Skip to content

Study of Recombinant Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein (rFIXFc) in Participants With Hemophilia B

B-LONG: An Open-Label, Multicenter Evaluation of the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Efficacy of Recombinant, Long-acting Coagulation Factor IX Fc Fusion Protein (rFIXFc) in the Prevention and Treatment of Bleeding in Previously Treated Subjects With Severe Hemophilia B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01027364
Enrollment
123
Registered
2009-12-07
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2012-07-31
Last updated
2020-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Severe Hemophilia B

Brief summary

The primary objectives of the study were: to evaluate the safety and tolerability of rFIXFc; to evaluate the efficacy of rFIXFc in all treatment arms; to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylaxis over on-demand (episodic) therapy by comparing the annualized number of bleeding episodes between participants receiving rFIXFc on each prevention (prophylaxis) regimen and participants receiving rFIXFc on an episodic regimen. The secondary objectives of the study were: to evaluate and assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter estimates of rFIXFc and rFIX (BeneFIX®) at baseline in the Sequential PK subgroup as well as rFIXFc at Week 26 (±1 week); to evaluate participants' response to treatment; to evaluate rFIXFc consumption.

Interventions

DRUGFactor IX (rFIXFc)
DRUGrFIX

Sponsors

Swedish Orphan Biovitrum
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and 12 years of age and older and weigh at least 40 kg * Diagnosed with hemophilia B (baseline Factor IX level less than or equal to 2%) * History of at least 100 exposure days to any Factor IX product * Platelet count ≥100,000 cells/μL

Exclusion criteria

* History of Factor IX inhibitors * Kidney or liver dysfunction * Diagnosed with another coagulation defect other than hemophilia B * Prior history of anaphylaxis associated with any Factor IX or intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin administration

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalitiesup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekClinical laboratory evaluations included hematology and blood chemistry. Table does not include laboratory tests evaluated during the surgical/rehabilitation period. Because the perioperative management period represents a unique clinical situation, safety data obtained during the surgical/rehabilitation period for participants in Arm 4 were included in listings and reviewed separately. Review of the listing was sufficient to assess this endpoint. ULN=upper limit of normal.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)up to 52 weeks + 30 days ± 1 weekAE=any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment, and could be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study product, whether related or not. TE=event present prior to receiving the first injection of BeneFIX or rFIXFc that subsequently worsened in severity or not present prior to receiving the first injection but subsequently appeared before last visit on study. Serious AE (SAE)=AE resulting in death, immediate risk of death, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital/anomaly/birth defect, or any other medically important event. Related=related, possibly related, and relationship missing. Data include AEs emergent during the surgical/rehabilitation period; AE data are included in each treatment arm only for the time each participant was enrolled in that arm.
Number of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation Periodup to 52 weeks + 30 days ± 1 weekAE=any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment, and could be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study product, whether related or not. TEAE=AE present prior to receiving the first injection of BeneFIX or rFIXFc that subsequently worsened in severity or was not present prior to receiving the first injection but subsequently appeared before last visit on study. Participants are counted once if they report multiple events in the same system organ class (SOC) or preferred term (PT). Coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 15.0 dictionary. The following SOCs are abbreviated in the table: Immune System (IS); Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural (IPP); Metabolism and Nutrition (MN); Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue (MCT); Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal (RTM); Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue (SST).
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation Periodup to 52 weeks + 30 days ± 1 weekSAE=AE resulting in death, immediate risk of death, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital/anomaly/birth defect, or any other medically important event. TESAE=SAE present prior to receiving the first injection of BeneFIX or rFIXFc that subsequently worsened in severity or was not present prior to receiving the first injection but subsequently appeared before last visit on study. Participants are counted once if they report multiple events in the same system organ class (SOC) or preferred term (PT). Coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 15.0 dictionary. The following SOC is abbreviated in the table: Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural (IPP).
Incidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor Developmentup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekAn inhibitor test result ≥0.6 Bethesda units (BU)/mL, identified and confirmed by re-testing of a second sample obtained within 2 to 4 weeks, was considered positive. Both tests were to be performed using the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda Assay by the central laboratory. The incidence rates along with the 95% CI were summarized for all titers for subjects with 50 or more exposure days (EDs) to rFIXFc and a valid inhibitor test after the 50th exposure. In addition, the incidence rates for all subjects regardless of their exposure days to rFIXFc were also summarized. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson exact method.
Annualized Bleeding Rateup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes / number of days in the respective period)\*365.25. In Arms 1 and 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode.
Comparison of Annualized Bleeding Ratesup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Estimated with a factor for arm, based on whole study duration for all participants. Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes / number of days in the respective period)\*365.25. In Arms 1 and 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding Episodeup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Please see the definition of the Efficacy Period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A follow-up injection administered \>72 hours after the most recent injection given to treat a bleed was considered a new bleed at the same location and was classified as type=Unknown (bleeding episodes of this type were not evaluable). The first bleed for each participant could not be included in this analysis since there was no previous bleed from which to measure time. The number of days from the last injection to treat a bleed to a new bleeding episode was analyzed across all evaluable bleeding episodes per participant.
Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episodeup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)In Arms 1 and 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. All injections given from the initial sign of a bleed until the last date/time within the bleed window are counted. The resolution of a bleed is defined as no sign of bleeding following injection for the bleed.
Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of Bleedup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. All injections given from the initial sign of a bleed until the last date/time within the bleed window were counted. The resolution of a bleed was defined as no sign of bleeding following injection for the bleed. Bleeding episodes that presented in multiple locations are included as a single event in the overall summary for the number of injections to resolve that bleeding episode but are included in summaries for each location.
Investigators'/Surgeons' Assessment of Participants' Response to rFIXFc for Major Surgeryup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekBased on the first assessment of hemostasis by the surgeon/investigator 24 hours or later post-surgery. Scaled responses: Excellent = 1, Good = 2, Fair = 3, Poor/none = 4.
Total Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of Bleedup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)For each bleeding episode at one location, the total dose is the sum of the doses (IU/kg) administered across all injections given to treat that bleeding episode. Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. Bleeding episodes that presented in multiple locations are included as a single event in the overall summary for dose administered to resolve that bleeding episode but are included in the individual summaries for each location.
Hemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Children (Haemo-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52Baseline, Week 26, Week 52The Haemo-QoL, a quality of life (QoL) assessment instrument for children and adolescents with hemophilia, was administered to participants from 13- to 17-years-old. This instrument assesses domains specific to living with hemophilia. For the Haemo-QoL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.
Hemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Baseline, Week 26The Haem-A-QoL consists of items pertaining to 10 domains specific to living with hemophilia and was administered to adult participants (\> 17 years). The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and treatment (all 7 domains, during the last month) and future, family planning, and outlook for the future (all 3 domains, recently). Changes from baseline for the Haem-A-QoL questionnaire are summarized by prestudy treatment regimen (pooled for Arms 1 and 2). Lower scores represent better QoL; therefore, a negative change from baseline represents improvement during the course of the study. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.
Haem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Baseline, Week 52The Haem-A-QoL consists of items pertaining to 10 domains specific to living with hemophilia and was administered to adult participants (\> 17 years). The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and treatment (all 7 domains, during the last month) and future, family planning, and outlook for the future (all 3 domains, recently). Changes from baseline for the Haem-A-QoL questionnaire are summarized by prestudy treatment regimen (pooled for Arms 1 and 2). Lower scores represent better QoL; therefore, a negative change from baseline represents improvement during the course of the study. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.
Number of Injections Required to Maintain Hemostasis During Major Surgeryup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekThe number of injections to maintain hemostasis during surgery includes all injections for surgery purposes including the loading dose to the end date/time of surgery.
Dose Per Injection and Total Dose Required to Maintain Hemostasis During Major Surgeryup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekMean dose per injection is the average dose for all injections (including loading dose) needed to maintain hemostasis during surgery. Total dose is the sum across all injections (including loading dose) needed to maintain hemostasis during surgery.
Estimated Total Blood Loss During Major Surgeryup to 52 weeks ± 1 week
Number of Transfusions Required Per Surgeryup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekNumber of blood component transfusions during a single surgery.
Participant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding Episodeup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekParticipant's assessment of the response to the first rFIXFc injection for each bleeding episode. Percentages were based on the number of bleeding episodes for which a response was provided for the first injection, using the following 4-point scale: excellent=abrupt pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after the initial injection; good=definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after an injection, but possibly requiring more than one injection after 24 to 48 hours for complete resolution; moderate=probable or slight beneficial effect within 8 hours after the initial injection and requiring more than one injection; no response=no improvement, or condition worsened, within approximately 8 hours after the initial injection.
Area Under the Curve (AUC) Per DoseSee Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.Dose normalized area under the drug concentration-time curve. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Half Life (t1/2) Alpha and t1/2 BetaSee Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.Time required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value. Alpha and beta half-life indicate distribution and elimination half-life in a two-compartment PK model. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Clearance (CL)See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.The measure of the efficiency of the body to remove the drug and the unit is the volume of the plasma or blood cleared of drug per unit time. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Mean Residence Time (MRT)See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.The average time for all the drug molecules to reside in the body. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Volume in Steady State (Vss)See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.Volume of distribution at steady state. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Incremental RecoverySee Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.IU/dL rise in plasma per IU/kg drug administered. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Time to 1% and 3% FIX ActivitySee Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.Time to reach 1 or 3 IU/dL (%) after a single dose. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signsup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekNumber of participants with clinically relevant abnormalities or relevant changes from baseline in temperature, pulse (beats per minute \[bpm\]), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are presented. Baseline (BL) is defined as the last non-missing evaluable assessment taken prior and closest to the first rFIXFc dose. Because the perioperative management period represents a unique clinical situation, safety data obtained during the surgical/rehabilitation period for participants in Arm 4 were included in listings and reviewed separately. Review of the listing was sufficient to assess this endpoint.
Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Pre-dose, 1 hour post-dose, 6 hours post-dose, and 24 hours post-dose at baseline (120 hours before Day 1, for BeneFIX), Day 1, Week 26, and Week 52 (for rFIXFc)Maximum value post-dosing is defined as maximum value over the 1-, 6-, and 24-hour evaluations.
Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexPre-dose, 1 hour post-dose, 6 hours post-dose, and 24 hours post-dose at baseline (120 hours before Day 1, for BeneFIX), Day 1, Week 26, and Week 52 (for rFIXFc)Maximum value post-dosing is defined as maximum value over the 1-, 6-, and 24-hour evaluations.
Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerPre-dose, 1 hour post-dose, 6 hours post-dose, and 24 hours post-dose at baseline (120 hours before Day 1, for BeneFIX), Day 1, Week 26, and Week 52 (for rFIXFc)Maximum value post-dosing is defined as maximum value over the 1-, 6-, and 24-hour evaluations.
Maximum Concentration (Cmax)See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.Maximum concentration during a dosing interval. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.
Physicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcup to 52 weeks ± 1 weekPhysicians assessed each participant's response to rFIXFc using a 4-point scale: excellent=bleeding episodes responded to less than or equal to the usual number of injections or less than or equal to the usual dose of rFIXFc, or the rate of breakthrough bleeding during prophylaxis was less than or equal to that usually observed; effective=most bleeding episodes responded to the same number of injections and dose, but some required more injections or higher doses, or there was a minor increase in the rate of breakthrough bleeding; partially effective=bleeding episodes most often required more injections and/or higher doses than expected, or adequate breakthrough bleeding prevention during prophylaxis required more frequent injections and/or higher doses; ineffective=routine failure to control hemostasis or hemostatic control required additional agents. Percentage of the total count of scale responses for all participants is presented. Multiple responses per participant are counted.
Annualized rFIXFc Consumption Per Participantup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Consumption is calculated for the efficacy period (EP). In Arms 1 and 2, the EP started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. Overall units (IU/kg) of annualized rFIXFc consumption = \[Total rFIXFc IU/kg received during the EP / number of days in EP\]\*365.25.
Average Weekly Dose For the Fixed Weekly Interval Prophylaxis Armup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Average weekly dose = (total IU/kg of all eligible prophylactic doses in the included intervals / total number of days in the included intervals)\*7. Eligible dose = the first of the 2 doses defining the interval. Participants could have multiple prophylactic dose changes. Prophylactic dosing = from first prophylactic injection received for rFIXFc to the last prophylactic injection on study. Intervals between 2 prophylactic doses separated by a bleed/surgery/PK visit were not included. In Arm 1, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries).
Average Dosing Interval For the Individualized Interval Prophylaxis Armup to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Average dosing interval = sum of days in the included dosing intervals divided by the number of included intervals. Participants could have multiple prophylactic dose interval changes. Prophylactic dosing = from first prophylactic injection received for rFIXFc to the last prophylactic injection on study. Intervals between 2 prophylactic doses separated by a bleed/surgery/PK visit were not included. In Arm 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). The EP was interrupted for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries).
Annualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes/number of days in efficacy period)\*365.25. Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. Any bleeding at a different location was a separate bleeding episode regardless of time from the last injection.
Annualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes/number of days in efficacy period)\*365.25. Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. Any bleeding at a different location was a separate bleeding episode regardless of time from the last injection.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1: Weekly Prophylaxis
50 IU/kg rFIXFc via intravenous (IV) injection once every 7 days initially, then at a dose indicated by the participant's baseline pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment that ensured a target trough of 1% to 3% above baseline or higher, as clinically indicated. Adjustments to the initial weekly dose of rFIXFc (50 IU/kg) were to be made based on baseline PK assessments, occurrence of spontaneous bleeding episodes, and the trough levels, which were to be monitored at Weeks 4, 16, 26, and 39. Prior to the first dose of rFIXFc, participants in the Sequential PK subgroup were to receive a single dose of 50 IU/kg BeneFIX administered IV in the clinic, followed by PK sampling. A single dose of 50 IU/kg rFIXFc was administered following a 120-hour washout from BeneFIX, followed by PK sampling for a baseline PK profiling. At Week 26 (±1 week) subjects were to receive a single dose of 50 IU/kg rFIXFc for repeat PK profiling.
63
Arm 2: Individualized Interval Prophylaxis
100 IU/kg rFIXFc via IV injection once every 10 days initially, then at an interval derived from the baseline PK assessment that ensured a target trough of 1% to 3% above baseline or higher, as clinically indicated. Adjustments to the initial 10-day interval were to be made based on baseline PK assessments and trough levels, which were monitored at Weeks 4, 16, 26, and 39.
29
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)
20 to 100 IU/kg rFIXFc via IV injection, or the dose indicated by the participant's baseline PK to target a plasma level of 20% to 100%, as needed for the treatment of mild to severe bleeding episodes
27
Arm 4: Perioperative Management
The surgical period and dosing were dependent on the type of surgery the participant underwent. Participants who started the study in one of the other treatment arms prior to surgery returned to the original treatment arm. Participants who joined the study in the Surgery arm were assigned to one of the other treatment arms following post-operative rehabilitation.
4
Total123

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event1010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1000
Overall StudyProtocol Violation1001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisArm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisArm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Arm 4: Perioperative ManagementTotal
Age, Continuous28.0 years33.0 years36.0 years40.5 years30.0 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
63 Participants29 Participants27 Participants4 Participants123 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 6317 / 2911 / 27
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 634 / 294 / 27

Outcome results

Primary

Annualized Bleeding Rate

Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes / number of days in the respective period)\*365.25. In Arms 1 and 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate2.95 episodes per participant per year
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate1.38 episodes per participant per year
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate17.69 episodes per participant per year
Primary

Comparison of Annualized Bleeding Rates

Estimated with a factor for arm, based on whole study duration for all participants. Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes / number of days in the respective period)\*365.25. In Arms 1 and 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisComparison of Annualized Bleeding Rates3.12 episodes per participant per year
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisComparison of Annualized Bleeding Rates2.40 episodes per participant per year
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Comparison of Annualized Bleeding Rates18.67 episodes per participant per year
Comparison: The null hypothesis for the primary endpoint is no difference between any prevention regimen and the on-demand regimen. The sample size of this study was mainly based on clinical rather than statistical considerations. However it was projected to have \> 95% power at the 2-sided 0.05 level of significance, based upon this hypothesis test.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.11, 0.24]negative binomial model
Comparison: The null hypothesis for the primary endpoint is no difference between any prevention regimen and the on-demand regimen. The sample size of this study was mainly based on clinical rather than statistical considerations.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.08, 0.2]negative binomial model
Primary

Incidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor Development

An inhibitor test result ≥0.6 Bethesda units (BU)/mL, identified and confirmed by re-testing of a second sample obtained within 2 to 4 weeks, was considered positive. Both tests were to be performed using the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda Assay by the central laboratory. The incidence rates along with the 95% CI were summarized for all titers for subjects with 50 or more exposure days (EDs) to rFIXFc and a valid inhibitor test after the 50th exposure. In addition, the incidence rates for all subjects regardless of their exposure days to rFIXFc were also summarized. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson exact method.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Safety Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of of rFIXFc and who had a valid inhibitor test; n=number of participants with given number of exposure days who had a valid inhibitor test.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisIncidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentAll participants (n=63, 27, 27, 4, 121)0 percentage of participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisIncidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentParticipants with>=50 EDs to rFIXFc(n=52,2,0,1,55)0 percentage of participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisIncidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentParticipants with>=50 EDs to rFIXFc(n=52,2,0,1,55)0 percentage of participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisIncidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentAll participants (n=63, 27, 27, 4, 121)0 percentage of participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Incidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentAll participants (n=63, 27, 27, 4, 121)0 percentage of participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Incidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentParticipants with>=50 EDs to rFIXFc(n=52,2,0,1,55)0 percentage of participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Incidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentParticipants with>=50 EDs to rFIXFc(n=52,2,0,1,55)0 percentage of participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Incidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentAll participants (n=63, 27, 27, 4, 121)0 percentage of participants
Arm 4: Perioperative ManagementIncidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentParticipants with>=50 EDs to rFIXFc(n=52,2,0,1,55)0 percentage of participants
Arm 4: Perioperative ManagementIncidence Rate of FIX Inhibitor DevelopmentAll participants (n=63, 27, 27, 4, 121)0 percentage of participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation Period

AE=any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment, and could be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study product, whether related or not. TEAE=AE present prior to receiving the first injection of BeneFIX or rFIXFc that subsequently worsened in severity or was not present prior to receiving the first injection but subsequently appeared before last visit on study. Participants are counted once if they report multiple events in the same system organ class (SOC) or preferred term (PT). Coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 15.0 dictionary. The following SOCs are abbreviated in the table: Immune System (IS); Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural (IPP); Metabolism and Nutrition (MN); Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue (MCT); Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal (RTM); Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue (SST).

Time frame: up to 52 weeks + 30 days ± 1 week

Population: Safety Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of BeneFIX or rFIXFc. A participant may have been in more than one group (i.e., participants in Arm 4 who were also in Arm 1, 2, or 3; please see Participant Flow for details).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Blood/Lymphatic System Disorders; PT: Anaemia2 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Ear and Labyrinth Disorders; PT: Vertigo1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Gastrointestinal Disorders; PT: Constipation1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Gastrointestinal Disorders; PT: Nausea1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Gastrointestinal Disorders; PT: Vomiting1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: General Disorders; PT: Asthenia1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: General Disorders; PT: Infusion Site Pain1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: IS Disorders; PT: Drug Hypersensitivity1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Infections/Infestations; PT: Cellulitis1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: IPP Complications; PT: Incision Site Pain1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: IPP Complications; PT: Procedural Pain1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: IPP Complications; PT: Wound Complication1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Investigations; PT: Weight Increased1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: MN Disorders; PT: Decreased Appetite1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: MCT Disorders; PT: Muscle Spasms1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Nervous System Disorders; PT: Dizziness2 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Nervous System Disorders; PT: Headache1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Nervous System (NS) Disorders; PT: Neuralgia1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: NS Disorders; PT: Neuropathy Peripheral1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Psychiatric Disorders; PT: Anxiety1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Psychiatric Disorders; PT: Insomnia1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: RTM Disorders; PT: Dyspnoea1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: RTM Disorders; Oropharyngeal Pain1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: SST Disorders; PT: Hyperhidrosis1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Vascular Disorders; PT: Hypertension1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Non-serious Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Vascular Disorders; PT: Hypotension1 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities

Clinical laboratory evaluations included hematology and blood chemistry. Table does not include laboratory tests evaluated during the surgical/rehabilitation period. Because the perioperative management period represents a unique clinical situation, safety data obtained during the surgical/rehabilitation period for participants in Arm 4 were included in listings and reviewed separately. Review of the listing was sufficient to assess this endpoint. ULN=upper limit of normal.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Safety Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of BeneFIX or rFIXFc; n=the number of participants with at least one post-baseline value. For this study, a table was not generated for potentially clinically significant laboratory abnormalities for participants in the perioperative management/surgical arm (Arm 4).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin >=190 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Protein <=45 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium >=156 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit <=37%; n=62, 28, 274 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells <3.0*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 272 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium <=126 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit >=60%; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils >13.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCreatinine >=176.8 µmol/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets <=75*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes <0.8*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 261 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen >=10.7 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets >=700*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose <=2.22 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Bilirubin >=34.2 µmol/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesMonocytes >2.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 272 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells >=16*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate >=1.71 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesEosinophils >1.6*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin <=25 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate <=0.55 mmol/L n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesBasophils >1.6*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes >12*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride >=118 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesRed Blood Cells <=3.5*10^12/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Protein >=100 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride <=90 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesRed Blood Cells >=6.4*10^12/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose >=9.71 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 274 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium >=6 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin <=115 g/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils <1.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 262 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium <=3 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose <=2.22 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells <3.0*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells >=16*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes <0.8*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 262 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes >12*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils <1.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils >13.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesMonocytes >2.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesEosinophils >1.6*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesBasophils >1.6*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesRed Blood Cells <=3.5*10^12/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesRed Blood Cells >=6.4*10^12/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin <=115 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin >=190 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit <=37%; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit >=60%; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets <=75*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets >=700*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Bilirubin >=34.2 µmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen >=10.7 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCreatinine >=176.8 µmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium <=126 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium >=156 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium <=3 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium >=6 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride <=90 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride >=118 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate <=0.55 mmol/L n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate >=1.71 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose >=9.71 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin <=25 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Protein <=45 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Protein >=100 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin >=190 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Protein <=45 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium >=156 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHemoglobin <=115 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose >=9.71 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium <=3 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesRed Blood Cells >=6.4*10^12/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes <0.8*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 263 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPotassium >=6 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesRed Blood Cells <=3.5*10^12/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells <3.0*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 272 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride <=90 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesBasophils >1.6*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlbumin <=25 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesChloride >=118 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesEosinophils >1.6*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesWhite Blood Cells >=16*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate <=0.55 mmol/L n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesMonocytes >2.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Protein >=100 g/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAspartate Aminotransferase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlanine Aminotransferase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 272 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPhosphate >=1.71 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesAlkaline Phosphatase >=3*ULN; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets >=700*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils >13.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesTotal Bilirubin >=34.2 µmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesPlatelets <=75*10^9/L; n=62, 28, 271 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesNeutrophils <1.5*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 261 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesBlood Urea Nitrogen >=10.7 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit >=60%; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesGlucose <=2.22 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesCreatinine >=176.8 µmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesHematocrit <=37%; n=62, 28, 272 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesLymphocytes >12*10^9/L; n=60, 28, 260 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Potentially Clinically Significant Laboratory AbnormalitiesSodium <=126 mmol/L; n=62, 28, 270 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

AE=any untoward medical occurrence that did not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment, and could be any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study product, whether related or not. TE=event present prior to receiving the first injection of BeneFIX or rFIXFc that subsequently worsened in severity or not present prior to receiving the first injection but subsequently appeared before last visit on study. Serious AE (SAE)=AE resulting in death, immediate risk of death, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital/anomaly/birth defect, or any other medically important event. Related=related, possibly related, and relationship missing. Data include AEs emergent during the surgical/rehabilitation period; AE data are included in each treatment arm only for the time each participant was enrolled in that arm.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks + 30 days ± 1 week

Population: Safety Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of BeneFIX or rFIXFc. A participant may have been in more than one group (i.e., participants in Arm 4 who were also in Arm 1, 2, or 3; please see Participant Flow for details). Participants with at least one TESAE reported are included in the TEAE count.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TEAE2 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TEAE0 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TESAE0 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TESAE0 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TEAE45 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TESAE0 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TEAE5 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TESAE5 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TESAE1 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TEAE4 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TESAE4 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TEAE23 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TEAE20 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TEAE1 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TESAE0 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TESAE4 participants
Arm 4: Perioperative ManagementNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TESAE0 participants
Arm 4: Perioperative ManagementNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TESAE3 participants
Arm 4: Perioperative ManagementNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 Related TEAE0 participants
Arm 4: Perioperative ManagementNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)>=1 TEAE10 participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation Period

SAE=AE resulting in death, immediate risk of death, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or a congenital/anomaly/birth defect, or any other medically important event. TESAE=SAE present prior to receiving the first injection of BeneFIX or rFIXFc that subsequently worsened in severity or was not present prior to receiving the first injection but subsequently appeared before last visit on study. Participants are counted once if they report multiple events in the same system organ class (SOC) or preferred term (PT). Coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 15.0 dictionary. The following SOC is abbreviated in the table: Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural (IPP).

Time frame: up to 52 weeks + 30 days ± 1 week

Population: Safety Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of BeneFIX or rFIXFc. A participant may have been in more than one group (i.e., participants in Arm 4 who were also in Arm 1, 2, or 3; please see Participant Flow for details).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Cardiac Disorders; PT: Tachycardia1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Infections/Infestations; PT: Bacterial Sepsis1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Infections/Infestations; PT: Pilondial Cyst1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: Infections/Infestations; PT: Tooth Abscess1 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) During the Surgical / Rehabilitation PeriodSOC: IPP Complications; PT: Limb Crushing Injury1 participants
Secondary

Annualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)

Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes/number of days in efficacy period)\*365.25. Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. Any bleeding at a different location was a separate bleeding episode regardless of time from the last injection.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Joint1.11 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 2.678
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Muscle0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 1.273
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Internal0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.562
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Skin/Mucosa0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.668
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Skin/Mucosa0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.472
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Joint0.36 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 2.498
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Internal0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.448
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Muscle0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.902
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Skin/Mucosa0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 2.968
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Muscle3.96 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 3.733
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Internal0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.893
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate by Location of Bleed (Joint, Muscle, Internal, Skin/Mucosa)Joint13.58 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 10.418
Secondary

Annualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)

Annualized bleeding episodes = (number of bleeding episodes/number of days in efficacy period)\*365.25. Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. Any bleeding at a different location was a separate bleeding episode regardless of time from the last injection.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc with evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Traumatic0.99 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 1.539
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Spontaneous1.04 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 2.154
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Unknown0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.603
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Traumatic0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 2.065
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Spontaneous0.88 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 1.78
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Unknown0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 0.705
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Spontaneous11.78 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 11.096
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Unknown0.00 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 1.043
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized Bleeding Rate by Type of Bleed (Spontaneous and Traumatic)Traumatic2.21 episodes per participant per yearInter-Quartile Range 7.214
Secondary

Annualized rFIXFc Consumption Per Participant

Consumption is calculated for the efficacy period (EP). In Arms 1 and 2, the EP started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. Overall units (IU/kg) of annualized rFIXFc consumption = \[Total rFIXFc IU/kg received during the EP / number of days in EP\]\*365.25.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc with evaluable data in the efficacy period. 'Overall' n=all participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data in the efficacy period; 'Last 3 Months on Study' n=all participants in the Full Analysis Set with evaluable data and \>=6 months on study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized rFIXFc Consumption Per ParticipantOverall (n=61, 26, 27)2686.94 IU/kg rFIXFc per participant per yearStandard Deviation 825.969
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAnnualized rFIXFc Consumption Per ParticipantLast 3 months on study (n=58, 26, 27)2467.32 IU/kg rFIXFc per participant per yearStandard Deviation 978.529
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized rFIXFc Consumption Per ParticipantOverall (n=61, 26, 27)3371.92 IU/kg rFIXFc per participant per yearStandard Deviation 649.69
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisAnnualized rFIXFc Consumption Per ParticipantLast 3 months on study (n=58, 26, 27)3497.78 IU/kg rFIXFc per participant per yearStandard Deviation 957.377
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized rFIXFc Consumption Per ParticipantOverall (n=61, 26, 27)936.70 IU/kg rFIXFc per participant per yearStandard Deviation 481.764
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Annualized rFIXFc Consumption Per ParticipantLast 3 months on study (n=58, 26, 27)957.73 IU/kg rFIXFc per participant per yearStandard Deviation 699.64
Secondary

Area Under the Curve (AUC) Per Dose

Dose normalized area under the drug concentration-time curve. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisArea Under the Curve (AUC) Per DoserFIXFc Baseline31.32 IU*h/dL per IU/kg
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisArea Under the Curve (AUC) Per DoseBeneFIX15.77 IU*h/dL per IU/kg
Secondary

Average Dosing Interval For the Individualized Interval Prophylaxis Arm

Average dosing interval = sum of days in the included dosing intervals divided by the number of included intervals. Participants could have multiple prophylactic dose interval changes. Prophylactic dosing = from first prophylactic injection received for rFIXFc to the last prophylactic injection on study. Intervals between 2 prophylactic doses separated by a bleed/surgery/PK visit were not included. In Arm 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). The EP was interrupted for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries).

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants in Arm 2 who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc with \>=6 months on study and evaluable data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAverage Dosing Interval For the Individualized Interval Prophylaxis ArmOverall12.53 daysInter-Quartile Range 2.018
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAverage Dosing Interval For the Individualized Interval Prophylaxis ArmLast 3 months on study14.00 daysInter-Quartile Range 2.864
Secondary

Average Weekly Dose For the Fixed Weekly Interval Prophylaxis Arm

Average weekly dose = (total IU/kg of all eligible prophylactic doses in the included intervals / total number of days in the included intervals)\*7. Eligible dose = the first of the 2 doses defining the interval. Participants could have multiple prophylactic dose changes. Prophylactic dosing = from first prophylactic injection received for rFIXFc to the last prophylactic injection on study. Intervals between 2 prophylactic doses separated by a bleed/surgery/PK visit were not included. In Arm 1, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries).

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants in Arm 1 who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc with evaluable data. 'Overall' n=participants with evaluable data; 'Last 3 Months on Study' n=participants with evaluable data and \>=6 months on study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAverage Weekly Dose For the Fixed Weekly Interval Prophylaxis ArmOverall (n=61)46.26 IU/kgStandard Deviation 11.304
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisAverage Weekly Dose For the Fixed Weekly Interval Prophylaxis ArmLast 3 months on study (n=58)43.10 IU/kgStandard Deviation 15.395
Secondary

Clearance (CL)

The measure of the efficiency of the body to remove the drug and the unit is the volume of the plasma or blood cleared of drug per unit time. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisClearance (CL)rFIXFc Baseline3.193 mL/h/kg
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisClearance (CL)BeneFIX6.340 mL/h/kg
Secondary

Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimer

Maximum value post-dosing is defined as maximum value over the 1-, 6-, and 24-hour evaluations.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 1 hour post-dose, 6 hours post-dose, and 24 hours post-dose at baseline (120 hours before Day 1, for BeneFIX), Day 1, Week 26, and Week 52 (for rFIXFc)

Population: The Sequential PK subgroup consisted of all participants who had evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc, and/or evaluable PK profiles for both baseline and repeat rFIXFc at Week 26 (±1 week). n=participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerPre-dosing Value (n=23, 22, 20, 19)153.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 119.37
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)35.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 101.8
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)47.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 259.7
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 18, 0)20.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 85.93
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 22, 19, 0)95.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 266.98
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 22, 19, 0)100.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 494.7
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)-39.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 134.42
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)89.6 ng/mLStandard Deviation 509.24
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerPre-dosing Value (n=23, 22, 20, 19)176.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 165.48
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 18, 0)-31.0 ng/mLStandard Deviation 138.22
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerPre-dosing Value (n=23, 22, 20, 19)120.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 73.38
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)-5.9 ng/mLStandard Deviation 28.18
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)-9.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 16.84
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 22, 19, 0)4.8 ng/mLStandard Deviation 16.1
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 18, 0)-8.2 ng/mLStandard Deviation 26.06
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 18, 0)NA ng/mL
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)NA ng/mL
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerPre-dosing Value (n=23, 22, 20, 19)134.7 ng/mLStandard Deviation 151.36
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 21, 20, 0)NA ng/mL
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in D-dimerMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 22, 19, 0)NA ng/mL
Secondary

Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)

Maximum value post-dosing is defined as maximum value over the 1-, 6-, and 24-hour evaluations.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 1 hour post-dose, 6 hours post-dose, and 24 hours post-dose at baseline (120 hours before Day 1, for BeneFIX), Day 1, Week 26, and Week 52 (for rFIXFc)

Population: The Sequential PK subgroup consisted of all participants who had evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc, and/or evaluable PK profiles for both baseline and repeat rFIXFc at Week 26 (±1 week). n=participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)-3.7 pmol/LStandard Deviation 34.39
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)73.4 pmol/LStandard Deviation 171.68
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Maximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)83.0 pmol/LStandard Deviation 168.71
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)7.8 pmol/LStandard Deviation 55.45
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Pre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)134.1 pmol/LStandard Deviation 64.93
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)8.3 pmol/LStandard Deviation 38.66
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)9.8 pmol/LStandard Deviation 45.62
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Maximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)30.9 pmol/LStandard Deviation 48.52
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)8.6 pmol/LStandard Deviation 39.14
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Pre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)130.0 pmol/LStandard Deviation 57.55
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)-4.4 pmol/LStandard Deviation 45.95
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Pre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)131.6 pmol/LStandard Deviation 42.43
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)1.3 pmol/LStandard Deviation 51.64
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)1.7 pmol/LStandard Deviation 27.14
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Maximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)20.4 pmol/LStandard Deviation 49.38
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)NA pmol/L
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)NA pmol/L
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Pre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)176.7 pmol/LStandard Deviation 112.36
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Change at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)NA pmol/L
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Prothrombin Split Fragments 1+ 2 (F 1+2)Maximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)NA pmol/L
Secondary

Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) Complex

Maximum value post-dosing is defined as maximum value over the 1-, 6-, and 24-hour evaluations.

Time frame: Pre-dose, 1 hour post-dose, 6 hours post-dose, and 24 hours post-dose at baseline (120 hours before Day 1, for BeneFIX), Day 1, Week 26, and Week 52 (for rFIXFc)

Population: The Sequential PK subgroup consisted of all participants who had evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc, and/or evaluable PK profiles for both baseline and repeat rFIXFc at Week 26 (±1 week). n=participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)-0.58 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.968
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)6.67 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.491
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)7.42 ng/mLStandard Deviation 15.416
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)1.91 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.303
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexPre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)2.87 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.891
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)1.07 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.686
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)0.81 ng/mLStandard Deviation 6.095
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)3.63 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)1.05 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.019
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisCoagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexPre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)2.87 ng/mLStandard Deviation 2.23
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)-0.09 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5.763
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexPre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)3.11 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.075
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)0.11 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5.813
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)-1.10 ng/mLStandard Deviation 4.308
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)0.32 ng/mLStandard Deviation 5.969
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 24 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 18, 0)NA ng/mL
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 1 Hour Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)NA ng/mL
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexPre-dosing Value (n=23, 23, 20, 19)4.28 ng/mLStandard Deviation 7.588
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexChange at 6 Hours Post-dosing (n=23, 22, 20, 0)NA ng/mL
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Coagulation Parameter: Change From Pre-dose Values in Thrombin-antithrombin (TAT) ComplexMaximum Post-dosing Change (n=23, 23, 19, 0)NA ng/mL
Secondary

Dose Per Injection and Total Dose Required to Maintain Hemostasis During Major Surgery

Mean dose per injection is the average dose for all injections (including loading dose) needed to maintain hemostasis during surgery. Total dose is the sum across all injections (including loading dose) needed to maintain hemostasis during surgery.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Participants in Arm 4 who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisDose Per Injection and Total Dose Required to Maintain Hemostasis During Major SurgeryDose per Injection90.91 IU/kgFull Range 30.869
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisDose Per Injection and Total Dose Required to Maintain Hemostasis During Major SurgeryTotal Dose102.59 IU/kgFull Range 60.93
Secondary

Estimated Total Blood Loss During Major Surgery

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Participants in Arm 4 who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisEstimated Total Blood Loss During Major Surgery65.50 mLFull Range 95.161
Secondary

Haem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52

The Haem-A-QoL consists of items pertaining to 10 domains specific to living with hemophilia and was administered to adult participants (\> 17 years). The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and treatment (all 7 domains, during the last month) and future, family planning, and outlook for the future (all 3 domains, recently). Changes from baseline for the Haem-A-QoL questionnaire are summarized by prestudy treatment regimen (pooled for Arms 1 and 2). Lower scores represent better QoL; therefore, a negative change from baseline represents improvement during the course of the study. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 52

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants in the 2 prophylaxis arms (Arms 1 and 2) over 17 years of age who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc and had an assessment. n=participants who had specified assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Total Score (n=25, 19)-4.35 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Physical Health (n=26, 23)-10.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Feeling (n=26, 23)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52View of Yourself (n=26, 24)-7.50 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Sports and Leisure (n=20, 16)-0.62 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Work and School (n=22, 20)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Dealing with Hemophilia (n=27, 24)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Treatment (n=27, 24)-6.25 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Future (n=26, 23)-5.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Family Planning (n=14, 11)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Treatment (n=27, 24)-4.69 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Total Score (n=25, 19)-6.06 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Work and School (n=22, 20)-3.13 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Physical Health (n=26, 23)-15.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Family Planning (n=14, 11)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Feeling (n=26, 23)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Dealing with Hemophilia (n=27, 24)4.17 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52View of Yourself (n=26, 24)-5.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Future (n=26, 23)-5.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHaem-A-QoL Questionnaire for Adults: Change From Baseline to Week 52Sports and Leisure (n=20, 16)-17.50 units on a scale
Secondary

Half Life (t1/2) Alpha and t1/2 Beta

Time required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value. Alpha and beta half-life indicate distribution and elimination half-life in a two-compartment PK model. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHalf Life (t1/2) Alpha and t1/2 BetarFIXFc Baseline: t1/2 alpha5.0279 hours
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHalf Life (t1/2) Alpha and t1/2 BetaBeneFIX: t1/2 alpha2.4113 hours
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHalf Life (t1/2) Alpha and t1/2 BetarFIXFc Baseline: t1/2 beta82.12 hours
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHalf Life (t1/2) Alpha and t1/2 BetaBeneFIX: t1/2 beta33.77 hours
Secondary

Hemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26

The Haem-A-QoL consists of items pertaining to 10 domains specific to living with hemophilia and was administered to adult participants (\> 17 years). The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, feeling, view of yourself, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and treatment (all 7 domains, during the last month) and future, family planning, and outlook for the future (all 3 domains, recently). Changes from baseline for the Haem-A-QoL questionnaire are summarized by prestudy treatment regimen (pooled for Arms 1 and 2). Lower scores represent better QoL; therefore, a negative change from baseline represents improvement during the course of the study. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants in the 2 prophylaxis arms (Arms 1 and 2) over 17 years of age who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc and had an assessment. n=participants who had specified assessment at given timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26View of Yourself (n=27, 30)-5.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Dealing with Hemophilia (n=27, 31)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Feeling (n=27, 31)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Treatment (n=27, 31)-6.25 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Sports and Leisure (n=22, 21)-7.50 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Future (n=26, 30)-5.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Physical Health (n=27, 31)-10.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Family Planning (n=15, 13)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Work and School (n=22, 25)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Partnership and Sexuality (n=26, 30)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Total Score (n=27, 26)-6.82 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Partnership and Sexuality (n=26, 30)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Total Score (n=27, 26)-6.25 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Physical Health (n=27, 31)-15.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Feeling (n=27, 31)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26View of Yourself (n=27, 30)-5.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Sports and Leisure (n=22, 21)-20.0 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Work and School (n=22, 25)-6.25 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Dealing with Hemophilia (n=27, 31)-8.33 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Treatment (n=27, 31)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Future (n=26, 30)0.00 units on a scale
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisHemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Adults (Haem-A-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26Family Planning (n=15, 13)0.00 units on a scale
Secondary

Hemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Index for Children (Haemo-QoL) Questionnaire: Change From Baseline to Week 26 and Week 52

The Haemo-QoL, a quality of life (QoL) assessment instrument for children and adolescents with hemophilia, was administered to participants from 13- to 17-years-old. This instrument assesses domains specific to living with hemophilia. For the Haemo-QoL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 26, Week 52

Population: No summary analysis was done for this outcome measure due to the small number of participants completing the questionnaire.

Secondary

Incremental Recovery

IU/dL rise in plasma per IU/kg drug administered. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisIncremental RecoveryrFIXFc Baseline0.9211 IU/dL per IU/kg
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisIncremental RecoveryBeneFIX0.9451 IU/dL per IU/kg
Secondary

Investigators'/Surgeons' Assessment of Participants' Response to rFIXFc for Major Surgery

Based on the first assessment of hemostasis by the surgeon/investigator 24 hours or later post-surgery. Scaled responses: Excellent = 1, Good = 2, Fair = 3, Poor/none = 4.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Participants in Arm 4 who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisInvestigators'/Surgeons' Assessment of Participants' Response to rFIXFc for Major SurgeryExcellent or Good14 responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisInvestigators'/Surgeons' Assessment of Participants' Response to rFIXFc for Major SurgeryExcellent13 responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisInvestigators'/Surgeons' Assessment of Participants' Response to rFIXFc for Major SurgeryGood1 responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisInvestigators'/Surgeons' Assessment of Participants' Response to rFIXFc for Major SurgeryFair0 responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisInvestigators'/Surgeons' Assessment of Participants' Response to rFIXFc for Major SurgeryPoor/None0 responses
Secondary

Maximum Concentration (Cmax)

Maximum concentration during a dosing interval. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisMaximum Concentration (Cmax)rFIXFc Baseline40.81 IU/dL
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisMaximum Concentration (Cmax)BeneFIX43.08 IU/dL
Secondary

Mean Residence Time (MRT)

The average time for all the drug molecules to reside in the body. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisMean Residence Time (MRT)rFIXFc Baseline98.60 hours
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisMean Residence Time (MRT)BeneFIX41.19 hours
Secondary

Number of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding Episode

Please see the definition of the Efficacy Period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A follow-up injection administered \>72 hours after the most recent injection given to treat a bleed was considered a new bleed at the same location and was classified as type=Unknown (bleeding episodes of this type were not evaluable). The first bleed for each participant could not be included in this analysis since there was no previous bleed from which to measure time. The number of days from the last injection to treat a bleed to a new bleeding episode was analyzed across all evaluable bleeding episodes per participant.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc and at least 1 evaluable bleeding episode.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding EpisodePer Bleeding Episode40.78 daysInter-Quartile Range 57.184
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding EpisodePer Participant59.52 daysInter-Quartile Range 49.61
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding EpisodePer Bleeding Episode39.48 daysInter-Quartile Range 63.228
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding EpisodePer Participant76.13 daysInter-Quartile Range 37.451
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding EpisodePer Bleeding Episode13.42 daysInter-Quartile Range 21.837
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Days From Last Injection to Treat a New Bleeding EpisodePer Participant19.67 daysInter-Quartile Range 40.576
Secondary

Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode

In Arms 1 and 2, the efficacy period (EP) started with date and time of first prophylactic dose following a completed PK sampling period and ended with last dose administered (for prophylaxis or a bleeding episode). In Arm 3, the EP started following last PK sampling timepoint and ended with either date of last contact or date of last entry into the eDiary, whichever was later. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. All injections given from the initial sign of a bleed until the last date/time within the bleed window are counted. The resolution of a bleed is defined as no sign of bleeding following injection for the bleed.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc and had at least 1 bleeding episode.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding EpisodePer Bleeding Episode1.0 injectionsInter-Quartile Range 0.56
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding EpisodePer Participant1.00 injectionsInter-Quartile Range 0.5
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding EpisodePer Bleeding Episode1.0 injectionsInter-Quartile Range 0.53
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding EpisodePer Participant1.09 injectionsInter-Quartile Range 0.3
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding EpisodePer Bleeding Episode1.0 injectionsInter-Quartile Range 0.31
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding EpisodePer Participant1.04 injectionsInter-Quartile Range 0.32
Secondary

Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of Bleed

Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. All injections given from the initial sign of a bleed until the last date/time within the bleed window were counted. The resolution of a bleed was defined as no sign of bleeding following injection for the bleed. Bleeding episodes that presented in multiple locations are included as a single event in the overall summary for the number of injections to resolve that bleeding episode but are included in summaries for each location.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc, had a bleeding episode, and had evaluable efficacy assessments; n=total number of bleeds at given location.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedJoint (n=125, 52, 314)1.0 injections
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedMuscle (n=35, 10, 90)1.0 injections
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedInternal (n=9, 3, 11)1.0 injections
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedSkin/Mucosa (n=11, 4, 21)1.0 injections
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedSkin/Mucosa (n=11, 4, 21)1.0 injections
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedJoint (n=125, 52, 314)1.0 injections
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedInternal (n=9, 3, 11)2.0 injections
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedMuscle (n=35, 10, 90)1.0 injections
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedSkin/Mucosa (n=11, 4, 21)1.0 injections
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedMuscle (n=35, 10, 90)1.0 injections
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedInternal (n=9, 3, 11)1.0 injections
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Injections Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedJoint (n=125, 52, 314)1.0 injections
Secondary

Number of Injections Required to Maintain Hemostasis During Major Surgery

The number of injections to maintain hemostasis during surgery includes all injections for surgery purposes including the loading dose to the end date/time of surgery.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Participants in Arm 4 who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Injections Required to Maintain Hemostasis During Major Surgery1.00 injectionsFull Range 0.825
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

Number of participants with clinically relevant abnormalities or relevant changes from baseline in temperature, pulse (beats per minute \[bpm\]), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) are presented. Baseline (BL) is defined as the last non-missing evaluable assessment taken prior and closest to the first rFIXFc dose. Because the perioperative management period represents a unique clinical situation, safety data obtained during the surgical/rehabilitation period for participants in Arm 4 were included in listings and reviewed separately. Review of the listing was sufficient to assess this endpoint.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Safety Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of BeneFIX or rFIXFc; a table was not generated for participants in the perioperative management/surgical arm (Arm 4). n=participants with a baseline assessment and at least one post-baseline assessment for temperature or at least one post-baseline assessment for pulse, SBP, and DBP.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsPulse: >120 bpm or >20 bpm ↑ from BL, n=62,28,241 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: <90 mm Hg or >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL, n=62,28,244 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mm Hg or >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsTemperature: >38°C and ≥1°C ↑ from BL, n=61,28,240 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: <50 mm Hg or >20 mm Hg ↓ from BL, n=62,28,245 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mm Hg or >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL, n=62,28,243 participants
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsPulse: <50 bpm or >20 bpm ↓ from BL, n=62,28,242 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mm Hg or >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL, n=62,28,241 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsTemperature: >38°C and ≥1°C ↑ from BL, n=61,28,240 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsPulse: >120 bpm or >20 bpm ↑ from BL, n=62,28,242 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsPulse: <50 bpm or >20 bpm ↓ from BL, n=62,28,241 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: <90 mm Hg or >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL, n=62,28,241 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mm Hg or >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisNumber of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: <50 mm Hg or >20 mm Hg ↓ from BL, n=62,28,244 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: <90 mm Hg or >30 mm Hg ↓ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsPulse: >120 bpm or >20 bpm ↑ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: <50 mm Hg or >20 mm Hg ↓ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mm Hg or >30 mm Hg ↑ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mm Hg or >40 mm Hg ↑ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsPulse: <50 bpm or >20 bpm ↓ from BL, n=62,28,240 participants
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Number of Participants With Clinically Relevant Abnormalities or Relevant Changes From Baseline in Vital SignsTemperature: >38°C and ≥1°C ↑ from BL, n=61,28,240 participants
Secondary

Number of Transfusions Required Per Surgery

Number of blood component transfusions during a single surgery.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Participants in Arm 4 who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Transfusions Required Per Surgery0 transfusions12 surgeries
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Transfusions Required Per Surgery1 transfusion0 surgeries
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Transfusions Required Per Surgery2 transfusions1 surgeries
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Transfusions Required Per Surgery3 transfusions0 surgeries
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisNumber of Transfusions Required Per Surgery>3 transfusions1 surgeries
Secondary

Participant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding Episode

Participant's assessment of the response to the first rFIXFc injection for each bleeding episode. Percentages were based on the number of bleeding episodes for which a response was provided for the first injection, using the following 4-point scale: excellent=abrupt pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after the initial injection; good=definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after an injection, but possibly requiring more than one injection after 24 to 48 hours for complete resolution; moderate=probable or slight beneficial effect within 8 hours after the initial injection and requiring more than one injection; no response=no improvement, or condition worsened, within approximately 8 hours after the initial injection.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc and had a bleeding episode; participants with a non-evaluable bleeding episode are counted in the 'number of participants analyzed,' but not the percentages.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeModerate18.6 percentage of responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeGood43.6 percentage of responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeExcellent or Good78.8 percentage of responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeExcellent35.3 percentage of responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeNo Response2.6 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeGood42.9 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeExcellent or Good74.6 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeExcellent31.7 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeModerate22.2 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisParticipant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeNo Response3.2 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Participant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeNo Response1.0 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Participant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeModerate11.9 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Participant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeExcellent or Good87.1 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Participant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeGood49.7 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Participant Assessment of Response to Injections to Treat a Bleeding EpisodeExcellent37.3 percentage of responses
Secondary

Physicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFc

Physicians assessed each participant's response to rFIXFc using a 4-point scale: excellent=bleeding episodes responded to less than or equal to the usual number of injections or less than or equal to the usual dose of rFIXFc, or the rate of breakthrough bleeding during prophylaxis was less than or equal to that usually observed; effective=most bleeding episodes responded to the same number of injections and dose, but some required more injections or higher doses, or there was a minor increase in the rate of breakthrough bleeding; partially effective=bleeding episodes most often required more injections and/or higher doses than expected, or adequate breakthrough bleeding prevention during prophylaxis required more frequent injections and/or higher doses; ineffective=routine failure to control hemostasis or hemostatic control required additional agents. Percentage of the total count of scale responses for all participants is presented. Multiple responses per participant are counted.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc, had evaluable efficacy assessments, and had nonmissing observations at time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcExcellent74.5 percentage of responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcEffective24.3 percentage of responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcPartially Effective1.1 percentage of responses
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcIneffective0 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcIneffective0 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcExcellent73.2 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcPartially Effective0.8 percentage of responses
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisPhysicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcEffective26.0 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Physicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcIneffective0 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Physicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcEffective39.6 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Physicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcPartially Effective2.1 percentage of responses
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Physicians' Global Assessments of Participants' Response to Treatment With rFIXFcExcellent58.3 percentage of responses
Secondary

Time to 1% and 3% FIX Activity

Time to reach 1 or 3 IU/dL (%) after a single dose. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTime to 1% and 3% FIX ActivityrFIXFc Baseline: 1% Activity11.224 days
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTime to 1% and 3% FIX ActivityBeneFIX: 1% Activity5.087 days
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTime to 1% and 3% FIX ActivityrFIXFc Baseline: 3% Activity5.767 days
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTime to 1% and 3% FIX ActivityBeneFIX: 3% Activity2.832 days
Secondary

Total Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of Bleed

For each bleeding episode at one location, the total dose is the sum of the doses (IU/kg) administered across all injections given to treat that bleeding episode. Please see the definition of the efficacy period (EP) in the Outcome Measure 4 Description. The EP was interrupted for the repeat PK period in Arm 1 (sequential PK subgroup) and for all surgical/rehabilitation periods (for both major and minor surgeries) in all 3 arms. A bleeding episode started from the first sign of a bleed, and ended 72 hours after the last treatment for the bleeding, within which any symptoms of bleeding at the same location, or injections less than or equal to 72 hours apart, were considered the same bleeding episode. Bleeding episodes that presented in multiple locations are included as a single event in the overall summary for dose administered to resolve that bleeding episode but are included in the individual summaries for each location.

Time frame: up to 52 weeks ± 1 week (efficacy period as defined in description)

Population: Full Analysis Set: participants who received at least 1 dose of rFIXFc, had a bleeding episode, and had complete information on the dose administered to treat a bleeding episode; n=total number of bleeding episodes at this location.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedJoint (n=124, 52, 313)50.14 IU/kg
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedMuscle (n=35, 10, 90)55.56 IU/kg
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedInternal (n=9, 3, 11)48.72 IU/kg
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedSkin/Mucosa (n=11, 4, 21)46.89 IU/kg
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedSkin/Mucosa (n=11, 4, 21)48.48 IU/kg
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedJoint (n=124, 52, 313)45.29 IU/kg
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedInternal (n=9, 3, 11)70.26 IU/kg
Arm 2: Individualized Interval ProphylaxisTotal Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedMuscle (n=35, 10, 90)67.17 IU/kg
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Total Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedSkin/Mucosa (n=11, 4, 21)22.22 IU/kg
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Total Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedMuscle (n=35, 10, 90)46.57 IU/kg
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Total Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedInternal (n=9, 3, 11)46.73 IU/kg
Arm 3: Episodic (On Demand)Total Dose Per Injection Required for Resolution of a Bleeding Episode by Location of BleedJoint (n=124, 52, 313)46.73 IU/kg
Secondary

Volume in Steady State (Vss)

Volume of distribution at steady state. Assessment of FIX activity with BeneFIX was conducted following a required 120-hour (5-day) washout period, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 72 (±3) hours, and 96 (±3) hours (4 days) from the start of the injection. Assessment of FIX activity and rFIXFc concentration was conducted following the initial dose of rFIXFc (after a required 120-hour \[5-day\] washout period) and at Week 26, at these timepoints: predose, 10 (±2) minutes, 1 hour (±15 minutes), 3 hours (±15 minutes), 6 hours (±15 minutes), 24 (±2) hours, 48 (±2) hours, 96 (±3) hours (4 days), 144 (±3) hours (6 days), 168 (±3) hours (7 days), 192 (±3) hours (8 days), and 240 (±3) hours (10 days) from the start of the injection.

Time frame: See Measure Description for complete time frame. Each participant was to complete PK sampling up to, and including, the 96-hour (4-day) timepoint for BeneFIX PK assessment and the 240-hour (10-day) timepoint for rFIXFc PK assessment.

Population: Participants in the Sequential PK Subgroup who have evaluable PK profiles for both BeneFIX and baseline rFIXFc.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisVolume in Steady State (Vss)rFIXFc Baseline314.8 mL/kg
Arm 1: Weekly ProphylaxisVolume in Steady State (Vss)BeneFIX261.1 mL/kg

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026