Skip to content

Dronedarone Pattern of Use in Patients Scheduled for Elective Cardioversion (ELECTRA)

A Phase IV, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Canadian Multicentre Study Comparing Two Treatment Strategies of Dronedarone Administration Following ELECTive caRdioversion for Prevention of Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Recurrence

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01026090
Enrollment
292
Registered
2009-12-04
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2014-08-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

Primary Objective: To determine whether daily administration of dronedarone started 5-7 days before cardioversion is superior to dronedarone started only after cardioversion with respect to the absence of symptomatic, ECG confirmed, atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence over 6 months in adult patients with persistent AF, for whom cardioversion is clinically indicated and planned to reduce symptoms and antiarrhythmic treatment is clinically indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization due to AF. Secondary Objectives: Main Secondary : * To assess the number of symptomatic AF recurrences/patient/6 months with and without ECG confirmation; * To assess characteristics of symptomatic AF recurrence in the two treatment arms (frequency, duration of episodes, type, number, and severity of AF symptoms per patient); * To compare the rates of early recurrences of AF between the two treatment strategies; Other secondary: * To assess whether there is a difference in proportion of patients with symptomatic AF recurrences (with and without ECG confirmation) between the two treatment strategies; * To assess whether there is a difference in number of electrical cardioversions per patient between the two treatment strategies; * To assess the impact of the two strategies on number of shocks, cumulative amount of energy delivered, shock failure, and immediate success of cardioversion; * To assess whether there is a difference in rate of cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations and length of hospital stay between the two treatment strategies; * To assess whether there is a difference in quality of life between the two treatment strategies.

Detailed description

The study period of approximatively 6 months consisted in: * Double-blind treatment period (placebo or dronedarone) for 5-7 days prior to cardioversion; * Electrical cardioversion; * Open-label treatment period with dronedarone for 6 months after cardioversion.

Interventions

Film-coated tablet Oral administration under fed conditions (during breakfast and dinner)

film-coated tablet strictly identical in appearance Oral administration under fed conditions (during breakfast and dinner)

Sponsors

Sanofi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

\- Adult patients with persistent AF (current episode at the screening visit \>72 hrs and \<12 month duration), for whom cardioversion was clinically indicated and planned to reduce symptoms and antiarrhythmic treatment was clinically indicated to reduce the risk of cardiovascular hospitalization due to AF.

Exclusion criteria

* Severe congestive heart failure (NYHA Class IV) and other unstable hemodynamic conditions; * Bradycardia \<50 bpm; * QTc Bazett interval ≥500 ms; * Second- or third- degree atrio-ventricular (AV) block, or sick sinus syndrome (except when used in conjunction with a functioning pacemaker); * Severe hepatic impairment; * Pregnancy and lactation; * History of hypersensitivity reactions to dronedarone or any of its excipients or component of the container. Concomitant drugs: * Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) other than dronedarone should not be administered during the study and should be withdrawn for at least five plasma half-lives prior to the first study drug administration; * Dronedarone should not be co-administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors; * Dronedarone should not be co-administered with drugs inducing torsades de pointes. The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of participants with at least one symptomatic, ECG confirmed, AF recurrence6 months from initial cardioversion

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Characteristics of Symptomatic AF Recurrence (Frequency, Duration of Episodes, Type, Number, and Severity of AF Symptoms)up to 6 months from initial cardioversion
Proportion of Participants With Early Recurrence of AF (i.e. From 5 Minutes to to 7 Days Following Cardioversion)up to 7 days following initial cardioversion
Proportion of Participants With Symptomatic AF Recurrences (With or Without ECG Confirmation)up to 6 months from initial cardioversion
Number of Electrical Cardioversions Per Patientup to 6 months from intial cardioversion
Number of Symptomatic AF Recurrences/Patient/6 Months (With or Without ECG Confirmation)up to 6 months from initial cardioversion
Cumulative Amount of Energy Delivered and Shock Failureduring the initial cardioversion
Proportion of Participants With Immediate Recurrence of AF (From 5 Seconds to 5 Minutes After Electrical Shock)during the initial cardioversion
Number of CV Hospitalizationsup to 6 months from initial cardioversion
Quality of Life, as Measured by Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS) and Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) QuestionnairesBaseline and 6 months after initial cardioversion
Number of Shocks Required During Initial Cardioversionduring the initial cardioversion

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026