Skip to content

Optimal Planning Target Volume With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Determination of the Optimal Planning Target Volume for Brain Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01017497
Enrollment
49
Registered
2009-11-20
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2015-02-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Cancer, Brain Neoplasms

Keywords

Brain Metastases

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to estimate the rate of local control at the treated site of the metastasis as a function of 1mm versus 3mm expansion about the gross tumor volume (GTV). Each lesion, not each patient will be ranndomized to either the 1mm or 3mm margin with 40 lesions randomized to each arm.

Detailed description

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used either as definitive treatment alone or as a boost in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for the treatment of brain metastases. To establish a target for SRS, the gross tumor volume (GTV) is typically defined as the contrast-enhancing volume on T1-weighted axial MRI images. In turn, the volume chosen for treatment (the planning target volume or PTV) is generated by expanding the GTV to account for microscopic extension of tumor beyond the MRI-visualized volume and deviations in patient positioning at the time of treatment., However, the optimal PTV in patients undergoing SRS of brain metastases has not been established. This pilot randomized study of approximately 49 patients (representing a total of 80 brain lesions) should be sufficient to explore the effect of margin expansion around the GTV for brain metastases. The patients enrolled in this study will undergo radiosurgery to a planning treatment volume generated by expanding the GTV of each lesion by either a 1mm or 3mm margin. Each lesion, not each patient, will be randomized to receive either the 1mm or 3mm margin with 40 lesions randomized to each arm (a patient with multiple lesions potentially could have a lesion randomized to the 1mm arm and a different lesion randomized to the 3mm arm). The primary outcome of 12-month local recurrence and the secondary outcome of the rate of radionecrosis at the SRS treatment site will be lesion-specific outcomes. All other secondary outcomes will be patient-specific outcomes.

Interventions

RADIATIONStereotactic Radiosurgery

PTV Diameter \< 2.0 cm receives 24 Gy; PTV Diameter 2.0-3.0 cm receives 18 Gy; PTV Diameter 3.1-4.0 cm receives 15 Gy;

Sponsors

Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>18 years * Life expectancy of at least 6 months. * Karnofsky Performance Score greater than 70 * Graded prognostic assessment (GPA score 0.5 or greater * 1 to 3 brain metastases unresectable * Maximum tumor diameter no larger than 4cm

Exclusion criteria

* Primary lesion with radiosensitive histology (such as: small cell carcinoma, germ-cell tumors, lymphoma, leukemia, and multiple myeloma. * Metastases in the brain stem, pons or medulla or within 5 mm of optic apparatus * Previous cranial radiation * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
12-month Local Control Rate12 months after SRSThe 12-month local control rate is the percentage of lesions without recurrence at the lesion site 12 months after SRS. Time to local recurrence was defined as the time between SRS and local recurrence. If local recurrence did not occur, the time to local recurrence was censored at last follow-up (including deaths without local recurrence). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to local recurrence.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
12 Month Rate of Distant Brain Metastases12 month after SRSThe 12-month rate of distant brain metastases is defined as the percentage of participants with the appearance of new brain metastasis located away from the previously treated lesion (i.e. distant brain failure) 12 months after SRS. Time to the appearance of new brain metastasis was defined as the time between SRS and distant brain failure. Patients without new distant brain metastases as of the last follow-up were censored at the last follow-up date. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to distant brain failure.
Median Overall Survival24 months after SRSOverall survival was defined as the time in months from the start of SRS to the date of death or last contact if alive. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival.
Quality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)Baseline to 3 months after SRSQuality of life as measured by the change in FACT-Br scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The FACT-Br (version 4) is comprised of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), a 27-item core questionnaire evaluating the domains of physical, family/social, emotional and functional well-being, with the addition of 23 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-G total score is the sum of the four FACT-G domain scores. The Brain Cancer Subscale (BrCS) is the sum of 19 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-Br Trial Outcome Index (TOI) is the sum of the BrCS score and the physical and family/social domain scores. The FACT-Br total score is the sum of the FACT-G total score and the BrCS score. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved quality of life.
Rate of Radionecrosis at SRS Treatment Site24 months after SRSThe rate of radionecrosis is defined as the proportion of lesions with an indication of radiation-associated changes but no evidence of viable tumor on follow-up imaging (and confirmed by tissue biopsy whenever possible).
Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT)Baseline to 3 months after SRSCognition as measured by the change in scores on the Trail Making Test (TMT) from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The TMT consists of two parts. Part A (TMT-A) requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. Task requirements are similar for Part B (TMT-B) except the person must alternate between numbers and letters (e.g., 1, A, 2, B, 3, C, etc.). The score on each part represents the amount of time required to complete the task. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Negative change scores indicate improved cognition.
Rate of Death Due to Neurologic Causes24 months after SRSThe rate of death due to neurologic causes is defined as the percentage of participants whose death is attributable to the progression of neurological disease.
Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)Baseline to 3 months after SRSCognition as measured by the change in MMSE scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The MMSE is an 11-item measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language. The minimum score is 0 and teh maximum score is 30 with higher MMSe scores indicating better cognition. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved cognition.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Optimal PTV
Optimal Planning Target Volume with Stereotactic Radiosurgery
49
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOptimal PTV
Age, Continuous61 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
29 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

12-month Local Control Rate

The 12-month local control rate is the percentage of lesions without recurrence at the lesion site 12 months after SRS. Time to local recurrence was defined as the time between SRS and local recurrence. If local recurrence did not occur, the time to local recurrence was censored at last follow-up (including deaths without local recurrence). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to local recurrence.

Time frame: 12 months after SRS

Population: This is a lesion-specific outcome. A patient could have 1 lesion randomized to the 1mm arm and a different lesion randomized to the 3mm arm, the total participants analyzed will not equal 49. Of the 80 lesions, 4 of 40 lesions in the 1-mm arm and 7 of 40 in the 3-mm arm had insufficient post-SRS imaging data to be included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
1mm Margin12-month Local Control Rate91.4 percentage of lesions
3mm Margin12-month Local Control Rate95.2 percentage of lesions
Secondary

12 Month Rate of Distant Brain Metastases

The 12-month rate of distant brain metastases is defined as the percentage of participants with the appearance of new brain metastasis located away from the previously treated lesion (i.e. distant brain failure) 12 months after SRS. Time to the appearance of new brain metastasis was defined as the time between SRS and distant brain failure. Patients without new distant brain metastases as of the last follow-up were censored at the last follow-up date. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to describe the time to distant brain failure.

Time frame: 12 month after SRS

Population: The rate of distant brain metastases is a patient-specific outcome. Of the 49 patients enrolled, six had insufficient post-SRS imaging data to be included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
1mm Margin12 Month Rate of Distant Brain Metastases45.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)

Cognition as measured by the change in MMSE scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The MMSE is an 11-item measure that tests five areas of cognitive function: orientation, registration, attention and calculation, recall and language. The minimum score is 0 and teh maximum score is 30 with higher MMSe scores indicating better cognition. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved cognition.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS

Population: Only 24 patients of 49 enrolled completed both the baseline and month 3 questionnaire.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1mm MarginCognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)0.3 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 0.3
Secondary

Cognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT)

Cognition as measured by the change in scores on the Trail Making Test (TMT) from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The TMT consists of two parts. Part A (TMT-A) requires an individual to draw lines sequentially connecting 25 encircled numbers distributed on a sheet of paper. Task requirements are similar for Part B (TMT-B) except the person must alternate between numbers and letters (e.g., 1, A, 2, B, 3, C, etc.). The score on each part represents the amount of time required to complete the task. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Negative change scores indicate improved cognition.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS

Population: Only 24 patients of 49 enrolled completed both the baseline and month 3 questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1mm MarginCognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT)TMT-A-1.9 Change in seconds baseline to 3 monthsStandard Error 3.1
1mm MarginCognition at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Trail Making Test (TMT)TMT-B-19.9 Change in seconds baseline to 3 monthsStandard Error 13.7
Secondary

Median Overall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time in months from the start of SRS to the date of death or last contact if alive. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival.

Time frame: 24 months after SRS

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
1mm MarginMedian Overall Survival10.6 months
Secondary

Quality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)

Quality of life as measured by the change in FACT-Br scores from baseline to 3 months after SRS. The FACT-Br (version 4) is comprised of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), a 27-item core questionnaire evaluating the domains of physical, family/social, emotional and functional well-being, with the addition of 23 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-G total score is the sum of the four FACT-G domain scores. The Brain Cancer Subscale (BrCS) is the sum of 19 brain cancer specific questions. The FACT-Br Trial Outcome Index (TOI) is the sum of the BrCS score and the physical and family/social domain scores. The FACT-Br total score is the sum of the FACT-G total score and the BrCS score. Change score = score at 3 months after SRS - score at baseline. Positive change scores indicate improved quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to 3 months after SRS

Population: Only 24 patients of 49 enrolled completed both the baseline and month 3 questionnaire.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-G: Physical Well-being (range: 0-28)-3.2 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 1.2
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-G: Family/Social Well-being (range: 0-28)-0.4 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 0.6
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-G: Emotional Well-being (range: 0-24)0.6 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 0.9
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-G: Functional Well-being (range: 0-28)-1.5 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 1.5
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-G: Total Score (range: 0-108)-4.5 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 3.3
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-Br: BrCS (range: 0-76)-1.3 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 3.2
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-Br: TOI (range: 0-132)-6.0 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 5.3
1mm MarginQuality of Life at 3 Months After SRS as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Brain (FACT-Br)FACT-Br: Total Score (range: 0-184)-5.8 Change in score from baseline to 3 monthStandard Error 6.1
Secondary

Rate of Death Due to Neurologic Causes

The rate of death due to neurologic causes is defined as the percentage of participants whose death is attributable to the progression of neurological disease.

Time frame: 24 months after SRS

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
1mm MarginRate of Death Due to Neurologic Causes0.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Rate of Radionecrosis at SRS Treatment Site

The rate of radionecrosis is defined as the proportion of lesions with an indication of radiation-associated changes but no evidence of viable tumor on follow-up imaging (and confirmed by tissue biopsy whenever possible).

Time frame: 24 months after SRS

Population: This is a lesion-specific outcome. A patient could have 1 lesion randomized to the 1mm arm and a different lesion randomized to the 3mm arm, the total participants analyzed will not equal 49. Of the 80 lesions, 4 of 40 lesions in the 1-mm arm and 7 of 40 in the 3-mm arm had insufficient post-SRS imaging data to be included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
1mm MarginRate of Radionecrosis at SRS Treatment Site0.0278 proportion of lesions
3mm MarginRate of Radionecrosis at SRS Treatment Site0.1515 proportion of lesions

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026