Skip to content

Outcomes in Rotator Cuff Repair Using Graft Reinforcement

A Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm Study to Assess Clinical Outcomes In Primary Open or Mini-Open Rotator Cuff Repair Using Conexa Graft Reinforcement

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01025037
Enrollment
61
Registered
2009-12-03
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2014-04-30
Last updated
2015-01-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rotator Cuff Tear

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Tear, Large, Massive, Rotator, Cuff. Tear

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient shoulder functional outcomes following rotator cuff repairs reinforced with a surgical mesh.

Detailed description

Conexa is a surgical mesh derived from porcine dermis and processed to produce an acellular dermal matrix. It is designed to perform as a surgical mesh for use as a soft tissue patch to reinforce soft tissue where weaknesses exist and for the surgical repair of damaged or ruptured soft tissue membranes. The purpose of this post-market clinical study is to collect safety and efficacy data when Conexa is used to repair torn tendons of the rotator cuff. Conexa will be used in accordance with its labeling for this clinical study.

Interventions

DEVICEConexa Reconstructive Tissue Matrix

Conexa will be placed as a soft tissue reinforcement in primary open or mini-open rotator cuff repair procedures

Sponsors

LifeCell
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Stryker Trauma and Extremities
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

The patient: 1. is an adult male or female between the ages of 40-70 years old; 2. has repairable primary large retracted two-tendon rotator cuff tears measuring from 3 cm to 5 cm; 3. requires surgical repair of single rotator cuff (i.e. one limb); 4. has movement of the non-operative arm defined as shoulder elevation of equal to or greater than 90 degrees and is able to perform postoperative exercises; 5. is able to return for all scheduled and required study visits; 6. is able to provide written informed consent for study participation.

Exclusion criteria

The patient: 1. has irreparable large rotator cuff tears that are found intra-operatively. Note: irreparable is defined by the inability to approximate the tendon to the tuberosity without tension; 2. has a rotator cuff tear \< 3cm (measured intra-operatively); 3. has a rotator cuff tear \> 5cm (measured intra-operatively); 4. has a rotator cuff tear where the subscapularis tendon is disrupted/requires repair; 5. has grade 3 or 4 fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff; 6. has had prior surgical repair to the affected shoulder; 7. is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class 4 or 5 (See Appendix I); 8. is a tobacco user; unless tobacco free 6 months prior to surgery and willing to remain tobacco free for the duration of the study. 9. has lower limb injuries requiring walking assist devices such as crutches and walkers; 10. has a known collagen disorder, including systemic lupus erythematous (SLE), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), polymyositis, scleroderma, ankylosing spondylitis, dermatomyositis, osteogenesis imperfecta or the inherited disorders of Sjogren, Larsen, Raynaud, Ehlers-Danlos or Marfan syndrome. 11. has obstacles that pose an inordinately high surgical risk, in the judgment of the certified surgeon; 12. has co-morbid factors which predispose to postoperative infection, such as insulin dependent diabetes, chronic steroid use, malnourishment, cancer, or co-existent infection; 13. has a history of alcohol abuse, illicit drug use, significant mental illness, physical dependence to any opioid, or drug abuse or addiction; 14. is enrolled or plans to enroll in another clinical trial during this study that would affect the patient's safety or results of this trial; 15. has any of the conditions identified within the labeled contraindications, i.e. sensitivity to porcine derived products or polysorbate. 16. has an inability to have a closed MRI conducted. 17. needs a re-operation for a re-tear of the rotator cuff.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24The ASES evaluation generally has a patient self-evaluation section and a physician assessment section. The patient self-evaluation section of the form contains visual analog scales for pain, instability, an activities of daily living (ADL) questionnaire. The physician assessment section includes an area to collect demographic information and assesses range of motion, specific physical signs, strength, and stability. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%) (Richards, Bigliani, Gartsman, Iannotti, & Zuckerman, 1994). The ASES evaluation has a total of 100 points possible; with 100 being the best possible outcome, and 0 being the worst.
Adjusted Constant-Murley Scorebaseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score is a 100-point functional shoulder assessment tool in which higher scores reflect increased function. The subjective variables are pain (15 points) and function (Activities of Daily Living - sleep, work, recreation/sport) (20 points), for a total of 35 points. The objective variables are active range of motion (clinician assessment) (40 points) and strength (25 points), for a total of 65 points (Stiller & Uhl, 2005).
Simple Shoulder Test (SST)baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24The Simple Shoulder Test (SST): a series of 12 yes or no questions the patient answers about the function of the involved shoulder; 2 questions relate to pain, 7 questions relate to function and 3 questions relate to range of motion. The answers to these questions (yes = 1, no = 0) provides a standardized way of recording the function of a shoulder before and after treatment (McClure & Michener, 2003). A score of 12 on the Simple Shoulder test represents the best possible outcome, while a score of 0 represents the worst possible outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rotator Cuff Re-tear EvaluationPost-op months 6 and 12Subjects will have MRI to assess healing of the repaired tendon at 6 and 12 months post-op. The rate of re-tear will be reported. Two different definitions of a re-tear were used for the analysis. 1. Primary definition (used for analysis of the secondary objective): Full thickness tear that is 80% or greater in length of the original tear size. 2. Sub-analysis: Full thickness tear one centimeter or greater in length.
Isometric Strengthbaseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Complications, Including InfectionAll time pointsComplications were summarized by reporting adverse events of special interest. AEs of special interest were defined as any reported infection (incision, wound, surgical site), seroma, hematoma, inflammation (surgical site, wound), and re-tear. The re-tear rate reported in this section is the number reported via AE or surgical intervention (not the MRI results). The AEs of special interest were chosen because they are in alignment with the potential complications listed on the product insert.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Conexa
Rotator cuff repair using Conexa
61
Total61

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event3
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up7
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicConexa
Age, Continuous56.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5
BMI32 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
Height171.5 cm
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
5 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
56 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
61 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants
Weight94.9 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.9

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
35 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

Adjusted Constant-Murley Score

The Constant-Murley Shoulder Score is a 100-point functional shoulder assessment tool in which higher scores reflect increased function. The subjective variables are pain (15 points) and function (Activities of Daily Living - sleep, work, recreation/sport) (20 points), for a total of 35 points. The objective variables are active range of motion (clinician assessment) (40 points) and strength (25 points), for a total of 65 points (Stiller & Uhl, 2005).

Time frame: baseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ConexaAdjusted Constant-Murley ScoreBaseline Measurement45.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.2
ConexaAdjusted Constant-Murley Score6 Month Measurement62.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.6
ConexaAdjusted Constant-Murley Score12 Month Measurement68.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.3
ConexaAdjusted Constant-Murley Score24 Month Measurement71.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.6
Primary

American Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)

The ASES evaluation generally has a patient self-evaluation section and a physician assessment section. The patient self-evaluation section of the form contains visual analog scales for pain, instability, an activities of daily living (ADL) questionnaire. The physician assessment section includes an area to collect demographic information and assesses range of motion, specific physical signs, strength, and stability. A shoulder score can be derived from the visual analogue scale score for pain (50%) and the cumulative activities of daily living score (50%) (Richards, Bigliani, Gartsman, Iannotti, & Zuckerman, 1994). The ASES evaluation has a total of 100 points possible; with 100 being the best possible outcome, and 0 being the worst.

Time frame: baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ConexaAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)Baseline Measurement48.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.2
ConexaAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)3 Month Measurement69.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.2
ConexaAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)6 Month Measurement79.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.7
ConexaAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)12 Month Measurement85.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.4
ConexaAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Score (ASES)24 Month Measurement90.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.3
Primary

Simple Shoulder Test (SST)

The Simple Shoulder Test (SST): a series of 12 yes or no questions the patient answers about the function of the involved shoulder; 2 questions relate to pain, 7 questions relate to function and 3 questions relate to range of motion. The answers to these questions (yes = 1, no = 0) provides a standardized way of recording the function of a shoulder before and after treatment (McClure & Michener, 2003). A score of 12 on the Simple Shoulder test represents the best possible outcome, while a score of 0 represents the worst possible outcome.

Time frame: baseline, post-op months 3, 6, 12, and 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ConexaSimple Shoulder Test (SST)Baseline Measurement5.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.6
ConexaSimple Shoulder Test (SST)3 Month Measurement6.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3
ConexaSimple Shoulder Test (SST)6 Month Measurement8.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
ConexaSimple Shoulder Test (SST)12 Month Measurement9.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
ConexaSimple Shoulder Test (SST)24 Month Measurement10.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.2
Secondary

Isometric Strength

Time frame: baseline, post-op months 6, 12, and 24

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ConexaIsometric StrengthBaseline Measurement34.4 newtons (N)Standard Deviation 26.8
ConexaIsometric Strength6 Month Measurement61.9 newtons (N)Standard Deviation 52.8
ConexaIsometric Strength12 Month Measurement83.0 newtons (N)Standard Deviation 71.7
ConexaIsometric Strength24 Month Measurement78.6 newtons (N)Standard Deviation 63.2
Secondary

Rotator Cuff Re-tear Evaluation

Subjects will have MRI to assess healing of the repaired tendon at 6 and 12 months post-op. The rate of re-tear will be reported. Two different definitions of a re-tear were used for the analysis. 1. Primary definition (used for analysis of the secondary objective): Full thickness tear that is 80% or greater in length of the original tear size. 2. Sub-analysis: Full thickness tear one centimeter or greater in length.

Time frame: Post-op months 6 and 12

Population: Participants were analyzed at 6 and 12 months post-op. 2 participants not analyzed due to exclusion prior to 6 month post op visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ConexaRotator Cuff Re-tear Evaluation80% re-tear Definition, 6 months18.5 percentage of participants
ConexaRotator Cuff Re-tear Evaluation80% re-tear definition, 12 months16.9 percentage of participants
ConexaRotator Cuff Re-tear Evaluation1 cm re-tear definition, 6 months32.2 percentage of participants
ConexaRotator Cuff Re-tear Evaluation1 cm re-tear definition, 12 months33.9 percentage of participants
Other Pre-specified

Incidence of Complications, Including Infection

Complications were summarized by reporting adverse events of special interest. AEs of special interest were defined as any reported infection (incision, wound, surgical site), seroma, hematoma, inflammation (surgical site, wound), and re-tear. The re-tear rate reported in this section is the number reported via AE or surgical intervention (not the MRI results). The AEs of special interest were chosen because they are in alignment with the potential complications listed on the product insert.

Time frame: All time points

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ConexaIncidence of Complications, Including InfectionInflammation (surgical site, wound);Severity: Mild9.8 percentage of participants
ConexaIncidence of Complications, Including InfectionRe-tear;Severity: Mild9.8 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026