Skip to content

Specificity of Elevated Plasma EM66 Levels in Pheochromocytoma

Clinical Application of New Pheochromocytoma Markers: INSERM Pilot Study of the Specificity of Elevated Plasma EM66 Concentrations in Patients With Pheochromocytoma or Paraganglioma Compared to Patients With Essential Hypertension

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01022515
Acronym
PHEO
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-12-01
Start date
2008-11-01
Completion date
2022-04-13
Last updated
2026-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Essential Hypertension, Paraganglioma, Pheochromocytoma

Keywords

pheochromocytoma, paraganglioma, hypertension

Brief summary

Pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma are tumors generating hypertension as a symptom. Different biological tests are currently available to diagnose these tumors. However, they all lack specificity since they do not distinguish cases of hypertension without pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. To improve the diagnostic specificity of these tumors, the investigators are testing a new marker called EM66.

Detailed description

Neuroendocrine tumors (NT) correspond to neoplasms that develop from endocrine and neuroendocrine cells scattered throughout the body. They are characterized by the occurrence, in their cytoplasm, of dense-core secretory vesicles containing hormones, neuropeptides and acidic proteins such as granins. The diversity of NT (from hypophysis, pancreas, adrenal, gastrointestinal tract) makes very difficult the identification and evaluation of the different types of tumors by the diagnostic and prognostic tools currently available. We have thus established a research program aimed at identifying new biological markers for the detection, the prognosis and the follow-up of NT by seeking in tumor and plasma samples of patients, granin-derived peptides. Our program was initiated on one type of NT : pheochromocytoma. These neoplasms correspond to tumoral chromaffin cells mainly originating from the adrenal medulla. It is considered that 10 % of pheochromocytoma patients will develop metastases and, currently, except in the presence of metastases, there are no means to predict malignancy of the tumor. We setup a radioimmunoassay of EM66 (a secretogranin II-derived peptide) that allowed us to demonstrate that (i) plasma concentrations of the peptide are significantly elevated in pheochromocytoma patients, (ii) combined with other biological tests EM66 measurement increase the diagnostic sensitivity for these neoplasms, (iii) after surgical removal of the tumor, plasma EM66 concentrations rapidly return to basal level and, (iv) intra-tumoral EM66 concentrations are higher in benign than in malignant pheochromocytomas (Yon et al., 2003, Guillemot et al., 2006). These results reveal that EM66 constitutes a novel tool for the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of pheochromocytoma. In the frame of a clinical use of an EM66 measurement test, it is necessary to evaluate the specificity of this marker. For instance, renal deficiency, hypergastrinemia, reduction of renal clearance, type A gastritis, Crohns disease, or proton-pump inhibitory treatment, lead to increase plasma chromogranin A (CgA) concentrations (false-positive cases). In addition, while hypertension account for one of the symptoms of pheochromocytoma patients, in essential hypertensive patients, CgA levels are higher than in normotensive individuals. The main objective of our clinical transfer research project consists to study the specificity of the measurement of EM66 as a diagnostic and prognostic marker of pheochromocytoma. This multicentric study will allow us to compare plasma EM66 levels in pheochromocytoma patients with a cohort of essential hypertensive patients. At the same time, in a long-range prospect, due to the lack of malignancy markers for these tumors, we will investigate if plasma or tumor EM66 levels are correlated to the differentiation status of pheochromocytomas, and if the expression level of a set of genes that we identified by a transcriptomic approach developed in the laboratory, is associated with the malignant status of the tumors. The stakes of this transfer research, involving our laboratory and the Center for Clinical Investigations (CIC) of Rouen and Lille, are to provide an easy and simple novel tool to practitioners and anatomo-pathologists for the screening, the evaluation and the follow-up of patients with neuroendocrine tumors.

Interventions

OTHERplasma EM66 & CgA levels assessment

After inclusion checking to eliminate the presence of pheochromocytoma / paraganglioma, a blood sample will be drawn to assess plasma EM66 and CgA levels.

OTHERusual follow up with regular EM66 & Cga levels assessment

Patients with pheochromocytoma / paraganglioma will be followed-up as the international standards recommend. Regularly, blood samples will be drawn for the usual assessment of CgA levels and also EM66 (research purpose) levels.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Rouen
Lead SponsorOTHER
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patients with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma Inclusion criteria : * men \& women, age \> 18 years old * Newly diagnosed patient : suspicion of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma with elevation of urinary metanephrines and/or normetanephrines along with evidence of tumor which surgical removal is considered (histological findings following surgery will be the gold standard for final diagnosis and inclusion in the study) * During follow-up of a patient with known genetic predisposition to pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma : suspicion of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma with or without elevation of urinary metanephrines and/or normetanephrines along with evidence of a tumor which surgical removal is considered (histological findings following surgery will be the gold standard for final diagnosis and inclusion in the study) , * Patients with known pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma, whether malignant or not, whether with metanephrine secretion or not, With tumor sites at inclusion in the study * Patients informed and willing to participate in the study * Patients with medical insurance (French social security) Non inclusion criteria * Patients newly diagnosed, recently operated and the histological findings disprove pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma. * patient imprisoned or under legal protection. Patients with essential hypertension Inclusion criteria * men \& women, age \> 18 years old * paired with a patient with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma for : gender, age (± 5 years) and centre * patient with hypertension. No aetiology was found after initial check up. * Normal 24 hours urinary excretion of metanephrines \& normetanephrines * For women of childbearing potential : effective contraceptive method and negative urinary pregnancy test * Patients informed and willing to participate in the study * Patients with medical insurance (French social security) Non inclusion criteria * Treatment with proton-pump inhibitors in the 8 days before inclusion in the study * Treatment with beta-blockers, antidepressants, Benzodiazepins, dopa, alphamethyl dopa, if this treatment cannot be interrupted during the study (i.e. for approximately 10 days) * patient imprisoned or under legal protection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Plasma EM66two years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Plasma Chromogranin A levelsbefore treatement

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAnne F Cailleux, MD

University Hospital, Rouen

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026