Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the Interlace Medical Hysteroscopic Morcellator

Retrospective Case Review - Clinical Evaluation of the Interlace Medical 1st Generation Hysteroscopic Morcellator

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01026805
Enrollment
11
Registered
2009-12-04
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2009-03-31
Last updated
2012-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Abnormal Uterine Bleeding, Infertility

Keywords

morcellator, hysteroscope, myomectomy, polypectomy, uterine fibroids

Brief summary

This study assesses the effectiveness of intrauterine fibroid and polyp removal using the Interlace Medical 1st generation hysteroscopic morcellator device based on a retrospective review of medical records of women who have been treated with the device.

Detailed description

A retrospective review of medical records for eleven (11) premenopausal women who had been treated with the new hysteroscopic morcellator was conducted at four hospital or ambulatory surgical center sites. Four physicians performed hysteroscopic operative procedures to remove intrauterine polyps, type 0 (completely within the uterine cavity), type I (mostly within the cavity) and type II (\< 40% within the cavity) submucous myomas. Percent pathology removed, total morcellation time, total fluid used, fluid deficit and treatment-related adverse events were assessed. Each of the four treating physicians also evaluated device performance using a 10 point scale (1 = poor and 10 = excellent).

Interventions

DEVICEInterlace Medical 1st Generation Hysteroscopic Morcellator

The Interlace Medical hysteroscopic morcellator system has been cleared by the FDA(K073690)and consists of a motor drive unit connected to a 3mm morcellator. The morcellator is approximately 12 cm long and is equipped with an open channel that houses a reciprocating blade. When the motor is activated, the reciprocating blade will cut the tissue within the channel. The tissue travels down the 3mm morcellator shaft cannula via suction coupled to the proximal end of the morcellator and is captured in a tissue trap in a suction canister for pathological diagnosis following the procedure.

Sponsors

Hologic, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* female * at least 18 years old * treated for intra-uterine submucosal fibroids (Type 0 or 1 myomas and/or polyps using the Interlace 1st generation morcellator device.

Exclusion criteria

* none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Tissue Removedimmediately post-treatmentmean percentage of polyp and fibroid tissue removed, as measured on post-treatment hysteroscopic imaging. Images were obtained immediately post treatment, before the subject left the surgical suite.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluid Volume Per Procedureat time of treatmentmean volume of distension fluid infused into the uterus, per procedure. Distention fluid is used to distend the uterus and provide increased visibility.
Fluid Deficit Per Procedureat time of treatmentmean fluid deficit per procedure. Fluid deficit is the difference between the amount of fluid which is infused into the patient during the hysteroscopic procedure, and the amount of fluid collected at completion of the procedure.
Treatment Time Per Patientat time of treatmentmean morcellation(division into and removal of small pieces, as of tissue) time per patient
Interlace Medical 1st Generation Hysteroscopic Morcellator Cutting Ability - Mean Score2-3 months post treatmenta 10 point scale assessed performance of the Interlace Medical 1st Generation Hysteroscopic Morcellator(1 = poor and 10 = excellent).
Adverse Events2-3 months post-treatmentPatient medical records were examined to identify any procedure-related or post-treatment adverse events. An adverse event is any undesirable experience (sign, symptom, illness, or other medical event) occurring in a subject, that appears or worsens during a clinical study
Resected Tissue Weight Per Patientat time of treatmentmean weight of resected tissue per patient

Participant flow

Recruitment details

An unselected series of eleven (11) premenopausal women who had been treated with the new hysteroscopic morcellator at four hospital or ambulatory surgical center sites were assessed for this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment Group
Subjects underwent hysteroscopic tissue removal of intrauterine polyps and/or myomas using the Interlace Medical tissue removal device.
11
Total11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicHysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
11 Participants
Age Continuous40.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
size of fibroid or polyp16.3 mm

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Tissue Removed

mean percentage of polyp and fibroid tissue removed, as measured on post-treatment hysteroscopic imaging. Images were obtained immediately post treatment, before the subject left the surgical suite.

Time frame: immediately post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment GroupPercentage of Tissue Removed97.5 Percentage of tissue removed
Secondary

Adverse Events

Patient medical records were examined to identify any procedure-related or post-treatment adverse events. An adverse event is any undesirable experience (sign, symptom, illness, or other medical event) occurring in a subject, that appears or worsens during a clinical study

Time frame: 2-3 months post-treatment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment GroupAdverse Events0 events
Secondary

Fluid Deficit Per Procedure

mean fluid deficit per procedure. Fluid deficit is the difference between the amount of fluid which is infused into the patient during the hysteroscopic procedure, and the amount of fluid collected at completion of the procedure.

Time frame: at time of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment GroupFluid Deficit Per Procedure567.8 mL
Secondary

Fluid Volume Per Procedure

mean volume of distension fluid infused into the uterus, per procedure. Distention fluid is used to distend the uterus and provide increased visibility.

Time frame: at time of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment GroupFluid Volume Per Procedure5179.0 mL
Secondary

Interlace Medical 1st Generation Hysteroscopic Morcellator Cutting Ability - Mean Score

a 10 point scale assessed performance of the Interlace Medical 1st Generation Hysteroscopic Morcellator(1 = poor and 10 = excellent).

Time frame: 2-3 months post treatment

Population: All treating physicians completed a survey questionnaire.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment GroupInterlace Medical 1st Generation Hysteroscopic Morcellator Cutting Ability - Mean Score9.5 scores on a scale
Secondary

Resected Tissue Weight Per Patient

mean weight of resected tissue per patient

Time frame: at time of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment GroupResected Tissue Weight Per Patient10.8 g
Secondary

Treatment Time Per Patient

mean morcellation(division into and removal of small pieces, as of tissue) time per patient

Time frame: at time of treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Hysteroscopic Morcellator Treatment GroupTreatment Time Per Patient4.3 minutes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026