Skip to content

Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Using EsophyX for the Treatment of GERD

Phase II Study of Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of Tailored Transoral Incisionless Fundoplication (TIF) Using EsophyX for the Treatment of GERD

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01025739
Enrollment
0
Registered
2009-12-03
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2015-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

Keywords

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), EsophyX

Brief summary

Objectives of the Study: The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the relative merits, safety and effectiveness of the tailored TIF2 procedure in treating GERD patients who have persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy. The secondary objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the tailored TIF procedure in restoring the antireflux barrier and eliminating GE reflux. Type of Study: Prospective, non-randomized, uncontrolled Study Duration 12 months Number of Patients 20 Inclusion Criteria: Age 18-70 years, on daily PPIs for \> 6 months, persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy, anatomic disruption of the gastroesophageal valve to a Hill Grade II-III, evidence of one of the following while on PPI therapy: (1) erosive esophagitis (erosions or ulcerations during endoscopy); (2) abnormal ambulatory pH study; or (3) biopsy confirmed changes characteristic of reflux esophagitis; acceptable esophageal motility (by either manometry or video esophagogram), hiatal hernia no larger than 2 cm, patient willing to cooperate with post-operative dietary recommendations and assessment tests, signed informed consent Exclusion Criteria: BMI \> 40, hiatal hernia \> 2 cm, esophagitis grade D, esophageal ulcer, fixed esophageal stricture, gastric motility disorders, previous splenectomy, pregnancy (female), immunosuppression, ASA \> 2, portal hypertension and/or varices, history of previous resective gastric or esophageal surgery, cervical spine fusion, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, achalasia, scleroderma or dermatomyositis, eosinophilic esophagitis, or cirrhosis, active gastro-duodenal ulcer disease, gastric outlet obstruction or stenosis, gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying, coagulation disorders Interventions: Treatment: Tailored transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF2) using EsophyX system with SerosaFuse fasteners (EndoGastric Solutions, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA) Evaluation Criteria: Primary Outcome Measure 24 hour pH impedance study: change in Johnson DeMeester scores; GERD-HRQOL scores Secondary Outcome Measures PPI usage, GERD symptoms at 6 and 12 months vs. baseline off PPI's, total number of reflux episodes, and Symptom Association Probability while off PPI. Safety: Adverse events will be mapped to standard terms and reported.

Interventions

DEVICEEsophyX™ system with SerosaFuse fasteners

The EsophyX™ system with SerosaFuse fasteners (EndoGastric Solutions, Redmond, WA, USA) was designed to reconstruct the gastroesophageal junction through anterior partial fundoplication with tailored delivery of multiple fasteners during a single-device insertion.

Sponsors

AHS Cancer Control Alberta
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18-70 years * On daily PPIs for \> 6 months * Persistent GERD symptoms despite PPI therapy * Anatomic disruption of the gastroesophageal valve to a Hill Grade II-III * Evidence of one of the following while on PPI therapy: * Erosive esophagitis (erosions or ulcerations during endoscopy) * Abnormal ambulatory pH study * Biopsy confirmed changes characteristic of reflux esophagitis * Acceptable esophageal motility (by either manometry or video esophagogram) * Hiatal hernia no larger than 2 cm * Patient willing to cooperate with post-operative dietary recommendations and assessment tests * Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* BMI \> 40 * Hiatal hernia \> 2 cm * Esophagitis grade D * Esophageal ulcer * Esophageal stricture * Esophageal motility disorder * Prior splenectomy * Pregnancy or plans for pregnancy in the next 12 months (in females) * Immunosuppression * ASA \> 2 * Portal hypertension and/or varices * History of previous resective gastric or esophageal surgery, cervical spine fusion, Zenker's diverticulum, esophageal epiphrenic diverticulum, achalasia, scleroderma or dermatomyositis, eosinophilic esophagitis, or cirrhosis * Active gastro-duodenal ulcer disease * Gastric outlet obstruction or stenosis * Gastroparesis or delayed gastric emptying confirmed by solid-phase gastric emptying study if patient complains of postprandial satiety during assessment * Coagulation disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
24 hour pH impedance study: change in Johnson DeMeester scores; GERD-HRQOL scores1, 3, 6, 12 month

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
PPI usage, GERD symptoms at 6 and 12 months vs. baseline off PPI's, total number of reflux episodes, and Symptom Association Probability while off PPI. Safety: Adverse events will be mapped to standard terms and reported.1 day; 1 week; 1, 3, 6, 12 month

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026