Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIPYes43 Participants
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [0.42, 1.27]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a robust Poisson regression model, with log link and center as repeated measure. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy over drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [0.85, 1.45]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Within pre-operative diagnosis, Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using log-binomial regression. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. PROC MCMC with effect coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, baseline risk, and the treatment by Pre-operative diagnosis were the covariates. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Time to Full Feeds

Time to full feeds while on study

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyTime to Full Feeds46.9 daysStandard Deviation 45.8
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainTime to Full Feeds50.6 daysStandard Deviation 27.7
Comparison: A frequentist analysis.95% CI: [-13.02, 7.91]
Comparison: A Bayesian analysis. Initial Laparotomy and Initial Peritoneal Drain were compared using a hierarchical linear regression. The SAS procedure PROC MCMC with reference cell coding was used. Center (random effect), treatment, pre-operative diagnosis, and baseline risk of death or NDI were binary covariates. Pre-operative diagnosis levels were NEC and IP. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) characteristics: three chains, 10000 tunings, 10000 burn-ins, 1000000 samples, thinning=20.
Secondary

Time to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative Diagnosis

Time to full feeds while on study. Stratification variable is pre-operative diagnosis: Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) or Isolated Intestinal Perforation (IP).

Time frame: between randomization and Neonatal Research Network NRN infant status i.e., the first occurring of: discharge home, death, transfer, or 120 days following birth

Population: Analysis included all eligible participants who were consented, randomized, did not withdraw consent, and who provided outcome data after randomization.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyTime to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP52.4 daysStandard Deviation 50.4
Randomized Trial: Initial LaparotomyTime to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC29.6 daysStandard Deviation 18.9
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainTime to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisIP56.3 daysStandard Deviation 27.1
Randomized Trial: Initial Peritoneal DrainTime to Full Feeds Stratified by Pre-operative DiagnosisNEC32.3 daysStandard Deviation 21.3
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to NEC.95% CI: [-24.62, 18.36]
Comparison: This by treatment and by pre-operative diagnosis secondary analysis was completed by using a mixed linear regression model, using center as the random effect. Model included treatment, baseline risk of death or NDI, pre-op diagnosis (NEC/IP), and treatment by pre-op diagnosis as covariates. Reported results in this analysis restricted to model based treatment effect estimate (laparotomy minus drain) when pre-operative diagnosis is equal to IP.95% CI: [-14.42, 9.63]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026